\n<\/p>\n
\n Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. <\/p>\n
In private equity, the smartest general partners (GPs) are realizing that co-investments<\/a> aren’t just a fundraising sweetener; they’re a strategic lever. Done right, they strengthen the portfolio, deepen LP relationships and reduce overall risk exposure. Yet many GPs still treat co-investing as an afterthought rather than a core element of fund strategy.<\/p>\n In today’s climate, where LPs<\/a> are more selective, underwriting standards are higher and trust is harder to earn, co-investments can be the edge that separates high-performing GPs from the pack. Here’s how the most sophisticated firms are using co-investing not just to raise capital, but to build resilient portfolios and tighter LP alignment.<\/p>\n Related: The Collaboration Between Limited Partners and Growth Partners: Investors’ Perspective<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n The co-investment market has matured rapidly over the past decade. According to Preqin’s Global Private Equity Report<\/a>, nearly 70% of LPs now expect co-investment opportunities from their fund managers. This demand is no longer limited to mega-institutional family offices. Sovereign wealth funds and even smaller foundations are seeking ways to increase exposure to direct deals while lowering blended fee structures.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, a 2023 report from PitchBook<\/a> emphasized that co-investment volume is rising even in volatile markets, fueled by LPs looking for more control, lower fees and deeper access to quality deals.<\/p>\n For GPs, this presents both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge: Co-investments can strain internal resources and slow deal execution if not managed well. The opportunity: When built into the fund’s operations and strategy from day one, co-investments enhance portfolio flexibility, attract strategic LPs and reduce concentration risk, all without diluting fund governance.<\/p>\n Smart GPs treat co-investment capacity as part of their capital stack<\/a>, not a separate, ad hoc offering. This mindset allows them to:<\/p>\n Let’s say your $100M fund is targeting 10 core platform deals of $10M each. You come across a $25M acquisition that fits the thesis but exceeds your single-asset exposure cap. With co-investment capital lined up, you can still lead the deal, funding $10M from the fund and $15M from co-investors. This approach maintains portfolio balance while giving LPs direct access to a larger asset.<\/p>\n More importantly, it builds your reputation as a GP who brings access, not just capital.<\/p>\n For a case study of this dynamic in action, this piece from Hamilton Lane<\/a> illustrates how co-investments have become an essential tool in modern private market strategy.<\/p>\n Related: The Risks And Rewards Of Direct Investment For LPs<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n One underappreciated benefit of co-investing is how it allows GPs to retain control of high-conviction assets without overexposing the core fund. In many cases, the most attractive deals are also the most capital-intensive. Without co-investment partners, a GP must choose between taking a smaller slice or over-allocating from the fund.<\/p>\n By bringing in co-investors, GPs can secure majority or lead positions while staying within prudent limits. This improves control over governance, exit timing and value creation plans, all critical levers in reducing downside risk.<\/p>\n Additionally, co-investing can be a powerful tool in navigating market cycles. During downturns<\/a>, GPs can selectively syndicate capital-heavy deals to preserve dry powder, while still deploying into discounted opportunities. The BVCA’s 2023 Private Equity Guide<\/a> offers insights into how firms are adjusting their co-investment behavior during a recession.<\/p>\n Of course, offering co-investments isn’t just about having the deal flow. The GPs who excel at this have built internal systems to handle:<\/p>\n This operational backbone is often the difference between firms that “can” offer co-investments and those that do so consistently, cleanly and at scale.<\/p>\n For GPs looking to mature their fund ops, platforms like Carta and Juniper Square simplify co-investment administration, LP communications and investor onboarding.<\/p>\n More advanced GPs are also using tools like Passthrough to streamline subscription documents or Anduin for automated investor workflows.<\/p>\n From an LP point of view, we see co-investing as a way to display confidence and alignment. It gives them more say, more return and often a larger role at the table. When done fairly, it turns your investors into what they are \u2014 full partners. In a world that is becoming more relationship-based in terms of fundraising, GPs who put in consistent, thoughtful co-investments are at an advantage.<\/p>\n According to HarbourVest’s 2023 LP Survey<\/a>, nearly 80% of LPs reported higher satisfaction and trust in managers who offered co-investment access, especially when the deals performed well and were communicated transparently.<\/p>\n Related: Why Direct Investments By LPs Are On the Rise<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n With all its advantages, co-investing is not a silver bullet. When used excessively or poorly, it may bring execution risk, create inefficiencies and bring LPs into conflict. The most common shortcomings are:<\/p>\n Providing too much in co-investments, devaluing their quality<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Granting favors with allocations<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Procrastinating closings from side deal logistics<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Failing to coordinate internal bandwidth to handle the complexity<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n The best firms are selective. They set expectations with LPs early, often in the PPM or DDQ, and focus on quality over quantity. One excellent co-investment that delivers a win can be more powerful than five rushed ones that don’t perform.<\/p>\n Co-investments are no longer optional; they’re a defining feature of modern private equity. But the edge doesn’t come from offering them. It comes from integrating them into your portfolio construction, risk management<\/a> and LP strategy.<\/p>\n The smartest GPs know this. They use co-investing not just to fill out a cap table, but to build durable LP relationships, de-risk big bets and unlock operational agility. As fundraising becomes more competitive and LPs demand more from their managers, those who treat co-investing as a core fund ops capability, not a last-minute offer, will stand out.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In private equity, the smartest general partners (GPs) are realizing that co-investments<\/a> aren’t just a fundraising sweetener; they’re a strategic lever. Done right, they strengthen the portfolio, deepen LP relationships and reduce overall risk exposure. Yet many GPs still treat co-investing as an afterthought rather than a core element of fund strategy.<\/p>\nWhy co-investments matter more than ever<\/h2>\n
Co-investing as a tool for portfolio construction<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
Reducing risk while increasing ownership<\/h2>\n
The operational backbone of a co-investment strategy<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Co-investment fosters lasting trust<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
A word of caution: Don’t over-promise<\/h2>\n
\n