August 2026

Why Doesn’t 6-Figures Feel Like You “Made It” Anymore?


Yale University made an announcement last year that stopped a lot of people mid-scroll. Households earning $200,000 a year now qualify for 100% free tuition at the school.

That’s not a typo. Two hundred thousand dollars is now the threshold for financial need at one of the most prestigious universities in the country.

At the same time, Goldman Sachs published a report finding that roughly 40% of Americans earning over $500,000 a year describe themselves as living paycheck to paycheck. Not $50,000 a year. Five hundred thousand.

Something strange is happening to the relationship between income and financial security. And if you earn good money but still feel like you’re not quite getting ahead, you’re not imagining it.

A six-figure salary was the benchmark for decades. It meant you’d arrived. It meant a comfortable home, a funded retirement, money to spare. It meant financial freedom was within reach.

In 2025, the average American household spends over $70,000 a year before a single dollar goes toward savings, investments or debt repayment. In major metros, that baseline is significantly higher. After taxes, housing, student loans, childcare, insurance and the cost of just keeping a household running, a $100,000 income in many parts of the country leaves almost nothing.

The benchmark moved. The salary didn’t.

This isn’t a complaint about expensive cities or bad luck. It’s a structural problem that catches people off guard precisely because they’re doing everything they were told to do. They got the degree, landed the job, earned the raises. And they’re still not building the wealth they expected.

This is the distinction most financial content glosses over, and it’s the most important one to understand.

Income is what you earn. Wealth is what earns for you.

A doctor who earns $400,000 a year and spends $395,000 of it is not wealthy. They’re dependent. One bad month, one health crisis, one job loss and the whole structure collapses. The income stops. The bills don’t.

Wealth is the collection of assets that keep producing money regardless of whether you show up. Dividend stocks. Rental income. A business that doesn’t require you to run it every day. And yes, passive real estate investments.

The uncomfortable truth is that most high earners are very good at growing their income and very poor at converting it into wealth. Not because they’re irresponsible. Because income feels like security. It feels like the thing that solved the problem. So the urgency to build something beyond it never quite materializes.

And then the income stops.

There’s a specific pattern that plays out among busy professionals, and it’s almost invisible from the inside.

When your income rises, your lifestyle rises with it. Bigger apartment. Better car. More travel. Nicer restaurants. None of these feel like reckless decisions in the moment. They feel like rewards. They feel appropriate to the income level. And they are, individually.

But collectively, they absorb the raise before it ever has a chance to become a savings rate. Financial planners have a term for this: lifestyle looping. You earn more, you spend more, you feel like you’re doing well, and the gap between what you earn and what you’re actually building stays stubbornly narrow.

There’s a second layer to this. High earners are often embarrassed to admit they don’t have a financial plan. The logic goes: if I’m smart enough to earn this much, I should instinctively know what to do with it. So they don’t ask. They defer. They assume they’ll figure it out when things settle down. And things never quite settle down.

The professionals who actually build wealth aren’t always the highest earners in the room. They’re usually the ones who started treating their income as an input to a system rather than a destination.





Source link

Why Doesn’t 6-Figures Feel Like You “Made It” Anymore? Read More »

How to Rent Out Your House (Step-by-Step Guide)

How to Rent Out Your House (Step-by-Step Guide)


Want to rent out your house? This is how to do it right: get the best tenants and the highest rent.

For most Americans, renting out their previous primary residence will be their first experience in real estate investing. Thankfully, renting out your house like a professional is not hard; you just have to follow a few key steps that inexperienced investors will completely skip over. Today, Dave is sharing his step-by-step guide to renting out your home, even if you have no experience, even if you’re self-managing.

From estimating how much to charge for rent to listing your property, screening tenants, collecting security deposits, and keeping the cash flow coming, anyone can be a good landlord if they put in the effort. When done right, renting out your home can give you another stream of income, tens or even hundreds of thousands in equity over the long term, and experience in real estate investing.

You’ve got the house; this is how you rent it out.

Dave Meyer:
Do you want to rent out your house and start producing passive income? If you do, you can go two different paths. The first path is what most people do. They don’t want to sell their home, so they post a listing on Zillow, except the first tenant they find and forget about it until of course their property is trashed, they’ve lost money, and then they swear that they will never try real estate again. The second path, the path that I’m teaching you today is when you do it the right way, you find great tenants, you get paid rent every month like clockwork, and you control a property that can add hundreds of thousands of dollars to your net worth. And with just this one property, you can put yourself on the path to financial freedom. This is what I did 16 years ago. I had no experience, but I bought a property and needed to rent it out.
Years later, that one property allowed me to buy a second and then more and then more. And today I’m 38 and financially free. In this episode, I’m sharing the tips I really wish someone had told me when I first got started, and I’m going to walk you through the steps you need to take to rent out your house successfully so that you get wealthier instead of work.
All right, so here are the steps that you need to go through if you want to rent out your house and become a first time landlord. The first question you should ask yourself is should I actually be renting out this house in the first place? Because a lot of people assume they can rent out their home and make a lot of money. And a lot of them are right, but some are just wrong. Luckily though, you don’t have to guess. You can actually do the math and figure out if your home makes a good rental. The best way to do this is just to analyze it like it was a rental property that you were going out to buy. And this is super simple. You can run your numbers through a rental property calculator like the one that we have at BiggerPockets. You can check it out at biggerpockets.com/calculators and see if it cash flows.
See if it will perform better than other things that you can do with your money. Because let’s just imagine you’re living in a home and trying to figure out whether you want to sell it or rent it out. There’s probably a lot of money. You probably have equity trapped up in that house. And so you need to decide, am I better keeping my money in this home and renting it out? Or should I sell it and put my money in the stock market, buy some bonds, buy some crypto? Whatever it is you would do as an alternative, you do need to weigh those two things against each other. So if it won’t perform better than the alternative options, you should do those alternative options. You should sell and put your money elsewhere. But if it does perform as good or ideally better than those alternatives, then you should rent out your house.
And I’ll explain exactly how you do that in just a minute. But first I kind of just help everyone do this analysis for themselves because the trick to this analysis is not the math. You can do that with the calculator. It’ll do all of the math for you. The thing you need to focus on and get right are your comparables. You need to understand what you can actually rent your property out for because the number that you put into the calculator is super important. If you’re just guessing that you could rent your house out for 2,000 bucks a month, that’s not good enough for this analysis because you might find that you’re not cash flowing down the line if you don’t make that rent. So I want you to do something else instead. Go and find rent comps, rent comparables for your specific property. And this isn’t hard.
There are a couple of different ways that you can do it. The first is using some sort of automated system that uses an algorithm to pull your rents. We have a BiggerPockets rent estimator. There are other products out there that can do it as well. Or the other two ways I recommend you doing this is one, asking a real estate agent, make sure it’s an investor-friendly agent because they’ll understand rents more than just a run-of-the-mill real estate agent. Or ideally, ask a property manager. Call a property manager in the area, say, “I’m thinking about renting out my home. What do you think this would rent for?” Or talk to renters in your neighborhood and ask them what they are paying for rent. Getting a good estimate, an accurate understanding of what your rents might be is the most important part of this analysis because it’s going to help you decide definitively if you want to rent.
And it will also help if you decide to go out and rent knowing what you can charge. It’ll make listing easier. It will help you understand the quality that your property needs to be in to get the best rents. If you go out and look on Zillow and see that everything that’s renting for $2,000 is in nicer condition than yours, you can start to think about, do I charge less or do I bring my property up to that better condition that my competitors have? And if you do all this, you’ll learn whether or not to rent out your home, but it’ll also help you get a great tenant quickly by pricing your property accurately. The other thing you need to do and put into the calculator other than your rents are your expenses. And luckily, this should be really easy for you. It’s your house, right?
You should know what most of your expenses are. Just gather your mortgage information, your tax information, your insurance information. That might all be together in one payment. If so, even easier. If not, gather all of that information and put it into the calculator alongside a couple of other expenses you might not know off the top of your head because if this is a home you’re living in, you know all the stuff I just mentioned. But if you are a first time landlord, you’re going to need to figure out what repairs and maintenance costs, how much you need to keep and set aside for things like vacancy, what a property manager will cost if you’re going to use a property manager. And for most people, you can use rules of thumb because you’re not going to know precisely what each of these things is going to be.
I think that on an average home, if it’s in decent good shape, you should set about 10% of your rent every single month aside for repairs and maintenance. I personally like to use 8% for vacancy, but if you’re in a single family home in a good neighborhood that’s going to have high tenant demand, if you’re going to have families that want to stay a longer time, you could go down to six or maybe even 4%. If you rent to young professionals or young folks, they move more so you might have higher vacancies. So those are things that you should keep in mind, but usually between four and 8%. If you want to self-manage your property, that’s great. It will save you a lot of money, but if you’re going to hire a property manager, eight to 10% is what most of them charge. So you can just put those directly in the BiggerPockets calculator, press the button, and you will find out whether or not you should be renting out your home.
Once you see the results of the calculator and do this analysis for yourself and see all these numbers, here’s some things that you should look for to make this decision. First and foremost, I think your property should cashflow. It does not make sense in my opinion, especially if you’re a first-time landlord, to hold onto an asset that doesn’t cashflow. So I think you need at least a two or 3% cash on cash return. If it’s in a good neighborhood and you think it’s going to appreciate two, three, 4% cash on cash return, good enough. At least in my opinion, I think that is good enough. If you’re in an area that’s probably not going to appreciate, and you should be honest with yourself about this, but if it’s not going to appreciate that much, I would want you to see a cashflow number that’s going to be six, 7% cash on cash return.
So just think about that and do that analysis for yourself. The other thing to think about is whether or not holding onto this deal will get you better returns than an alternative investment. If you only have a 3% return on equity, and the BiggerPockets calculator will show you this, but if you only have a three or 4% annualized return, that’s not good enough. The stock market returns eight to 10% on average. So why would you hold onto this property, do the work of being a rental property investor if you could make more money elsewhere? Go to the stock market or sell the property and go buy a rental property that earns a better return than your home. Just because you already own this home does not mean that this is necessarily the best real estate investment for you. And so that’s what you’re trying to figure out in this analysis.
The other thing is there’s a non-math component to this because if you want to keep your property for personal reasons, that’s fine. If you’re like, “I’m moving for a job and I might move back in three years,” hold onto the property. That’s fine. That’s a totally different thing here. But if you’re looking at this from a financial perspective, you want to make sure it cashflows and you want to make sure your aggregate return when you add up the tax benefits, the cashflow, the amortization, the appreciation, when you add all of that up, it should be better than alternative investments like the stock market. Personally, I like to use a 12% return as my benchmark for that. So you want to see 12% or higher for your average annual ROI. So at this point, once you’ve done the calculator report, you should know for sure whether or not renting out your house is actually a good idea.
And if it is, I’m going to show you exactly how to do this in the right way. We’ll do that right after this quick break. Stick with us.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. Today in the show, we’re talking about how to rent out your house. Before the break, we talked about how to do this analysis like an investor, thinking about it in terms of math and deciding for sure whether or not it is actually a good idea for you to rent out your house. Now let’s turn to how you actually do it. If the numbers make sense and you think this can be a good investment, a good financial decision for you, let’s talk about the things you should do to make sure this goes well. Step one is fixing up your property. So you live in your home, you probably love it. Maybe you don’t care that there’s some splotches on the wall, that there’s some dirt under the baseboards, stuff like that. You live in a house for a long time, these things happen.
Tenants who have a choice of where they want to live are going to see those things. So spend a little time, spend a little money getting your property into a presentable condition to be listed. For some homes, this is as simple as a deep cleaning, which you can do yourself or you can pay someone for. Paint goes a really long way if you’re willing to do that. In some places you might want to put down some luxury vinyl plank flooring to make sure that it’s really resilient, ripping out carpet because that stuff gets really dirty when you have tenants. Those decisions are up to you, but I recommend you make those decisions based on two things. First and foremost, those comps that we talked about before. How are you going to be competitive in your market? Because yeah, you could just throw something up on Zillow or apartments.com, but tenants have choices and you should figure out how you want to position your property compared to everything else they might be seeing.
The second thing is cost efficacy. You want to make upgrades that number one will help you generate good rents. Number two will be safe quality products for your tenants and they’re going to love living in their place. And three, are durable and hopefully are going to last a long time. Now it can be tempting and easy to spend a lot of money on that. You want to do that in the most cost-effective way. But if you’re in this for the long run, if you want to rent your property out for several years, making those investments upfront really does pay off because you’re going to get higher rent, you’re probably going to have lower vacancy, and you’re going to have fewer headaches rather than one-off fixing things and improving things. If you just do it now, it can save you a lot of hassle over the next couple of years.
So that’s step number one, getting your property rent ready. Step two is actually going out and listing your property. This is marketing your place to tenants. And there’s two ways that you can do this, and this is sort of where you have to make this decision. You can either self-manage, this is sort of the DIY approach where you just go post it on Zillow, post it on apartments.com. It is super easy. I’ll tell you, it takes five to 10 minutes presuming that you have pictures. You can take pictures with your iPhone. Make them good pictures though, by the way. Take a couple of minutes to make them look nice. But if you spend 15 minutes taking pictures thoughtfully, you can definitely do this yourself. But with self-management also comes property management, right? You have to do all the coordination, the lease signing, you have to answer maintenance requests and calls.
You need to do all that stuff. Self-managing is great. I did it myself for 10 years, and it can be a great way to save money because you’re keeping eight to 10% of your income that you would normally be paying a property manager to do, but you have to do the work. Now, if you’re just managing one unit, if this is your former home and you live nearby, that amount of work is not that much. I will be honest, it will probably be a couple of hours a month at most. And for a lot of people, it is worth that time to increase their income. If you are interested in this approach, doing this DIY sort of self-management approach, check out a book we have. It’s called The Self-Managing Landlord. It will basically teach you everything you need to know. But don’t worry, people are so dramatic about how hard property management is.
It’s really not that hard. If you want to do this yourself, if you’ve got five hours a month, you absolutely can do it yourself. And it can be really helpful early in your investing career to build up some reserves, to build up some cashflow, and to learn the business. Honestly, if you want to be in real estate for the long run, doing self-management is so valuable because you learn everything about tenant management, everything about asset management and managing the repairs and maintenance on your project. And eventually, most people down the road in their investing career wind up hiring a property manager. But by self-managing first, you know what to look for in a property manager. You know who to hire, who’s going to be a great steward of your home and who might not do the best job. And so this is a great option.
The second option for going out and listing is going out and hiring that property manager right off the bat. This is also totally fine. If you are busy, if you just don’t like dealing with tenants and people, if you know nothing about property maintenance and repairs, go out and hire a property manager. It will cost you eight to 10% of your rents every single month, but you’ll regain time. And I’ve found that by hiring a property manager, it can also make your business more scalable. If you want to go out and buy more rentals, you’ll have more time to do all the other work that real estate investors need to do because the property manager, they’re going to do the comp research for you. They’re going to figure out what to charge for rent. They’re going to market it to tenants. They’re going to communicate with those tenants.
They’ll do the lease signing, they’ll handle repair and maintenance calls, they’ll do renewals, they’ll do all of it for you. So if you want to err on the side of more passive real estate, go out and hire that property manager. Now, whatever option you choose, whether it’s self-management or hiring a property manager, they’re probably going to use the same tools to market it. It’s not like property managers have some secret database of tenants that they’re going out and finding like you’re going to go and put it on apartments.com. You’re going to put it on RentReady, you’re going to put it on Zillow, Avail. These kinds of companies, they will put it across all of these websites. And when you’re doing it, spend a little time on the listing, right? Whether you’re approving something your property manager wrote or writing it yourself, be specific. Be thoughtful about the amenities and benefits of renting your property because you have competition.
Is it close to schools? Is it close to a grocery store? Is there high walkability? Is there off-street parking? Is there a really nice yard? What is it that you love about the property that you think tenants will love about the property? You can use ChatGPT if you want, but I recommend editing that and just really putting some thought and care into it. People want to rent places that feel special or unique or that they’ve found something that has all the amenities that they really, really love. So make sure you highlight what yours have. If I were a tenant, I would want to rent from a property manager who cares enough to take good photos, who cares enough to write a good description. When I see these one-line descriptions, I’m like, “This person is not going to be a good property manager. I don’t want to live in their home.” So just spend a little bit of time.
Again, 30 minutes, an hour, making sure that your listing is as good as possible. Once you’ve done that, you can move on to step three, which is evaluating and screening tenants. If you have done your listing right, you are going to get people contacting you. You’re going to schedule tours so people can come see the property in person. And then the crucial part of the process comes, which is finding the right tenant for your property. You cannot control many things about rental property investing, the economy, eviction timelines, all of that, but you can control how you screen tenants and make sure that you find tenants who are a good fit for your place. Now remember, you absolutely have to follow fair housing laws, but you can also implement some of your own requirements. For example, a lot of investors have criteria similar to this. These are a good place for you to start.
Number one, having a minimum credit score of 650. This is usually a benchmark. Some people use 625, but having some credit score in the mid 600s or above is what many investors do. The second thing is having an income-to-rent ratio of at least 30%. So most budgeting experts recommend that renters spend maximum 30-ish percent on their rent. And so you want to see if their income will cover their rent in that sort of proportion. Because if someone is saying, “I want to rent your property,” they could be great. But if they’re going to have to put 50% of their income to your rent, that’s not good for anyone. That is not good for the tenant. They’re going to be stretched on their budget. You don’t want that because that means the likelihood that they pay on time and as agreed is lower. You don’t want to put yourself or the tenant into that situation.
And so go and check their rent to income ratio. Third, you definitely want to call references. So many people skip this. Do not. Don’t just call their last landlord. We’ll tip about the industry. If you just call the last landlord and they’re a bad tenant, that landlord might tell you that they’re a great tenant because they just want them out of their property. So don’t just call their last landlord, but you should do that. Call their two landlords ago. Call three landlords ago. So make sure that part of your application process for renting out your home is that they list the names, phone numbers, and emails from their past three landlords. Call them and ask them. And then the last step is to pull any sort of report. So pull a credit score, you can pull eviction background, you can pull criminal records. Again, make sure that you are following all local laws and regulations about doing these things, but go and learn as much as you can about your prospective tenants and pick a tenant who can afford to live there, but also really wants to live there.
I find that when people are really excited about living in the property, they tend to be great tenants. They take good care of the place. They usually renew. You have lower vacancy. It really can work out. So be patient and diligent about this. There’s nothing really that hard about it. It’s just kind of doing a little bit of research and some common sense. You can absolutely do this. Once you’ve done that and pick the right tenant for you, this is when you go through the lease. I really recommend you get a professionally made lease. You could do this by going out and hiring an attorney. Or if you are a BiggerPockets Pro member, we actually have leases for all 50 states. They’re updated by attorneys every single year to make sure you’re compliant with all rules and provide maximum amount of protection for both you and your tenants.
It creates a mutually beneficial document that everyone can agree to. You can check those out at biggerpockets.com/leases. Now, once you have your lease in place, you need to do a walkthrough of that lease with the tenant. And you can do that in person. You could do it over the phone. What I usually do is send the lease to the tenant a couple days ahead of a meeting, and then I meet them in person at the property or at a coffee shop and just walk them through it. I find that sitting with someone and talking to them about the lease dispels a lot of this legalese that goes on through the lease. I think when you send someone this five-page document with a lot of big words that are super hard to understand, it’s legal mumbo jumbo. It’s hard to understand. It can often feel for a tenant like, what are they trying to hide in here?
What if I don’t fully understand it? I sit with tenants and I go through paragraph by paragraph, this is what this means, this is what this means. I send it ahead of time too. So if they want to run it through ChatGPT or talk to an attorney or talk to a friend or whatever, and they have questions, I can answer them. And I think the main thing that I always try to convey to tenants is that this document is here to protect both of us. It’s here to protect the property owner so that people pay on time that the property is taken care of. But in the leases, there are also provisions that protect the tenants and make sure that their privacy is respected, that their security deposit gets returned on time, that landlords don’t just barge into their property without announcing themselves. It is a mutually beneficial document.
And so talking through it person to person, face-to-face, I think really helps establish a good relationship between the property manager and the tenant. So if you are self-managing, I really recommend doing this in person if you can. Once you’ve done that, pretty simple, sign the lease, then keep a copy of it, make sure that both of you sign it and that both of you have copies, and then collect the security deposit. In your lease, you will say when the security deposit is due. Usually it’s on the first day of the lease, but sometimes you can do it like a week before or if it’s far out, you can ask for a deposit a couple months ahead of time. Get that deposit, but then I need you to do something here. Take that deposit and do not put it in your checking account. You need to create a separate bank account for your security deposits.
This is really important. A lot of people miss this, but that is not your money. A security deposit is not revenue. It is not income. It is actually, if you want to get into the accounting of it, it is a liability on your balance sheet. It is money you actually owe the tenant back. So you should not put this in your checking account. You are not legally allowed to, so you should do this. Go open another savings account, stick it in there, and don’t think about it until the tenant moves out and you have to figure out whether you’re going to return the full amount or not. So that is just one step that a lot of people miss that you need to do. Next, step five, another thing so many people miss here is you have to switch your insurance. Your normal homeowner insurance will cover some things, but is not sufficient.
It just is not enough for a rental property owner. You need landlord insurance because it covers things that landlords have to think about where normal homeowners don’t need to think about. So the number one thing I notice in this is loss of rent. So I’ve made this mistake. I’ve had landlord insurance that didn’t have loss of rent. They might call it business interruption insurance is another thing that it’s often called, but I want this crazy story. I had someone break into one of my homes and damage the water heater. I had to move the tenant out. I put him up in a short-term rental for, I think it was like a month. And I didn’t make the tenant pay because I couldn’t provide the service that he was paying for. He was paying to live in my unit. He wasn’t. So I had to come out of pocket for that.
And I didn’t get my rent that month. And so that was sort of a double hit. If you get business interruption or a rent insurance, the insurance company, when something like that happens, actually pays you your rent so it can help make you whole. So I really recommend you go out and get a good quality insurance. It’s honestly not that much more expensive than normal homeowner’s insurance. It might be a couple hundred bucks a year, but in my experience, man, it is well worth it. If you want a recommendation for a good insurance company, I use steadily. And if you’re a BiggerPockets Pro member, you can actually get increased insurance coverage and 5% off your premiums just by being a BiggerPockets Pro member. So if you’re a Pro member, go check that out. Or if you need landlord insurance, maybe go check out Pro and see if the package of perks, which are many, are worth it for you.
All right, so those are all the things you need to do before the tenant actually moves in, before you collect that first rent check. But there’s still stuff you need to do once the tenant is in the property. We’ll cover that right after this break.
Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m Dave Meyer talking to you about how to rent out your home the right way. So far in the show, we’ve talked about whether or not you should rent out your home. And if you do decide to do it, what you need to do prior to a tenant moving in. These are things like creating your listing, screening your tenants, getting your lease written, and getting the right insurance for your property. Now comes the fun part, right? Now the tenant is moving in, you’re going to start collecting those rent checks, but you got to figure out how you’re going to do that. That is step six here. Figure out what system you want to put in place to collect your rents. I laugh at myself all the time thinking about how I collected rent when I first started being a landlord.
I had people mail checks. This was 16 years ago. All right? So it’s not like we had all these systems, but there were so many better systems. And sometimes I would literally lose the rent checks and I would have to ask my tenants to write them again. It’s so embarrassing. It was totally my fault. So figure out a system better than that. And there are many of them, right? There are digital management platforms like RentReady or TurboTenant or Avail. This is much more convenient for the tenants too. It allows them to pay digitally. Tenants don’t have to pay for these things, and you just get all of your income coming in. You also get a lot prepared for taxes and for accounting all at once. It just makes the system so much easier. You’re watching a YouTube video. I can’t imagine this is hard for you to conceive of, but using a digital system is better than analog.
So go check out a couple of these management softwares. We have some on ProPerks. You can go in BiggerPockets and read reviews and see which one is right for you. Most of them are good. A lot of them can meet your needs, but they have individual differences. So go check them out and figure out which one is right for you. If you are using a property manager, I should mention, they will have their own digital system. So the way it usually works is you’re not going to collect rent directly. They’re going to play the property management company and then the property management company is going to give you distributions monthly. So I have some out-of-state rentals where I have a property manager and the way it works is that every month they collect the rent for me through their system. I honestly don’t even know what it is.
They use some digital system, but it works. Then they take out one, their fee, and they also take out any repairs that came up that month, and then they give me the difference. They send me an ACH, they just deposit it directly in my bank account at the end of the month. But either way, it’s all automated. That’s really what you want for your rent collection system. Hopefully this shouldn’t be hard. This should take, again, 15, 30 minutes to set up. It’s really not that hard. And then you move on to the long game. This is where you manage your property and make sure that you’re taking care and optimizing your financial performance. Because now that you’ve got a tenant in place, you need to do the work. They are paying you for a service. You need to provide that service. You need to keep up with proactive maintenance, make sure things aren’t falling apart.
I find that one of the best ways to keep tenants is to show that you care about the property. You should care about your property and you should be going over there, looking at the outside, making sure that things are looking good. If something’s on the verge of breaking, fix it before it breaks. These things go a long way. If a toilet breaks and someone’s without a toilet for a day, that’s super inconvenient. But if you replace it proactively, they will be like, “Wow, I I love living in this place because they take care of problems before they even come to fruition. So try to be proactive about maintenance. Even when you do that, it is absolutely inevitable that you are going to have problems come up. Reply to them quickly. That is the number one thing you can do. Sometimes, unfortunately, you can’t fix the problem overnight.
I have unfortunately had problems where heat goes out and I can’t get a tech there for three days. So number one, be communicative. Be understanding. Don’t get defensive. Say, “I know this sucks. I’m sorry.” That’s true, right? You don’t want your tenant to not have heat, but sometimes things break. What do you do? Ask them what they need. Do they need space heaters? Go to Home Depot, buy a couple space heaters, go bring them over. Show that you care. Show that you really want them to have a good experience in your property. It will mean a lot to them and it will help you in the long run. I know buying three space heaters is going to cost you a couple hundred bucks, but I bet you, you have a much higher chance of keeping that tenant at the end of their lease if they saw that you were willing to do what it takes to make their experience as good as possible.
Now, one thing you can do and really should do from the start to minimize these interruptions is to build up your vendor list. This honestly, it took me years and it’s a constant battle. It’s something you always have to be doing, but you should know before something goes wrong who the good HVAC people are, who the good plumbing people are, who the good contractors are, who the good handymen are. You want to be able to call these people right away because honestly, speaking from experience, it is a bad feeling when something goes wrong, when there’s a leak, when the heat goes out, like I was explaining before, and you’re just calling around to a million different people and you don’t know who will actually show up. And the best way to do this in my experience is ask for referrals. Ask for referrals from other investors, other homeowners.
It doesn’t need to be from investors, but investors usually know cost-effective people. You don’t want to buy the cheapest person. I promise you this. It is such a big mistake people make is to go with the cheapest contractor. You also probably don’t want to go with the most expensive one. You want to search for value. Who is going to answer the phone? Be communicative. Show up on time and charge a fair and reasonable price. You need those people in your business. And again, I think the most important ones are HVACs, plumbers, electricians, and a handyman. If you can get those people, have a good reference, put them in your phone, who to call if something comes up, that’s going to make your life so much easier as a landlord because people, I think, dramatize the difficulty of being a rental property investor because like, oh, there’s a toilet breaks.
Oh, you don’t want to deal with that? No, I’m not going to go change the toilet myself. I’m going to pick up the phone. I’m going to call a plumber that I trust and say, Hey, I need a new toilet. And they’re going to go take care of it. I’m going to pay for it and everyone’s fine. It’s not that hard if you know who to call. So just spend a little time asking around and build up that list of people. And ideally, think about getting a primary and a backup because some people are on vacation. Some people are super busy that day or that week. So have two HVAC people, two plumbers that you can call in a time of need. And that’s really it. That is what you need to do to manage a rental property effectively. But there’s one more thing I do want to mention here, which is taxes.
Because if you’re going to go through the effort in doing this, the passive income is great, but there are a lot of tax advantages to renting out your home that you do not want to miss out on. A lot of newer investors don’t take full advantage of the tax code and the advantages that are written into it for people who hold onto real estate and rent it out. So this is not tax advice, but you should talk to a CPA about the following things. Number one, writing off your interest on your mortgage, right? This is what you can do with your primary. You could do it with rental properties as well. Depreciate the property. This will allow you to not pay much or any tax on the rental income that you generate each and every year. This is amazing. You do have to pay depreciation recapture when you go and sell the property, but most tax advisors recommend you do this and it could be really great for generating more cashflow.
Third, make sure you’re writing off expenses, right? Create an LLC. I’m a fan of creating an LLC. I know there’s a huge debate about this. I like creating LLCs. Every property I buy is in an LLC, and I don’t think it is worth the risk for like 400 bucks or whatever it costs to create an LLC. If you’re going to invest in this giant asset, protect it. Protect your financial life by putting it in an LLC. The other thing is if you open an LLC, you can open a business banking account and you can write off your expenses easily. So driving back and forth to Home Depot. If you need to go buy a tool to make a repair yourself, these are write-offs that you can charge against your business that will save you money as well. Also, if you have to do any big capital expenditures like replacing a roof, you could depreciate that as well, and that will lower your overall tax liability.
So I guess that’s a bonus step is go talk to your CPA. If you’re going to go rent this out, go talk to a CPA about what tax moves you should be making to ensure that you’re optimizing your performance. So that’s it. That’s how you rent out your home the right way. First thing to do, make sure that your renting out your home is actually a good investment. Go do the analysis. It shouldn’t take you that long, but figure out if this actually makes sense and it’s worth your time and effort. I think for a lot of people, especially people who have really low locked in mortgage rates over the last couple years, it is worth it. And if it is worth it to you, make sure you follow the steps that we’ve outlined in this episode so that you do it the right way.
You protect yourself, you maximize your opportunity to make money, and you provide a high quality place for your tenants to live. If you do all that, renting out your home can be a phenomenal investment that can really genuinely be a launchpad to your financial freedom. That’s our episode for today. Remember, if you are interested in doing this, our pro memberships, specifically our pro perks, have tons of benefits that you can take advantage of. Discounts on insurance, discounts on mortgages, discounts on property management software. So if you’re going to go out and do this, check out BiggerPockets Pro. It is designed for people who are managing their own rentals and can give you a huge leg up and help ensure that you’re successful when you go out and rent your home. Thank you all so much for watching this episode of the BiggerPockets Podcast. I’m Dave Meyer.
I’ll see you next time.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].



Source link

How to Rent Out Your House (Step-by-Step Guide) Read More »

Inventory edges slightly higher year over year as rates rise

Inventory edges slightly higher year over year as rates rise





Inventory edges slightly higher year over year as rates rise





















What’s New?

Updated 1 day ago

manage feed




Source link

Inventory edges slightly higher year over year as rates rise Read More »

Here’s the Massive Sum Margot Robbie Made As Barbie

Here’s the Massive Sum Margot Robbie Made As Barbie


Key Takeaways

  • The 2023 Barbie movie grossed $1.4 billion worldwide at the box office, breaking records.
  • New details have emerged about star Margot Robbie’s payday for playing Barbie in the film.
  • Talks for a sequel have reportedly stalled because the core Barbie team has not been able to agree with Warner Bros. on pay.

The 2023 Barbie movie grossed $1.4 billion worldwide at the box office, making it the highest-grossing film in Warner Bros. history. Now new details have emerged about Margot Robbie’s payday as the movie’s titular character. 

According to Variety, Robbie reportedly made a staggering $50 million from starring in and producing Barbie. The publication added that Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav has not been able to bring on the core Barbie team, including Robbie, Ryan Gosling, director Greta Gerwig and her co-writer husband, Noah Baumbach, for a sequel. 

Talks have reportedly stalled because Zaslav and the team have not been able to agree on pay. The creative team has rejected more than six offers for sequels in the three years since Barbie debuted. 

Variety noted that the latest offer Warner Bros. made was the “highest ever” from the studio. One source called the offer “life-changing money.”

A separate source downplayed the offer, saying that the individual compensation for each member of the team is not as “historic” as the combined amount. 

Gosling is pushing for $20 million to play Ken again in the sequel. Sources told Variety that Gerwig made “tens of millions of dollars” from the 2023 movie. 

Variety confirmed that Gerwig and Baumbach have a concept in mind for a sequel, but they are not revealing any details and will not start writing it until signing a contract with Warner Bros. 

What the team has said about a sequel

After Barbie became a billion-dollar success, the core team talked publicly about possibly making a sequel. At Time’s Women of the Year event in March 2024, Gerwig spoke about her guiding principles. 

“My North Star is ‘What do I deeply love? What do I really care about?’ Like, ‘What’s the story underneath this story?’” Gerwig said at the event. “And I think with Barbie, the story underneath this story was I loved Barbie. I remember going to Toys R Us and looking at Barbies, and I loved their hair. And I loved everything about them, and my mom was not sure about it. And I find that’s the story, that’s the generational story…I’m always trying to find those undertows.”

Gerwig wasn’t able to give a definitive answer about a sequel, but noted that she “loved” making the movie. 

“I loved the world that we built so much and all of the actors and the idea of getting to be with that group of people again is very exciting,” she said at the event. 

Meanwhile, Robbie told the Associated Press in November 2023 that it was “really important” that Barbie did well at the box office. She said that the “biggest takeaway” for her was that original films can still “hit huge.”

“It doesn’t have to be a sequel or a prequel or a remake,” she said. “It can be totally original. It can still be big.”

Robbie added that the team “put everything” into the movie. 

“I can’t imagine what would be next,” she said. 

Key Takeaways

  • The 2023 Barbie movie grossed $1.4 billion worldwide at the box office, breaking records.
  • New details have emerged about star Margot Robbie’s payday for playing Barbie in the film.
  • Talks for a sequel have reportedly stalled because the core Barbie team has not been able to agree with Warner Bros. on pay.

The 2023 Barbie movie grossed $1.4 billion worldwide at the box office, making it the highest-grossing film in Warner Bros. history. Now new details have emerged about Margot Robbie’s payday as the movie’s titular character. 

According to Variety, Robbie reportedly made a staggering $50 million from starring in and producing Barbie. The publication added that Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav has not been able to bring on the core Barbie team, including Robbie, Ryan Gosling, director Greta Gerwig and her co-writer husband, Noah Baumbach, for a sequel. 

Talks have reportedly stalled because Zaslav and the team have not been able to agree on pay. The creative team has rejected more than six offers for sequels in the three years since Barbie debuted. 



Source link

Here’s the Massive Sum Margot Robbie Made As Barbie Read More »

The Playbook That Got You Ranked on Google Won’t Win You Customers on ChatGPT. Here’s What Will.

The Playbook That Got You Ranked on Google Won’t Win You Customers on ChatGPT. Here’s What Will.


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • The playbook that worked for Google doesn’t move AI engines, and understanding why is the strongest business case for PR in twenty years.

ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity build their answers from earned media — the one channel you can’t buy, automate or publish yourself. That quietly changes what PR is for, and who needs it.

Try a quick experiment. Open ChatGPT or Perplexity and ask it to recommend the best companies in your category — the exact question a prospect might ask. Then ask what your company does and who it serves. Now compare those answers to the positioning your team spent months refining.

For most businesses, the two don’t match. The engine’s description runs a few years out of date, borrows a competitor’s framing, or flattens a carefully built value proposition into a generic one-liner. And the mismatch matters more every quarter: a Prosper Insights & Analytics survey found that 53% of Americans who use generative AI turn to it to search the internet. Those users don’t get ten blue links and a chance to click yours. They get a summary, and increasingly they treat it as settled.

So what actually moves those answers? Companies have spent two decades learning to influence Google with content and SEO. That playbook doesn’t transfer, and understanding why is the strongest business case for public relations I’ve seen in twenty years of doing it.

The engines have an editorial hierarchy, and your website is at the bottom

AI engines weight sources by credibility, and they’re refreshingly blunt about the pecking order. At the top sits third-party editorial coverage: reporting that has passed through journalists, editors and fact-checkers. Your own website, blog and social channels sit well below it, for an obvious reason — on your own properties, you can claim anything. When my firm surveyed the engines directly for a report on the attention economy, ChatGPT put a number on it, saying as much as 63% of its answers derive from traditional media sources.

In budget terms, that means the majority of what the most-used AI engine says about your company is drawn from a channel most marketing plans treat as a line item somewhere below paid search. Gartner has done the math and expects PR and earned media budgets to double by 2027, driven largely by AI’s preference for vetted editorial content.

Why this is the one channel you can’t self-serve

Here’s the uncomfortable part for the do-it-yourself instinct. Every other marketing channel is self-serve: you can buy the ads, publish the content, post the thread. Earned media is the exception by definition. It exists only when an independent journalist decides your story is worth telling. That gate is precisely what makes it valuable to the engines, and precisely what makes it hard.

Getting through the gate consistently is harder than it looks from inside a company, for two reasons. The first is perspective. Internal teams sit too close to their own story to see it the way a reporter will. The craft of PR lives at the intersection of what a company wants to announce and what journalists actually want to write about, and finding that intersection requires a third-party vantage point that an in-house team, by definition, doesn’t have.

The second is cost. A functioning in-house PR operation is not one hire. You need a senior strategist to set direction, a VP-level team member to oversee messaging and writing, and junior staff to handle the daily work of pitching media. Salaried out, that structure costs considerably more than retaining a proven PR team, and standing it up is a distraction from the work marketing departments are actually built to do. The honest division of labor is to keep strategy, content, paid and email in-house, where those channels are easily managed and proximity to the business is an advantage. PR is not one of those channels.

It’s also worth being clear about what a good agency actually sells. It was never really “press releases.” It’s external messaging, positioning, media relations strategy, editorial judgment and access — and in the AI era that combination compounds, because engines don’t just index the coverage  — they adopt its language. Across our client work, I’ve watched a precise, memorable phrase from a single article in a modest but authoritative outlet surface in AI answers within days. When coverage is loose and generic, the engines improvise, and you inherit whatever they invent.

The other pattern I see, aside from building internal teams, is companies skipping specialist talent altogether and putting their own press release straight on the wire. The result is almost always the same. With no media relations done in advance, the release gets no coverage, and because it was written without an editorial eye, it reads as poorly constructed and overly promotional. That’s the worst of both worlds in the AI era: a release sitting uncovered on a wire service is exactly the kind of unvetted, self-authored material the engines discount, so it costs money and teaches them nothing.

What to actually ask of a PR partner now

None of this means hiring the first agency that mentions AI in its deck. It means holding any PR partner to a new standard. If you’re evaluating one, two requirements matter.

First, demand a baseline. Before any pitching starts, they should audit what each major engine currently says about you — same questions, clean sessions, answers logged — and define success as movement in those answers, not a clip count. “Coverage secured” is the old metric; “the engines now describe us the way we describe ourselves” is the new one.

Second, evaluate strategy, not contacts. Prospects almost always lead with the wrong questions: what publications do you work with, who are your connections? Access matters, but for any established agency it’s table stakes. Last year my agency placed stories with over 10,000 different journalists, and one recent story alone was picked up by 400 outlets. Numbers like those tell you a pipe exists; they don’t tell you what flows through it. The evaluation that actually predicts results is looking at the work: ask an agency to walk you through the strategies they built for different clients, and how they turned those strategies into narratives that shifted a market’s perception — both in AI engines and in the minds of the people reading the articles. That’s the skill you’re buying.

I’ve written before that marketing goals should translate directly from business goals. Earned media is the mechanism that carries your story into narratives that shift the market’s perception in support of those goals — both in the minds of human readers and in the answers AI engines give about you.

Key Takeaways

  • The playbook that worked for Google doesn’t move AI engines, and understanding why is the strongest business case for PR in twenty years.

ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity build their answers from earned media — the one channel you can’t buy, automate or publish yourself. That quietly changes what PR is for, and who needs it.

Try a quick experiment. Open ChatGPT or Perplexity and ask it to recommend the best companies in your category — the exact question a prospect might ask. Then ask what your company does and who it serves. Now compare those answers to the positioning your team spent months refining.

For most businesses, the two don’t match. The engine’s description runs a few years out of date, borrows a competitor’s framing, or flattens a carefully built value proposition into a generic one-liner. And the mismatch matters more every quarter: a Prosper Insights & Analytics survey found that 53% of Americans who use generative AI turn to it to search the internet. Those users don’t get ten blue links and a chance to click yours. They get a summary, and increasingly they treat it as settled.



Source link

The Playbook That Got You Ranked on Google Won’t Win You Customers on ChatGPT. Here’s What Will. Read More »

Jimmy John’s and Buffalo Wild Wings Open First Co-Branded Site

Jimmy John’s and Buffalo Wild Wings Open First Co-Branded Site


Buffalo Wild Wings Go and Jimmy John’s are launching their first combined location together, in a Florida town built around game day.

By

Jon Small


|


edited by
Dan Bova


|


Aug 14, 2026

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Would you like some wings with that sub? Buffalo Wild Wings Go and Jimmy John’s are opening a co-branded restaurant in Palmetto, Florida, on August 18, Nation’s Restaurant News reports. Both chains are owned by Inspire Brands, which also owns Dunkin’, Arby’s and Sonic.

The company picked Palmetto on purpose, describing it as “a community built around game days,” including local high school football and Pittsburgh Pirates spring training. The restaurant will share an entrance and seating area, with each brand running its own kitchen. Jimmy John’s will keep its drive-thru.

It’s part of a bigger co-branding trend. Inspire already runs Dunkin’/Jimmy John’s and Jimmy John’s/Baskin Robbins locations, and other chains are joining forces for the same strategy, including Dine Brands with Applebee’s and IHOP, and MTY Food Group with Papa Murphy’s and Famous Dave’s.



Source link

Jimmy John’s and Buffalo Wild Wings Open First Co-Branded Site Read More »

The Power of Warm Introductions in Business

The Power of Warm Introductions in Business


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Jake Fleshner and Michael Axman didn’t build The Nucleus Network to start another advisory firm or venture fund. They built it because they couldn’t ignore a pattern. Jake’s background spans entrepreneurship at the University of Michigan, working with Gary Vaynerchuk, and serving as the right-hand to a figure he calls the “real‑life Jerry Maguire.” Michael’s path began as an early growth hire at a tech company in the music, travel, and entertainment space, a company that raised hundreds of millions before he left to build his own consulting agency. Together, their skill sets form a complete spectrum: Jake brings brand instinct, operator discipline, and storytelling; Michael brings financial architecture, strategic rigor, and scalable systems. Between them, they’ve made 10,000+ warm introductions, each intentional, double-opt-in, and designed to reduce the time it takes a founder to reach the right person. 

Everywhere they looked, talented founders were stuck not because their product wasn’t good enough, but because they couldn’t get in front of the right person. Meanwhile, Jake and Michael were constantly asked, “Do you know anyone who…?” And they almost always did. Their ability to connect people wasn’t a side skill; it was the most valuable thing they offered. That realization became the foundation of a company built on one belief: the warm introduction is the most powerful force in business.

Photo credit: Nucleus Network

Their partnership works because they share a core philosophy: everything is figure‑out‑able. It’s the mindset that drives their company, their leadership style, and their approach to solving problems for founders. They don’t believe in waiting for perfect conditions; they believe in building momentum through action, judgment, and trust. 

Use Warm Introductions as a Strategic Growth Engine 

The Nucleus Network operates across three interconnected pillars: AdvisoryVentures, and Community, all designed to connect the right people at the right moment and turn trust into opportunity. Advisory is their retainer “warm intros as a service” practice where venture-backed founders and agencies receive targeted warm introductions to customers, partners, talent, advisors, and more without ever sending a cold email. Instead of “spray and pray” outreach, Nucleus delivers curated, double-opt-in introductions that condense months of effort into a single trusted connection. Their clients rely on them not just for access, but for judgment, the ability to know who should meet, when, and why. 

Ventures is their deal‑by‑deal SPV syndicate backed by 400+ LPs, in which they’ve invested in 29 companies and deployed $54M. Their portfolio reflects their thesis that the best opportunities travel through relationships, not advertisements. It includes emerging consumer and tech‑enabled brands such as Othership, Hot Girl Pickles, Packsmith, Drizzy, Ammortal, Siegelman Stable, and Culture Media companies that represent cultural momentum, strong storytelling, and founders who benefit from Nucleus’s ability to open doors that would otherwise remain closed. Their LP base trusts them because they don’t chase hype; they chase founders who are building something real and need the right people around them to accelerate. 

Community is their invite‑only events arm, and it has become one of the most distinctive parts of the Nucleus ecosystem. They’ve hosted 100+ events across New York City, LA, Miami, San Francisco, Vegas, Chicago, and Europe, partnering with companies like Morgan Stanley, Cash App, MongoDB, Alliance Bernstein, Rho, Boardy, Sydecar, DraftKings, and more. These aren’t typical networking mixers; they’re curated experiences designed to deepen trust and create real relationships. Sauna and cold‑plunge sessions, tennis tournaments, backgammon nights, founder dinners, investor salons, and ecosystem meetups all serve the same purpose: get the right people in the right room and let trust do what it does. Their events have become known for their warmth, intentionality, and ability to create connections that actually lead somewhere. 

Together, these three pillars form a compounding system. Advisory drives introductions, Ventures opens doors to private deals, and Community deepens trust in person. Each pillar strengthens the others, creating a network that grows not through volume, but through quality. 

Protect Trust Like It’s Your Most Valuable Asset 

The biggest challenge in their industry is noise. Founders and executives are buried under cold emails, automated LinkedIn messages, and outreach that treats them like a number instead of a person. Access has never been easier, but meaningful access has never been harder.

Technology optimized for volume instead of quality, and genuine relationships became collateral damage. 

Jake and Michael built the opposite. Every introduction is intentional, double opt‑in, and rooted in judgment. They don’t connect people who shouldn’t be connected. They don’t “spray and pray.” They protect the quality of every introduction because one bad connection can torch credibility earned over years. Their discipline is exactly why their introductions convert into deals, customers, and partnerships instead of dying in an inbox. 

Their approach is a direct response to a market that automated its way into disconnection. While others chased speed, scale, and mass outreach, Nucleus doubled down on warmth, trust, and human curation. They believe the winners of the next decade won’t be the ones with the biggest lists; they’ll be the ones with the deepest trust. 

A Mission Rooted in Trust and the Future It’s Building 

The Nucleus Network’s mission is to make warm introductions the currency of business. Jake and Michael built the company on the belief that trust, intentionality, and human connection are the most valuable assets in a world drowning in cold outreach and automated noise. Every introduction they make is double-opt-in, curated with judgment, and designed to reduce the time it takes a founder, investor, or operator to reach the right person. 

That mission is shaping the future they’re building. Over the next few years, they see The Nucleus Network becoming the default destination for anyone who needs meaningful access to the place where founders, investors, and operators go to reach the right person without the noise. Advisory will continue to expand, Ventures will scale beyond its current 29 companies and $54M in deployed capital, and Community will grow into new markets with even more curated gatherings across major cities.

Photo credit: Nucleus Network

They’re also building technology that makes warm introductions dramatically easier to source, match, and track, proving that human trust and smart systems aren’t at odds; when done right, they multiply each other. Their goal is to create a future where warmth is the standard, trust is the currency, and intentionality is the norm across an entire ecosystem. 

Zoom out, and their mission is bigger than the company itself. They want to change how business gets done to make the warm introduction the default, not the exception. If they succeed, “figure‑out‑able” won’t just be their motto. It will be the operating system for a network built on human connection.

Jake Fleshner and Michael Axman didn’t build The Nucleus Network to start another advisory firm or venture fund. They built it because they couldn’t ignore a pattern. Jake’s background spans entrepreneurship at the University of Michigan, working with Gary Vaynerchuk, and serving as the right-hand to a figure he calls the “real‑life Jerry Maguire.” Michael’s path began as an early growth hire at a tech company in the music, travel, and entertainment space, a company that raised hundreds of millions before he left to build his own consulting agency. Together, their skill sets form a complete spectrum: Jake brings brand instinct, operator discipline, and storytelling; Michael brings financial architecture, strategic rigor, and scalable systems. Between them, they’ve made 10,000+ warm introductions, each intentional, double-opt-in, and designed to reduce the time it takes a founder to reach the right person. 

Everywhere they looked, talented founders were stuck not because their product wasn’t good enough, but because they couldn’t get in front of the right person. Meanwhile, Jake and Michael were constantly asked, “Do you know anyone who…?” And they almost always did. Their ability to connect people wasn’t a side skill; it was the most valuable thing they offered. That realization became the foundation of a company built on one belief: the warm introduction is the most powerful force in business.

Photo credit: Nucleus Network

Their partnership works because they share a core philosophy: everything is figure‑out‑able. It’s the mindset that drives their company, their leadership style, and their approach to solving problems for founders. They don’t believe in waiting for perfect conditions; they believe in building momentum through action, judgment, and trust. 



Source link

The Power of Warm Introductions in Business Read More »

FSBO vs. Agent Isn’t the Real Debate Anymore — Here’s What Is

FSBO vs. Agent Isn’t the Real Debate Anymore — Here’s What Is


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • Real estate is still one of the last fully bundled services left in a major industry, but the NAR settlement this spring is changing that, whether anyone intended that or not.
  • The industry keeps fighting over whether agents will survive technology, but that’s the wrong question to ask. The real question is what level of service each consumer needs for their specific deal.

For about two decades, the real estate industry has talked about itself like it’s in the middle of a war. Agents vs. technology. Full commission vs. flat fee. For-sale-by-owner (FSBO) vs. full service. Every few years, a new headline declares that agents are about to go extinct, technology is about to make the profession obsolete and the old model is finally cracking. None of that has actually happened, and there’s a pretty obvious reason why. Consumers were never asking the question the industry kept arguing about.

Nobody wakes up wondering whether real estate agents should exist as a category. They wake up wondering how much help they actually need for the specific situation in front of them. That’s a completely different question, and it’s the one the industry has mostly ignored while it kept refighting the same fight.

Here’s the part that should embarrass everyone still arguing about FSBO. It’s at an all time low.

Last year, 5% of home sales had no agent involved at all, down from over 20% in the ’80s, and 91% of sellers used an agent. If the future of real estate were really about consumers ditching agents entirely, the data would show some version of that happening. It shows the opposite. People are not rejecting professional help. What’s actually shifting is something quieter and more interesting: how much help, and which parts of it, people want to pay for.

Real estate is finally catching up to everyone else

Real estate is still one of the last fully bundled services left in a major industry. When you hire an agent, you’re typically buying a pricing strategy, MLS access, negotiation, marketing, paperwork and advice as one inseparable package, whether you need all of it or not.

Most other industries went through this exact transition years ago. Travel agents used to be the only way to book a trip. Now you can do everything yourself, hire someone for the complicated parts or use a hybrid service depending on what the trip requires. Investing went the same direction. You can manage your own portfolio, pay a flat fee for specific advice or hand the whole thing to a full-service advisor.

Tax prep splits the same way. Real estate has been one of the slowest industries to unbundle, mostly because the transaction itself has stayed so structurally complicated that full service felt like the only safe option for most people.

That’s actually changing, and the National Association of Realtors settlement accelerated it, whether anyone intended that or not. Buyer-agent commissions are now negotiated individually instead of baked silently into the deal, and sellers are no longer required to cover them automatically. Flat fee MLS listings, hourly consultations and à la carte services are becoming real options rather than fringe ones. None of this is eliminating the agent relationship; it’s just giving people more entry points into how much of it they actually want.

Good agents win when consumers get more options

Here’s where the conversation gets a little uncomfortable for some agents and a little exciting for others. The agents who are nervous about unbundling are usually the ones whose value was tied up in tasks that technology was always going to make easier: scheduling showings, generating comps, formatting paperwork, etc. Those things were never really the reason a good agent was worth the money.

The agents who thrive when consumers get more options are the ones whose actual value was always negotiation, judgment under pressure, local market knowledge that doesn’t show up in an algorithm and the ability to walk a stressed-out buyer or seller through a decision that’s bigger than almost anything else they’ll do financially. Unbundling doesn’t threaten that kind of expertise — it clarifies it. When a consumer can choose exactly which services they’re paying for, the services that are genuinely hard to replicate become more obviously valuable, not less.

This is where I’d point to something like Ownli, the flat-fee real estate platform built around the idea that consumers shouldn’t have to choose between affordability and real representation. The traditional model ties commission to home price, so two nearly identical transactions can cost wildly different amounts for the same basic work. And it’s not about stripping services down to a menu; it’s about making the cost of good representation transparent and predictable instead of opaque and percentage-based. Consumers don’t actually want less help. They want to know what they’re paying for and why, and they want that price to reflect the actual work involved rather than an arbitrary cut of their home’s value. That’s not anti-agent. It’s pro-consumer in a way that, if anything, makes good agents more valuable by forcing the market to compete on transparency and real service instead of legacy pricing nobody questions.

The industry keeps fighting over whether agents will survive technology. That’s the wrong question, and the data already answered it. The real question — the one actually shaping where this market is headed — is what level of service each consumer needs for their specific deal. Real estate spent decades as one of the only major service industries that hadn’t figured out how to answer that question flexibly. It’s starting to now. The agents and platforms that understand the difference are going to be in a much stronger position than the ones still arguing about a war that consumer behavior already settled.

Key Takeaways

  • Real estate is still one of the last fully bundled services left in a major industry, but the NAR settlement this spring is changing that, whether anyone intended that or not.
  • The industry keeps fighting over whether agents will survive technology, but that’s the wrong question to ask. The real question is what level of service each consumer needs for their specific deal.

For about two decades, the real estate industry has talked about itself like it’s in the middle of a war. Agents vs. technology. Full commission vs. flat fee. For-sale-by-owner (FSBO) vs. full service. Every few years, a new headline declares that agents are about to go extinct, technology is about to make the profession obsolete and the old model is finally cracking. None of that has actually happened, and there’s a pretty obvious reason why. Consumers were never asking the question the industry kept arguing about.

Nobody wakes up wondering whether real estate agents should exist as a category. They wake up wondering how much help they actually need for the specific situation in front of them. That’s a completely different question, and it’s the one the industry has mostly ignored while it kept refighting the same fight.

Here’s the part that should embarrass everyone still arguing about FSBO. It’s at an all time low.



Source link

FSBO vs. Agent Isn’t the Real Debate Anymore — Here’s What Is Read More »

Why Your Top Performers Quit Right After Their Biggest Wins (and How to Prevent It)


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • Top performers quit after their biggest wins because the dopamine, adrenaline and cortisol cocktail they’re running on drops fast after the goal is hit.
  • What follows is what researchers call post-achievement depression, or the success crash. The result looks like disengagement. It gets treated like a management problem. It is neither.
  • Organizations that keep top talent through high-output cycles have a plan for what comes after the win. The plan includes awareness, a structured recovery window and someone who can walk them through it.

When a top performer hands in their notice, the instinct is to look inward.

Why do high performers leave? Why did my best employee quit? Why are my best employees leaving right after their biggest wins? The answer most organizations reach for is familiar: compensation, culture, management, growth path. Sometimes it is those things.

But there is a pattern showing up inside high-performing teams that none of those explanations account for. It tends to strike at the worst possible moment — right after a major win.

The record quarter. The product launch that exceeded every target. The employee who finally got the promotion they worked years toward. The top performer who delivered their best year on record and handed in their notice two months later. On paper, everything was going right, which is exactly what makes this pattern so hard to see and so costly when you miss it.

I have spent years documenting this. What I keep finding is not a management story. It is a biology story that organizations have never been given the language to understand.

Why top performers quit after their biggest wins

For months leading up to a major goal, the brain runs on a specific neurochemical cocktail. Dopamine drives the pursuit. Adrenaline sharpens focus. Cortisol sustains the pressure. Your top performers are running on all three, and they are exceptionally good at it. That capacity is precisely what makes them top performers.

When the goal lands, all three drop. Fast.

The target disappears. Dopamine has nothing left to anticipate. What follows is what researchers call post-achievement depression, or the success crash: a biological comedown that hits hardest in the people who drove hardest to get there. It is why top performers leave after hitting their biggest goals, why an employee who just delivered a record quarter starts looking distracted two months later, why the person who crossed every finish line on the roadmap suddenly cannot seem to find their footing.

According to NIH research on burnout and the HPA axis, chronic stress leads to a predictable progression of elevated cortisol followed by exhaustion and suppressed function. Your best people have been running that system at full capacity. The finish line removes the reason it was running. It does not turn the system off.

The result looks like disengagement. It gets treated like a management problem. It is neither.

The people most likely to crash are your best ones

This is the part most retention conversations miss entirely.

The people most likely to crash after a big win are not your struggling employees. They are your best ones. The ones who care the most, push the hardest and have tied the most of their identity to what they deliver. Google’s research found that top performers produce up to 400% more than the average employee. That output does not come free. It comes from a brain that has been running in sustained pursuit mode, often for months, with the finish line as the only thing keeping the system calibrated.

When the finish line disappears, so does the calibration.

And the standard organizational response — celebrate the win and immediately load them up with the next project — is the fastest way to accelerate the crash. You are not giving them momentum. You are removing their recovery window and handing them a bill they do not yet have the capacity to pay.

Left unaddressed, this is not just a retention problem. The World Health Organization estimates that in a company of 1,000 employees, 1 worker will die by suicide every 10 years, and for every 1 who does, another 10 to 20 will have made an attempt. The Bureau of Labor Statistics identifies management occupations as having the highest share of workplace suicides, and workers in finance and insurance, where many of your highest performers sit, face suicide rates more than three times the national workplace average.

These are not numbers about weak people or troubled people. They are numbers about driven people who were never given the tools to come down from the level they were asked to sustain.

What it costs when you miss it

Losing a top performer costs a minimum of three times their annual salary in recruitment, onboarding, lost productivity and institutional knowledge that walks out with them. That is the financial cost, and it is the one that gets tracked.

The more expensive cost does not show up in any dashboard. When your highest performers quietly disengage before they leave, the organization loses its engine while the metrics still look fine. Teams feel it before leadership sees it. And by the time anyone acts, the person is already halfway out. The managers who ask why their best employee quit after their best year are asking exactly the right question. They are just asking it too late, and looking for the answer in the wrong place.

Seventy-five percent of voluntary departures are preventable. Three out of four resignations did not have to happen. The conversation around top talent retention almost always starts too late and looks in the wrong direction. And almost none of it accounts for whether the departure followed a major win.

The ones that do look in the right direction have something in common.

What organizations need to build that almost none of them have

The organizations that keep top talent through high-output cycles are not doing it with better perks or faster promotions. They are doing it by building something most companies have never considered: a plan for what comes after the win.

That plan has three components. The first is awareness. Every leader and every executive needs to understand what the post-win crash actually is, what it feels like from the inside and why the people most likely to experience it are the people they can least afford to lose. Without that foundation, every other intervention is guesswork.

The second is a structured window. Every major win should come with an intentional recovery period, anywhere from 48 hours to seven days, where the expectation shifts from acceleration to integration. Not a vacation. Not a performance review. A guided process built around three questions every leader should be asking their top performers after a major finish: What did this cost you? What part of this actually mattered? What do you need before you can give us full energy again? Each person’s answer looks different. That is the point. A one-size retention policy does not account for the fact that the biological cost of finishing something significant is personal, cumulative and different for every high performer on your team.

The third is someone who can walk them through it. Employee retention starts with leadership, but leaders cannot guide people through a cycle they were never taught to recognize in themselves. The way you manage energy across your team after a major finish is not a wellness initiative. It is a skill. And like every skill, it improves when someone names what is happening, provides the right tools and creates space to actually use them.

Your best people are not leaving because of you.

They are leaving because nobody, including them, understood what finishing something that hard was going to cost. Nobody taught them how to come down. And nobody in your organization had a plan for the part that comes after the win.

That changes when we decide it does. And the cost of waiting is higher than most organizations have been willing to look at directly.

Key Takeaways

  • Top performers quit after their biggest wins because the dopamine, adrenaline and cortisol cocktail they’re running on drops fast after the goal is hit.
  • What follows is what researchers call post-achievement depression, or the success crash. The result looks like disengagement. It gets treated like a management problem. It is neither.
  • Organizations that keep top talent through high-output cycles have a plan for what comes after the win. The plan includes awareness, a structured recovery window and someone who can walk them through it.

When a top performer hands in their notice, the instinct is to look inward.

Why do high performers leave? Why did my best employee quit? Why are my best employees leaving right after their biggest wins? The answer most organizations reach for is familiar: compensation, culture, management, growth path. Sometimes it is those things.

But there is a pattern showing up inside high-performing teams that none of those explanations account for. It tends to strike at the worst possible moment — right after a major win.



Source link

Why Your Top Performers Quit Right After Their Biggest Wins (and How to Prevent It) Read More »

Why Software Quality Is Now a Founder-Level Problem, Not Just an Engineering One


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Key Takeaways

  • Building software has never been easier, but verifying that what you build actually works is still a challenge. And it’s no longer just an engineering problem; it’s a founder problem, too.
  • At the speed teams are now shipping, the cost of missing quality shows up in ways that are hard to recover from: security breaches, customer trust, reputation, investor confidence, compliance risk, etc.
  • In most companies, quality looks covered on paper. But a process that worked when humans wrote every line doesn’t automatically hold when an agent writes 95% of it and a human skims the rest. 
  • The assurance gap is real. Founders, product teams and engineering leads — everyone has a role in closing it.

We’re living in the best time to build software. AI writes code faster than any team can review it, development cycles have collapsed, and barriers to shipping have never been lower. 

With the rise of vibe coding, almost anyone can be a coder now, and the market is already reflecting that. Twenty-five percent of Y Combinator’s Winter 2025 startups had codebases that were 95% AI-generated.

The first version of a product has never been easier to create. But software isn’t judged by how fast it shows up in a repo. It’s judged by whether it holds up once real users, real data and real attackers arrive.

However, every superpower comes with a blind spot — and ours is quality. Building got easy. Verifying that what we built actually works did not. In 2026, it quietly moved up the org chart. It’s no longer just an engineering problem. It’s a founder problem, too.

When quality breaks, the business breaks

A December 2025 analysis of 470 open-source pull requests found that AI-co-authored code contained roughly 1.7 times more issues than human-written code, with security vulnerabilities at up to 2.74 times the rate. 

At the speed teams are now shipping, the cost of missing quality shows up in ways that are hard to recover from.

  • Security breaches: The assumption that AI-generated code is production-ready is one of the most expensive mistakes a team can make. Lovable, a popular vibe coding platform, had critical security vulnerabilities in over 10% of the live apps sampled from its own showcase. The root cause wasn’t a sophisticated attack. It was AI-generated code that simply skipped basic security configurations.
  • Customer trust: Users don’t read incident reports. They don’t care whether the bug came from a human or an AI; they just know the product failed them. Moltbook, one of the most talked-about AI social networks at the time, exposed 1.5 million API tokens and 35,000 email addresses through a single misconfigured database in AI-generated code. The reputational damage spread faster than the patch ever could.
  • Reputation and investor confidence: Quality failures don’t stay in the engineering team. They show up in board meetings, investor updates and press coverage. In 2026, software quality is a business risk, and founders are accountable for business risk.
  • Regulatory and compliance risk: AI doesn’t understand compliance obligations; it just writes code. GDPR, HIPAA, data residency requirements — these don’t come baked into a prompt. And unlike a security breach that shows up quickly, a compliance failure can sit quietly in a codebase for months before anyone notices. By the time it does, it’s not an engineering fix. It’s a legal one.

These look like four different problems. They’re the same one wearing four costumes: speed that outran verification. When nobody owns the gap between how fast you ship and how well you check, it surfaces wherever the business is most exposed.

The accountability gap nobody talks about

In most companies, quality looks covered on paper. There’s a QA team, a review process, a definition of done. But a process that worked when humans wrote every line doesn’t automatically hold when an agent writes 95% of it and a human skims the rest. 

The checks were built for a slower kind of mistake. So when something breaks in production, the fallout doesn’t end at engineering. 

It travels up to the product lead, to the CTO and eventually to the founder. And by the time it gets there, it’s not just a technical problem anymore. It’s a company problem.

What I know from being in this space is that AI has made speed a commodity. Every team is fast now. Every team is shipping. Speed alone will not keep you afloat anymore. What will is quality, and for that, you need the founder in the picture, captaining the boat.

This is something I’ve learned firsthand at TestMu AI. Across hundreds of conversations with engineering and product leaders, from early-stage startups to large enterprises, one thing stays constant. 

The ones shipping with confidence aren’t defined by their size or their headcount. They’re defined by how seriously they take quality. Whether you’re a team of five or 500, quality has to be the goal.

What changes when the founder owns it

Founder-level accountability isn’t about the founder reviewing pull requests. It’s about three shifts in how the company treats quality.

First, quality becomes a number of leadership watches, not a status QA reports once a sprint. If revenue and burn get a dashboard, so should escape rate, security findings and time-to-detection.

Second, AI output gets treated as a draft, not a deliverable. The default assumption is untrusted until verified, the same way you’d treat code from a contractor you’ve never worked with.

Third, verification moves into the pipeline instead of sitting at the end of it. When code is generated continuously, quality has to be checked continuously. A gate at the finish line can’t keep pace with a team shipping every day.

None of this slows you down. It’s what lets a team keep moving fast without quietly betting the company on code nobody actually verified.

The assurance gap is real. And it widens every quarter; nobody is watching it. Founders, product teams and engineering leads — everyone has a role in closing it. But it only becomes everyone’s priority when it starts at the top.

Key Takeaways

  • Building software has never been easier, but verifying that what you build actually works is still a challenge. And it’s no longer just an engineering problem; it’s a founder problem, too.
  • At the speed teams are now shipping, the cost of missing quality shows up in ways that are hard to recover from: security breaches, customer trust, reputation, investor confidence, compliance risk, etc.
  • In most companies, quality looks covered on paper. But a process that worked when humans wrote every line doesn’t automatically hold when an agent writes 95% of it and a human skims the rest. 
  • The assurance gap is real. Founders, product teams and engineering leads — everyone has a role in closing it.

We’re living in the best time to build software. AI writes code faster than any team can review it, development cycles have collapsed, and barriers to shipping have never been lower. 

With the rise of vibe coding, almost anyone can be a coder now, and the market is already reflecting that. Twenty-five percent of Y Combinator’s Winter 2025 startups had codebases that were 95% AI-generated.

The first version of a product has never been easier to create. But software isn’t judged by how fast it shows up in a repo. It’s judged by whether it holds up once real users, real data and real attackers arrive.



Source link

Why Software Quality Is Now a Founder-Level Problem, Not Just an Engineering One Read More »