March 2024

Leveraging Data Analytics in Real Estate Investing

Leveraging Data Analytics in Real Estate Investing


There’s no denying that big data and data analytics tools are transforming the real estate landscape. But just how is this happening? What is behind the power of analytics in real estate investing—beyond simply saving you time trawling through sales records? 

Let’s dive deeper into how real estate data analytics tools source, process, and use data to help investors make better decisions. 

Traditional Data Sources for Investors: The Local County and the MLS

First: Where does reliable property data come from? The first port of call for any real estate investor is publicly available property data contained in county records.

The key information held in these records includes the deed details and information on any liens against the property, as well as mortgage details and plat maps (e.g., details about land boundaries). 

These records are invaluable for a real estate investor because they help identify potential investment opportunities. A homeowner whose property has a lien against it (say, a tax claim) or that has an underwater mortgage or is in pre-foreclosure is likely to be motivated to sell to a cash buyer. 

Typically, obtaining these records means going to a local county tax assessor’s office, though some states have the public property data available online. That is, unless you are in a nondisclosure state, in which case you’d only be able to access the data through the multiple listing service (MLS). The MLS is available to licensed real estate professionals, so you’d need to earn a license or work with an agent to get the data.

If you do choose to work with an agent, they’ll typically send you a sheet full of sales figures, rental history data, and so on. It’s then up to you to make sense of it, which is time-consuming and, frankly, can be confusing.

Regardless of whether you’re able to access property data online, at a local tax assessor’s office, or through the MLS, you’ll likely end up going through the data house by house. 

Big Data in Action: Tools and Techniques for Investors

This is where real estate data analytics software can be useful. From the simple perspective of saving valuable time and identifying potential investment properties more efficiently, real estate data analytics tools will trawl through public records and MLS sales records for you, identifying potentially suitable homes. Analytics platforms like CoreLogic and Zilculator search through billions of records: CoreLogic boasts having access to records covering 99% of the U.S. population, or over 5 billion housing records. 

These platforms aggregate and then analyze the data, presenting the potential investor with potential leads. Some platforms are more detailed than others in what they include in the data analysis, but Zilculator, for example, calculates projected ROI, cash flow, and even profits after tax on properties it identifies as suitable during the search. 

Having said all this, property data-crunching will only get you so far. Ultimately, real estate decisions should always take into account local demographics and migration patterns. You won’t know what renters are looking for in a particular area or whether a local market is hot or not just by looking at property sales details. 

Real estate data analytics tools use geographical, demographic, and user behavior data to help you really get a feel of a local market. They do this similarly to Google Analytics, but in a much more targeted way because the data are real estate-specific. For example, you can get insights into prospective buyers’ or renters’ ages or what types of properties people are looking at the most on property websites and property-related ads.

Applying Data Analytics to Identify Market Trends

Let’s imagine you’re about to invest in a specific neighborhood of a popular metro area. How do you perform market trend analysis? How do you know whether people are likely to move into or leave the area within the next five years, whether home and rental prices here will continue growing steadily, or whether they are vulnerable to decline?

Traditionally, you would have to gain access to demographics reports and home price data and try to make sense of what was going on manually. That, of course, is how mistakes are made: To make statistically significant conclusions, you would have had to analyze data sets far larger than any investor can over a short period of time before making a home purchase. 

The benefit of data analysis tools is that they process vast quantities of data from multiple sources, including reports from ATTOM, Quantarium, and Terradatum. But these tools also use what we call unconventional or nontraditional data sources to identify market trends more accurately. These data sources range from local Yelp reviews of neighborhoods and restaurants to mobile phone signal patterns. In other words, they’re attempting to track how people feel about specific neighborhoods—and whether they’ll want to stay there. 

Predictive Analytics for Property Valuation

Nontraditional or nonlinear data sources also power predictive analytics tools that help investors in appraising property values. Again, there’s a combination of sheer volume and an acknowledgment that analyzing human behavior goes a long way toward predicting real estate investment performance. 

Traditionally, if you want to do a property valuation, you would perform a comparative market analysis by looking at how other properties in the area have appreciated over time. You would consider factors like local schools and amenities. 

Again, there’s ample room for mistakes here if you’re only comparing the property you’re about to buy with only five or even 20 others. A real estate analytics tool will give you a more accurate valuation based on thousands of other similar properties nearby.  

But again, that is only half of the equation. The other half takes into account nonlinear relationships between people’s preferences and home values. Remember when Zillow discovered that Seattle apartments appreciated more over time if they were in proximity to Whole Foods? That’s an important nonlinear relationship right there: an alchemic reaction between an urban population that valued access to high-quality, organic food.

Data analytics tools factor this type of highly localized data into their appraisals. Traditional appraisal methods easily miss such valuable insights.  

Case Studies: Success Stories of Data-Driven Real Estate Investments

Big data is already making big changes for real estate investors. One recent example is Dallas-based real estate investment firm Metro Realty Group. Metro Realty’s pain points were accurately measuring real estate performance and identifying lucrative new investment opportunities. 

The firm then partnered with Power App, developed by TechSolutions. The result was an 18% increase in profitability and a 30% rise in investment accuracy. Because the firm now had real-time data, it could make better decisions about which properties to invest in. 

Another issue real estate investors often face is an inability to connect with the right client base, whether that’s renters or buyers. San Francisco-based real estate agency RE/MAX was struggling to attract buyers. Using real estate data analytics tools, however, it was able to recraft its marketing campaigns and target the right audience by tracking demographics, online behavior, and interests. The result? A 20% increase in leads. 

And on the BiggerPockets blog, Eric Fernwood has shared how he uses real estate data analytics to fine-tune his investment decisions based on a very specific category of tenant he’s trying to attract.

Final Thoughts

Big data in real estate is all about using vast quantities of information to gauge precise, granular results relevant to your local market and specific goals as an investor. And to seamlessly integrate these insights into actionable strategies, consider leveraging DealMachine. It’s your gateway to maximizing the potential of big data in real estate, enabling you to find, analyze, and secure the best deals with precision and efficiency.

This article is presented by DealMachine

DealMachine

DealMachine empowers real estate professionals to discover and invest in off-market properties with ease, offering a comprehensive app that guides you every step of the way. From identifying potential investments to instantly accessing high-quality homeowner data for informed decision-making, we make investing simple and effective. Click to start expanding your portfolio today!

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link

Leveraging Data Analytics in Real Estate Investing Read More »

What to know about renting a condo or co-op apartment

What to know about renting a condo or co-op apartment


Portra | E+ | Getty Images

Spring is almost here — and people looking for a new rental face a competitive market.

Asking rent prices in the U.S. jumped to $1,959 in February, according to Zillow Group’s latest Rental Market Report. That’s up just 0.4% from the month prior, but a 3.5% increase from a year ago.

The national rental vacancy rate remained flat at 6.6% by the end of the fourth quarter of 2023, according to the Federal Reserve.

Vacancies have increased in some cities due to new builds, and more new apartment buildings are expected to hit the rental market in 2024. Yet, some cities have few open apartments. New York City’s vacancy rate recently hit 1.4%, the lowest level since 1968.

More from Personal Finance:
Equal Pay Day highlights $1.2 million salary shortfall for some women
How to use rent reporting services to improve credit
Three ways Gen Zers can build credit before renting their own place

Consumers hunting for a new place may encounter different types of rental properties available on the market, from straight-forward rental buildings to properties that may come with their own particularities, such as condos and housing cooperatives.

“Buildings really determine their own policies for what an owner can do if they decide to rent out the unit and for how long, and what the requirements are for doing that,” said Carlo Romero, a StreetEasy concierge.

That means if you are looking at a rental, you should consider what the application process is like, any fees that are involved and what amenities you will have access to, experts say.

Upfront fees can vary significantly

Properties such as condominiums and co-ops tend to carry high upfront fees, while traditional rental buildings are more likely to be under local rent regulation policies.

“In a condo or co-op building, upfront costs and fees are determined at the building level and they can vary significantly,” Romero said. “An application fee for renting a condo might be several hundred dollars, maybe even a thousand. And there are often move-in fees or move-out fees associated.”

To compare, for a typical rental building, according to New York state law, the application fee is capped at $20, and the security deposit is limited to one month’s rent, Romero said. Wisconsin has a similar cap where the application fee must not exceed $20.

Rhode Island has a new state law that prohibits landlords, rental agents and property managers from charging application fees to rental applicants beyond the actual cost of conducting certain background checks if needed.

In addition to the monthly rent, make sure to inquire about all the additional costs you may be responsible for in a potential unit.

What to know about renting a condo or co-op

How homeowners associations became so powerful

For perspective, the average HOA fee for condo owners is $300 to $400 a month, but they can go over $1,000 a month in some markets, according to RubyHome, a luxury real estate site.

In most cases, a tenant who rents a condo has the same privileges as the owner would, said Romero. However, as a potential renter, it’s important to ask before signing the lease if access to such amenities is granted to tenants.

Some buildings in New York, for example, have units available for both condo owners and renters, but condo owners might have access to some amenities that are not available for tenants, said Romero

2. Co-ops

If a co-op building allows shareholders to rent their units, the prospective tenant may need to apply to live in the co-op and go through a co-op board approval process.

The application process for a co-op is truly up for consideration by the board of the building, “and they can reject an applicant for any reason,” said Romero. 

Each building may have their own set of requirements. It could require an independent background check with additional fees, experts say.

“A co-op is like a corporation. They have to like you, have you be one of them,” said Frank Dong, a real estate agent with Redfin.

Additionally, co-op buildings may have rules that limit how long a renter can live there, said Romero.

If you can buy instead of rent right now do it, don't wait, says Shark Tank's Barbara Corcoran

3. Traditional rental buildings

While condos and co-op buildings may have limitations to how long a renter can live there, tenants have more certainty that they can continue renting in traditional rental buildings. In such properties, you don’t typically run the risk of an owner wanting to live in that unit, or face building policies that limit how long you can stay.

Additionally, “the application tends to be a lot more straightforward,” said Romero. You know what the application fee is going to be, you know what the security deposit is going to be and you know how much you’re going to have to pay upfront.

Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:



Source link

What to know about renting a condo or co-op apartment Read More »

Making 0K on ONE Rental and Why Rob STOPPED Buying Real Estate…

Making $500K on ONE Rental and Why Rob STOPPED Buying Real Estate…


You hear us talk a lot about buying real estate, but what real estate deals are WE doing in 2024? Today, we’re pulling back the curtain on our portfolios, walking you through actual deals we’re doing, how much they cost us, how much they’re making, and why, surprisingly, one of us STOPPED buying real estate to focus on something that’ll make much more money. Want to know what it is? We’re about to give you every detail you need to repeat the real estate deals we’re doing!

First, Rob will talk about his Pink Pickle…yes, you read that right. It’s the newest bachelorette party-themed short-term rental in Austin, Texas! This short-term rental has everything you’d ever need: a pink pickleball court, a pink dinosaur, a mysterious red button that you SHOULD NOT PRESS, and an above-ground pool. This property took a LOT of work, but it only happened because of a real estate deal gone wrong.

Next, David gives a masterclass on how to make half a MILLION dollars in equity on one rental property. He also shows you how having an investor’s eye can allow you to TRIPLE the square footage of a home and skyrocket the rents, making you much more cash flow than you thought possible. And no one even wanted this property in the first place! How do you find these hidden deals? Stick around; we’ll show you!

David:
This is the BiggerPockets Podcast show, 9 1 4. What’s going on everyone? This is David, your host of the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast. And boy am I happy to be here today with my good buddy, Rob Abasolo, as we pull back the curtains and show y’all what we got going on with our own real estate projects.

Rob:
Good to be here once again, fellow host David. I’m, I’m excited about today. We have a good episode that we’re calling Catching Up with the Cast, where we will give you all of the hot goss of everything going on in our real estate portfolios in 2024.

David:
And nobody loves Hot Goss more than Robert. What’s your favorite Ryan Gosling movie, by the way? Is it, uh, behind The Pines? Was it Barbie? I

Rob:
Think I’m gonna Go Crazy Stupid Love, which I know is a bit, uh, unconventional for, for the Baby Goose Gospel himself. I know a lot of people like the Notebook like yourself, but yeah, dude, crazy, stupid. Love’s a good one.

David:
That’s right. On this episode, you’re gonna be learning about what Rob and I are doing in our own investment journeys to help inform you on yours. You’re gonna hear about how our portfolios are performing and what deals we’re actually working on a little bit into the day to day of how we’re pulling off deals in 2024, what strategies we’re using and the approaches that we’re taking. So without further ado, let’s get into today’s show. All right, Rob, let’s start with you. How is your portfolio performing right now?

Rob:
You know what, it is actually looking pretty dang good relative to where we were a year ago. I, I’ve been talking about this for a bit now, reinvesting back into my properties, all that good stuff, and I’m finally starting to see the results, uh, on a lot of the different properties that I’ve put my money back into versus, you know, I think a year ago I was really into this mindset of wanting to buy more and acquire more, but I’ve just tried to be disciplined and trying to do what we call portfolio revenue optimization. So I would say for the most part, um, other than maybe two properties, that one of them is down relatively significantly on the short term rental side. Uh, still profitable, but just not making as much as it was in 2021. Surprise, surprise. I had another property that took a, maybe like a two or 3% dip, and everything else, for the most part has either performed the same, if not significantly better, AKA or Scottsdale property. That one has really, uh, you know, that one’s turned a corner for us, which has been really, really fun to experience.

David:
Yes, it has. And hopefully more corners to turn in the future as we just slowly and steady keep adding amenities. So on that topic, are you buying more properties right now or are you increasing amenities like what we did in Scottsdale?

Rob:
That’s a very good question. The answer is yes, no, maybe everything. Um, I actually just released a video on my YouTube channel called Why I Stopped buying real Estate and Why You Should Too. And basically, I talked about this idea that we all get caught up in door count, um, which we’ve all been there like, right? Like we all want more doors. We, we’ve gone to the real estate meetups and everyone’s like, I’ve got 70 doors, and it’s like, oh, I need more doors. But I’ve really been more into this idea of making meaningful doors. So yes, I am buying more properties, however, the properties that I’m buying right now are bigger development deals. For example, we’re currently looking at like a six to $8 million hotel deal that would be effectively a 22 door complex. Much more meaningful to what I’m looking to do in the real estate world. I’m not necessarily taking down single family residences the way I once was. Instead of doing that, I am taking the same amount of money that I would typically have used to deploy into real estate. And really just putting that back into my portfolio. We’ll get into one of the deals that I’m talking about specifically where I did sink a pretty penny into it, but the results have been pretty astounding. What about you? Uh, are you buying more properties or what’s your approach been?

David:
Oh man, I bought a whole bunch of it one time. You and I have talked about that. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Then I ran into a whole bunch of headaches with the city. Long, long story there, but, uh, I bought in really nice neighborhoods. The neighbors did not want rental properties in their neighborhoods, and I came across problems I haven’t come across before. So I tried to get people in place to fix those problems. They didn’t really get any progress made. I finally switched to new people. I’m on my third group of people and they’re doing great. So these people have become employees of mine now. I pay them to be in-house property managers for my projects. And we are finally starting to see light at the end of the tunnel. I got maybe another couple months and I’ll have all the permits cleared the city good with everything. Basically the neighbors all get together and they call the city and made it seem like I’m Blackstone coming in to buy up their neighborhoods. And when we finally were able to get in touch with the city officials, we’re like, no, we’re not at all. We’re just regular people that are, you guys are crushing us with these, uh, permits that, I mean, basically Rob, they were telling me that I needed to tear down structures on the property that had been there for 80 years.

Rob:
Yeah, that’s crazy, man.

David:
Right? 80 years ago, someone didn’t complete the permitting process, and so they want me to take down the duplex that’s on the property, but good news is, is I’m turning the corner and once that’s done, it’s kind of like, all right, now let’s go clean up all the pieces, put everything back together, start rebuilding, and then look at start buying more properties. And I think things are gonna be looking good for me in the future. So in the market you’re looking at today, what headwinds are you seeing that are slowing things down for investors?

Rob:
Uh, yeah, I mean obviously I think the, the big elephant in the room is interest rates. We are seeing them go down a little bit. Um, and so as a result, I still think that we’re a bit in a stalemate where people have really low interest rate homes and they don’t wanna sell them because then where are they gonna go? You know, they’re gonna have to pay five, six, 7%. So I think that has ultimately kind of caused this really weird stalemate in the market. I think interest rates also make it really, really difficult to, I dunno, produce a meaningful cash on cash return, which isn’t really the, the golden metric it used to be, but it’s still very important to a lot of investors. And a lot of investors say, well, if I’m not gonna make money on this deal or if there’s not enough room for error, then I’m just not gonna do it. Other than that, I, I wouldn’t say like, too much more has changed because I would honestly argue that competition has kind of subsided a little bit and we’re no longer in this era where you have to make an offer that’s $50,000 over asking and waiving all your contingencies.

David:
Yeah, I would agree. I think we have an inventory problem more than anything. There’s not enough houses to buy. You mentioned what contributes to that. Part of it is lower interest rates, keeping people from putting their properties on the market. And that’s further compounded by people don’t wanna sell their house because what are they gonna buy? There’s not much out there to buy. So there’s just not a lot of options. So demand goes up, supply doesn’t keep up. We’re still not really building many houses. So the good news is you’re not having to pay massively over asking price in a lot of markets like you were before. The bad news is it’s very hard to get cash flow. So if you wanna be buying real estate now, you kind of gotta take a longer term approach. So you can’t just set it and forget it now.

David:
You have to always be thinking about how do I get a leg up on the competition? What’s going on in the algorithms? What are the people who are booking short term rentals looking for? What are tenants and markets looking for? How do I get into a new niche like medium term rentals? What markets does that work in? What markets are other investors missing? It’s sort of becoming, in a sense, like a day trader in stocks. Like, I gotta know everything going on in the market so that I can make these like minute, quick adjustments, which is great, which is why podcasts like this are that much more valuable because if you don’t know what’s going on and your competition does, they’re gonna beat you.

Rob:
Yeah. Uh, I guess I’d like to clarify too a little bit. I said that I’m not buying as much. I mean, I’m still buying for the purposes of cost segregations and tax benefits. I’m just not doing, I’m just, I I’m approaching real estate very differently. And so yes, 2024 is a little bit more competitive. I’m kind of, I’m not gonna say hedging my bets, but I’m, I’m changing my strategy. I’m doing a lot more off market and creative finance deals, which is how I’m able to make things pencil for my personal strategy a lot more, I don’t know, meaningfully. So we can actually talk about this as in, in this next deal if you, if you’re down,

David:
I was just getting ready to ask you man. Alright, we’re gonna take a quick break, but on the other side, Rob and I walk through details of real deals that we are doing in today’s market. So stick around,

Rob:
Welcome back, friends, frenemies, investors, and everyone in between. David and I are catching up on what’s working for us in our portfolios today, specifically what we’re learning from our deals right now that you can apply right at home.

David:
That’s right. And you’re up first in the hot seat. Rob, tell us about the deal that you are calling the pink pickle.

Rob:
Okay, so the latest deal that I’ve finished, um, I started this back in, hmm, back in May. So it’s honestly, it’s taken a little bit of time, but, um, this is in Austin, Texas. Um, the strategy that I used to acquire this property was creative finance. It was actually kind of a mixture of strategies. So I was able to acquire this creative finance and it basically turned into what we call a brrrrster here at BiggerPockets, which is a full on renovation, buy, rehab, rent, refinance, repeat. That’s the typical method. But I bought, I bought it, rehabbed it, short-term, rented it, and now I’m probably gonna refi and do that strategy. But it’s been a whole journey for me, man. I spent $440,000 for this specific property. I invested pretty heavily into the design of it. I would say the a RV on this property is in the neighborhood of $700,000. Uh, which actually isn’t like a, I know that sounds like a really big increase in value, which it is, but I also invested a significant amount of money into this property. So I would say it’s actually probably a little closer to a wash. I’d turn a small profit if I were to go out and sell it. But I’ve had some bumps and bruises on this one. I’ll pause for questions.

David:
All right, so let’s get into this thing. Uh, and by the way, bumps and bruises are not uncommon in this market. I basically was in a fiery dumpster fire of a car crash, so, uh, don’t feel bad Rob. ’cause it happens to the best of us. All right. I’m sure, knowing you that you bought a short term rental, tell me what your intention was going into this property.

Rob:
Yeah, so this one was supposed to be a a, a nice little creative finance flip. Uh, it’s called a sub tail, where you basically creatively finance the property while you rehab it, and then you retail it and sell it. So I came into this thinking it was gonna be a flip and that I was gonna make, you know, I don’t know, $50,000 on it, 75, something like that. That was the initial idea as I got into the flip, a lot of skeletons in the closet, if you will. Uh, and in between the studs and two by fours. And pretty much everything was wrong with this house.

David:
Side note, we may need to rename this podcast between the studs. You just gave me a great idea. <laugh> like between Two ferns? Yeah, between two studs could become the new name for the bigger podcast.

Rob:
That’ll be our YouTube series.

David:
Yes. All right. As you were,

Rob:
Yeah. So it was meant to be a flip and I was gonna come into this thing and, uh, I was gonna have to invest, you know, I, I think it was initially the budget was like a hundred and the upside was I was gonna make like up to a hundred thousand dollars on the, on the exit for this. Well, the Austin market really corrected itself very quickly in the time that I owned this property. And honestly, I’m kind of glad because I, I waited about a month, month and a half before I started this flip. And had I started immediately, I would’ve been in the middle of like a strategy that wasn’t gonna work because what I found out with this specific property was basically the money I was gonna have to spend a ton of money to break even on it. And I was like, dang, that’s never a good place to be having to spend a hundred thousand to just make your money back.

Rob:
And so I quickly thought to myself, well listen, how can I take a losing situation and turn it into a winning situation? How do I make lemonade outta lemons? And so I just decided, well, hey, I’m rehabbing this house, I’m gonna make it super nice. Why don’t I just make it like a super amazing short-term rental, which is eventually, uh, what this property ended up becoming. And I ended up really creating what I think is something, uh, I think it’s very special. We call it The Pink Pickle. It’s a bachelorette party house in Austin, Texas. If anybody wants to check it out, you can go to pinkpickleatx.com and it’s full. I mean, it’s, it’s very pink, uh, very, very, very, very pink. But it really hits on one avatar.

David:
Can confirm. Yeah. Super pink

Rob:
<laugh>. It is. But it’s amazing, man. And, um, it’s honestly like been a very creative experience for me to kind of do this. Uh, and I’ve never done anything like it. So it’s actually turned out to be what I think will be the coolest property in my portfolio.

David:
All right. I’m gonna make you give us a little more detail here, right? Okay. Other than just pink, like tell me what’s in these rooms. Tell me what you got hanging on the walls. Tell me about any extra design features you brought in. Walk me through this.

Rob:
Well, you know, I love my pickleball, right? So we’ve got a, like a hot pink pickleball court in the backyard. Um, we’ve created an amazing above ground pool. So a lot of people ask like, how can I add value? Pulls out a lot of value on the short term rental side of things, but I didn’t wanna spend a hundred thousand dollars on a pool. So what we did is we built an above ground pool and we built this whole wraparound wood deck around it, and it looks like a really premium, like really, really nice pool. Dude, I can’t believe we pulled this off for like $15,000. So now we got an amazing pool. We have a ton of murals. Uh, one of the murals says like, how do y’all, another one says, like, it’s not my first rodeo. Yeah, yeah. We’ve got neon lights that say cosmic cowgirl.

Rob:
Um, so, and then like obviously all these murals are like a mixture of hot pink and purple and all that stuff. And one of them says, lucky you. But I would say the most insane feature on this entire property, I don’t know if you saw it, but, well, first of all, there’s a pink dinosaur in the backyard. We found it at like a junker yard. And we went and we, it was green and we, I can see this. Yeah, we, uh, basically painted it like hot pink. That was cool. But the most insane feature at this property is there’s a red button when you walk in with a giant sign that says, do not push this button.

David:
Don’t push this

Rob:
Yeah. And then the moment you push the button, the lights turn off, a disco ball starts turning, and then Abba dancing Queen starts playing for one minute and you can’t stop it. So the idea is it’s our hype button. So, you know, bachelorettes come in and they’re like, oh, we need to get hyped up. And they push this button and then boom, like they can dance for a minute and then leave the house. So we have a lot of like, things like that.

David:
How’d you pick Dancing Queen to be the song that played?

Rob:
Um, well, you know what? I was, uh, advocating for Shania Twain, uh,

David:
Man, I feel like a woman.

Rob:
Yeah, that one Uhuh because that, that’s, you know, that’s my song right there. But, uh, I interviewed several ladies, I asked them for their opinions and they all agree that Abba’s just very iconic to that, to that demographic. So, you know, Hey, I, I had to listen to my avatar, you know, let

David:
Me know in the comments everybody what song you would have put. Had this been your property and you wanted something to come on, uh, I’m surprised you make me feel like a natural woman didn’t make the shortlist there. All right, so you also have pink felt on your pool table. You have cowboy hats hung on the white wall. Look like you have kind of like a bar set up with like a a yes look a hole in the drywall between rooms. I did something very similar on a cabin of mine in Blue Ridge, Georgia where I converted a garage and I basically had like, uh, a wall like separating two rooms and it has to be there ’cause there’s a beam, so you can’t get rid of the wall. But I did what you did. I punched a big hole in the wall and then I put a bar so you could kind of pass through drinks between the two spaces. Right. Can you share what you did there?

Rob:
Yeah, so that was an idea for my contractor. Um, and he was basically like, Hey man, your space is kind of closed, but I think if we knocked this down, it is a load bearing wall. We’ll have to put in a beam. But he is like, it would completely open up the space and it wasn’t really a cheap thing for him to do, but we all agreed it needed to be done. And it, man, it really just changed. I mean, I would live in this house now. It’s absolutely amazing. In that same room, we’ve basically created an open game room concept, but like you said, it’s got a pink pool table on it. And then there’s what we call a selfie vanity station. So we have like a, like a, a wall that’s all pink wallpaper with about six or seven mirrors and six or seven bar stools where all the ladies and they can get ready for a night on the town to go to sixth Street in Austin. So really, I’ve gotten so much creative sort of fulfillment from this because I’ve never really approached my Airbnbs with really just hammering down on who that avatar is. And uh, that’s something that I’m starting to discover as well with the whole like pickleball court in Scottsdale, our avatar there is the pickleball player and they pay a lot of money for the three courts.

David:
Oh, that’s the plan words, the pink pickle pickle ball,

Rob:
That’s one of the play on words. Yes. Yeah. <laugh>, there’s, there are a few,

David:
We’ll leave it there now. I’m kinda jealous that you got a pink property. I, I need like the green cucumber, the, the greenhouse I needed one of my own and make it all green. <laugh>

Rob:
The dill pickle.

David:
The dill pickle. There you go. <laugh> like the, the disco ball makes green lights go around and you’ve got like artificial AstroTurf everywhere. What song would play Eye of the Tiger turns on when you push the button? <laugh>.

Rob:
I love it man. Yeah, that that’d be fun. Uh, but yeah man, the results, it’s a little early to say, but uh, we could dive into that and then you can get into your deal if you’re cool with that. Well

David:
Let’s hear, is it performing yet? Do you have it on the market? How’s it doing?

Rob:
I do. So we just listed it, I just checked April. We have about $7,800 on the books. My entire mortgage and everything on this property is about $3,000. So it, we initially, before all the renovations, if we just made it acute Airbnb, like you know, just doing my typical style, it was slated to make between like 40 to 60 probably around that $50,000 ra, ra uh, range. And now as a result to all of this, we think it’ll do a hundred k plus. So we’ve effectively added 20, $30,000 to the bottom line, which will be very significant from a cash flow perspective.

David:
Congrats man. That’s awesome. Pink Pickle ATX if you guys wanna check that out and get some inspiration for your own designs. And if you’re wondering why ATX is, because that’s how people like Rob from Texas that wanna look cool, talk about their hometowns. He lives in H-T-X-A-T-X, I dunno if they call it, do they call Dallas DTX?

Rob:
No, but I do travel to Portland, which is PDX.

David:
There you go

Rob:
I’ve actually only been there one time, but they do follow the same naming convention,

David:
Getting both useful and useless information all on the same podcast while you are entertained and educated.

Rob:
Okay. I can’t wait to hear the details of your deal specifically how you added, I don’t know, half a million dollars of equity with just $150,000 of work right after the break.

David:
And welcome back, Rob and I are here walking you through what’s working for us in today’s market. So let’s jump back in.

Rob:
Okay. So, uh, I know you’ve got a deal that you’ve been working on this this past year, so tell us about that. Yeah,

David:
I got a couple of them. So the one we’re gonna talk about today is in the East Bay of California, a city called Castro Valley. This is one of the nicer cities in the Bay Area. And uh, if you don’t know the San Francisco Bay area dynamics, it’s more than just the city of San Francisco. There’s a ton of small cities that surround it and make it up. You basically have polarized options. You have pretty expensive real estate that usually has high crime, rough tenant bases, not very desirable or you have relatively safe and stupid expensive. There is nothing in the middle out here. So Castro Valley would fall into that relatively safe, but stupid expensive. The school scores are gonna be high, the crime is gonna be low. You’re getting a lot of professionals that are there that have some really nice hospitals. It’s a good area, but you can’t get into that thing for less than a million bucks.

David:
Like every house pretty much is over a million dollars. Well I found this one when rates were just starting to go up and I saw that it was a three bedroom, one bathroom, about 1100 square feet. It was a very small property. The floor plan was a little odd, so you have to walk up the stairs to go into the house. All the houses on this street were built on Ray’s foundations. They basically had like a bi, like they were all on top of a big basement. But the garage itself was at floor level. ’cause you can’t have a Ray’s garage. So the idea would be you drive in, you park your car in the garage and you have to walk out of the garage and go up the stairs to get to your house. Or you go from the garage into a basement and then up a different set of stairs to get into the interior of the house.

David:
Well the house was sitting on the market at 950,000 and nobody was biting ’cause it was just this weird floor plan. It had one bathroom and it wasn’t that big. It’s a small house and for three bedrooms it’s very difficult to have only one bathroom. So they had just reduced the price to 850 and they thought they were gonna get a bidding war. Well I watched it after they reduced it about eight days in. To me that’s like this perfect period of time. If you go before seven days of pass from a price reduction, the seller’s expectations are still, I’m gonna get several offers and I’m gonna bid it right back up to the price I wanted. If you wait longer than that, you’re at risk of someone else coming in to buy it. So I jumped in right at eight days and I talked listing agent and said, do you have any offers? She said, no, we got several people looking, which is realtor, speak for it. Please write an offer. I just don’t wanna admit that that’s the case we’re at. There’s always gonna be several people looking. So I wrote the offer for uh, it was listed I think at 850. I wrote it at 825 with $30,000 in closing costs. So net it’s gonna be a little bit less than 800.

Rob:
So so like 795 or so, yeah, somewhere in there

David:
That’s about where the net would be. They countered back and then we went back and forth and we settled on 830 with 25,000 in closing costs. So we’re at about 805 now. The plan for this property was that there was some square footage that wasn’t included in the listing. It had a sunroom in the back and it also had in that basement, it had a part of the basement that was finished. It had like a bedroom that they had created to be an office. So it had drywall, it had a window, it had finished floors and they put a closet in there. It had electrical run to, it looked like a regular bedroom. You just get into it by walking through a dirty basement. It was weird. And then the area where the stairs went down from the house, they had also put laundry in.

David:
So they finished that area too. The rest of the basement was just, you know, exposed wooden beams and uh, electrical and the framing was all done. And then you have like this old garage. Well I took that room that was in the back of the house. I guess I didn’t mention that there was a room in the back of the house. It was kind of like right off the kitchen. It was an odd place for it. And then they had a sunroom in the back of the home that wasn’t included in the square footage. I basically combined the sunroom with that bedroom that was in the back and created a one bedroom unit like a junior ADU, right off the back. And I was able to put a bathroom and a kitchenette in that as well as its own laundry. So that’s like a little studio type of a property, A one one bedroom unit.

Rob:
So really fast. Tell me, tell me, because ADUs, they’re very popular in California accessory dwelling unit you just said um, a junior which is also known as a JADU.

David:
Yes sir.

Rob:
What is the distinguishing factor between both?

David:
Yeah, so an ADU is usually detached. It’s not connected to the property. It’s like a standalone structure and then a junior ADU has to be attached to the main property. It’s kind of like a little house tumor.

Rob:
Yeah, okay, that makes sense. So I actually have, I used to have what’s called like a bonus room under my house that we would rent. I’ve chosen to not rent it anymore, but what a lot of people have mentioned is, yeah, I should just convert it to a JADU and get it all the paperwork ready to rock because that’s very common in the Los Angeles area as a bonus room. But JADU, um, that’s basically if you wanna like convert like a garage or something like that too, right?

David:
Same idea. Yeah, the garage would be attached to the house. That’s a JADU. Exactly.

Rob:
Okay. Okay, that makes sense. Sorry, I didn’t mean to derail this, but some people at home may not know these strategies.

David:
That’s why you’re here, my man. Appreciate you. So we had that one bedroom unit that we converted in the back of the house. I took one of the bedrooms in the main house, the one that was right off the kitchen ’cause it’s weird to have a bedroom right off the kitchen. And I took it off of the main property, put it in that back one which left me with two bedrooms and one bathroom in the main house. And then I remodeled the kitchen. So I just made it look nicer. Now I have the appropriate square footage for a two bedroom unit. I’ve got a full family room, fireplace, dining room, remodeled kitchen and a bathroom with its own laundry. That’s like the main house. About 1100, 11 50 square feet. I’ve got that one bedroom in the back. And then I finished the basement and I occluded the attached garage.

David:
So you don’t really need garage parking that bad if the property has enough space because in California it doesn’t rain a ton. We don’t get snow, we don’t have a lot of inclement weather. You could survive without a garage, especially if you’re a tenant, you may be renting a car. It’s not your own car. So I took the garage area and I finished it and I combine it with the rest of the basement and the room that was already down there that already had laundry. And I built a bathroom and a kitchenette and I ended up with basically a three bedroom, one bathroom additional unit in the basement. Now all of this work more than doubled the square footage of this little property that was too little for anybody else to want down there. And I ended up with three units that can all be rented separately. So the plan is that that small one bedroom and the main house, two bedroom, I rent out two traveling nurses. There’s hospitals on that same street. So whenever they have placement agencies that need to put a nurse somewhere, this is like the first place that pops up for them. And then I rent out the basement unit as its own unit to a traditional person who just wants a place to live. Like somebody with a family that’s gonna want the additional bedrooms and doesn’t mind sharing a bathroom because they’re all a family.

Rob:
Okay, cool. So what was the square footage going into this property that was not captured in the, you know, in the appraiser’s office?

David:
So it was listed as, I believe 1150 and then there was probably like about 700 square feet that wasn’t included in the back of the house. That was the sunroom. And then there was another 1300 in the basement area that wasn’t included because it hadn’t been developed yet.

Rob:
Wow. Okay. So you mentioned you bought this for $795,000. It was about 1150 square feet. So that’s comes out to roughly $691 a square foot. Does it work, can you just extrapolate that out or not necessarily? Like if you doubled your square footage is every, is every square foot that you add to that property gonna be worth that $691? Is that how you’re able to increase the value?

David:
It’s close to it, but not the full 690 like that the basement that was converted won’t be worth as much as the main house. It’s not as desirable. The ceiling’s a little bit lower. It’s kind of a weird way to get into that basement. ’cause I had to create separate entrances for all the units. So you have to walk into the backyard, but it’s still close. Right? Maybe you’re adding another 500, $550 a square foot. So you took a property that was like 1150 square feet and you bump that thing up to like 3000 square feet and it’s in an area where real estate was already really expensive.

Rob:
Yeah, man, that’s, so that’s significant. So now the arv, the after repair value comes out to what with all the square footage?

David:
It’s about 1.3.

Rob:
Wow, okay. So you’ve added pretty close to $500,000 of equity somewhere in there.

David:
Yeah. And it costs about 150,000 or so to do that work.

Rob:
Dude, that is crazy. Now obviously this goes into several strategies, but the idea here is you’ll do a cash out refi, pull your out and then run ’em as rentals.

David:
That’s right. There’s a brrrr and I got three separate rentals and I’ll have two different strategies. So two of them will be medium term rentals and then the basement will be a traditional rental.

Rob:
Will you, do you think you’ll get all of your, I mean it sounds like it based on the arv, but it sounds you’ll get most of your money if not all of it out of this deal.

David:
Um, If I had wanted to, what hurt me was rates went up after I bought it. So once it was finished, I had decided like I don’t wanna pull all my money out of the deal because I don’t like how the high the rates went. So I could have yes, got it all out. I just didn’t do that.

Rob:
Yeah, yeah. Because then the interest rates would’ve maybe made the cash flow not as appetizing.

David:
Yep, that’s exactly right. But this is a great example of how in today’s market, you can’t just try to buy something out of the box with your pink pickle. You went in there and you put work into thinking about this. You hired a designer, you were intimately involved in the creation of this project and how it needed to look. You said, Hey, as it stands it would make this much, but if I do this I can double how much it makes. Same for me. I saw potential in a property that other people missed. I took advantage of a property that was sitting on the market longer than it normally would have because of what we call functional obsolescence in the real estate space. And then because I listened to the BiggerPockets podcast, I knew about medium term rentals and traditional rentals. I had all these tools that I could pull outta my tool belt to make a deal work just like you.

Rob:
Very cool man. Yeah, you know, if I’m being totally honest, even on the pink pickle, like I could cash out refi and get a, a pretty significant amount of money back, but I don’t need to. And I fi I’m fine with, I don’t, I mean I really like that my, it’s gonna be a crazy cash flow machine the way it is. So honestly, I might just wait it out and if I decide in a few months if interest rates are appetizing enough for me, I’ll do the cash out and complete the brrrr. But for now, I just really like that I’ve created a property that will make pretty dang good cash flow. So sounds like this property that you’re doing is also gonna be a cash flow machine too. It’s great. Congrats.

David:
That’s it. And when they’re in good areas like this, they’re gonna appreciate faster than what the national average does and in the future will be looking better. I like your advice there that you don’t have to pull your money out on a brrrr. You’re not losing the ability to do it, you’re just not doing it yet. If another opportunity comes out, you need some cash, that’s when you would go back and complete the burr and put it into the next deal. But if there’s nothing else available, just let it sit there and have a lower mortgage and have it cash flow stronger.

Rob:
Yep. That’s where I’m at. I’m just, uh, yeah, I, I don’t mind having equity at this time. Like I’ve worked so hard with my whole portfolio to get to optimize cash flow that’s working for me. So I’m happy to just kind of hang and be more, a little bit more methodical as we kind of get into the, the brunt of 2024. ’cause I’ve got some things I wanna do. Like I said, I’m doing some developments over here and looking at buying some stuff and going to the dark side of hotels. So yeah man, we’ll have to do another one of these pretty soon.

David:
Yes sir. And please go leave us a review wherever you listen to your podcast and follow us on the Apple and Spotify apps. Appreciate everybody, thanks for being here today. Keep an eye out for the next episode of the BiggerPockets podcast and Rob and I should be sharing more in the future. If you’d like to know more about Rob or I, you can get our personal information in the show notes. And don’t forget that BiggerPockets has an incredible full website. You could check out more information. This is David Greene for Rob, the Pink Pickle Prince Abasolo signing off.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link

Making $500K on ONE Rental and Why Rob STOPPED Buying Real Estate… Read More »

150+ Deals in 3 Years and Why You DON’T Want to Be a Landlord

150+ Deals in 3 Years and Why You DON’T Want to Be a Landlord


Most real estate investors do a few deals a year if they’re lucky. But today’s guest was doing twenty to thirty real estate deals a MONTH. That’s right—not per YEAR, per MONTH. And he did it all while scaling his real estate business at lightning speed. The best part? He didn’t have to use his own money to get there—his deals were being funded completely by private partners, and if you stick around, you’ll know exactly how to do it, too!

After closely observing investors while he was a real estate agentDon’nell Greer got the hang of finding and tackling profitable real estate deals. After much analysis paralysis, he got his first deal under contract—an $80,000 home that needed some heavy sweat equity to make it profitable. With high rents and low home prices, Don’nell knew the deal would work, but he needed more money. Through a family loan, Don’nell realized the power of private money, and once he saw the possibilities, there was no turning back.

Fast forward soon after, and Don’nell was borrowing hundreds of thousands of dollars from millionaire investors he met through his network. Thanks to the new source of funding, Don’nell was able to flip dozens of houses a month, making a life-changing business in the process. But it wasn’t all good news. Partnership problems, rising interest rates, and changing market dynamics forced Don’nell to make a hard pivot—a pivot you may have to make in the future!

Dave (00:00):
Hey everyone, welcome to the BiggerPockets podcast. I’m your host today ah Dave Meyer, and I’m joined by my friend Henry Washington. Henry, how are you?

Henry (00:09):
I’m doing fantastic, Dave. Love, love being here with you,

Dave (00:13):
Man. I’m excited to be here too. I’m just excited that you’re my co-host today. I’m excited that everyone is here listening to this podcast. I mean, you could listen to like 10 million different podcasts, but I am glad that whether you’re new or you’ve listened to 900 episodes of the BiggerPockets podcast, that you’re still here with us today learning about real estate and how to be a successful investor. Henry, what do we have in store for all of our friends and listeners today?

Henry (00:40):
So today, today we have an investor story and we share investor stories weekly here to get you inspired and to take action and provide a glimpse into what are real investors doing, what kinds of deals are they doing, and what’s happening right now in the market. So this week we’re bringing on Don’nell Greer, who’s done over 150 deals. You’ll hear about how he started investing in the Dallas-Fort Worth market, how he scaled his business there, and why he chose to exit that market.

Dave (01:08):
Don’nell has such a cool story, it’s just one of those stories of scaling really quickly, and I think he’s gonna bear it all for us. He’s gonna tell us the good parts about it, the challenging parts about it, how you get through some of those difficult times as an investor. He’s also gonna share with us how he did something that I think is super cool, which is finding the right strategy that matches your personality and your personal circumstances, and figuring out really what’s right for him. How he used my private money to scale. So there’s so much good stuff in here that I think everyone listening is gonna gain some value from. So let’s bring in Don’nell. So Don’nell, you bought five houses in 2018 in the Dallas Fort Worth area. Can you tell us a little bit about your strategy with those deals at the time and why you chose to invest in Dallas of all places?

Don’nell (01:59):
Well, first and foremost, that was just the area that I, I currently reside in. And then secondly, I, I’ve been an agent, I was an agent four years prior to that. I had a little analysis paralysis, uh, going in and uh, I mean that’s why it probably took so long for me to get from 2015, 2014 ish to, to then, uh, is because just the reading everything and, and making sure all my boxes were checked, utilize bigger pockets to, uh, understand and learn. The brrrr strategy is, is how I was able to go to buy those five houses as quickly in that, uh, first year. And then from there scale to start doing more fix and flips.

Henry (02:42):
You’re saying things that I think resonate with almost every investor looking to get started. Right. Especially if they’re in a market like a Dallas-Fort Worth, where it’s like, I am just over analyzing everything. I don’t know when I’m ready. And so what were some of the things that finally made you like, yes, now is the time, now I’m ready to do this. Like what kind of eased that, that process for you?

Don’nell (03:05):
I don’t think I actually ever got there. I just, I saw a house and I was like, I, this is the one I’m gonna do just, just for, yeah, I’m going after.

Dave (03:13):
So how Danelle did you learn to even analyze deals in the first place? ’cause I feel like that’s what some people just stop. They’re like, I’m so overwhelmed. There’s so many different things that I could possibly buy. And then they never actually start running the numbers or learning how to analyze deals. So what sort of, how did you gain that experience that you mentioned?

Don’nell (03:34):
Uh, I, I contribute a lot of that to just being an agent and running comps for, ’cause I, I worked with an investor and he finally kind of gave me, but didn’t gimme his playbook. Um, and essentially I, I, I understood how he was analyzing deals and how he looked at comps, and I basically copied and pasted what his strategy was and how he viewed some of these things. And I just basically did the same thing. Uh, and then it, it helped that I had access to MLS to where I didn’t have to go buy like prop stream or, or these other, uh, real estate softwares out there that, that do give or offer comps as a, as as a service.

Henry (04:14):
So your experience as an agent allowed you to practice running numbers, I’m sure. ’cause you were probably running numbers that your clients wanted you to run on top of the fact that you had access to the MLS, and so you had probably the best set of data you could in order to run numbers. And so you found this property and you were like, I’m just going for it. So how did you do it? Did you have any partners? Like what what’d that process look like?

Don’nell (04:38):
I, BiggerPockets was my partner, uh, <laugh>.

Dave (04:40):
Nice. We like to hear that. <laugh>.

Don’nell (04:44):
No, it was, uh, I was like, all right, I got the house on the contract now what? And I at the time was trying to figure out between hard money and utilizing private money in which I was able to utilize private money, uh, to where I <laugh> I did a little audible and instead of utilizing the private money to just buy that one house, I utilized the private money of, it was about a hundred thousand dollars and bought <laugh> all five, the the other five houses essentially is what I did. And so yeah, that’s, that’s basically I utilized, yeah, my first deal was actually from MLS, so I utilized MLS to buy the deal. Once I got the deal, I started, yeah, I was literally all over BiggerPockets forums. Like, what do I, what do I do next? Uh, I’m trying to find contractors. I’m, I’m like, oh shoot, I forgot I gotta get insurance.

Don’nell (05:36):
So all of this stuff is like happening. And mind you, like, again, like <laugh> in my head, I had all of that information and it’s like different if you, if you’re not putting it, putting it to practice. And so, yeah, like once I’m in it, now, I’m, I forgot everything from the previous years of what I’ve read or, or watched or whatever. Uh, so yeah, o once I got in the game or yeah, when I, once I got my, my jersey a little, little sweaty and dirty, uh, is when, yeah, like it, I just, I had to swim is what essentially happened. So Don’nell,

Dave (06:09):
I know you were, you were sort of joking about BiggerPockets being your partner, but I think a lot of people who listened to the show necessarily know how they can use the BiggerPockets website and the sort of broader BiggerPockets community to help them with their first deals. So do you have any advice for people about tricks or things that you did to leverage the power of the BiggerPockets community?

Don’nell (06:31):
Uh, BiggerPockets insurance contacts, right. <laugh>, like I, it literally was the playbook. Um, and I did have a few other investors that I, I asked them like, what were the resources that they were using? But again, like, I’m like BiggerPockets, BiggerPockets basically I, I learned the brrrr strategy through BiggerPockets. I, I, I, I think I was connected with a few hard money lenders through bigger BiggerPockets. So that was, it was <laugh>. It was almost like my, my, my, uh, real estate bible at the time was this, is, this is the source that I’m going to for all this information until I get to these first few deals. And then like figure out, okay, what are the, some other source or like other resources I can

Henry (07:12):
Use, you know, I think that’s helpful. ’cause a lot of people feel like sometimes with BiggerPockets they need to like dive directly into the forums and know exactly where to go look for things. And you can literally just do exactly what you did BiggerPockets house under contract and it will pull up all the articles and you can, you can read through like, the hundreds of articles of people who are in the same position of you. So I, I think that’s great information for people to see. Um, I want to, uh, backtrack a little bit on this deal. So you were on the MLS, you found this deal. Um, how did you find this deal? Was it, uh, listed for a certain amount of days? Like what, what made this deal stand out to you for

Don’nell (07:50):
This particular deal? It was in the market that I was looking in because, uh, the rental rates were pretty, pretty high. Uh, and the, the, the values of houses were just low. And the demand in this particular area is Cleburne, Texas, uh, was just booming at the time. And so I saw the listing on MLS, it popped up and it was at like a 100k or something like that. Uh, and I saw in like, as y’all know, like how, how the agents position or, or make the verbiage on a listing description, uh, like needs work or TLC stuff like that, or, uh, slightly dated or you wouldn’t need. And I’m like, this is all in my name. ’cause I was, again, not trying to get in over my head and I didn’t want anything over like 150,000 to start with. Um, and so I started, I called the agent and I started asking questions, seeing what offers that they had, um, and seeing if the, the seller was interested in, in, well if the price was flexible, we negotiated it down to $80,000 on top of, since I was an agent, I got 3% commission.

Don’nell (08:56):
So I just basically rebated it back to, uh, or put that to towards the sales price.

Henry (09:01):
So, so there’s, there’s so much gold in what you just said because, um, a lot of really analysis kind of went into you finding this deal that I don’t want people to miss out on. So if I heard you correctly, what you said was you knew the area of town that you liked, because typically the price points on those homes are lower, but the rents are fairly high. And so that’s the kind of analysis I think investors need to be doing when they’re trying to pick where they want to invest in. So you already knew if I can find a house and this price part of town for under $150,000, I think I’ll be good because the rents are high and I feel like the price points are good in that area. So then you’re looking on the MLS, you see a house pop up in that area, and then you’re looking at the keywords of that listing and the keywords are indicating to you that this house probably has some level of distress.

Henry (09:52):
And if that house has a level of distress, what you’re really saying is that the seller may be motivated to sell that property at even more of a discount. And so in order for you to figure out if that was true, you read the keywords, saw the distress, and then you reached out to the agent and had a conversation to say, Hey, what’s really going on? And you said, you said, I want to know what’s the seller’s pain point? ’cause if I can solve for that pain point, I can probably get a deal done. And I don’t want people to miss this because A, this is gold, but B, you don’t have to be an agent to do exactly what you just did. You can find a market where you feel like the price point and the rents are gonna mesh for you. And then you can set up a search.

Henry (10:36):
You don’t have to set it up on the MLS, you can set it up on realtor.com, or if you’re not an agent, have an agent set up that search for you. Say, I want homes in this particular part of town under $150,000. And then in the keywords, please indicate or look for these keywords in the, in the, in the comment section. And then as those things pop up, you’ll just get an email with those listings, and then you can have your agent reach out to those sellers and do exactly what Don’nell was just talking about. Like, this is real estate investing deal hunting 1 0 1, and I think you did a really great job identifying your deals. Okay,

Dave (11:14):
So we’ve been talking about how Don’nell got started and how he’s looking at deals, but the question is sort of how is he funding them? What would he do differently in his next partnership? And does he even like being a landlord? We get into all that right after the break. Hey everyone, welcome back. Henry and I are here with investor Don’nell Greer. Let’s jump back into our conversation.

Henry (11:37):
So you got your deal, you got the, the deal under contract at 80 grand, and you’re like, oh crap, now I need money. And so you said you raised some private money, and so what did that look like? Was it somebody you knew? Did you go cold calling people and say, gimme money? Like where did, where’d the money piece come in?

Don’nell (11:54):
It came from a family member. Um, and again, it, it was through, uh, some formal BiggerPockets about raising capital and basically the commentary or what their direction was or what they recommended was comparing it to, well, if you’ve got it in your Bank of America Chase account, you’re only making about, what, two, 3% on that in a savings account. And it’s like, I could promise you 10% interest on your money, uh, which is far greater than obviously what you’re getting now. Um, and that’s how I position it. And they kinda already knew that I was in real estate. It was from a family member and basically just saying, Hey, here’s what you’re currently getting. Here’s what I can give you.

Henry (12:36):
Boom, man, I feel, I feel like you <laugh>, you ran the, you ran the real estate investor play to a tea -I-I-I tell people all the time, if you need money for a deal, there’s probably enough money for your deal in your phone if you are willing to call people and have the right conversation. I tell people, like, when I call people and I’m looking for money, I say, look, I am going to borrow this money anyway. And if I’m going to borrow it, that means somebody’s going to make the interest. And I would much rather pay somebody I know like, and trust this money rather than some stranger who knows nothing about me or cares about me, uh, at all. And so it’s an opportunity for you. And you ran the play, you got the money, you were able to buy the deal, and so then you wanted to exit this deal, I’m sure. And so what was the exit strategy for this deal? Was it a rental? Was it a brrrr, was it a flip?

Don’nell (13:28):
Yep. So we, it was a brrrr So we, I basically did a cash out refi, paid back the, uh, private money and then, uh, rents, rinse and repeat is essentially what, what happened. Um, and from there, after doing that, I realized very, very quickly that I, I did not like being a landlord. Why not

Don’nell (13:47):
<laugh>? Yeah. Tenant started calling and I’m like, ah, man, I gotta, now I gotta find, I gotta find that contractor and then send them back to, to do X, y, Z. Now we’re getting into disputes about bedbugs and all these, these things that you don’t think about, read about really until like, once you get the deal, it’s like onto the next one. Uh, but not like the in intricacies of like actually owning that real estate now. Um, and so that’s actually when I decided I wanted to, to transition from doing the brrrrs to, uh, fix and flips.

Dave (14:19):
Well, Don’nell, I I really like that ’cause I think it’s really important for investors to find strategies and tactics that match their personalities. Like some people, me, I would never flip a house, it’s just not for me. And I have a tolerance for tenant relations that apparently you don’t. But I was curious if you, like, do you think it’s your personality, like it’s just not for you? Or did you have like just a bad luck first experience with being a landlord? It

Don’nell (14:46):
Was, uh, it’s, I think it’s a personality thing. ’cause uh, from the jump I remember going to a house that I own, that I had the direction of the, the rehab. I’m talking to a, a prospective tenant and instead of saying, yeah, we can, when they ask the question is this, is the owner negotiable on price? Well, me being the owner and talking to the prospective tenant, like right there, I’m like, ah, yeah, well let me, let me talk with him and see what he says. And like obvious little did the prospective tenant know that I’m the owner. But again, like my personality is obviously non non-confrontational. So I’m like, oh, I don’t really like, and again, so when we got into tenants asking for repairs that technically they should be responsible for, I’m, I’m basically folding and, and doing it just because I don’t want anybody to be mad at me. So

Henry (15:39):
What I hear you saying is, I won’t bill for this.

Dave (15:42):
Yeah man, I wanna be your tenant Don’nell, I’m gonna come to your, to your property and just ask for a, a rent reduction <laugh>.

Don’nell (15:50):
And yeah, like that’s the, that’s the part where you gotta have either the spouse or a partner or somebody that has that like type A personality that, that they’re like, no, like kick rocks. Like this is, this is what it is, take it or leave it. And me, I’m like, well, like maybe I can work it out. But yeah, it’s just, yeah, again, it was a personality thing for me. Well, well

Dave (16:11):
I we’re just joking around, but I do, I do really think that is super important and honestly impressive. You just need to know what you like and what you don’t like. Otherwise you’re gonna burn out like you, and, and I respect the fact that you looked at this, tried it, said, you know what, there are other ways in real estate that I can make money. So what’d you do next? Did you sell those properties and then go into sort of the transactional flipping side of things or how do you unwind that situation?

Don’nell (16:38):
So I actually still, uh, hold onto them to this day. Um, the next step for me was, I was talking with a

Dave (16:45):
But you hired a property manager?

Don’nell (16:47):
I actually, I actually didn’t because, uh, of all of those tenants, uh, well, I’ll take it back. Four of the tenants were perfect, three were felons. Uh, and what I’ve realized or come across like mistakenly was as a felon, they <laugh> they don’t have a lot of other chances and so they

Henry (17:10):
Don’t wanna screw it up.

Don’nell (17:11):
Yeah. So they’re, they’re like, I, I’m, I started texting him like, Hey, everything okay. Like, I, I hadn’t heard from you. I, I hadn’t heard from you. The rent comes and it’s never late. But at the same time I’m like, this other tenant’s calling and, and like they’re talking about a light bulb went out, but you don’t tell me anything. And he’s like, oh no, I, it’s all good. And again, we had a heart to heart conversation. He’s like, man, I just appreciate you giving me the opportunity because I don’t have any other place to go if you kick me outta here. And so he’s like, I could handle all the repairs or anything that is deficient in the house because again, I don’t want you to be upset to where you gotta raise the rent or, uh, something like that or of that nature.

Henry (17:54):
I know you said something that I think is hugely important that a lot of people don’t frequently talk about. And you said that you have, is it three tenants that are felons that have a felony conviction on the record and they are, um, great tenants. And so this is something that I think is hugely important because we as landlords have the opportunity to provide housing to people who really, really need it. And as landlords, landlords, I think we’re often taught that if somebody has a felony conviction that that’s a red flag, you should avoid them at all costs. Right? And, and that’s just not the stance that I’ve taken with my portfolio. Now I’m not saying you want to go out and rent to anybody that has a felony conviction. It’s not just, it’s not just about that they’ve made a mistake. It’s about what is that mistake?

Henry (18:48):
When was that mistake? And, and then you make a call because you could be providing somebody an opportunity for housing who doesn’t get much opportunity for it. I have a tenant who is a felon. He spent 14 years in prison for a nonviolent drug charge. And when he came to us to look at our place, he said, guys, I’ve spent several thousand dollars on application fees, uh, in order to look at places just to have them turn around and tell me no, uh, not based on anything other than the fact that I’ve been to prison. And so he, uh, he, he just wanted a shot. And so we pulled his record, we looked up everything we saw. It was a nonviolent conviction. He served his time. We met the guy in person. He seemed like a really great person, and he was remorseful for what he did.

Henry (19:46):
And he said, I just need an opportunity. And so we gave him an opportunity. And this guy has by far been the best tenant I’ve ever had. He mows the grass for the whole place. There’s an elderly woman next door, he mows her grass, he takes care of her. Like this guy just needed a shot and we were able to give him that. And so I love that that’s something that you do because I want other people who are landlords to consider this, like, do your due diligence and make sure that that person fits. Obviously I’ve had a, I’ve had a convicted felon who wanted to live in a multifamily, but his crime was, um, a little more violent. And so we couldn’t allow him to live in that multifamily ’cause there’s other families that live there. Um, so you have to do your due diligence, but there are people who’ve made mistakes who just need an opportunity. And we as people who provide housing can, can provide that, that opportunity. And I just love hearing somebody who didn’t just see a felony conviction and turn somebody away. So thank you for,

Don’nell (20:46):
For doing that. As I transitioned from, uh, holding these and not hiring a property manager like I probably should have, but, um, I was talking with a buddy of mine <laugh> to, uh, to see how we can scale it up. Because again, it, I was, I was doing a cash out refi from these brrrrs, but at the same time I was, I was putting, putting it into another property versus like, not necess, well, not necessarily going into my bank account. Uh, so my net worth was growing, but not my, like, not my active income was growing. Um, and so talked with a buddy of mine and, and we were trying to figure out how to scale it up. And so he, he put me in touch with a, uh, guy. He, he had sold his scrap metal business here in Dallas, and he was sitting on about 30 or $40 million and he was, he’s been ready and looking to get into real estate.

Don’nell (21:40):
So we, we met him over coffee one day, uh, I think it was maybe 30 minutes, and I think he showed up like 15 minutes late. Um, and so he, he heard all he needed to hear. We had the, the, the documents just kind of showing like what, what I’ve done, like the ROI he could potentially make. And that day he basically lit, lit me $160,000 and it was like, what’s, what’s the catch? And, uh, no, like that <laugh>. I’m like, are you gonna follow me? And like, what, what’s what’s happening here? Like, uh, don’t

Dave (22:13):
Ask any questions, just go

Don’nell (22:15):
<laugh>. Yeah, no, I’m like, in my head I’m like, is is he gonna kill me after like I’m, this can’t be true. ’cause again, like I’m like, that’s $160,000. Like not a, like if I lend you $200, like next week, two weeks from here, I’m, I’m probably like, Hey, like, where’s that $200? And like the, the beau the beautiful part about that was he, half the time I was trying to track him down to like give him updates. ’cause I’m like, man, he’s, he’s reached a level of money that I know nothing about. Uh, so anyway, we, we’ve utilized that $160,000, uh, to, to flip the first deal. He was all on, all on board from there, uh, when it was all said and done, he was, I think he was all in $750,000, which again, uh, I think we went like three months of sending him a text, trying to call him it, my man’s this ghost, like didn’t hear anything from him. And I’m like, that’s crazy that you’ve got all this money sitting in an account with basically a stranger you met over coffee. Um, and so again, like I used to hear and read like people raising money and it was just like, nobody’s gonna give you a hundred thousand dollars. Like, that’s, that’s, that’s crazy to think about. Uh, but again, like as I, I I’ve been on this real estate journey and just started asking, but also utilizing my experience to back like the reasons why you should basic, you should, uh, lend to me.

Henry (23:45):
I feel like you, you did all the things right, right? You went to this person who you were going to say, I would like a piece of this umpteen millions of dollars that you just had, but you didn’t just say, sir, give me money. I heard you say you went to him and you had kind of like a portfolio or some documentation showing your success history. And I think that that’s huge. I teach people to do that all the time. Every deal you do, just make it a slide and a PowerPoint and keep that PowerPoint running. Just a picture of the property before and after what you paid for, what you put into it, what you did to exit it. Like that’ll go a long way to showing these people who have this money, who want to make more than you know, 1% in the bank.

Henry (24:24):
Like I’m sure you showed him your success history and he was like, yeah man, let’s do this thing. So if you’re prepared and you speak from a place of confidence and uh, and you can talk about, hey, this is what we do, this is what we look for, this is how we monetize it, and this is the history that I’ve done. I think you’ve got a lot of opportunity to raise private money. And so I feel like, man, you ran, you ran that play to perfection. So you raised this private money, are you using it, were you using it just for flips at that point?

Don’nell (24:51):
Yeah, so I was, it was only flips. He told me to, it was we using a, a analogy of red light, yellow light, green light. And the, I had the green light. He was like, just go buy as much as real estate as you can. And which then that’s what I did. So we started pretty slow again. I’m like, is this, is this real life? Like was that a fluke? It’s almost like that kind of like a imposter syndrome in the sense of like, am I good enough? Is this real? Like, was that beginner’s luck? And so like, I kind of had a little self doubt in myself in the sense of like, <laugh>, if we lose on the house, like what, what happens then? Like, is he gonna pull all this money out? So like I’m, I’m like over analyzing deals just to make sure like this is the one, because again, like I, I, I don’t wanna lose this, this opportunity, that opportunity that, that I’ve been given and that I’ve basically been reading about this whole time that I genuinely didn’t believe I actually be done.

Dave (25:45):
But Don’nell, I feel like it’s that attitude that makes people want to invest with you, right? It’s ’cause like, as someone who invest in private deals, I don’t want someone who’s like coming in there super confident over, you know, over aggressive saying that they’re, they’re gonna do everything super well. You, you wanna invest in the people who are gonna take the responsibility of managing someone else’s money extremely seriously and are gonna treat it with the respect that you were talking about. Obviously you don’t want you having imposter syndrome, you know what you’re doing. But I think that mentality of, of being so careful of a steward to someone else’s money is really what a lot of passive investors are looking for.

Don’nell (26:28):
Yeah, no, that is, I think I go to every deal with that mindset of if it comes down to it, like what would that look like if I lost, what would that look like? What would all these steps look like? And so a lot of that is, goes into my underwriting in a sense of just making sure x, y, and Z are checked. And then now do we have multiple exit strategies, which when the interest rates took a, a spike in the wrong direction, that’s the obviously when things kind of went haywire.

Dave (26:53):
So tell us a little bit more about that Don’nell, you know, what happened to your business when interest rates started to go up and what did you do about it? It was

Don’nell (27:02):
Rough coming from, it’s like I went from being extremely like, tedious about everything, making sure like I’m, I’m, I’m being careful in deals to like, it, it almost was like I started putting on that, that, that that cloak of Superman and was like, I can’t lose. Like I’m, I’m crushing it now. Like I am I him like <laugh>. It’s like, yeah, it’s, it’s almost like a invincibility, uh, until like the interest rates, uh, hit and then we were, I think we’re sitting on 17 houses. Uh, and because our strategy, our strategy at the time was we were selling to a few hedge funds. We were selling as is. We were just listed on the market and people were just buying ’em up. So a lot of those re those houses that were sitting, uh, were not touched and they, they needed a ton of work.

Don’nell (27:57):
Um, and so once that hit, now we found out that buyers are way more picky now, now there’s a lot more competition that we we’re having to take a whole step back to, to assess all of this situ, like this whole situation to now make a plan. And at the time we had lost our, before we had crews, and then as we were just like blowing through inventory. ’cause everything was selling and obviously it was, in my opinion, it was just a momentum market, at least here in DOW everything. I felt like time just stopped once, uh, the, the interest rates rose. And again, like you, I we, you kind of could hear the chatter, uh, from like we were utilizing hard money at the time, uh, from our har hard money lenders kind of pulling back too. Um, and so yeah, that affected our business, uh, even to the point to where our partnership was dissolved, uh, based on just, uh, differences. And I think a lot of it was had to do with too many cooks in the, in the kitchen to where somebody wanted to do this, somebody wanted to do this, and the other person wanna do that. And it just kind of made things difficult to where everybody could work together.

Henry (29:07):
Alright, everyone, we’ve gotta take one more short break, but when we come back we’ll hear about how Don’nell is evaluating markets today. Stick around. Welcome back. We’re here with investor Don’nell Greer. Let’s pick up where we left off.

Dave (29:21):
Sorry. Yeah, so, so this was in 2022, I assume, just based on the timeline. Yeah. And so at that point, who were your partners that you were working with? And I’m just curious ’cause partnerships are such a challenging part of real estate and a great opportunity too, but like, who are your partners? And were some of the cracks that sort of evolved in 2022 apparent to you before interest rates go went up? Or was it sort of the stress of this new paradigm shift that started to cause some issues with your partnerships? It

Don’nell (29:55):
Was, yeah, it was, it was after that. And now again, we were, it was arguments about who was doing what. And I think the partnerships are extremely important and needed in real estate if you want to get to a certain level now, if you just want to be like two, three deals a month, yeah, you probably could do it on your own. But, uh, <laugh> being as ambitious as I was, we were, we were probably around 20 to 30 a month at the time, uh, deals per month. Um, and so yeah, once that stuff started cracking and, and, and buyers what weren’t buying like they were, uh, is that’s where yeah, just differences were just spotlighted. I feel like. Um, and again, just going back to your question, uh, I think it just, you have to have clearly defined responsibilities in a partnership because ours was pretty loose.

Don’nell (30:55):
It was like, oh, I know this guy we’re cool. Like, I like what he does. And then we had another, a capital partner come in from uh, uh, Massachusetts to where he saw what we were doing and he was, he wanted to be a part of it as well. And so again, like we just kind of came in and everybody was doing their own thing and nothing was really defined until like, there had to be, it is almost like the come to Jesus meeting <laugh> of, alright, like, what, what exactly are we doing here to like get through this inventory so we can continue to move on? And it just, it was just too many differences at the time to where we could even reconcile, uh, what was going on.

Henry (31:37):
Yeah. So it sounds like you, to backtrack, it sounds like you found your private money partner, you went out there, you started doing deals, and then somewhere along that path you decided I, I can do more volume and I could do more volume if I had partners. So it sounds like maybe you found another investor in the area that you partnered with.

Don’nell (31:55):
Yep. So, so it was, so it was a friend of mine, so initially it was me and a friend, and then we partnered with an, uh, the, the guy that sold his scrap metal business. Uh, we went with that partnership for about 18 months. And then from there we met another guy, uh, who was I guess even further along and, and he was ready to, he was ready to put literally millions into real estate. Uh, and that’s when we actually, we were buying houses in cash and we transitioned to, uh, leverage. Uh, it’s like, well, why don’t y’all just buy 15, 20 houses and obviously ultimately we got to like 25, 30 a month doing this this way. Um, and so yeah, that’s how we transitioned from buying all cash to now we’re, we’re leveraged, uh, through hard money lenders. Okay,

Henry (32:45):
Got it. So you were buying cash and then refining them, putting ’em on leverage?

Don’nell (32:49):
Yeah, well we were buying cash and just flipping. We, we were just flipping from at that point and then we, we were still flipping, but we just, we utilized leverage and then with, with that leverage, we, we, we found that,

Henry (33:02):
So the market shifted when you started to use leverage <laugh>? No,

Don’nell (33:05):
No, no, no. Well, thankfully, no. Uh, we, we did a a a huge run, thankfully. Um, but unfortunately we were left with, yeah, it was about 17 houses that had leverage. So now you’ve got these hard money lender payments coming every month on top of, now we have to enlist contractors to get some of these, these houses rehabbed to get ’em on the market, uh, to get ’em sold and off the books. So, um, yeah, it was, uh, yeah, again, it was eye-opening because at the time I was, I, I mainly was doing the acquisitions, the, the, the managing projects and dispositions because our business was built off of relationships, so we didn’t, we didn’t spend any money on marketing. Um, so yeah, like that’s where it was like, all right guys, I’m, I’m, I’m, I’m trying to figure out like whose role is what, and again, like I love partnerships. I’m in, I’m still in other partnerships, but just going back to making sure you just have clearly defined roles and responsibilities versus like trying to wing it. Like I’m, I’m, I’m usually used to

Henry (34:17):
So it sounds like if, if I’m hearing correctly, you were doing a lot of hotels. It sounds like you were buying ’em so cheap that you were able to not have to do much rehab, stick ’em on the market and you were making a profit. Interest rates started to shift and buyers could be a little more picky. And so now you’re like, okay, we need a plan. And that plan was to go ahead and bring in the contractors, renovate everything to where the point that it needs to be renovated to flip those properties and get ’em off the books. Yep. And you were able to then unload the properties by doing the full rehabs and flipping those. How’d that go? Did you make money on all of ’em? Were you losing some money? What did that look like?

Don’nell (34:52):
Uh, we lost money on the majority of those. Uh, but, um, the one thing I do, I, I, I guess I love that we were able to accomplish was our investors, if we had any investors, ’cause we were trying to raise other pro out, like outside capital because we were still looking into doing like land development and some other deals. We didn’t allow them to lose any money. Uh, and we stayed true to our promise. So whatever their principle was, they were paid back. Plus the interest that we promised

Henry (35:26):
Fact is why you are a person people are gonna want to continue to do business with. I tell this to students all the time. You have got, if you’re gonna borrow money, private money, you have got to make sure your investors get made whole. Whether you lose money or not, that is first and foremost. ’cause if you ever want to be able to borrow money again, you’ve gotta make sure your investors are made whole. And not everybody does that Don’nell, like not everybody will bite that bullet. There’s a lot of people who start making calls and asking for more money to try to keep the ship afloat and borrowing from Peter to pay Paul. And sometimes you just have to bite the bullet and you make sure your investors are made whole. And to, to hear someone say, look, we started to scale. We got into some trouble, we pivoted that pivot meant we lost money, but my investors did not lose money. Like, that’s the kind of operator that people want to work with. And I hope people listening to this like understand it’s not just about borrowing money to scale, it’s about borrowing money to scale and staying true to your word, no matter what happens with that deal.

Don’nell (36:28):
Yeah, I mean, through all of that is then we shift it to different markets. ’cause obviously now you’re, I think Dallas, Dallas, the Dallas market was tough because now you’re battling high interest rates and you’re battling high taxes, um, on top of like these inflated sales prices. So finding, trying to buy deals and trying to sell deals was, it was, it was tough to call. And so we shifted, shifted to the St. Louis market, Raleigh Durham, North Carolina, um, and even started looking into Nashville, Tennessee, uh, and St. Louis market. That was just a unique place just because it’s like taxes are like two, two grand a year. And I’m like, that’s, that’s two grand a a month in Texas, like <laugh>, um, on top of like, you can buy a, a livable house for $75,000. Like if you try to buy a house for $75,000 in DFW, it’s, yeah, you’re definitely in, in the hood like Oak Cliff or, or stop six or one of those places. So, um, which again, like even the rental, the rental rates in St. Louis was like, I’m like, is this really like somebody, somebody playing with my emotions right now.

Dave (37:44):
That’s awesome. So Don’nell, you obviously went through some setbacks and I’m, I’m sorry to hear that. That’s never fun. But how would you say you got through that and bounced back to kickstart your business?

Don’nell (37:59):
Yeah, it was more so just utilizing the mastermind that we were a part of because it was like, a part of that was, man, we’re <laugh>, we’re taking a beating. Like, nobody knows what’s happening in the market. Like what are other people, what are other investors experiencing? It was just eyeopening to see we’re not the only ones that, that we’ve experienced this. There’s like, there’re tons of others out there that are experiencing the same thing and now they’re just basically sitting on, sitting on the sidelines and, and waiting to see what the market does or like us just expanding to different markets to see if we can still real estate invest, uh, at scale as we once were doing, obviously just in a different market.

Dave (38:41):
Well, thanks so much for joining us today, Don’nell. We really appreciate you join, uh, being here. I

Don’nell (38:45):
Appreciate y’all. Thank you, sir. I

Dave (38:47):
Appreciate you. Or if anyone wants to connect with Don’nell or know to find more about him, just check out our show notes or the show description below for BiggerPockets. My name’s Dave Meyer, he is Mr. Henry Washington. And we’ll see you for an episode real soon.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link

150+ Deals in 3 Years and Why You DON’T Want to Be a Landlord Read More »

Weekly mortgage demand jumps again, as interest rates fall below 7%

Weekly mortgage demand jumps again, as interest rates fall below 7%


A For Sale sign is posted in front of a home for sale in San Marino, California on September 6, 2023. 

Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

Mortgage rates swung slightly lower last week, fueling a significant jump in mortgage demand for the second straight week. Total application volume rose 7.1%, compared with the previous week, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s seasonally adjusted index.

The average contract interest rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages with conforming loan balances ($766,550 or less) decreased to 6.84% from 7.02%, with points falling to 0.65 from 0.67 (including the origination fee) for loans with a 20% down payment.

“Mortgage rates dropped below 7% last week for most loan types because of incoming economic data showing a weaker service sector and a less robust job market, with an increase in the unemployment rate and downward revisions to job growth in prior months,” said Mike Fratantoni, senior vice president and chief economist at the MBA.

As a result, applications to refinance a home loan, which are most sensitive to weekly rate moves, rose 12% for the week and were 5% higher than the same week one year ago.

“While these percentage increases are large, the level of refinance activity remains quite low, and we expect that most of this activity reflects borrowers who took out a loan at or near the peak of rates in the past two years,” added Fratantoni.

Applications for a mortgage to purchase a home rose 5% for the week but were still 11% lower than a year ago. Homebuyers are up against more than just high interest rates. They are looking at sky-high home prices and a still lean supply of houses for sale. While more inventory is coming onto the market with the spring season, it is not enough to meet the demand, especially for smaller, starter homes.

Mortgage rates rose slightly at the start of this week, after a government report on consumer prices came in higher than expected Tuesday. However, the increase was smaller than previous reactions to similar economic data.

“It suggests the market is starting to see more convincing signs that inflation and the economy stand a better chance deliver rate-friendly news in the near future as opposed to news that would cause a big resurgence,” said Matthew Graham, chief operating officer at Mortgage News Daily.

Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO:



Source link

Weekly mortgage demand jumps again, as interest rates fall below 7% Read More »

Financial Lessons From History Anyone Can Use to Get Rich

Financial Lessons From History Anyone Can Use to Get Rich


Morgan Housel’s ground-breaking book, The Psychology of Money, changed how many Americans thought about saving, spending, and investing. Through a collection of financial lessons, Morgan opened up new thought patterns for many of us, showcasing that getting rich isn’t as complicated as you might think, but staying rich can be the actual challenge. Now, this personal finance powerhouse is back with a new book, Same as Ever.

In Same as Ever, Morgan doubles down on what has, and most likely always will, work in the personal finance world. By showcasing some of the most commonly repeated financial events of the past, we can better shape our understanding of what will happen in the future and use history to our advantage to build even bigger wealth, enjoy our lives even more, and not repeat our past mistakes.

But this episode goes much deeper than that. We talk about why so many Americans will die without building wealth, why people are afraid to invest, when to spend your wealth once you’ve built it, and exactly how Morgan invests his own money. Plus, why getting rich isn’t your biggest concern—staying rich is.

Mindy:
Today we are talking with perhaps the most notable thought leader in personal finance Morgan Hausel. While you may know him as the author of The Psychology of Money, his new book Same as Ever, is Even Better. Scott certainly thinks so. It’s

Scott:
So good. Mindy, today’s conversation is a rare opportunity to get a glimpse into how Morgan’s mind works. Take a deeper dive into some of the themes he spent his entire career studying and learn what he personally is doing with his own money.

Mindy:
Hello my dear listeners and welcome to the BiggerPockets Money podcast. You are in for a treat today. My name is Mindy Jensen and with me today is my co-host Scott Trench. How are you doing, Scott?

Scott:
Same as ever. Mindy, same as ever. How are you doing? I

Mindy:
Knew I was walking right into that as soon as you said that.

Scott:
Alright, we’re here to make financial dependences less scary, less just for somebody else to introduce you to every money story because we truly believe financial freedom is attainable for everyone, no matter when or where you’re starting.

Mindy:
Morgan Hausel, welcome to the BiggerPockets Money podcast. I am so excited to talk to you today.

Morgan:
Thanks for having me. Nice to see you guys.

Scott:
Morgan, you’ve had amazing career in the personal finance world over the years and decades in it and building an incredible reputation, helping lots of folks. I’ve told folks that have listened to the BiggerPockets Money podcast that I’m such a nerd that I devoured psychology of money on my honeymoon and I was super excited to have you on today to talk about your second book, same as Ever, which has recently come out and which I think is even better than the Psychology of Money. So can you tell us a little bit about Same as Ever and then I would love to kind of unwind and go through your career.

Morgan:
Well Scott, thanks so much for that intro. I appreciate it. And Mindy, thanks again for having me. This was great. Same as ever was interesting for me. I have been a financial writer for my entire career. I was hired by the Motley Fool while I was still in college, so it’s all I’ve ever done is written about finance and the first couple years of doing that was I was writing about the stock market in particular and even early on I was writing about individual stocks. So the idea of writing about something a little bit different had always appealed to me because as the years went on I realized I’m definitely not a stock picker. And even after that I was like, look, I enjoy the stock market because it’s interesting, but I’m interested in so much more than that. Psychology of money was my first like, Hey, I’m really interested in behavioral finance.
I couldn’t really care less about where people think the stock market’s going to go next or what you think GDP is going to do in Q4. I’m not interested in that and I think no one’s really good at that anyways, but I’m very interested in what is going on inside of people’s heads when they’re making financial decisions. Same as ever though was a little bit different. It was like I’ve as many people are, I’m an amateur student slash fan of history and it had always been so astounding to me when I would be reading something about history, whether it was the history of economics or business or war or politics or science, whatever it would be, and you read something that took place a hundred years ago or even 500 years ago and you realize to yourself you’re like, that’s exactly what happens today. And the scene is different, the characters are different, the set is different so to speak, but so many behaviors about how people behave and respond to life, greed and fear and risk and uncertainty and opportunity never change.
It’s the same today that it was hundreds of years ago and that was really important for the second part of why I wrote this book, which was kind of my cynicism about how bad the entire industry was at forecasting the financial industry, forecasting the next recession or the bes and bear market like you guys know as much as anyone else, nobody can do it. That’s kind of an exaggeration, but it’s close enough to accurate to say nobody can do it. And so with that you can either become more of a cynic and say nobody should ever try to predict the future or you can take the observation that there are all these behaviors that never change and realize that if something was true a hundred years ago to the same extent that it is today, it’s probably going to be true a hundred years from now. I have no idea when the next bear market’s going to come, but I know how people are going to respond to it whenever it comes because that’s never changed and I have no idea who’s going to win the next presidential election, but I know how people are going to respond to it regardless of what happens because that sense of tribalism has never changed. That was really the basis of it. Yeah,

Scott:
There’s so many great nuggets in there. The biggest lesson I think I took away from same as ever is long-term compounding slow, unremarkable progress is made every year adoption of new technologies, better health outcomes, those types of things, but that the short run is always full of risks that are unknowable. There’s just no one predicted the pandemic, no one predicts any of these things that are by definition surprises to everybody else. And so the game, my big takeaway is for my personal financial position is to build a strong enough financial foundation and trajectory to be able to play that long-term game, but then also to couch that with knowing myself and trying to know myself and predict how I would react when the whole world seems to be collapsing, the market doesn’t just go down 30%, something else happens that creates that 30% and that’s where that fear comes in. How am I doing in takeaways? Is that kind of what you wanted a reader to take away from the book?

Morgan:
I agree a hundred percent with that. I mean I dedicate the book to the reasonable optimist. I’ll tell you what that is in a second. But part of the reason I did that is because psychology of money was dedicated to my wife and my parents and my kids. I ran out of people to dedicate it to. So same as ever. I said the reasonable optimist, which this is my own definition, I made this up, which is if you are somebody who thinks the future is going to be great, that’s not optimism. That’s complacency. Reasonable optimism in my definition was you are very confident. You have the utmost confidence that things are going to be better in your own life and for society in the future, but you are equally confident that the path between now and then is going to be very hard. It’s going to be very surprising, it’s going to be challenging, it’s going to throw you off course.
That’s reasonable optimism, steadfast confidence of where you’re going and realistic view about how hard it’s going to be to get there. And so I think that really ties into what you just said of the way I phrase it in the book is save like a pessimist and invest like an optimist. Save your money with the idea that life’s hard, careers are hard, families are hard, recessions happen, pandemics happen, wars happen, but invest your money with the idea that if you can endure all of that, the rewards for those who stick around tend to be great if you can stick around. And the amazing thing about investing is that you do not need to make that many great decisions if you can stick around. You don’t need to be a genius trader. You don’t need to even have tremendous foresight. What you get paid for in investing is the ability to put up with and endure uncertainty. And if you can do that, the rewards can be amazing. The rewards can be greater than the people who did by luck or skill forecast exactly what the market’s going to do this year. I think that’s always been very appealing to me as an investor.

Mindy:
We’re off to a quick break when we’re back. Morgan Hausel will reveal why he believes that what you do to gain wealth will not necessarily help you in keeping it.

Scott:
And we’re back. We’re talking to Morgan Housel about his own money journey and why he thinks most people don’t change their money habits.

Mindy:
You’ve mentioned habits don’t change and you can predict reactions based on past reactions. Yet we keep hearing this statistic over and over. Most people in this country do not have an extra thousand dollars to spare if an emergency arises. So what you’ve learned from writing two books and blogging about finances for almost two decades, what do you think most people, why do you think most people will die without ever having built wealth?

Morgan:
I think there’s a couple of answers to this question. One could be that the most important word that you just said in that sentence was wealth. Well, how are we going to define that in financial values? I mean there are literally people in this world for whom a billion dollars is not that much money. Chris Rock, the comedian, made the joke where he said, if Bill Gates woke up with Oprah’s money, he jumped out the window. And it’s a joke, but it’s true. It’s all very relative. And so one of the chapters in Psychology and Money is about how our expectations have changed. And it’s very common throughout history in all kinds of nations that over a long period of time over the generations average wealth increases or increases substantially, but expectations increased by even more. I’m making this up, but you can imagine if you someone today who was like, they are a retired 87-year-old and their net worth is $5,000, you and I might say not good, dangerous living on the edge 200 years ago adjusted for inflation.
Someone would be like, they’re rich, they’re filthy rich. You got $5,000. Even if you adjusted for inflation, you’d be like, you’re doing great. A lot of that’s just because our expectations have changed. It was not that long ago in all of our parents’ generation, if you go back to the 1950s, even the early 1960s, the vast majority of Americans worked until they died. There was no expectation of that. Every person, every hardworking person was going to have 20 years where they didn’t have to work and still had a dignified financial situation. That’s a very new concept. And so I think if you even went back to our grandparents’ generation for sure, if you said like, oh, most people don’t have enough money in retirement, the response would be retirement. What? What’s that? You work until you die. Your retirement party is also your funeral. That’s how it worked until not that long ago.
So I guess the answer to your question, Mindy, is the reason it keeps happening, at least one of the reasons is society’s expectation of what counts as wealth is always inflating. There’s an expectations inflation. That’s part of it. But I think that’s just one answer. I guess we can almost devote the entire episode to this one question. I’ll give you one other little element to it. I do think life is so competitive that it’s never going to be a situation where everyone, or even the majority of people, I mean there’s a Charlie Munger quote where he says the iron rule of math is that only 25% of people can be in the top quartile. That’s another of just like he’s trying to be sarcastic here. But if you ask a broad question, and a lot of people do ask this of the tools are there, why can’t everybody be rich? It’s like, well, it’s a competitive game and the reason that there is opportunity for some people is because other people are going to lose. It’s not quite that zero sum, but I think that’s at least part of it here. It’s just like theres not, there’s never going to be amazing opportunities for every single person. Part of the reason the system works is because there is an embedded element of inequality in which not everyone is always going to win. That’s a much deeper philosophical political point, but I think there is some truth to it. Yeah,

Scott:
There’s only so much beachfront property in this country, for example, and prices just reflect the fact that it’s scarce and that everyone is competing for that same beachfront opportunity. Speaking of competition, I want to connect this theme if we can to another component. Another theme that you opened up the psychology of money with where I think you used two examples, I forget the second guy’s name, but the first one was Ronald Reed, a janitor who died with $8 million in net worth and the other was this hotshot who went bankrupt. And your point there was something along the lines of, and only in finance can a guy like Ronald Reed beat a Harvard educated NBA executive in the sport of money in here. You’d never see that happen in a doctor do open heart surgery versus there’s no way this janitor could have done that job the same way, but money and finance is different from that game. And so how do I bridge this dynamic of, hey, there’s this competitive dynamic where you never have an edge yet people like ordinary people can sometimes win in this game. How do we combine those themes into a takeaway?

Morgan:
I think that is part of why finance can be so confusing for people and also why so many people kind of get ripped off by professionals is that in every other endeavor of your life that has very high stakes, you need to seek out the advice of experts because novices cannot even do it. I use example like open heart surgery. If you need open heart surgery, go find the best, most qualified cardiologist and if the person is not a certified cardiologist, do not talk to that person or take their advice. And so that’s how most things in life work investing, it’s just not like that. And in fact, there are not only some, but literally millions of novices who have no education, no experience, no background, they are just dollar cost averaging into their 401k and they forgot their password and they will literally smoke the majority of hedge funds.
And that doesn’t happen in any other field. And so for me, the takeaway for psychology and money was that doing well in investing was not about what, it’s not about how smart you are, it’s not about where you went to school, it’s just about how you behave. And there are quite a few people who have no education but have mastered their behavior and there are lots of people who have the best education and have no control over their financial behavior. And the former of those people will do great, they’ll do great financially and the latter will do very poorly. I think a lot of this was kind of influenced by my own parents who are smart, wise, educated people who have no financial training or background or really interest. They’re both very smart people, but they’ve dollar cost average into Vanguard funds for 40 years and never sold a single share. And if you look at their performance, it stacks up with the absolute greatest people out there. I mean they’re literally in the top 5% of money managers of their generation and A, they don’t even know it. And B, they didn’t even try. They put in no effort to doing it and that doesn’t exist in any other field. And that was always really fascinating to me. So I think a lot of it was just digging into how my parents did it. Okay.

Mindy:
So why do you think so many people are afraid of investing when it isn’t about how smart you are and it isn’t about when you went to school and it seems to be to those of us who know about investing, it seems to be so easy and such a no brainer. Why are people so afraid of this?

Morgan:
I think it’s two reasons. One, because the stakes are so high, the majority of the investing industry is based off of two life events, retirement and sending your kids to college. That’s what the majority of people and where the majority of capital is investing for. And both those things, the stakes are really high. Don’t screw this up or else the entire trajectory of your life is going to be in jeopardy. That’s really scary and there aren’t a lot of other things that are like that. The only other thing that is that in life is maybe health where it’s like, Hey, don’t screw this up. It’s hard to have a good life unless you get this one thing right. You want to be healthy, you want to take care of your body, but in health there are qualified experts to seek out, you go to the doctor.
It is pretty straightforward in investing. I think what has made it intimidating for a lot of people, and this sounds kind of cynical, but I think the vast majority of investing professionals are good, honest, well-meaning people, but it’s also true that they can make a lot of money in the investing world. There’s a lot of money to be had among investing professionals and a lot of it is in order to justify your fees that the financial professional is charging, they make it seem really complicated. And again, I think that’s done with good intentions. A lot of it is the people who work in finance are very smart people and they want to put their big brains and their big degrees to work. So if you are a big brain, well-educated financial advisor, a lot of ’em do not want to say dollar cost averaging index funds and just let it rip over time.
They don’t want to say that. They want to say like, look, if I’m charging you a high fee and by the way Mr. Financial advisor, I have a 180 IQ and I went to Harvard, blah blah, blah. They want to put that intelligence to use by making it a little more complicated. And I think part of the reason that is very well-meaning is because also there’s so much opportunity in investing. I mean global financial markets are worth something like $300 trillion. And so if there is an opportunity to earn an extra two basis points of return, it’s a lot of money, it’s a ton of opportunity. So there is just an enormous amount of brainpower in there that is devoted towards picking up small pieces, pieces of opportunity because a small opportunity on a $300 trillion opportunity base is dynastic wealth. I think that’s a lot of reasons where this happens. It’s a combination of the stakes are high and the incentives to make it seem more complicated than it is are enormous.

Scott:
I want to go back to something you said earlier. You talked about how your parents were so successful as investors over a long period of time, and you’ve talked a lot about your father and his perspective in your books and in other interviews. Can you tell us a little bit about your upbringing with money and how that molded you into this really wise, I think leader, thought leader in the personal finance world?

Morgan:
Well, the first is everyone, me, you and everyone listening is shaped by their childhood. I mean, that’s just part of how humans works. What gets in early, what you will learn early sticks around. And so it wasn’t until I was older and I was an adult that I started thinking about the trajectory of my childhood from many different areas, but also financially how it worked. And mine was very, it pretty interesting because my dad, this was in psychology money. He started his undergraduate college when he was 30 and had three kids. That’s when he started his bachelor’s degree and he became a doctor when he was like 44 and had three teenagers. So it was a very different trajectory. I’m the youngest of three. He started his undergraduate college I think a month after I was born and it became a doctor when I was in third grade, something like that.
And so growing up I saw two very different sides before third grade. So I dunno how old you were in third grade, 10, something like that. From age birth to 10, we were extremely poor. My parents were students. I think they got a little bit of residual money from student grants enough to buy us Top Ramen and live in a cheap apartment. I had a very good childhood with two loving parents who took us out and we did a lot of things, but we were completely broke. I didn’t really know it as a lot of kids. I was happy. But then when I was in third grade, my dad became a doctor. Now he’s an ER doctor, which is among the lowest paid of the doctor are different kinds of doctors. We were not rich by any standpoints, but relative to where we were, it was like this sudden shock of we used to be like bonafide poor and now we’re upper middle class and it literally happened overnight.
And so it was jarring because during that period we bought a house and we bought nice cars, we went on vacations. And so I think seeing that, I think most people, maybe this isn’t true, maybe this is just my assumption, I think most people’s financial childhood tends to be in one bucket. We were always poor, we were always rich. It’s usually pretty standard. Mine was very clearly separated in 19 93, 19 93, everything changed. And so I think seeing both sides of that was really interesting. The other important thing is that the frugality that was demanded of my parents when they were poor, we didn’t have any money. They had to be frugal. They had to stretch every dollar that stuck around with them, even when they started making a lot more money. So we lived a better life, but my parents were very big savers all throughout my later childhood and teenage years, and I think for a long time in my teenage years, I looked down upon them for that.
It was especially as I became an older teenager, 16, 17, 18, and I started realizing, I was like, I know how much money you make and you’re not spending very much of it. You guys are saving a lot of this and we could be living a better life if you had spent more. That was kind of my view. And then this wasn’t even that long ago, this was 2011 that this happened. My dad retired many years earlier than I think he anticipated because as an ER doctor, it’s absurdly stressful among the hardest professions. It’s literally people dying in front of you every day and you’re working night shifts and whatnot. So after doing it for like 20 years, he said, I’m ready to retire way earlier than he expected. And he was able to do that, just retire on a whim ahead of schedule because he had saved so much.
He was such a big saver over time and that really stuck with me of his frugality was he was actually buying independence. Every dollar that he saved was not idle money, it was buying something very important, which was independence and the ability to just live the life on his own terms. So now he’s been retired for, I dunno, 12, 13 years, and he’s happier. He’s happier than he’s ever been. My mom’s happier than she’s ever been because of the independence that they had and they only had independence because they were living so far below their means. That really stuck with me. Yeah.

Scott:
Here at BiggerPockets Money we’re all about the personal financial independence and that’s what I’ve kind of thought about all these years is I’m buying financial independence instead of whatever artifact or good or house or whatever it is on that front, what are you motivated by there? Is it financial independence? Is it something else? You talk about rational optimism and risk. Is fear in there at all for you as an emotion with the way you build your money?

Morgan:
Definitely early on, very much motivated by fear. Even maybe this is somewhat contradictory to what I write, but I’m very much a worst case scenario thinker, and I think worst case scenario about virtually everything, particularly after I got married and then had kids, all of a sudden as every spouse and parent can relate to, all of a sudden it’s not about you anymore. It’s not just about you, particularly after you have kids, you’re like, I don’t matter. It’s just these little ones are all that matter and there’s a lot of pressure on my shoulders to make sure I do things right and provide for these children. That was a fear motivator that is still today. Now, as time has gone on, I think it has moved from fear as the motivator and then it was independence as the motivator and then maybe even after that, it’s like the motivator is like, well, do I really want to be doing this if I don’t need to be working as hard as I can just for the paycheck, do I really enjoy the work that I’m doing and I want to make some money on top of that?
But do I really enjoy, do I have intellectual freedom outside of financial and time freedom? That’s always been really important for me. Morgan,

Mindy:
You’ve talked about how getting money and keeping money are two different games. Can you explain what the difference

Morgan:
Is? I’d always been astounded by the story of Jesse Livermore, who is on one hand one of the greatest investors who ever lived. He was around in the early 20th century, made most of his money in the 1920s and the 1930s, and I think at three separate occasions he became the inflation adjusted equivalent of a billionaire. And after the crash of 1929, which he was short the market just before that, he became by some accounts the richest man in the world. He made during the crash of 1929, the equivalent of 3 billion by shorting the market. That’s one side of Jesse Livermore’s story. The other side is that he went bankrupt, I think four times and eventually committed suicide the last time he went bankrupt. So here you have someone who is better at getting rich than literally anyone else in history and is among the worst people in history at staying rich.
He could not stay rich. It was like every time he became wealthy, he just kept taking bigger bets, bigger bets, bigger bets until it would blow up in his face. That was all he could do. So that to me is what motivated the concept of getting rich versus staying rich. And once you have that little framework, you see it everywhere. There are actually a lot of people who are very good at getting rich in the stock market and in business it’s a totally different skill to stay rich because getting rich requires being an optimist. It requires you to take a risk, be optimistic on yourself, be optimistic about the economy. Staying rich is almost the exact opposite. It’s a completely contradictory skill. It requires that while you are taking a risk and being an optimist, you’re also a little bit paranoid, a little bit pessimistic.
You acknowledge you own faults, your own flaws. You are keenly aware of how fragile the economy can be, and you need both of those feelings to coexist, to do well over time. Most people view optimism and pessimism as black and white. You’re either an optimist or a pessimist. And I think once you understand getting rich versus staying rich, you realize that you need both optimism and pessimism to coexist at the same time. And the cognitive dissonance of like I can explain my very optimistic view of the future, I can also switch gears instantly and explain my very pessimistic view of the future and the ability to hold both of those thoughts together and be like, yep, that’s my philosophy. The forging of those two things is a really important skill financially, and I think there are also a lot of people who are very good at staying rich but not good at getting rich. I know that’s an oxymoron, but people who are only pessimistic, only conservative, they’re just putting their money into FDC insured savings account, they’re never going to get rich. They’re always going to keep their principle, but they’re never going to get rich. And the opposite of that is the YOLO trader or the crypto trader in 2021, very good at getting rich, zero skill at staying rich. I think you see it everywhere.

Scott:
Where do you get all of these anecdotes from? How did you find out about Jesse? What is the process you undertake to learn about the history of all these stories that you have interwoven into your works so thoroughly?

Morgan:
It’s the entire, I mean, I first say there is no strategy is the strategy is you just have to view it as just let your curiosity take you where it is. And at least for me, anytime that I’ve tried to put a structure around it, even a structure as mild as saying like, oh, I want to read more about this topic. I think the whole thing breaks down. It’s only fun for me, and I only learned if I could just have no structure, just be like, oh, I heard about this topic and it seemed interesting. So I read more about it. And I think at least for me, if you always have this seed in your head of how does this story relate to finance, then you see it everywhere. And then when you’re reading about evolution, when you’re reading about science, when you’re reading about politics, when you’re reading about militaries everywhere you look, you’re like, oh, that’s exactly the behaviors that impact investors.
Once you look for it, it’s impossible not to see it everywhere. And so the huge majority of my day for the last 17 years has been casual reading with no structure. I actually spend very little time writing. It’s usually maybe one day a week that I’m actually typing on a keyboard. The rest of the time is just sitting around reading. And it’s been hard to convince my wife that when I’m sitting on the couch in my sweatpants reading a book, I’m working very hard. This is the core of my work. It is taken me a long time to convince her of that, but that’s really what it is now. I would, well, you invested in this great office, so I got to use it with that. I think I’ve been able to pull that off because I’ve always worked from home for 17 years. I’ve never worked.
I’ve never worked in an office and because of that, I’ve been able to pull off that I’m going to sit here and read, and that’s my most productive work. If you work in an office, if you’re a journalist in the New York Times, by and large, you can’t do that. Your boss wants you at your desk typing, moving the mouse in your nice business suit, sitting at your desk looking productive. I think that’s part of what’s worked for me is that the fact that nobody is watching me has allowed me to do things that do not look like work, but actually in hindsight are the most productive things that I could possibly be doing. That

Mindy:
Sounds a lot like Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger. They get up on stage and talk about how all they do all day long is read newspapers and chat with each other. I think,

Morgan:
Yeah, I mean most of us, and I would venture that the vast majority of people listening to this have what I would call thought jobs. Their job at work is to make a decision with their brain, and I’d contrast that to working with your body if you are digging a ditch or whatnot. So more and more people in the modern economy have thought jobs, and if your job is to use your brain, then I think the most productive thing that you can be doing most of the time is thinking, and most thinking doesn’t look like work. You’re not typing, you’re not moving your mouse. Most people will recognize that their best ideas, regardless of what their profession is, does not come when they’re sitting at their desk. The best ideas come when they’re in the shower or on the treadmill or walking their dog or doing the dishes or folding the laundry.
That’s when you get aha moments. And the reason why is because when you are folding the laundry, you’re probably thinking, you’re not typing an email, you’re thinking, and so one of the great ironies of the information age is that so many of us have thought jobs, and we don’t give ourself any time to think. Our employers don’t allow us to think and even we don’t allow ourselves to think. And so if you’re in a situation like me where nobody’s watching you, then I think you actually have a fighting chance of using your precious time during the day to think.

Scott:
I think it’s fantastic. I completely agree. And I think a substitute for, if you feel like you can’t think, a great substitute for that is to turn on an audiobook and same as ever. And let Morgan do the thinking for you and absorb some of those thoughts and do that 500 times over the course of 10 years, and you’re going to start making a lot of connections that you would never have predicted across a lot of different disciplines. So completely agree with that. And sometimes I’m not ready to think so I just passively absorb. And now a quick break when we’re back, we’ll be talking to Morgan Hausel about his investment strategy.

Mindy:
We are back and we’re talking to Morgan Hausel about his biggest money regret, but before that, we’ll hear about how he invests and why he chooses to continue investing simply.

Scott:
Alright, so I want to transition here. You spend all this time thinking, you spend all this time researching. You’ve studied money as exhaustively as anybody around. What do you do personally with your money? Has your investment strategy evolved? For example, since writing psychology of money with the pandemic or anything like that? What are you doing today?

Morgan:
Hasn’t really changed that much in years. I went through a period of change in my early mid twenties. I started investing when I was 19 as a day trading penny stocks as many people do because that’s appealing. But I think I learned very quickly that was one thing. In hindsight, I’m so glad that I day traded penny stocks for a month and then said like, oh, this seems dumb. But then there was a good 10 year evolutionary period for me of trying different things before I finally settled where I am right now, which is a dollar cost average into index funds. I have a pretty high percentage of my over assets in cash and treasuries, and I always have to say, I’m not recommending other people do that. You just have to figure out what works for you. And my wife and I really value the simplicity of it.
And also the variable that I want to maximize for is endurance and longevity. And so if in my view by owning index funds, the simplicity of it and the blamelessness of it increases the odds that I can stick with it. So if having this boring, basic investing strategy means that it increases the odds that I can stick with it for 50 years, then it’s the right thing to do. So I really haven’t changed that in probably a decade. The composition of our net worth is, I mean, our entire net worth is this house Vanguard funds, cash, treasuries, and shares of Markel where I’m on the board of directors, and that’s it. Really nothing else other than that. Awesome.

Scott:
What percentage, how many months or years of your annual household expenses do you keep in cash? Months or years?

Morgan:
It’s a lot. It’s quite a bit. I mean, some of that is just because our household expenses are not terribly large relative to our net worth. It’s also, I think as a writer, I have most writers, this is probably going down a little bit different avenue. Most writers do not have 30 year careers. A lot of it is like it’s not quite as fickle as an athlete where even pro athletes can have two year careers. Maybe it’s not that fickle as an author, but no author, no matter, unless they’re JK rallying or Stephen King, no one should expect that. Like, oh, I can keep doing this and earning this money for 30 years. So because of just the natural reality of the business I’m in, I keep more cash than might seem advisable to other industries. A lot of it too is just my personality. I value sleeping well at night and particularly because like I said, I have a worst case scenario mindset. I would never want to trade a bad night’s sleep because I think I could get an extra three basis points of return from my stock. It’s not worth it for me. And now that you can earn five and a half percent on your cash, it’s like, oh, it doesn’t even feel like there’s that much of a trade off anyways, so it’s quite a bit most people, is

Scott:
It years?

Morgan:
It’s years, yeah, for sure. I have two friends who are CFPs certified financial planners who I’m very open with about our finances, and I think it’s really important, even if you consider yourself a financial expert, bring somebody else into the fold who doesn’t have your emotional baggage. So I have two friends who know every detail about my wife and i’s money, and both of them at first glance, they’re like, why do you have so much cash? I don’t really get it. And I explain our reasonings and at the end I was like, okay, maybe it makes sense for you. But so there’s lots of it where it’s like, I am not recommending you do this. I don’t think that’s the right amount of cash for you necessarily, but it works for

Scott:
Us. Morgan, I have a question for you here that I want to get to before we run out of time, which is around real estate. You owe no real estate outside of your primary residence, and I’m wondering kind of what your viewpoint is on real estate investing as a strategy, where and when you think it might make sense as a tool and just your general views on it. Since we’re here at BiggerPockets, that’s what we’re all about.

Morgan:
Yeah. Well, I would very clearly separate investing in investing properties versus your primary residence. And mostly that’s because when you have a rental, you have a cashflow, you have money coming off of it versus your primary residence, you’re kind of just crossing your fingers that the real inflation adjusted value is going to increase over time, and a lot of people do, and they do that with a lot of leverage. Now, Robert Schiller from Yale won the Nobel Prize for many things, but one of which was putting together this historical series of US home prices since I think the 18 hundreds. And if you look at it in real terms, adjusted for inflation. For the vast majority of US history, US home prices adjusted for inflation are flat as a pancake like property prices, with the exception of the booms of the last 10 or 20 years, property prices will keep up with inflation every year, and that’s it.
And so it gets dangerous when people assume that their primary residence is going to go up by leaps and bounds and they’re like, oh, that’s my retirement. I’ll just buy a home and hold on, and then I’ll sell it. And by and large, historically that’s not been the case. There are periods when that works well if you’re in the middle of some sort of real estate boom. But I think investing, if you’re like, oh, I went out and bought a duplex to rent it out, great. Now I would say great. I wouldn’t say like, oh, that’s the best way to do it, because there’s a ton of everyone who has done that knows the broken toilets, the cracked windows, the missed rent payments. It is not an easy way to make money at all. And if there is any alpha so to speak, in that of like, oh, you can make more money than you could in the stock market doing that, it’s because you have to work for that money. You have to earn that money with sweat and labor and stress. I’ll

Scott:
See that point and I’ll raise you the hundreds of hours of self-education to actually learn about the mental models that you’re either going to do upfront before you invest or you’re going to do after you invest while you’re bleeding money.

Morgan:
Yes. So I’m not for or against it. I just think that to me, the biggest thing that I would be against is the diehard assumption that your primary residence is going to make you rich. I think that’s a dangerous mindset. If you can keep up with inflation, amazing, and that’s great, but the reason that I own a house is because it’s a great place for my family, not because I think it’s going to make me money over time.

Mindy:
Yeah, I love that. And another thing that I would say I am absolutely against is people investing in real estate because they feel like they have to. There are so many things you can invest in that I am not invested in. I don’t invest in, well, I don’t consider an investment, but I’m not in Bitcoin, I’m not in bonds. There’s a lot of things I’m not invested in and I don’t feel like I’m missing the boat. There are so many people who are like, oh, well, I feel like I really have to get into real estate, so I’m going to, well, that’s when you’re probably going to lose the most money you could possibly lose because you’re not going to be educated, like Scott said, you’re not going to be into it. It’s not going to be something that you’re going to want to do, so you’re not going to give it your best. It’s a real business. It’s a real lot of work.

Scott:
I’ll just chime in and say I agree with everything Morgan said. There is potentially alpha to be made in real estate, and one of the things that the rewards of real estate for me is an index fund like Vanguard might deliver a one and a 5% dividend yield and a rental property that’s paid off might produce income at a five to 6% cap rate, and I just feel better spending that cashflow and feel like it’s an inflation adjusted return on my lifestyle, and that’s the end result of the real estate investing for me. That makes me like it. But yeah, I completely agree. It’s not better, especially not unlevered than the stock market. It’s worse if you’re throwing darts at the wall and picking average duplexes out, for

Morgan:
Example. I love Mindy’s point about the feeling that you just need to do it. Brent Beshore has a great quote where he says, I am perfectly fine watching you make a lot of money doing something that I have no interest in. I think that’s an important financial skill to do. It’s a lack of fomo that is such an important financial skill, and the danger is that you see your friends making a lot of money in real estate and then you say, I have to get into this as well, just because you have the FOMO of what they’re doing. That’s tough. I

Mindy:
Love that.

Scott:
Morgan, is there anything else you want to leave us with before we ask a final question here?

Morgan:
No, this has been fun. This is good. This is

Scott:
Good. Alright, our last one here is are there any financial regrets that you have or big mistakes that you have that you take back in your personal story?

Morgan:
I made plenty of mistakes, but I would not call those regrets. And I mentioned earlier I started as an investor day trading penny stocks. Was that a mistake? Of course. Was it a regret? No, because I’m so glad I learned that lesson when I was 19 versus 46 and trying to put my kids through college. Everyone’s going to have to learn some tough financial lessons. Nobody goes through their life doing everything perfect. I actually really am grateful that I learned those lessons young and I learned them quickly. And so we could sit here for another five hours talking about mistakes that we’ve made. But I feel like because we’ve learned from them, my wife and I don’t consider them regrets at all. I think if there might be some, and this was so common for people of my generation and hundreds of millions of other people during the aftermath of the financial crisis in 2008, I was just overwhelmed with career anxiety of because nobody was hiring.
Unemploy rate was 10% and it really took a toll on me. It was a really big stress in life, and it was during the area where I was trying to figure out my own writing career, can I be a writer? How do I be a writer? I look back at that and I don’t regret that because I think fear is a motivator, but I wish I could go back and just say, it’s all going to be okay. It’s not going to be easy. It’s not going to be flawless. It’s not a straight path up, but it’s all going to work out eventually. I think that’s something that I think about financially that maybe this comes full circle to where we began of like, you’re going to be better over time, but don’t fool yourself into thinking that it’s going to be easy. I think coming to terms with both of those realities and grasping them with both hands is a really important part of doing well financially.

Mindy:
I love the distinction between regrets and mistakes. That is such an important lesson that people need to learn. Morgan, this has been so much fun. Seriously dream come true. I am so excited to have had this opportunity to listen to you and to talk to you. Where can people find you online?

Morgan:
Well, my two books, same as ever in the Psychology of Money are out there. Most of my time is on Twitter. That’s for better or worse where I’ve chosen live my digital life. So on Twitter, my handle is Morgan Hausel, my first and last name. Awesome.

Scott:
Yeah. And thank you for writing two great books. The second even better than the first in my opinion out there. So everyone needs to go check out. Same as ever if you haven’t got a chance yet.

Morgan:
Well, I mean I was a little book inside baseball. Amazon is roughly 90% of book sales, so I know that’s where you’re going to get it anyways. But other than that, it’s pretty much in all bookstores. There’s just not many of them left except for Amazon.

Mindy:
Okay. The book is same as ever by Morgan Hausel, and it is an awesome read if you have not picked it up yet. Alright, Morgan, we will talk to you soon. Thank you. Thank you. Oh my goodness, Scott, I hope my fan girl didn’t show too much. That was Morgan Housel and that was so much fun. I know I say that at the end of episode, but this one was seriously my favorite episode that we have ever done. I loved specifically at the end, Morgan’s distinction between regrets and mistakes. What a brilliant piece.

Scott:
Yeah, I think he’s one of those people that has spent so much time building up his mental models and has a framework for all of the things that are related to personal finance. You feel like we could have fired random questions at him for 10 hours straight and every single response would’ve had a well-rounded answer to it. And it’s probably not just true in personal finance, it’s probably true in a great body of related and other areas of life because of the amount of time he spends thinking, reading, and writing. And I have true admiration for that and hope over the course of the next 50 years, if I’m so lucky to live that long, I can get somewhere close to that.

Mindy:
You said that we could just fire questions at him and he kept answering. And there were several points in this interview where I was like, oh, that’s just like Warren Buffet, that’s just like Warren Buffet. He’s just like Warren Buffet. I see a lot of similarities and it’s underlined the amount of time that they both spend reading and consuming. And it isn’t just pump out all this content. It’s absorb information as well. And you’re absolutely right. We could have spent the next nine hours. I happily would’ve spent nine hours talking to Morgan. This was just an absolutely fabulous interview. I had such a good time. I’m so excited it

Scott:
Worked out. I want to leave a speculative question here because I think Morgan is one of those minds that if he had decided to spend his career trading and investing like Warren Buffett, maybe he would’ve been one of those few exceptional people who could have actually delivered those outsized returns. And instead he chose to put his mind to work in this capacity and he’s going to create 10 times that amount of wealth, or a hundred times that amount of wealth for the people who absorb his information and thought leadership instead. And it’s like, I wonder about that. So that’s as high a compliment as I can give to somebody around there and saying, the guy has just absolutely mastered these frameworks and has really made a dent in the world. Yes,

Mindy:
He has really made a dent in the personal finance world. If you are not currently reading his blog, if you are not following him on Twitter, make sure you go and do that. Alright, Scott, we get out of here.

Scott:
Let’s do

Mindy:
It. That wraps up this fabulous episode of the BiggerPockets Money podcast. Of course, he was Morgan Hausel, that guy. There is Scott Trench and I am Mindy Jensen saying, got to hit the road, little Toad.

Scott:
If you enjoyed today’s episode, please give us a five star review on Spotify or Apple. And if you’re looking for even more money content, feel free to visit our YouTube channel at youtube.com/biggerpockets money.

Mindy:
BiggerPockets Money was created by Mindy Jensen and Scott Trench, produced by Kaylin Bennett, editing by Exodus Media Copywriting by Nate Weintraub. Lastly, a big thank you to the BiggerPockets team for making this show possible.

 

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Check out our sponsor page!

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link

Financial Lessons From History Anyone Can Use to Get Rich Read More »

New York AG questions Trump cash reserves in 4 mln fraud appeal

New York AG questions Trump cash reserves in $464 mln fraud appeal


Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks as he arrives at a Manhattan courthouse, for the trial of himself, his adult sons, the Trump Organization and others in a civil fraud case brought by state Attorney General Letitia James, in New York City, U.S., October 2, 2023. 

Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

Former President Donald Trump has not shown that he has enough cash to cover the full amount of a $464 million civil fraud judgment if he loses his appeal, New York’s chief law officer warned in a court filing Monday evening.

New York Attorney General Letitia James raised that concern as she argued that Trump and his co-defendants should be required to post cash or bonds covering the entire fraud judgment, if they want to pause it from coming due while they challenge the ruling.

“Defendants have never demonstrated that Mr. Trump’s liquid assets—which may fluctuate over time—will be enough to satisfy the full amount of this judgment following appeal,” James told a New York appeals court.

Trump’s real estate holdings may also decrease in value as the appeal drags on, while post-judgment interest continues to rack up, she wrote.

His finances could be further strained by his other civil and criminal legal battles, James added, including a January jury verdict ordering him to pay $83.3 million in damages for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll.

Trump “has substantial liabilities that may reduce his liquid assets further, including other outstanding money judgments against him, and he faces multiple criminal indictments,” she wrote, pointing to that verdict.

Without a full bond, the civil fraud defendants — Trump, his two adult sons, his company and its top executives — might also try to “evade” or exacerbate enforcement of the judgment if they lose the appeal, James warned.

She urged the appeals court to reject Trump’s bid to stay the judgment with a $100 million bond, less than a quarter of the total amount awarded by Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron.

Attorneys for Trump did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on James’ filing.

The defense lawyers had argued that the smaller bond amount was enough to secure the judgment, when coupled with the continuing oversight of the Trump Organization’s assets by a court-appointed financial monitor.

New York Attorney General Letitia James sits in the courtroom during the civil fraud trial of former President Donald Trump and his children at New York State Supreme Court on November 03, 2023 in New York City.

David Sanders | Getty Images

They claimed that it would be “impossible” for them to secure a full appeal bond, which could be set at 120% of the judgment — more than $550 million — since that judgment also barred Trump from applying for loans in New York.

James challenged that claim, writing that the defendants “fail to provide information about what steps (if any) they have taken to secure an undertaking prior to filing their motion.”

They have not yet shown that Trump — a professed multi-billionaire who said in a deposition last year that he holds more than $400 million in cash — has tried and failed to obtain a bond, she noted. The ban on borrowing is also no obstacle, because appeal bonds are not loans, she wrote.

Appeal bonds are intended to ensure that the person awarded damages at trial will be able to collect that money if the verdict is upheld on appeal. The person posting the bond will get their deposit back if they win their appeal.

Read more CNBC politics coverage

New York appeals court Judge Anil Singh on Feb. 28 rejected the $100 million bond proposal, but allowed the defendants to continue doing business in New York and lifted the ban on seeking loans.

That temporary ruling is in effect before a full panel of appeals court judges is set to consider the matter next week.

Meanwhile, Trump on Friday posted a $91.6 million bond as he appeals a federal civil jury verdict finding him liable for defaming Carroll after she came forward to accuse him of raping her in the mid-1990s.

That was the second jury to order Trump to pay Carroll damages for defamation. The presumptive Republican presidential nominee has continued to attack Carroll, prompting her lawyers to suggest that they might file another defamation lawsuit.



Source link

New York AG questions Trump cash reserves in $464 mln fraud appeal Read More »

I Want to Double My Real Estate Portfolio…What Should I Do?

I Want to Double My Real Estate Portfolio…What Should I Do?


Want to double your real estate portfolio and bring in much more cash flow? What about using some of your untapped home equity to invest? Today, we’re showing you how to do just that on this episode of Seeing Greene, where we get into real estate partnerships, paying off rental properties, using home equity to invest, and the not-so-secret repeatable thirteen-percent return real estate investment.

Green means go, so we’re flooring it in this episode as David Greene and expert guest James Dainard bring some high-level investing tactics you can use to build wealth even faster. First, we get a question from Real Estate Rookie guest Matt Marcelissen, wondering how he can double his real estate portfolio by harnessing the power of partnerships. David and James give some rare advice on why you SHOULDN’T split things 50/50. Next, an investor wants to know if his low ROE (return on equity) rental is worth paying off. Then, what to do when you have home equity but can’t sell the house? And finally, James’ thirteen-percent return investment he’s using to pay for his kids’ college!

Want to ask David a question? If so, submit your question here so David can answer it on the next episode of Seeing Greene. Hop on the BiggerPockets forums and ask other investors their take, or follow David on Instagram to see when he’s going live so you can jump on a live Q&A and get your question answered on the spot!

David (00:00):
This is the BiggerPockets Podcast show 9 1 2. What’s going on everyone? This is David Greene, your host of the BiggerPockets Real Estate podcast, the show where we arm you with the information that you need to start building long-term wealth through real estate today. Today’s episode is a Seeing Green episode that I’m bringing to you from Las Vegas where I’m attending a Keller Williams real estate event and I brought in some backup. James Dayner and himself joins me to tackle your questions and help you all learn how to build more wealth, get more real estate, and put together the life that you’ve always wanted to live in today’s show, we got some really good stuff. We talk about trapped equity, what to do when you are equity rich, but cashflow poor. How to think about equity like a bank account and where you’re storing your energy, including the pros and cons of the different ways that you can store energy.

David (00:49):
And if you want to know how to get a 13% return, James is going to share one of his strategies with you all. So make sure you listen all the way to the end to get that information. Now up first we have a live caller wanting to double up his portfolio and we’re going to take that call right now. So buckle your seatbelt and get ready. Let’s see some green. Alright, up next we have Matthew Marli in Houston. He was featured on the BiggerPockets Rookie episode 3 47 and today’s Seeing Green. We’re doing our best to bring the BiggerPockets community into the podcast. Matthew, what’s on your mind? Hey

Matthew (01:21):
Guys, good afternoon. Thank you so much for having me, David. Firstly, I wanted to thank you so much for all of the information that you’ve doled out over the years. You guys have been instrumental in my success at helping me become stage one financially free. So super enthused and thank you so much. And James, congrats on the market. I love that podcast. I listened to the episodes as soon as they drop. So today wanted to ask about partnerships. So I currently have 11 units over four properties. I have all the TRS, S-T-R-M-T-R-L-T-R. My 2024 goals are pretty ambitious. I’d like to double my monthly profit from 5K to 10 K, and to do that I may need partnerships. I’ve already completed one partnership that went really well in New Braunfels, Texas. I gave my buddy a stellar deal. He may not know it. Just kidding.

Matthew (02:15):
I tell him all the time. So not only did I bring the time and the knowledge, but I also brought 50% of the funds to the closing table as a Texas real estate broker. I did receive some commission that I put some into the business startup fund, but as I continue on this journey, more friends are noticing my success and they want in totally don’t blame them, but since they’re busy w tours, they really can only contribute money and not time or knowledge. And we know that equity partners are more expensive than debt partners, but I do want to share this adventure with them. If you or me, how would you structure future partnerships that give my friends a fair return but also acknowledge my knowledge and time that I bring as well?

David (03:03):
All right, I’ve got some thoughts on that, but James ladies first

James (03:06):
Appreciate it. I absolutely love this question. We all do this when we first start getting investing. When you get going, you’re trying to raise the money, you’re offering massive service to start grow it out. I did the same thing throughout all of my twenties, partnering with people over providing the services. I definitely think I brought a lot more to the table than they did, but at the time, well, no, at the time, they were bringing a lot because they’re bringing the cash in. And as you grow, you have to adjust your partnerships and your offering because a one, you’re a more established operator with better systems, which means a safer investment for them. And your time is money that prevents you from scaling. And so that’s one thing I really had to figure out in my early thirties was like, Hey, I love these partnerships, but because I’m doing so much work, I can’t keep growing in certain aspects.

James (03:58):
And so you always want to audit those throughout the years, but typically a lot of us do that 50 50 split in the beginning and there’s nothing wrong with that, but it’s about exploring all the different options and what you need inside your business. There’s so many ways you could do it. Actually, we just built a calculator that allows people to play with it all and make offerings out for people and so they can play with the different fees throughout it because there’s different ways you can cut it up. You can still do a 50 50 split, but you’re still working throughout the deal in my opinion, 50 50, they would bring the cash in and then you can also fee it throughout each transaction, right? Like when they purchase it for the leasing, if there is a turn and you have to lease it up for a month, you can charge a fee there.

James (04:44):
The reason you want to charge your fees isn’t to be greedy. So you provide your company the capital to grow and scale, and the more capital you have coming in for the fees, the better your business can run, which is going to take better care of your investors. A lot of our fees when we’re doing partnerships, they’re not really profit centers for us, but what they are are engines for quality. Our company runs a lot more efficient now by having these fees because we’re not constrained on capital, it’s not affecting our return. So as you become a good operator, it’s about a, I don’t think you should be bringing your own money in the deal, and if you are bringing your own money in the deal, they should get a much smaller equity piece or they need to bring all the capital, but then make sure you’re charging for your time because you’re going to get your time back by having those extra fees. You can hire out and scale. You don’t want to get trapped in that partnership mud where you’re doing all the work and there’s nothing wrong with it, but it’s not going to get you to financial freedom 2.0.

Matthew (05:43):
Yeah, no, that makes perfect sense and that’s exactly what I was looking to hear, so I appreciate it.

David (05:48):
Before I weigh in, what are your thoughts on James’s answer, Matthew?

Matthew (05:51):
I love it just because I am naturally a doer. So for example, we had a big freeze in Texas and some of our pool equipment froze, so I got my car, drove here and fixed it and did some other things around the house. So I need to get out of that and charging those fees, being able to hire people to do that will allow me to scale.

David (06:11):
All right, Matt, I’m going to weigh in with my thoughts on this right after a quick break. So stick around for some more seeing green truth and welcome back. Matt here is trying to figure out how to double his portfolio with partnerships and then how to structure the splits. All right, I’ll weigh in on this whole idea of partnerships and I’m going to go a little bit deeper, which might not be what people want to hear. Oftentimes what someone’s looking for is just a quick answer. It should be 50 50, it should be 60 40. They just want a shortcut, but life doesn’t always work that way. Most things in life operate with a lot more gray than the quick answer we’re looking for. So when I’m in a situation like you, Matthew, where I’m trying to figure out how do I split a partnership, there’s a few negotiation principles that I’d put into play.

David (06:55):
The first thing is who controls the deal? That person has more negotiation leverage than the other one. So if your partner is finding the property and putting it under contract and they are in control of how things go, they’re relinquishing a portion of their power to you, which means that they have more negotiation leverage than you do. Now, if they are a poor manager of that leverage, they will give you a bigger split than what you maybe deserve. 50 50 tends to come out, everyone feels good about it, but you only feel good about it until you see who’s doing the work and who’s taking the risk. And then you don’t feel good about 50 50 anymore. It’s not as safe of a place to start as what people assume because like James was just saying, if he’s the one managing the risk, managing the clients, taking on all the stress and his partner’s just putting money in the deal, he’s not going to feel good about 50 50.

David (07:40):
It actually isn’t fair like what it said. In fact, the whole idea of fair is actually a social construct we’ve created. There’s no way of ever measuring what’s actually fair. So ask yourself who is controlling the leverage and then how much of your chunk do you want to give away? And ideally, Matthew, you want to be the one controlling the deal. You would rather be in the position that you’re contacting the realtor or you’re contacting the seller. You’ve run the numbers and you know what you want to leverage out. I don’t want to manage the rehab. I don’t want to do the design. I don’t want to figure out the money. You want clarity on what you actually need. It’s not an even 50 50 thing. It’s Matthew has a hundred of it. He’s willing to give away 37% of whatever those things are that you don’t want.

David (08:25):
Okay? Now it comes to what are you going to pay to get that? I would look at it and say for your partner, if we’re assuming that they’re money, don’t say, what is a fair percentage of this deal? Say, what is a fair compensation to them based on what the market is paying with the risk involved in this? So if they can go get 6% money in a CD or 10% money in the stock market with very little risk, maybe you give them a 20% return on their money because there’s some risk in this, they could actually lose it, right? Maybe it’s a home run deal with a ton of equity and there’s almost no risk. You offer ’em a 14% return, but the idea here is to set a baseline of what they could make somewhere else and make it better with you. When you’re controlling the deal, you are responsible for making sure that it makes sense for the other partner also. But don’t just default to 50 50 is what I’m getting at because that makes everybody feel good. You want to weigh in on that, James?

James (09:20):
Yeah, no, I completely agree. And I think when you’re looking at partnerships, don’t rush in because everyone gets excited about the deal and they’re like, I got this deal. I got to go get it done. And they get deal goggles and they forget about what actually they have and what they should be offering. And it is really important for you to walk through the numbers and play with the percentages. What is a great return for that investor and what are you happy with? And at the end of the day, it has to be both. And so when we talk about doing partnerships, we don’t ever ask what people want. We provide them with the opportunity, we know what their return is going to be and we say, Hey, look, do you want to invest in this deal and make an 8% pref with a 20% equity position? Your return should equal out to 25 to 30% over the next three to four years. And when you come with a plan saying, Hey, if we look at this on a one year, two year, three year basis, here’s your return. And if it’s beating where they can get, like David said, it’s a good investment for them, especially if they want to get interested. And the problem being is for them is they’re a W2 employee. They don’t have the time and you have the time, and so they need you.

James (10:37):
So don’t undervalue those services and just make sure it’s worth, if you’re giving someone a 20% return, like David said, that’s a huge return, you might be able to keep 90% of the equity and then as they participate more, maybe they’re signing on the debt instead of you. Maybe I give ’em more because they’re taking on risk. And so just looking at each one play with, and then I would suggest come up with two formats. I have an equity with a fee split that I do with people, and then I have a straight equity and they’re weighted differently depending on who the investor is and how they want to participate. And when you model it out, when people talk about me investing with me, I have three things that I offer. That’s it. I don’t make different types of side deals because different types of side deals also require different types of paperwork is really important as you’re working with new investors in the real estate space that everything’s documented with a lawyer set up correctly, whether it’s a lender agreement, an LLC, a joint venture agreement, and an understanding so they know exactly what’s going on because I have had a lot of partnerships in life, some have been amazing that have last almost 20 years, almost no issues, and some have been short-lived and nonstop issues.

James (11:50):
But what saves those partnerships at the end of the, is it all put down on paper so people really know what they’re getting into because people rush into deals and they’re like, Hey, how is this working? And explain the risk. Put it on paper. Have professionals prepare that paperwork after you’ve kind of allocated all your fees and then get your partnership going,

David (12:12):
And that will help you psychologically too. Matthew James is advising on a practical purpose, which is really good, but most people will go into whatever partnership they think is fair, and if no one proposes what is fair, then they’re going to say 50 50. We always default to that. But if you’re bringing them something that’s already been written up because controlling the deal and you’re saying, well, this is what I’ve offered to other people, and then maybe you sweeten it a little bit better just for them, you’ve now set a baseline of what is fair because that’s what the market is offering according to you, and you’ve made it even better so that of course they’re going to be happy doing it. When you don’t do that, their mind is like, well, I don’t want to get less than I deserve, but I also don’t want to get more.

David (12:50):
And there’s no baseline with which people can operate. We talk about that on the David Greene team all the time. The importance of setting a baseline, right? If I am trying to get you to buy a house, Matthew, and you don’t want to go over asking price, it’s because you’ve set a subconscious idea in your head that the asking price is what the house is worth and that’s where your baseline is. But if I can convince you that that house is worth more than the asking price, now you might be paying more than the asking price, but less than what it’s worth. I move the baseline to whatever the appraised value is or the market value. Humans need that in order to navigate these relationships with a lot of fear being taken advantage of and greed of wanting to get more of what they want. So James’s advice is awesome, right? You be the guy to do the work to draft up those documents and then say, Hey, here is the way that I do things. Tell me if you want to do this. And they’re going to look at it and say, well, is this better than what I could get in the stock market? And if so, you’re going to have yourself a partnership where you’re controlling it. Love

Matthew (13:45):
It. Love both of the responses, both five stars. Thank you, David.

David (13:49):
Thanks Matthew. Appreciate you man, and thanks so much for being here with us today. At this segment of the show, I like to review some of the comments that y’all have left on YouTube, as well as some of the reviews that our loyal followers have left for us on the podcast app itself. And then sometimes we get into some forum questions from BiggerPockets. So let’s see. These YouTube comments come from episode 8 97 where we interviewed my homie Felicia Rexford, and if you haven’t seen that episode, I highly recommend you check it out after this one. Alright, our first comment comes from ais Mendoza Trust made me feel at ease that my kids will not be homeless when my husband and I are not around anymore. Different generations have different struggles in life, but I want to make sure that my kids have strong foundations to deal with it. Oh, the mother’s love is something else, isn’t it James? It

James (14:35):
Is. Nothing Trumps that.

David (14:37):
Now be ulu. He says, my husband sent me this episode and he loves learning from your podcast. Thank you for continuing to show us how to diversify our incomes and the steps that you provide for us to get there. And Florian Iwo says, excellent content, just placed my home and real estate investments into a revocable living. Trust brains develop around the age of 26. So think about legacy planning. I appreciate the honesty and pivots and these ideas in turbulent times. And last but not least, we have a comment from the Apple podcast app that says, excellent resource. I stumbled into the real estate game after buying a duplex without realizing how much it would change my financial future. Ain’t that the truth? I remember I bought my first house, James, I had no idea what that was going to do for me. I found BP and dove into all the content they produce and have since used the equity in the duplex to buy a new primary. And I’m working on my first off market seller finance deal. I don’t claim to be an expert, but I’m amazed how confident I am working through this new deal because of my familiarity with real estate, which is in large part due to the education I received through bp. Thank you for all the hard work from redeemed Ski Bum via the Apple podcast. Such

James (15:45):
Nice things and we appreciate all the feedback. I know for us as hosts, we love getting the feedback so we can actually start other types of conversations too.

David (15:53):
That’s right. If you would like to be on Seeing Green, simply head over to biggerpockets.com/david and leave us your question because one, we can’t make the show without you, and two, we just want to get to know you. So let us know what struggles you’re having, what questions you have, what you’ve always wanted to know. If you bumped into David Greene or James Dainard in a bar at a conference, at an event, what would you say? What would you ask it here because here for you. Alright, let’s get into our next question. Good stuff. So far, this question comes from Jamie Dusa in Boston, Massachusetts.

Jaime (16:26):
Hi David. My name is Jamie Dusa from Boston Mass, and my question for you relates to loan pay down. I have a property that I will finally be able to pay off next year. I owe about 170,000 on the mortgage. I have a 4% interest rate and I’ve been into this loan for about eight years now. The property rents for 1850, the mortgage payment is 1400. So when you consider repairs, it doesn’t cashflow very much. The property itself is worth about 450 K as is. So I feel my return on equity is very low. If I paid off the mortgage, this would clear up about $12,000 a year. If you would not consider doing this, what would you think about doing instead? I don’t have access to wholesale deals and I feel the MLS is quite overpriced. Finally, the 1850 I charged should be likely closer to 2,500. What are your thoughts on raising rents? I’ve never done so on current tenants. Thanks.

David (17:23):
All right, Jamie, I’ll give you some practical advice here. First off, check out BiggerPockets podcast episodes 4 48 and the rookie episode 360 9 where we interviewed my buddy Dion McNeely and he has some advice there that just might help you, especially when it comes to raising rents. Second off, I’m in the same struggle. James is in the same struggle that all of you are in. Cashflow is very hard to find and the methods that we’ve utilized to try to find cashflow often end up with you getting a less than desirable property, a less than desirable location, or trading in your W2 for a full-time job trying to find cash flow real estate. And so you didn’t really get a net positive there. How I’ve adapted is I’ve started buying in properties that I believe will appreciate more than the national average. I call this market appreciation equity.

David (18:08):
So I look for literal market, cities, neighborhoods, areas where I think, look, if I’m not going to get cashflow, this needs to make up for it by getting more appreciation than I would get somewhere else, as well as adding value to properties. I have a new book coming out in August. I’m probably going to be calling it better than Cashflow that details some of these strategies. So think about that. If you can’t get the cash on cash return you want, how can you add value to real estate in other ways by buying it under market value, by adding value to it, by buying in better locations where you look back or five or 10 years and say, wow, this thing has performed so well. I don’t even care about the cash flow. Alright, our next question comes from Melissa Alejandro in California. David, I’m stuck in limbo.

David (18:49):
I have two properties, one I live in and one I just got in a trust that belongs to my mom. My goal is to buy a ranch at house, hack my home and maybe sell the house in the trust. The only problem is that my son, his family and my brother all live in the home that is in the trust. I need to buy a ranch first to put them in, then figure out what to do with the trust house. Both houses have equity and I’m not sure I want to use it. I’m thinking a hard money loan for a down payment on the ranch. I need help. After I get situated, I want to invest. I appreciate your time. Alright, so we’ve got some good real estate dilemmas coupled with some mom guilt, giving us a nice little cocktail. James, what are you thinking so far?

James (19:25):
The family guilt’s a real thing. My mom lives in one of my duplex units and I bring in $0 a month in rent, so it’s a great return, but it’s well worth it. And that’s the one beautiful thing about real estate is it can give you financial freedom to where you can help your family out and that is the power of real estate. But we all go through these different transition periods as investors, we have assets we might not want to touch them, especially with low debt on ’em right now, we don’t intend on selling them because maybe they’re not traders like I am, they want to keep ’em in their portfolio or they have a reason to keep in ’em, but they’ve created enough equity that they want to go and acquire more property, but they’re low on liquidity. And so it’s that bridge financing that you’re looking for.

James (20:14):
And there’s two great options for that. One is hard money. You want to find a cross collateralized lender that’s a hard money lender that is going to take your equity position, which will be in second position, and that’s a harder loan to get. Hard money. Lenders will give you cross collaterals. If you own a piece of property free and clear, that’s a really easy thing for them to put a loan on as you’re buying that next property. When it’s in second position, you have to really clearly state what the equity position is, what the cashflow is, and you want to make them feel comfortable. But you can find a hard money lender that will take your equity position and they’ll look at that and they’ll consider that as your down payment for your farm property. In addition to, as you’re a real estate investor, I’m a firm believer working with local banks, local banks look at you as like an asset rather than just a person that fits in a square box like many of the big banks.

James (21:06):
If you move your deposits and banking over to these smaller banks that are local to where your real estate is or where you’re buying and you move deposits over, they will work with you and help you put your plan together. So they will also look at giving you a bridge loan based on your deposits and your properties that you have with equity in ’em, and they will bridge it with a construction loan or a bridge loan at that point. So really you want to talk to these local lenders that are more creative because when you’re dealing with those bridge loans, you have to have them be able to see the big picture, not just what’s on your W2 or your tax

David (21:41):
Return. And I think that Melissa here has the right idea. Get another property, move my family into that one, then figure out what to do with the equity. I love these issues that we’re trying to struggle.

James (21:52):
And David, I like what you said about equity, right? As we build this equity, equity’s really a bank account and people kind of hoard it and they’re like, oh, this is my special thing. I have all this equity, I have all this net worth, but it’s just a number on the paper and if you don’t use it, you can’t really ize it. And the purpose of building equity is building a bank account. If I want to go make cashflow, that usually requires money. If you go buy a standard rental property, you’re putting 20% down to make a six to 7% return, or maybe even 10 if you’re buying a good deal. Equity is the same thing. You’re just utilizing, instead of transferring your bank account, you’re transferring property to property. And as long as you’re increasing your position, that is a smart move. And so I think a lot of people need to treat your properties like an ATM, don’t go buy boats, but pull the cash out when you need it and then go reallocate and go buy some more investments. And that’s how you scale and grow.

David (22:47):
Good deal there. In pillars of wealth, I talk about how equity is a form of energy, financial energy that you have wrapped up in a property. Cash in the bank is a form of financial energy that you have stored at a bank account. Your 401k is a form of financial energy that you have stored. Now, different forms of energy have different pluses and minuses. Money in the bank is very liquid. You can use it in a pinch. Energy in a 401k is going to be efficient because it’s not being taxed, but you can’t use it as easily. So understanding the pluses and minuses, the pros and cons of all the places where you can store energy will sort of give you an advantage when you’re playing this investing game. But to your point, James, yeah, if you’re an active investor who’s trying to find deals, who’s trying to put them under contract, you need a bigger proportion of that energy where you can get to it via money in the bank, via a HELOC on a property where you can quickly take the energy out of a house.

David (23:39):
So Melissa, thank you very much for your question here. I think you just need to get a little bit more clarity on what the next deal’s going to look like. Then you’ve got lots of options. You can throw a HELOC on the property that you have right now and use that for the down payment. You could do a cash out refinance if you wanted. I know you didn’t want to take out debt, but you’re going to need to get the money for the next house from somewhere and we’ve got more in store for you. So stay tuned right after this quick break. Welcome back to the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast. Let’s jump back in. Alright, and our last question of the day comes from sar. Has Mohammed David, in your episode 8 97, James Dainard mentioned about a hard cash investment that returns 13% per year. Can I please get more information on that investment? Thank you. Well, Sarda, yes. So politely that I brought James in himself. Just to answer your question, BiggerPockets with the white glove treatment. So James, what is this 13% annual return that you speak of and how might one partake?

James (24:35):
When I started preparing for my kids, once you have your kids, you start thinking about my whole mindset changed. You got to worry about 10, 20 years down the road, not just for yourself but for them. And as I saw education in college just skyrocketing the last 10 years since they were born, I wanted to be proactive and kind of stay up with those costs, right? Because the point of investing is to hedge against inflation, hedge against rising costs and to keep you in the game. And I started looking at the 5 29 plan where it’s a great plan, you can invest in it. It goes into the stock market, gets you steady growth, it protects the money. But the issue for me is I’m a high return person. I don’t like to do it traditional. And that has not worked well for me over 18 years.

James (25:19):
The way I do it seems to work for me, which is high risk investments with high returns. So then I started exploring, well, what can I do better that maybe isn’t a shelter but I can get a higher return? And that’s where I looked into a hard money lending fund and you have to be very careful about who you’re investing with. But I basically deposited $20,000 for each kid. And those compound at 10% annually and over 10 years, that $20,000 is going to turn into almost 275,000. And that’s how you keep in. That’s how you keep in the game and you keep up with those rising costs, but you want to make sure you’re doing it the right way and with the right company. The first thing is, many times when you’re investing in these types of hard money funds, they’re going to pay you a return eight to 10% roughly, or depending on what they’re lending it at.

James (26:13):
But you have to be accredited. Now, my kids are not accredited investors, so I did put the money in accounts under their name, my name for them. And so in this hard money fund, I have my own investment and then I have two separate accounts that are for my children that are compounding regularly. You need to vet these operators. There is all sorts of syndicators out there. There’s all sorts of hard money shops that have popped up and they’re newer to the market. And when you’re working with an operator that is not used to market condition changes, that’s where it can be a lot higher risk. And so things you want to do is how long has the company been in business for? What is the operator’s experience? What do they lend on? Is it a high risk investment? The fund that my kids are in with me, it’s a first position deed to trust with intrust funding.

James (27:02):
And so they only lend on properties with first position deeds of trust in a specific area I know well, and the average loan to value is at 65%. And so it’s a safe fund for me to stick my kids’ future in because I know what they’re lending on. So you want to find out who the operators are, how long they’ve been operating for, what they lend on, and then what is the requirements for them to lend because you don’t want to give your money to, whether it’s your kids’ money or money to hard money lenders that are just trying to push money out the door nonstop because that’s how they get into riskier loans. But there’s so many different things that you can do with your kids. You can buy a house in their name, you could buy a piece of raw land for 5,000 and put it in their name and let it grow over 20 years. That’s also going to get you a high return if you buy in the right area. And so just don’t look at just the traditional ways all the time. If you want higher growth, look at what you can execute on. I mean, you can go buy land for five grand, take that money, let it grow, and then let ’em sell it to fund their college.

David (28:01):
I think when people hear the ROI, in this case 13%, there’s an assumption that it’s passive. Especially because traditionally most investment options anybody got involved in, we’re all passive. Do I buy stocks? Do I buy bonds? Do I put my money in a cd? Do I give a personal loan? So we created this idea of ROI to compare investment options, apples to apples. Well, if I give them my money, how much of it will I get back every year? But real estate investing is not passive. A business is not passive. We’ve now kind of created a spectrum of passivity and the higher returns tend to come with either more risk or more work. So if you don’t want the risk, you can get a better return by taking on more work. If you don’t want the work, you can get a better return by taking on the risk.

David (28:42):
And if you don’t want either one, you’re going to get a lower return, which means you need more capital to be able to invest. So this podcast, we typically teach people about how to invest their money and there’s going to be some form of activeness. You’re going to be managing a flip, managing contractors, managing a team of people that’s helping you managing a short-term rental. But there’s always going to be a form of management, which is not passive income. So what I’m getting at here is don’t get tricked into just comparing the ROI on a deal. This one gives a 5% return, this one gives a 15% return, this one gives a 25% return. I’m going to go with the 25. That might be a flip that has a lot of risk and a lot of work associated with it. And the 5% return could have been the opposite of that.

David (29:24):
Alright, thank you everybody. Sarda, I hope you’re happy. We got James himself into answer your question and all the rest of you remember, I need you to go to bigger p.com/david and submit your question to be featured on a future episode of Seeing Green. Also, if you’d be so kind, leave us some comments on YouTube. Let us know what you thought about today’s show and what you’d like to see more of. And if you’ve got a minute, please go leave us a review wherever you listen to your podcast. Those help a ton. James, anything you want to say before we get out of here? No,

James (29:51):
I think these are great. I think keep sending in the questions. I love coming on here with you. Just this is my favorite thing, breaking down the mechanics of real estate. What is that next step? And you don’t know until you ask the question and send in the questions. We will happily

David (30:07):
Discuss ’em. If you want to know more about where you can find James or I, just go to the show notes. You’ve got our contact info on there. So if you’re too embarrassed to ask something on Scene Green, you can send us a direct message on your favorite social media. And if you’ve got a minute, check out another BiggerPockets video. This is David Greene for James, the great dard signing off.

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.





Source link

I Want to Double My Real Estate Portfolio…What Should I Do? Read More »