{"id":3064,"date":"2022-07-01T14:45:57","date_gmt":"2022-07-01T14:45:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/?p=3064"},"modified":"2022-07-01T14:45:57","modified_gmt":"2022-07-01T14:45:57","slug":"how-to-get-to-early-retirement-even-faster","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/2022\/07\/01\/how-to-get-to-early-retirement-even-faster\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Get to Early Retirement Even Faster"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<p>Those searching <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/retire-early-real-estate-investing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>how to retire<\/strong> <strong>early<\/strong><\/a> usually come away with one conclusion\u2014you have to make much, much more money. Most <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/financial-independence-savings-rate\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>financial independence<\/strong><\/a> pursuers think that a large salary or enormous sum of assets is what will bring them closer to FI. Fortunately for you, that isn\u2019t always the case, and you\u2019ll see exactly why when we talk to today\u2019s Finance Friday guest, <strong>Rebecca<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca makes a great salary. Actually, she makes two great salaries, <strong>working at her government job during the day<\/strong> and her<strong> technical writing job at night<\/strong>. She\u2019s pulling in six figures, owns her own home, and splits expenses with her boyfriend. But she\u2019s struggling to put together a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/passive-real-estate-investing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>passive income<\/strong><\/a><strong> portfolio<\/strong> that will give her a good amount of monthly income when she decides to leave work. So what\u2019s the missing piece in this passive income puzzle?<\/p>\n<p>Scott and Mindy sift through Rebecca\u2019s finances and find some strikingly simple ways that she (and all of you) can <strong>save money every month<\/strong> and <strong>get to financial freedom decades in advance<\/strong>. This strategy isn\u2019t hard, but it will take a little bit of willpower to get done. Thankfully, even those <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/fire-financial-independence-retire-early\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>FIRE movement<\/strong><\/a> and financial freedom chasers who aren\u2019t die-hard FI fanatics can still take these lessons to heart.<\/p>\n<div style=\"overflow-y: scroll; max-height: 600px; background: #eee; padding: 20px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Welcome to the BiggerPockets Money Podcast show number 314, Finance Friday edition, where we interview Rebecca and talk about tracking actual spending, generating income outside a traditional 9:00 to 5:00 and finding your true monthly needs.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I\u2019ve learned that the money\u2019s out there, you can get it. This job that I\u2019ve had for three and a half years, that\u2019s the first time I\u2019m ever doing it. When I walked in the door three and a half years ago, I had no idea. I didn\u2019t even have a background in it. But up until this point, I was just kind of throwing all this money away. I didn\u2019t know what to do with it. So now that I\u2019m on this track, now that I\u2019m thinking about it in a different way, 10 years ago, if you would\u2019ve said that, I would have been like, \u201cEh, that\u2019s too far in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Hello. Hello. Hello. My name is Mindy Jensen and with me as always is my goal reframing cohost Scott Trench.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>That\u2019s right. If the goal\u2019s too far away, just move those goalposts closer to you.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Scott and I are here to make financial independence less scary, less just for somebody else, to introduce you to every money story, because we truly believe financial freedom is attainable for everyone no matter when or where you are starting.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>That\u2019s right. Whether you want to retire early and travel the world, go on to make big time investments in assets like real estate, start your own business, or simply establish clear goals that give you more flexibility, we\u2019ll help you reach your financial goals and get money out of the way so you can launch yourself towards those dreams.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Scott, I love today\u2019s guest. She is in a great position financially. She just wants to speed up retirement. So we have a lot of fun talking to her about her different options today.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah, I mean, we\u2019ve had a number of guests recently who kind of all have a similar profile in the sense. There\u2019s all a ton of differences, so I think we had really unique show today, but the similarity or the theme that I keep harping on is this concept of you can\u2019t have all your wealth in retirement accounts and home equity if you want flexibility before traditional retirement age. You must do something different there. And that means hard choices of capital allocation that are not going through this 401(k) and IRA ladder and to your home mortgage payment. It means an intentional shift to putting that money elsewhere and\/or redeploying what is likely to be a massive amount of home equity for a lot of listeners into something that can deliver that flexibility. So hard choices. But I think you have to confront that problem, frame your goal very clearly and say, \u201cWhat do I want?\u201d and then begin actually making those actions towards it even at the cost of perhaps some more tax advantaged wealth at the end of the journey 25 years from now.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>It\u2019s all personal. All these options are personal to your journey and your specific position, but there\u2019s a lot of suggestions here, Scott, today. I specifically like you\u2019re reframing goals, conversation that you had with her. You took her $7,200 monthly passive income goal down to $4,000 in about 45 seconds. And that was, I think, hugely helpful to her. I think it\u2019ll be hugely helpful to other people that are listening to this show who may not realize why they have chosen their specific monthly goal. \u201cOh, I need this much money in income. Why?\u201d Follow Scott\u2019s steps and what he was talking to Rebecca today, follow his suggestions and see if you can\u2019t reframe and cut down your goal and get where you really need to be.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah. It\u2019s this paradox, I think, where if you can cut the goal dramatically, if you can spend $2,000 a month, which was something that I was able to do when I was starting out because I was house hacking and I had a paid off car and all this other stuff, I\u2019m spending very little on my lifestyle and now I\u2019m financially free in some very lean sense. Well, now you can begin piling assets on top of that. And then things begin to expand, right? You have the option to work or not work or do all these other different types of things, but you can also just pile assets on top of your position. And then if you want to spend $3,000, $4,000, $5,000, $10,000 a month, you just wait until your asset base grows large enough to be able to do that.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>But if you can make the sacrifice now or reframe the game, the rules of the game by house sacking or whatever it is to lower your expenses, achieve financial freedom, realize those benefits and then pile on the assets from there, you might be able to get some huge benefits at the\u2026 You can\u2019t have everything. You can\u2019t spend $7,000, $8,000 a month and get to financial freedom in 15 years and have it be totally passive in Rebecca\u2019s situation. But you can reframe the goal, make a huge amount of progress in one year, dramatically jumpstart your savings rate, have introduce a lot of flexibility, and then begin piling assets on top of that give you more and more optionality each passing year. That\u2019s an achievable goal.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>I think that folks kind of struggle to see that if they can make those changes that are unusual like the house hack in the short run and then use that to leverage a lot of wealth later on, you can have essentially all of the things that the huge amount of passive income and the life flexibility and not have to work down the line. You just can\u2019t have it all up front. So you got to prioritize.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yes. Oh, I could not have said that better myself so I\u2019m not even going to try. And now let\u2019s make our attorney happy by saying the contents of this podcast are informational in nature and are not legal or tax advice. Neither Scott, nor I, nor BiggerPockets is engaged in the provision of legal tax or any other advice. You should seek your own advice from professional advisors, including lawyers and accountants regarding the legal, tax, and financial implications of any financial decision you contemplate. Also, let\u2019s bring in Rebecca.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Rebecca and her boyfriend make more money than they spend, even after contributing to retirement accounts and brokerage accounts. So that\u2019s good, right? They also have a big challenge and I quote, \u201cWe spend a ridiculous amount on unbudgeted things. As of right now, spending is trending downwards this year. But last year we spent almost $40,000 on grocery, Amazon, eating out, Amazon, travel, Amazon, pet care. Did I say Amazon?\u201d So Rebecca, I think I see an area to work on even before we start talking, but welcome to the BiggerPockets Money Podcast. I\u2019m very excited to talk to you today.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Good. Thank you so much for having me.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. First off, yes, Amazon, everybody should cancel their Amazon Prime account because it is way too easy to click buy. I mean, they set it up on purpose to make it so easy to buy so you would continue to buy. However, it\u2019s so easy. I don\u2019t have to go out. It\u2019s so easy to just buy. So it\u2019s hard to cancel that. I understand where you\u2019re coming from. I don\u2019t want to see how much I spend on Amazon so I just don\u2019t look at it.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I tried not to.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>What a great plan. No, it\u2019s a terrible plan because I have no idea how much I spend on Amazon. So I am going to give myself a research opportunity, which is going to make my heart break and look and see how much I am spending on my Amazon purchases. I\u2019m going to ask people in our Facebook group, which you can join at facebook.com\/groups\/bpmoney to ask. I\u2019m going to challenge them to look and see how much they spend in their Amazon accounts as well. And I\u2019m an Amazon shareholder so I don\u2019t want anybody to cancel their account, but also I care about people more than the bottom line. So if you\u2019re spending a lot on Amazon, a really great way to stop is to cancel your Prime account because there\u2019s this thing in your head, you\u2019re like, \u201cOh, it\u2019s free shipping. I can just click buy.\u201d But if I have to pay for shipping, I\u2019m going to say, \u201cMaybe I don\u2019t need it that much.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So I don\u2019t know. Maybe other people have that same barrier. Maybe they don\u2019t. Maybe I\u2019m just cheap, but I don\u2019t want to pay for shipping and Amazon Prime makes it super easy. So I\u2019m going to go. I will let everybody know. When this show airs, I will let you know how much I am spending on my Amazon Prime. I now have a little bit of heart palpitations saying that because I\u2019ve got to go look that up. Okay, this is not about me. This is about you.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Great.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Let\u2019s start over. Rebecca, welcome to the BiggerPockets Money Podcast. How are you today?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I\u2019m doing so good. So good.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Let\u2019s jump into your finances, not mine. And let\u2019s look at your income and where it\u2019s going.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay. So I make about $100,000 a year as a salary W-2 income from my job. I work in local government. I also have a second job as a contract technical writer. That income varies significantly between $35,000 a year and $100,000 a year. Now, something that I may have a question later on is I don\u2019t budget for that income. So all my expenses are covered by my first W-2 salary job.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>What do you do with that income? The contract income?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Well, with my local government job, I have a 457 plan that I\u2019m able to max out. With the second job, I have a 401(k) and I also max that out. I actually just maxed it out on Friday, was our final payday for\u2026 Yay.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yay.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>So up until this point, those paychecks have been, I want to say relatively small, but going forward, they\u2019ll be bigger. Usually, I take about 75% of that and stick it into our brokerage account. And then I\u2019ll use the rest for unbudgeted, I guess, sinking funds. Like we need a bathroom remodel, I need new sliding doors on the back porch, stuff like that that I just don\u2019t want to finance, then I\u2019ll just have the cashing around magically.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>After working your second job, magically your money appears.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. Exactly.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>I love it. Awesome. Any other sources of income?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. My boyfriend does have also a job with local government and that brings in about $30,000 a year.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome. So what\u2019s coming in after tax?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>After tax, let\u2019s see, and after my 457 plan, I bring home about $4,430 a month. And then he brings in about $1,880 a month. So total about $6,310.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome. Plus about let\u2019s call it 40 grand in after tax income from your second job?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah, we can call it that.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Which varies considerably, I think you discussed.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome. And where does that money go? What are you spending it on besides Amazon?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Right. Well, budgeted things go to car insurance. That\u2019s about 120 a month. We do have a Wyndham time share I got roped into about 10 years ago and it\u2019s about $50 a month.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Nice.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Mortgage currently is $1,400 a month. I suspect that will go down a little bit next year, because as I mentioned before, my homeowner\u2019s insurance went up, it doubled. So not only did I have to pay for what\u2019s coming up, but I had to make up for that shortage. So I would guess it\u2019ll go down a couple hundred bucks next year, but not significant. Utilities, which I would include water, trash, electric, internet, and then things like Netflix, Hulu and Amazon are about $475 a month. Cell phones, $125 a month. And then what I call luxury items, which are, we have a house cleaner that comes twice a week, lawn care, and a pool guy, and that\u2019s about $325 a month.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>And then we have the big expense of groceries\/eating out\/gas and then what we like to call fun money, and that\u2019s $1,800 a month. And those are, I guess, our lifestyle expenses. And then I have my monthly investments that come out after tax, which is $500 in an IRA for both of us, so $1,000 a month. And then a brokerage, $500 a month. And then I also budgeted $100 a month for crypto. Sometimes I do it, sometimes I don\u2019t. If I don\u2019t, it goes into the brokerage.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome. So if I\u2019m doing the math here, we\u2019ve got $6,300 in income between you and your boyfriend each month and $4,300 going out every month on average, obviously with big fluctuations in the variable expenses being a major part of that. And that leaves you a $2,000 surplus, which generally gets invested in a combination of brokerages, IRA, et cetera, not to mention that pretax you\u2019re also contributing to your 457 plan. Is that a good synopsis of the situation?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome. And then on top of that, we\u2019ve got an unknown factor about the tens of thousands of dollars you\u2019re bringing in after tax from your second job.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Correct.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So we have a really strong cash generation situation here. If we factor out all those investments, we\u2019ve got $2,000 a month coming in steady state after tax and 457 contribution. So that\u2019s $24,000 a year. And we\u2019ve also got about $30,000 to 40,000, I\u2019m calling it $40,000, in additional cash coming in from your second job. So that\u2019s a $64,000, $65,000 per year that we got to play with in order to build wealth.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes, that sounds great.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. So I\u2019m seeing that she\u2019s got all this income. I think that her expenses or her spending has some leaking in it. If you\u2019re not seeing this giant surplus every month, where\u2019s it going? And there is $500\u2026 What is this? $500 to the IRAs and $500 to the brokerage. So that\u2019s $1,500. And then an additional $100, but I think that there\u2019s more money available that is just kind of-<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>\u2026 not being accounted for.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>So with that second job that I have, as I mentioned, it does have a 401(k). So up until about this point, about 50% of my money has been going into that as well. And now, I mean, you also made a great point, up until this point I\u2019ve been having about $2,400 a month extra coming in, but I haven\u2019t been saving it. I really am not sure where it\u2019s going.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. So there\u2019s the first research opportunity, is to find out where that\u2019s going and I\u2026 What Scott?<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Well, it\u2019s going to the IRAs and the brokerage accounts.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>No, this is on top of that.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Top?<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>That\u2019s on top of that.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So what I find, remember that A word that I said in the beginning of the show, in my little diatribe or my very lengthy diatribe? I really don\u2019t want to see how much I spend on Amazon every month, every year. But I think that you would be surprised at how much is still going there even when you\u2019re conscious of it. And I started tracking my spending. And you can follow along at biggerpockets.com\/mindysbudget. You can watch me really not be doing it right, because everything is a guess. I mean, all of this, even with all of my years of financial experience, it\u2019s still just a guess where my money\u2019s going. And what I have found over the month of May, I actually, wasn\u2019t writing down all of my expenses. So now at the end of May, I have to go back and enter them into the spreadsheet.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I have no idea how much I was spending, but when I wasn\u2019t tracking it, every single time I made a purchase, I didn\u2019t even have a vague running total in my head. I was swiping my card a whole lot more in the month of May than in previous months when I was far more conscious of having to type in the amount that I\u2019m spending. So on the one hand, it\u2019s super tedious to sit there and track your expenses so granularly like I do. But on the other hand, it\u2019s so eyeopening when you do it. Halfway through the month, you\u2019re like, \u201cI\u2019m already in the red in nine of my 10 categories. What is going on with me? I know I want to spend less. I have to make a conscious decision to spend less.\u201d But it\u2019s a work in progress too. Some of them, I\u2019m budgeted too low and I need to realize that I\u2019m spending more money.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>If you do enjoy going out to eat, then don\u2019t cut that. You have the money to do that. But every dollar you spend going out to eat is a dollar that you can\u2019t put into your house or save for a down payment on a new house, or do spend in a different way. You can only spend a dollar once. And I don\u2019t want anybody to send me an email about how you can borrow and spend it multiple times. Send that to Scott. He loves it. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection\" class=\"__cf_email__\" data-cfemail=\"9ac9f9f5eeeedaf8f3fdfdffe8eaf5f9f1ffeee9b4f9f5f7b4\">[email\u00a0protected]<\/a> You just have to be conscious of that. I think a lot of people, when you\u2019re not tracking every penny, it\u2019s very easy for lots of those pennies to just leave your wallet.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Well, let\u2019s keep rolling for a second here and go through net worth and then your goals. And that will lead us to what we can do about this situation. It could be that your spending is where we need to focus. It could be that there\u2019s other areas we need to focus more on. My guess is spending and getting control of your dollars and having a very clear understanding of what\u2019s coming in, where\u2019s it going, how\u2019s it flowing through your system is going to be the 80\/20, at least in the short term here, but let\u2019s kind of press on and make sure that\u2019s the case before going there. What\u2019s your net worth and where does that money go?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>All right. So let\u2019s see. I\u2019ve got a little list here. I guess I\u2019ll just give you number figures. We got about $24,500 in a joint brokerage account, $7,000 in a regular savings. And that\u2019s just for, I guess\u2026 I\u2019m not sure what that\u2019s for. But then I have $10,000 in a high yield savings account as a designated emergency fund. My boyfriend has an inherited IRA at $135,000. He\u2019s also got the FRS investment plan, which is a defined contribution plan and it\u2019s locked at 3%. There\u2019s about $5,500 in there. My 401(k) has 56,000, about 3000 in crypto. His IRA has $13,000 and that\u2019s a Roth. My Roth has $16,000. My traditional has $1,500 and then my 457 plan has $34,500. So that\u2019s about throughout $306,000. And then-<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So of that $306,000, I\u2019m counting that about $40,000 of that is not in an IRA. Is that right? Or similar type of vehicle?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. You\u2019re talking like savings and brokerage type?<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. Yeah, you\u2019re correct.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay, great. So we have $300,000 in net worth in these investment accounts, $40,000 of which is either cash or after tax brokerage and $260,000 of which is in various retirement accounts?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>And you consider your finances to be joint with your boyfriend?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>And then I have home equity. It\u2019s about $174,000. So I guess that brings us to $480,000.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay. And what are your goals? What can we help you with today?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I would like to\u2026 Just a quick short term goal would be to save $80,000 this year. I think we\u2019re right around $37,000 so far. But my ultimate goal is to have some passive income of about $7,200 a month. So I guess one of my questions is, can I do this without real estate? Do I need to start thinking about that? But mostly, I need a real fresh set of eyes on this. \u201cWhy aren\u2019t you doing this? It looks like you do well to do A or B.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome. So you want $7,200 per month in passive income as soon as possible and you want to save $80,000 this year?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>That\u2019s what we got. Can I ask how old you are?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>39.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>And your boyfriend\u2019s around the same age.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>He\u2019s a little younger. 35.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay, awesome. Well, great. I think we can certainly work with that and begin going there. With the passive income, what\u2019s the goal? What would you do if you had the $7,200?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I would not work anymore. That would be our PIE income.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay. So you want to retire essentially as soon as possible from work?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Love it. Let\u2019s think through this the first. I want to make an observation for you and get to spending. You may have heard me say this before, but of your $480,000 in wealth, $40,000 of that is accessible and relevant to your goal here of achieving financial freedom. The other $440,000 is in retirement accounts and home equity, which is not going to help you generate that passive income until you reach retirement age. And from the way you phrased your goals, I can infer that you\u2019re not looking to wait until retirement age to retire. You want to retire much earlier than that.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Correct. Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So I would noodle on that and say\u2026 Let\u2019s start with this. What does a portfolio that generates $7,200 per month in passive income look like at the end of the day? What does that mean to you?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I guess I\u2019m not sure. Just something that I don\u2019t really have to work for. It just kind of shows up, if that makes sense.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Well, that\u2019s the definition of passive income, right? I want to look at your second job. How much time does it take you to generate that $35,000 to $100,000 a year?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>It depends on the contract. So right now I\u2019m doing a contract. I make $100 an hour, but I am capped at 20 hours a week. I don\u2019t mind. I love the work. A lot of people are like, \u201cHow can you work 60, 70 hours a week? And I\u2019m like, \u201cWell, I work my government job and then I come home. The second job is kind of what I do to unwind.\u201d So that works out well for me.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Could you continue to do that to generate a portion of this income? It\u2019s a lot easier to work when you like what you\u2019re doing.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. Yeah, I have thought about that. I think I would actually prefer to do that.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I mean, I know I said I would want passive, but I mean, realistically, if I know myself, I would keep doing it.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. So if you are in a position where you\u2019re generating, let\u2019s see, $100 dollars an hour on this contract, can you take multiple contracts at a time?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>No, because it is a W-2 position and they kind of control what I do. Now I could go out into like what they call the contractor pool and take on multiple projects, but I\u2019m not sure I would really have fun doing that.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>But I could try.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>I want to stay focused on the goal here, because I think you\u2019ve created a number there and don\u2019t really have a good framework for how to achieve that. And so, because of that, I think we have an opportunity, with your permission, to reframe that goal to something that is more tangible and that can be achieved in a three to five year period that gives you more optionality. If you\u2019re going to go by the 4% rule and you want to achieve $86,000 in passive income per year, then that says you need to build a net worth of $2.1 million, right? That is a far way off even saving $80,000 per year. But we can get to something that achieves the result of life flexibility and the ability for you to leave your job and have optionality far earlier than that if we back into a reframing of that goal, right? And we think about how to access more of your net worth in the near term than what would currently be allowed with it all being trapped in retirement accounts and home equity here.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So I think first of all, if we go back to spending, why do you need $7,200 a month? How do you come up with that number?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I kind of just took what we spend now on, I guess, a normal month, including all of my extras. And it\u2019s between $6,000 and 9,000. And I was like, \u201cOkay, I don\u2019t need to be buying all this ridiculous stuff.\u201d So I just settled on $7,200 as a happy medium in there. There\u2019s no real science behind that number.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay. You didn\u2019t list any car payments. You have paid off cars?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. We have one vehicle. It\u2019s a 2015 Mazda. It\u2019s paid off. And then with my job in local government, they provide me with a vehicle and gas. So I\u2019m kind of lucky there.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay. We will, I think, spend a large amount of time tackling the variable expenses, but let\u2019s go back to housing, which for you is $1,400 a month, it may vary when you get your payment reset from the insurance thing. And we\u2019ve got the utilities bills, that\u2019s $1,800 a month. If we were able to drastically eliminate those, for example, now you don\u2019t need $7,200 anymore. And if you\u2019re able to cut out a bunch of that variable expenses from spending from Amazon and get that down, I mean, you could conceivably get your spending down to $3,000, $4,000 a month if we were able to pull those numbers down, is that right?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. Seems to be that way.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay. So now you don\u2019t need $7,200 in income. Now you need $4,000 in income per month or, or $5,000. Maybe you need $2,000 in passive income and you\u2019re like, \u201cOkay, I cannot retire, but I can leave the main job and just do the side hustle, and that will more than cover my expenses,\u201d right? This is, I think, the power of reframing the goals around what I\u2019m hearing is flexibility. You want the option to leave your job at an early time period and you want passive income and flexibility to enable that to happen as rapidly as possible and give yourself lots of options downstream. Is that right?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes, that sounds great.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Let\u2019s start with what I call financial runway. Right now you have $17,000 in cash. Is that right?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So what happens if you leave your job right now? How long do you run out of, before you run out of cash?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>It depends. If I lost both jobs then about three months.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah. I think that\u2019s where I would start. I think you\u2019d feel a lot better if you had closer to six to 12 months in an emergency reserve. You earn more money per hour at your side hustle than your main job. That\u2019s exciting. Something\u2019s there. I think that a runway of putting that cash towards, let\u2019s call it $30,000, $40,000 in that emergency reserve, is going to be really powerful for you because you have the side hustle opportunity. And because it sounds like you\u2019re doing a lot of home improvement projects as well with that. So I don\u2019t think you have enough cash on hand given the opportunities that I\u2019m beginning to smell in your circumstance. What do you think about that?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I agree with that 100%. Definitely the $10,000 in the emergency fund, it doesn\u2019t make me feel warm and fuzzy. I would feel better just with the emergency fund closer to $15,000 or $20,000. And then maybe having an additional $15,000, $20,0000 and something else.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah. I would think about \u201cHow big does that emergency plan have to be for me to feel comfortable leaving my full-time job for six months to a year to pursue this side hustle?\u201d You don\u2019t actually have to do it, but I think if you build your position and concentrate the next $40,000 in cash that you\u2019re generating primarily going towards that goal, then things will light up for you in a way that they wouldn\u2019t for somebody. I would not be given the same question, the same thought process, guidance, to somebody who did not have a big side hustle that was so lucrative. But I think in your situation, that\u2019s going to be really powerful.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay. No, that\u2019s a great, great plan.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay. So second, let\u2019s talk about your home\u2026 By the way, that will come at the expense of continuing to stuff dollars into these IRAs. You\u2019re doing this approach where you put a little bit in this one, a little bit in this one, a little bit in this one, a little bit in this one, and then you have very little cash and everything else is going into the mortgage payment and these other expenses. Instead, I think you need to prioritize what you think the best opportunity is. And so far, we have lots of discussion left, but so far it sounds like we\u2019re thinking maybe stuff it into the savings account or the emergency reserve and be willing to use that for some sort of opportunity downstream. So that means you\u2019re going to have to not contribute to all these other areas and prioritize that one until you get to your first goal. But I think that will open up flexibility and options for you. So I would consider that.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Second thing. Let\u2019s talk about home equity. Where do you live and how much do you like your house?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I live in South Central Florida. I like the house. It\u2019s small. It\u2019s a little small for us. I don\u2019t know. I\u2019m open to moving that\u2019s for sure.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So you have 174 grand in home equity right now, and that\u2019s costing you $1,400 a month to maintain. I would consider, I would put on in there the house hack, right? Is there a duplex? Is there a place that you could live with\u2026 We just interviewed a couple from\u2026 Where were Andrew and Hailey from, Mindy?<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>The east coast?<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Well, they\u2019re from Florida as well. I think they\u2019re on the west coast of Florida, if that makes sense.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>They\u2019re in a town where homes are $300,000-ish and they\u2019re able to buy properties with excess units and Airbnb them. And that is more than covering all of their housing costs while they live in a fairly nice unit and rent out the other units. I think you could either consider that long term or short term. That\u2019s super powerful. And if you want to get lots of flexibility very quickly, you can take that $175,000 in home equity, cash out a ton of that, use that to beef up your emergency reserve for example. Buy one of these properties, maybe even a second rental property within six months or year following that. And now you\u2019ve got a potential way to live for much cheaper on average. You\u2019re going to have to do some work managing the Airbnb or the tenants on the side, but that might be a way to jumpstart your rental property portfolio if you\u2019re interested in doing that.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>You may also find that you\u2019re able to live a very comparable living arrangements depending on how you want to do it. You obviously would generate less income or have less of an advantage if you buy a really nice place and live in the nice unit, versus if you buy a place that has more income potential and live in the garage, depending on your preference there. But I would put that bug in your ear and think about, hey, that\u2019s a big lever in your situation because right now we don\u2019t have much to play with in the form of cash or your IRAs. You can\u2019t do much with those. But we can do something with the home equity. That\u2019s a strategic move you could make in the next six to 12 months to redeploy what you do have.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. It\u2019s definitely something to think about. I\u2019ve been in the landlord business before. I\u2019m not opposed to getting back into it. I guess I hadn\u2019t really thought about it too much just because of where the housing market is right now. But that\u2019s pretty much the only reason I just\u2026<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>You\u2019re already exposed to the housing market in a big way with your current property, right? So the disadvantage to what I just said is you\u2019re going to trade your current interest rate for a higher one, right? So it\u2019s up to you to kind of determine, is that trade off worth it because of the income potential I can generate from these properties? But you\u2019ll have the same amount of wealth in the housing market before and after the transaction if you buy a property that\u2019s around the same value as your current home, for example.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay. Yeah, that makes sense.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So the risk profile is the same except for the higher interest rate, which you\u2019ll have to grapple with. That\u2019s a challenge for everyone.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I want to make a comment about passive income. There is this idea that passive income means absolutely no work on your part whatsoever. You have two jobs. If you had nothing to do all day, you would be bored. Sitting here for 25 minutes talking to you, I already know this. I just got back from a weekend retreat called Camp Mustache. And all of those people are on their path to financial independence or have got into financial independence. And none of them sit around doing nothing all day long.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>That\u2019s a good point.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>That isn\u2019t what they want to do. If you enjoy this technical writing at $100 an hour, that just seems kind of like a no brainer. No, it\u2019s not passive income, but it\u2019s also you\u2019re limited to 20 hours a week. That\u2019s a couple of really long days. And then you\u2019ve got the whole rest of the week to just lay on the beach and do nothing.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah, that\u2019s exactly true.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Or would you find other ways to fill your day? Having an Airbnb where you are the turnover. Hands down the hardest part of an Airbnb is finding somebody to consistently clean to your standards. People who rent Airbnbs really expect absolutely pristine. And it can be difficult to leave that up to somebody else especially if you\u2019re a control freak like some of us on this call. But it also doesn\u2019t take a ton of time. You\u2019re not doing it every single day. Even if you had a property that didn\u2019t have a minimum, you would still have people who come and stay for three or four nights, and then maybe you would turn it over once or twice a week. That\u2019s something for you to do. You\u2019re going to be working and generate, like filling your days with things.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>And I\u2019m not saying this to you, Rebecca. I\u2019m saying this to anybody listening. I think it\u2019s a little bit disingenuous to think that once you reach financial independence, you are only going to have passive income if you\u2019re never going to do anything else. And you don\u2019t get to this place and then just be like, \u201cI\u2019m just going to do nothing for the rest.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>That\u2019s a good point.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Your drive, your body, your mentality, your makeup is not going to allow you to just sit around and do nothing. So if you like doing this technical writing and it pays super well, pick and choose the jobs that you want to do. It sounds like $100 an hour is the going rate that you make. And they\u2019re capped at $20 for all contracts, or just the one that you\u2019re currently working on?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>The one I\u2019m currently working on is $100 an hour because it\u2019s California money.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>But it is capped at 20 hours a week. If I were to, say leave this company and go out on my own, I could probably charge in general, $50 to $75 an hour outside of California.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. So step number one is focus on California jobs.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Step number two is double up on those California jobs. Go out on your own and get those California jobs. I like what Scott did. He took your desired amount and your monthly and reframed it and cut it in half for you in 45 seconds.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah, that\u2019s pretty-<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So good job, Scott.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Thanks. That\u2019s pretty awesome.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah. Well, yeah, I think that if you say, \u201cGreat, I can move to a location that I want to move to and buy the same amount of house and get income for it.\u201d You might have a similar lifestyle, or even an improvement depending on how you do it, and now you\u2019ve knocked that down by $1,400 bucks if you could live for free for example with an Airbnb, right? And that just dramatically accelerates this position. So I think that\u2019s where you can say, \u201cWhat do I really want here?\u201d I don\u2019t think you want $7,200 in income. You want optionality to leave your job as soon as possible. And then you want as much passive income as you can possibly generate over time with that.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>But there\u2019s a minimum goal here that can be achieved in three to five years with creativity and a little bit of luck versus what you state at the beginning of this is if you save $80,000 a year and you want $7,200 in passive income, and you want to do that through passively managed real estate, long term rentals or stocks, you\u2019re looking at building $2 million in wealth, which is going to take you 10, 15 years. That\u2019s really long to get to what you want, what you really want, I think. And I think there\u2019s other ways to hack around that that are faster.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So that\u2019s how I frame that. And the less you spend, the less passive income you generate. One way to think about it is if you go the passive stock bond route, every dollar you spend per year, you got to generate $25 in wealth in order to have the passive income to cover. That\u2019s really hard. So every dollar you cut, reduces that. Every thousand dollars per month you cut in spending is $12,000 per year, times 25 is\u2026 What\u2019s 12 times 25? 300 grand in wealth that you need less. So if you can cut $1,000 a month out of your budget, you reduce your journey to financial independence by $300,000 in total wealth.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I\u2019m going to tag on Scott\u2019s rant before we change topics and challenge you to use my spending tracker, emulate my spending tracker, which I got from Waffles on Wednesday. So if you google Waffles on Wednesday mobile spending tracker, Mr. WOW detailed how to do it. If you\u2019re a technical writer, you probably can figure that out yourself. But it\u2019s very easy. You put it on your phone. And it\u2019s really hard to get in the habit of tracking every time you spend, but it will soon become a habit. It\u2019s so beneficial. And almost instantly, you will discover, \u201cOh, I am spending on Amazon every single day. I am going to the grocery store every single day.\u201d And that was my big one. Whatever it is you\u2019re doing.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>And challenge yourself. If you\u2019re going out to eat six nights a week, see if you can do it at five nights a week. Don\u2019t go from six to zero because you\u2019re going to be like, \u201cWow, my life sucks.\u201d Go from six to five. And then if that\u2019s okay, go from five to four. And if that\u2019s okay, then go from four to three. \u201cOoh, you know what? Four is really where I want to be.\u201d You\u2019re making good money, but know that every time you go out to dinner is more expensive than cooking at home. And there\u2019s all these trade offs. So it\u2019s not that you\u2019re spending too much money. You\u2019re generating a lot of income. You have this money to spend. You\u2019re not going into debt with the spending that you\u2019re having, but you could live far more frugally and rack up your savings faster by making different choices. And having the information in front of you helps you make those choices a lot easier. You don\u2019t have to give up everything. Scott still goes out for beers and wings.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>I think that\u2019s right. I think that\u2019s where we\u2019ve now talked about I think the biggest levers in getting you toward flexibility, which is one, emergency reserve. And emergency reserve, I would even relabel it financial runway. I think you need six months plus in your situation because I think that there\u2019s going to be lots of opportunities that are going to light up in front of you when you\u2019re sitting in a really strong, flexible, financial position that you\u2019re going to take advantage of. The second is home equity and getting the fixed expenses down as low as possible. You\u2019ve done a great job by having one car that\u2019s paid off. So you don\u2019t have that in your life. You just have the car insurance payment and then gas for that.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>And then the next is the mortgage payment. Your cell phones, I assume you don\u2019t want to cut those plans, although you could try the Mint Mobile plan that I think is a lot of people are really powerful. Now we get to what you call the luxury spending, which it includes all of those other items. And so great, now we can attack some of those and think through how we want to handle that. And so let\u2019s go through them line by line. Before we get to Amazon, I want to talk about house cleaning, lawn care, and pool guy, which you said is $325 a month?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes, for all three.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome. I like those. And I\u2019d keep them in your spending plan right now. But I would get into a point where I can track my total expenses and I know how much is going to those areas. The reason I\u2019d keep those right now is because your time is worth $100 an hour, $50 to $100 an hour. So you can hire out, I imagine, those services at a lower rate than you currently work for. And you work a full time job and then some, so your time is valuable. And I don\u2019t think that it makes sense to take those into your ballpark right now.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>If you want flexibility and you want to leave your job, for example, then the value of your time\u2019s going to come cratering down to a large degree. And that would be a time to cut those expenses at that point if you said, \u201cYou know what? I can take care of those things in exchange for not having to work anymore.\u201d But you can begin to kind of say, \u201cOkay, that\u2019s a reasonable trade off for now. It may not be later if I wanted to leave my job in three years, for example, on a modest amount of passive income, in a house hack or whatever.\u201d So that would be one thing there.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So that leaves us with $1,500 in other variable expenses. I think this is where Mindy\u2019s system can become really powerful for you.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I have a couple of other things I want to talk about. You said your homeowner\u2019s insurance just doubled. I want to tell a quick little story about how I had really low coverage for my automotive and insurance and really low coverage for my homeowner\u2019s insurance, and I decided that now is the time for me to get an umbrella insurance policy. So a friend had just gotten one. She really did a lot of research. She landed on Liberty Mutual. I called them up and I talked to them and they said, \u201cOh, you know what we can do for you, we can give you more automotive coverage and more homeowner\u2019s insurance coverage and an umbrella policy. Your annual premium is going to be less than what you were paying for your lower amount of auto and your lower amount of homeowner\u2019s insurance.\u201d And I was like, \u201cWhat? This has to be a catch.\u201d She said, \u201cNope.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>And I did increase my deductible on my homeowner\u2019s insurance because I don\u2019t really need\u2026 I\u2019ve never used homeowner\u2019s insurance in my life, but I\u2019m always going to have it because if my house burns down, I want somebody to come in and rebuild it for me for \u201cfree.\u201d I\u2019m doing little air quotes for those listening. But I think that insurance is valuable and I was shocked at how much lower I\u2019m paying now versus before I have the umbrella policy. So I challenge you to get your insurance requoted. You\u2019re in a place where you have to have probably some certain kinds of insurance that other people don\u2019t have. I don\u2019t have to have hurricane insurance over here in Colorado where we have a historically low chance of hurricanes every year, but I do have\u2026 Oh, I don\u2019t have flood insurance either. But in another house I had flood insurance because I lived on the lake and it was much more rainy there and there was a real possibility that I would flood.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>The ocean has to rise 5,280 feet for it to be an issue here.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. Right.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>And then we\u2019ve got way bigger problems than just having flood insurance.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>I think that\u2019s right. I think with the insurance, there may be an opportunity to combine those with the car insurance and the home insurance.We are not lawyers. This is for entertainment purposes only of course with all this. But one thought thing to noodle on from an insurance perspective is the concept of, \u201cDo you have assets to protect?\u201d Your assets are almost entirely in home equity, homeowners insurance. I can help with that. And then retirement accounts. You have no other assets outside of that besides the car and $40,000 in brokerage accounts and checking and savings. So I\u2019m not clear on the advantages for you of a big umbrella policy, for example, and other forms of asset protection because you may find that when you self-educate on this topic a little bit more that the retirement account contributions and such are going to be generally more protected from lawsuits and those types of things than other forms of assets.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So when you have a huge real estate portfolio that\u2019s in your name or an LLC that you own, or you have other things and you get angry at somebody at the bar and punch them in the face, those can go after you if you don\u2019t have the policies in place, right? Obviously this has not happened, I\u2019m making this up. But that would be a good case for an umbrella policy at that point to help cover some of those higher level things. And maybe not if you punch them in the face. I don\u2019t know if it protect against crimes that you commit. But I think that\u2019s where you\u2019d want to have the umbrella policy I think in place. That\u2019s the thing that can come later. Maybe when you approach $500,000 to $1 million in net worth outside of those areas that you have would be a good [inaudible] to think about.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yeah. And I wasn\u2019t suggesting that she get an umbrella insurance policy. I was just highlighting that when I had my insurance requoted, I went from two policies, auto and home, to three policies. My auto and home coverage went up, and yet my out of pocket premiums for all three policies is currently less than my out of pocket premiums for the two policies that I had before for lesser coverage. So it was just shocking. I mean, they didn\u2019t raise my insurance rates significantly over time. It was every year it\u2019s like $5. Well, why am I going to go re quote my insurance for $5? Now it\u2019s been a few years and it\u2019s not $5. I think my insurance was $600 for car, and now it\u2019s like $500. So I\u2019m not saving an enormous amount, but I\u2019m saving enough that it makes it worth my while to call up. 15 minutes can save you 15% or more on car insurance. It\u2019s actually not even where I went. That\u2019s where I was. But with all of this other coverage, I\u2019m still paying less now.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So definitely requote your insurance. If you have not requoted your insurance in a year, it\u2019s time to requote. Every year. They have no loyalty to you so you have no loyalty to them. Investment comment, you said that your boyfriend has an inherited IRA?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Are you familiar with the rules around inherited IRAs? There\u2019s a timeline for liquidation.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. I believe the last week checkout was 10 years. And he got this-<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yes. How long has he had this?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Since 2020. So only two years now.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I guess\u2026 I was just going to say, I think based on her income at time of death, there is no required minimum distribution from my understanding at this point.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>But I think that changed.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Do you have a CPA or a tax professional that helps you with your taxes or are you a DIY tax [inaudible]?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>This year was the first year I actually paid someone to do it.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>But we\u2019re not married. So that was just for me. So on his end, he\u2019s got a tax guy that I think his dad uses, that he inherited as that as well. So, yeah, hopefully we haven\u2019t had any withdrawals from that account this year, but last year it was minimal and it didn\u2019t really make a dent.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So I just would give him a research opportunity to look into the rules surrounding that, because you don\u2019t want to get to year 10 and say, \u201cOh, now I have to withdraw all of these funds. And I have this huge taxable event that I wasn\u2019t planning on that I now have to deal with.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So you have eight years to look into this. Start looking into it now and making plans for it. Maybe keeping it in there is the best choice. Maybe rolling it over is a great idea. I don\u2019t have an inherited IRA, so I don\u2019t have a lot of information about it. I just know that there is a timeline for you.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So I\u2019m going to send you down that rabbit hole.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I think our unofficial plan is to withdraw the majority of it and do something with it. Be it put it in the brokerage or anything while his income is still low and before we get married.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Let\u2019s talk about your incidentals. We said they\u2019re $1,800 a month. And if you pull out the 300 bucks for house cleaning, lawn care, and pool guy, which I think are perfectly reasonable given your income situation, that\u2019s $1,500 for incidentals per month. That is super reasonable at the end of the day. I mean that, like if you say it\u2019s $750 for groceries, then you have $750 between the two of you for life funds stuff and guilt free spending. What is that? That\u2019s 375 bucks per person per month. That would be a very reasonable amount of money to spend, perhaps even on the low end, from a, \u201cHey, I get to do that guilt free.\u201d I would encourage you to make that guilt free.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So I think you have an opportunity to control that grocery budget so you\u2019re making sure that\u2019s going where you want it to go. But at the end of the day, with what I hear here, have that 350, 400 bucks per month be guilt free spending. Just make sure that it doesn\u2019t go beyond $300, $400 per month, which is what I\u2019m hearing might have been happening for the last year or two. So I think that if you can-<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah, that\u2019s the hard part.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Great. Maybe it would be helpful to provide a toolkit, some options that could help make sure that that money does not advance beyond $400 a month per person for example. So one simple option would be the money date and the budget, the budgeting process, and saying, \u201cLook, we\u2019re going to have all these other expenses. And then here\u2019s your fund money account and here\u2019s my fund money account. Groceries and household goods are all included in this budget here, but then we are going to track. And all of your spending, boyfriend, I don\u2019t think we\u2019ve said his name yet, is going to be on this credit card. 400 bucks a month. And I\u2019m going to get the same on this credit card, the separate one.\u201d That way, every one of those expenses is tracked by that individual each month in preparation for the money date and you can see where those are going in crystal clear clarity, right?<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So you can even put a limit on those credit cards that is $500 or $750 or whatever, and then use your debit card or whatever for any bigger purchases if you want to control that.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>That would be one toolkit for this. What do you think, Mindy?<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I think that\u2019s awesome. In fact, I just made a note, \u201cOoh, put a new card on the Amazon account so that I can track my Amazon spending easily,\u201d because I do think that I am using it mainly for necessities.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>That\u2019s what my wife and I do. I have my credit card that I put all of my purchases on and she has her credit card which she puts all of her purchases on. We only use the debit card for certain expenses where it\u2019s just really hard to use the credit card or doesn\u2019t make sense. Like right now we\u2019re renting, we wouldn\u2019t pay 3% of the rent in transaction fees in the credit card. But that way, at the end of the month, it\u2019s super easy for me to track all the expenses because it just says Scott\u2019s credit card in our budgeting software. And so I know that I\u2019ve got to put in all those transactions and she\u2019s got to put in all the ones that say Virginia\u2019s credit card. And so that\u2019s really easy at the end of the month and we can tell where the money\u2019s going. By the way, I\u2019m always the culprit on the one that\u2019s spending more frivolously than my wife every month without exception. So yeah.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I\u2019m right there with you.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Scott, what a surprise.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah. Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. My boyfriend\u2019s like, \u201cLet\u2019s just cook in.\u201d And I\u2019m like, \u201cLet\u2019s go out. We haven\u2019t been out in three days. Let\u2019s just go. It\u2019s fine. We have money.\u201d So yeah, it is-<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>And that\u2019s great. Put it on your credit card as like, \u201cHey, I wanted to go out. It\u2019s going to be my credit card for this one. That\u2019s coming out of my fund money budget. Boom. We\u2019re good to go there.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>And then you know at the end of the month, \u201cOkay. Those were all my calls here.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>That\u2019s my bad. Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>But that would be a toolkit that we found really powerful because at the end of the month, you just look at it and there\u2019s no guilt. You\u2019re not shaming the other person. You\u2019re just facing the reality. \u201cHere\u2019s what was spent on Scott\u2019s credit card. And here\u2019s how much was spent on Virginia\u2019s with that. We want to make any tweaks? No, we\u2019re good. We\u2019re going to keep going with that.\u201d Or \u201cYeah, we want to get this expense a little bit more under control next month. Let\u2019s make a plan.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah, I like that. We don\u2019t really have any guilt. I wouldn\u2019t use that word, but it needs to get under control. Because at the end of the day, I made a goal for savings. We\u2019re on track to meet the goal. So it feels like anything outside of that is okay. And that\u2019s just it. It\u2019s just okay. It\u2019s not the right thing to do. We should be saving more. So I like that idea of splitting up the fund money.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So without reducing what you said, which is $1,800 per month in these miscellaneous expenses, your total spending comes to $4,300 per month, right? And if you were to come out of this in a year from now, be house hacking with an Airbnb or a rental property with that, your expenses now dropped from $4,300 per month to $2,900 per month. And you\u2019re good to go. You can cover that with your second job right now within a year. You won\u2019t be building a lot of wealth on top of that at that point. So you may want to continue that process, maybe buy several properties over three years and set up some systems, maybe think about stockpiling $80,000 or $100,000 a year. 80,000 next year, and then maybe a $100,000 or $120,000 after a year or two if you make some of these moves, grow that income in some of these categories. And that would further cement your position. But I think you can have your goal of flexibility way faster than trying to just work towards this kind of amorphous $7,200 per month in passive income goal.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay. All right. I do have another, I guess, small wrench. It\u2019s not a big deal. I do have a pension with this local government job. The problem is it\u2019s an eight year vesting period. I\u2019m about three and a half years in and it\u2019s already one of the longest jobs I\u2019ve ever held. But if I stay the full eight years and then even at that point wait until retirement age, that will be an extra $1,0000 a month. So if I leave before the eight year, that\u2019s kind of walking away from what? $300,000, right? Is that right?<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So the $1,000 a month, does that come into play four and a half years from now, or at retirement age?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>That would be at retirement age.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Interesting. I have to think about how to value that asset. At retirement age, it would be worth $300,000-ish if you want to call it that, depending on how likely it is that the government is likely to pay out that pension, which is probably fairly likely in Florida.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. I would say. I would say fairly likely.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>But that\u2019s discounted by 20 years by a discount rate because you\u2019re not going to access those funds until 20 years from now. Then you\u2019re going to access a $300,000 annuity at that point from the pension. So it\u2019s worth considerably less than $300,000 at this point.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Let\u2019s value it at $75,000 for purpose of this discussion. I\u2019m probably off there. You should go and value that by using a discount rate you think is appropriate, but that\u2019s 20 to 25 years from now. Is it 65 or 59 and a half?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Gosh, I think it\u2019s 65.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Okay. So you\u2019re 25 years out. It\u2019s probably worth less than $75,000 in present value right now.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>So that would be a way to think about that from a valuation perspective when you\u2019re making decisions. So yes, am I going to stay four and a half years in order to make $75,000 in additional value right now? Or I could easily make more than that potentially in this avenue.\u201d But that would be a way to think about it over the next couple of years.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay. Okay. But yeah, that was one of my big questions.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I missed how long you\u2019ve been at this job?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Three and a half years.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Three and a half. And it has to be a total of eight?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. Do you like your current job?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I do. I do like it. It\u2019s a higher level position. I\u2019m not a huge fan of the human resource aspects of being a director. I\u2019ve never been the best or most, I guess, interested supervisor. So that part of the job is not my favorite. I would rather be an individual contributor like I am with the technical writing. But right now, I mean, I like it enough that everything makes it worth it right now.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. Then I wouldn\u2019t make a rash decision right now because it\u2019s still $300,000 down the road. If you hated your job, I would say four and a half years is a lot of time to spend at a job that you hate for $300,000 in 20 years.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>By the way I pulled out a present value calculator because this is fun. And the present of a $300,000 pile of cash in 25 years, 2047, would be at a 5% discount rate is $88,000. So if you think-<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Hey, you were pretty close.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>If you think you can earn 10% return, it\u2019s going to go down to $27,000. So if you\u2019re using a 10% discount rate, it\u2019s like 25 grand with that. And by the way, you\u2019re not getting a pile of cash for 300 grand in 25 years. You\u2019re getting a set of future cash flows. So it\u2019s even less than that from a valuation perspective. So all of those things, I think will be helpful perspective for you in making that decision. I would not consider\u2026 This is less than 10% of your net worth right now. Most likely.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>It\u2019s 10% to 20% of your net worth depending on what discount rate you want to use, but probably closer to 10 or less.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>In that case, the current life satisfaction and current job enjoyment is going to factor heavily into my own decision if I was in your shoes. If I like my job, why would I leave? It\u2019s hard to find a job that you like, and there\u2019s no guarantee that when you change jobs, you\u2019re going to find one that you like better. If I hated my job, I would start looking. This wouldn\u2019t be enough to keep me there, based on what Scott is saying, it\u2019s-<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah, it\u2019s kind of-<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>He\u2019s not saying it\u2019s worthless.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>He\u2019s saying it\u2019s not worth much.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Right.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah. Well I\u2019m saying there\u2019s a calculable value on this income stream. And at the high end, assuming you are a terrible investor and get 5% returns on your money for the rest of your life, it\u2019s worth 90 grand. But it\u2019s worth less than that because it\u2019s a set of income. It\u2019s income from the future based on that, not a pile of cash. So it\u2019s not worth a lot relative to your financial position, but it is a factor. I would not stay in the job for four and a half more years in order to realize that benefit at the opportunity cost of really doing things you want to do in your life, pursuing investments or other job opportunities in other locations. This is not a powerful benefit relative to your overall savings rate.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay. Yeah, I appreciate that. I was thinking I was stuck on that, what it would take to generate $1,000 in income today. And based on that calculation, I think that\u2019s pretty much a non-factor for a decision making going forward.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>No, I was saying that\u2019s really great to be able to realize that a lot of people don\u2019t factor that in. Scott, can you share a link to that present value calculator? We\u2019ll include those in our show notes.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Sure. I Googled present value calculator very rapidly and then put it in there and this was one of the first results in Google. So I will go ahead and link that in the show notes at biggerpodcasts.com\/moneyshow314.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yeah. I think that is important to have the ability to realize, \u201cOh, this is a really great thing that I\u2019m about to give up if I just worked there for another month. Or this is nothing even if I work there for 10 more years.\u201d So it\u2019s when the decision is much tighter than It makes it a lot more difficult to make. But this one I like that you have realized very quickly too. You\u2019re so easy to let go of this weight, this golden handcuffs thing. That\u2019s not the right phrase.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>No, that\u2019s exactly what it is.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>I\u2019ve referred to it as that before as well. No, I think it\u2019s easy to let go because kind of over the years, I\u2019ve learned that the money\u2019s out there. You can get it. This job that I\u2019ve had for three and a half years, that\u2019s the first time I\u2019m ever doing it. When I walked in the door three and a half years ago, I had no idea. I didn\u2019t even have a background in it. But up until this point, I was just kind of throwing all this money away. I didn\u2019t know what to do with it. So now that I\u2019m on this track, now that I\u2019m thinking about it in a different way, 10 years ago if you would\u2019ve said that, I would have been like, \u201cEh, that\u2019s too far in the future. I\u2019m not going to think about it.\u201d But if you had said it a year ago even, I would\u2019ve been like, \u201cI will never let that go.\u201d But now here I am thinking that maybe not be worth it.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>I mean, if you\u2019re 62 and you have another year left to vest the thing, obviously like, \u201cOkay, we\u2019re going to do that.\u201d But I think that we can make a different decision or value it differently because of your circumstances. And by the way, I would discount it at a 10% rate of return.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>That\u2019s because I am perhaps a little arrogant and think I can do much better than 5% return over the course of the next 25 years with my invested dollars with that. So that value then is $27,000, 28,000.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>So now that\u2019s not the maximum I would get. That is basically the minimum if I stayed vested. Now, if I continued working there for another 20 years, which I don\u2019t see happening, it could be quite a big sum money. Maybe $4,000 a month. It just depends on if they take the average of your top five earning years, I believe. And that\u2019s how they base their calculations. But the less you work, the less lucrative it is.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. We did an episode, I just want to remind people, on episode 259, we spoke with Grumpus Maximus and it was called Pensions 101. So this is something to listen to if you\u2019re considering taking a job that has a pension, or if you\u2019re considering leaving a job that has a pension, or if you just want to know more about pensions, because I\u2019ve never had a pension. I didn\u2019t know anything about them. I thought it was a very interesting show. So that\u2019s episode 259 at wherever you get your podcasts.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I think this has been great from my perspective, but how do you feel about this information?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>It\u2019s a lot. It\u2019s interesting. It\u2019s interesting. I knew you guys would-<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>[inaudible].<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. I knew you guys would pull out some things that I hadn\u2019t really thought about. Yeah, it\u2019s been really helpful.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I\u2019m glad. This is not meant to be just, \u201cHere\u2019s all those. Problems solved.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. Yes.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>We\u2019re done.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>You have homework.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yeah. You have homework. You have things to look at. But it can be really difficult to get outside of your own head when you\u2019re focused on this. It\u2019s hard to see what else is around. So having these other options, you currently have $7,200 in expenses. Therefore, you need to generate $7,200 in expenses to be able to quit your job. And I love Scott\u2019s way of thinking. Let\u2019s reframe that. In 45 seconds, he cut your monthly needs in half.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes. Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>And then you\u2019ve got $2,000 of that already from your current job. So now you\u2019re down to 20 hours a week working and we\u2019ve got to figure out a way to generate 2,000 more dollars and then you can quit.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. Then I\u2019m good to go.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Another thing-<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Or not go.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah, right? Which I probably wouldn\u2019t. You were right about that. There\u2019s no way I could just sit around. But another thing you pointed out was my lack of accessible funds right now, which I really need to think about that. I think I may try to redirect some of this into maybe a one real estate deal or something.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Into a real estate deal, into after tax brokerage accounts, your boyfriend\u2019s inherited IRA. I\u2019m assuming that because you\u2019re not married, you don\u2019t file jointly taxes?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Correct. Yeah, yeah. Yeah.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>So look up the Mad Fientist, How to Access Retirement Funds Early. I don\u2019t know if you\u2019ve ever read that article before. He talks about the Roth conversion ladder in that article. The inherited IRA isn\u2019t a Roth so you convert it to a Roth by paying taxes currently at your current income level. So you want to look up. And this is where a good tax planner will be able to give you great direction. They will look at your situation and say, \u201cOh, you have this much space between your income and your capital gains tax cap where you can convert and not pay any capital gains on this.\u201d And then once it\u2019s sat in the Roth IRA for five years, you can withdraw the principle. Not what\u2019s grown, but the principle, and everything that you\u2019ve converted over is now principle. So it is an interesting idea.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>I mean, he\u2019s got eight years to pull out $135,000. He could Roth convert it little bit by little bit and reduce his taxable income, reduce his tax burden on that while changing it to a Roth. When the market\u2019s low, it\u2019s going to\u2026 I can\u2019t guarantee. Past performance is not indicative of future gains. But I think that the market will continue to bounce back and will return. I mean, if you look at the historic market returns, it goes up into the right eventually. So you want to buy low when you can. So when you-<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>That\u2019s fantastic advice.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Thanks.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yeah. Thank you very much.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Yeah. If you Roth convert it, then it\u2019s growing. He takes out the principle if he wants. The gains are still there and they continue to grow, or go up and down, whatever. But yeah, I think having a conversation with a tax planner, having all of your numbers out there for them to see, they can give you some really great advice that\u2019s even better than what Scott and I are giving you because we\u2019re not tax planners. We just know enough to give homework. So that\u2019s another homework assignment, is to connect with the tax planner and ask them for suggestions to maximize what you have both pre and post-tax, but more along the post-tax lines and see what they say.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>What else can we help you with, Rebecca?<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>No, I think that\u2019s actually it.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Awesome.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>That\u2019s awesome. I got a lot to think about.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Well, let\u2019s recap. At the strategic level, most of your net worth is in retirement accounts and home equity. That is not going to get the job done in giving you life optionality and financial freedom. So as you acquire more cash, that needs to go into accounts that can provide that freedom. Options would include after tax brokerage accounts, your emergency reserve which I think is a great starting place because that will help you build financial runway which may create options for you, and you might consider buying real estate. Your home equity is a major part of the equation and you should think through that as part of your journey here to cut costs and potentially think about redeploying that into a house hack or other investments that can bring you this flexibility.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>You make a great income, so you\u2019re really not at all unreasonable with your month to month spending, even though I think that\u2019s what you thought was your big problem coming in. Although that\u2019s assuming that you keep it at the levels that you stated and have been true in the recent past, it sounds like. So we have some tactics and tips to do that. Maybe consider the credit cards for each of the partners here, you and your boyfriend, to make sure that you are accountable for your own spending and can talk about it in a positive way once a month.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Okay.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>And then lastly, Mindy had some great tips for how to think about dealing with the boyfriend\u2019s inherited IRA and rolling that over bit by bit in order to play a really strong tax advantage game. Ideally, parts of that being done before if you guys are considering this before you get married and have to file jointly. So lots of good, I think, hopefully helpful tactics here and hopefully some helpful perspective on reframing the strategy and the overall goals. A lot of homework for you.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Yes, definitely.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Awesome. Well, Rebecca, thank you so much for your time today. This was so much fun. I really appreciate you sharing your unique situation. I think it will help a lot of people who are in similar situations. I don\u2019t think anybody\u2019s going to have the exact same scenarios, but I think a lot of people are going to have this portion or that portion or that portion. So this is always really helpful. And that\u2019s why we do these shows. I\u2019m so glad for your time.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>Thank you so much.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay. We\u2019ll talk to you soon.<\/p>\n<p>Rebecca:<br \/>All right, bye.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Okay, Scott, I just want to give you huge, huge, huge props for the reframing idea. I really, really, really like how you gave her different things to think about and were able to basically top her monthly needs in half in such a short time frame. Nice job. That was super helpful, I know, to her.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>Yeah. I think that the goal usually is optionality and flexibility right now or very soon for most people, right? And so I think that\u2019s-<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Of course.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>And so when you hear a number that is just like, \u201cOkay, we are not going to get you to $7,200 a month in passive income anytime soon with the current way things are structured. Let\u2019s reframe the goal and let\u2019s come up with a strategy that we can use to really jumpstart the journey towards that, by increasing the amount you\u2019re going to save every year, moving more of that wealth into after tax investments like real estate or after tax brokerage and having a bigger runway that gives you some flexibility,\u201d now we can play a game that is winnable in the short term and gives you real life options and improves your life.<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>Absolutely. I am so excited for her homework assignments and for what she finds out about them, because I think she is going to take this\u2026 At the end of the show after we stopped recording, we checked in with her and were like, \u201cHey, did we get you what you needed?\u201d And she said, \u201cI have so many things to look into now.\u201d but excitedly. Like, \u201cNow I have all these options that I wasn\u2019t aware that I had before,\u201d which is the whole point of this show, is just, here\u2019s things to introduce you to so you can make sure that you are doing all the things that you need to do, that you want to do, that you can do to reach your goal as comfortably as you want, as you can.<\/p>\n<p>Scott:<br \/>I love it. Should we get out of here, Mindy?<\/p>\n<p>Mindy:<br \/>We should. From episode 314 of the BiggerPockets Money Podcast, he is Scott Trench and I am Mindy Jensen, saying I have no clever line today. Email me, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection\" class=\"__cf_email__\" data-cfemail=\"e38e8a8d879aa3818a84848691938c8088869790cd808c8e\">[email\u00a0protected]<\/a>, with your suggestions.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Help us reach new listeners on <a href=\"https:\/\/itunes.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/biggerpockets-money-podcast\/id1330225136\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">iTunes<\/a>\u00a0by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds.\u00a0Thanks! We really appreciate it!<\/p>\n<p><i data-stringify-type=\"italic\">Interested in learning more about today\u2019s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our\u00a0<\/i><i data-stringify-type=\"italic\"><a class=\"c-link\" tabindex=\"-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/sponsors\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" data-stringify-link=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/sponsors\" data-sk=\"tooltip_parent\" data-remove-tab-index=\"true\">sponsor page<\/a><\/i><i data-stringify-type=\"italic\">!<\/i><\/p>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/money-314\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Those searching how to retire early usually come away with one conclusion\u2014you have to make much, much more money. Most financial independence pursuers think that a large salary or enormous sum of assets is what will bring them closer to FI. Fortunately for you, that isn\u2019t always the case, and you\u2019ll see exactly why when [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":3065,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.biggerpockets.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/MNY_314_WEB.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3064\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/imsfund.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}