Richard

Business Advice: I Asked 100+ Founders of M-B Businesses

Business Advice: I Asked 100+ Founders of $1M-$1B Businesses


What does it take to start and grow a business to $1 million? Or even $1 billion?

If you’re among the more than six in 10 (62%) of U.S. adults who want to be their own boss, you might be familiar with the basics of entrepreneurship. Still, the prospect of leaving a secure 9-5 job to go all-in on a side hustle or business can be daunting.

Hearing from founders who have already traveled the path to business success — and learning from their mistakes made and wins achieved along the way — can help prepare you for your own entrepreneurial journey.

Related: I Wish I Received This Advice as a Young Entrepreneur

Over the past four years, I’ve interviewed more than 100 successful entrepreneurs who started businesses worth $1 million to $1 billion or more.

I’ve sat down with business luminaries like Richard Branson (Virgin Group), Martha Stewart (Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia), Alexis Ohanian (Reddit), John Mackey (Whole Foods Market) and Bobbi Brown (Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, Jones Road Beauty), among so many others.

No matter how well-known the founders or their particular industries, they, like all entrepreneurs, had to push through business ups and downs to reach success on the other side.

Related: 7 Critical Pieces of Business Advice for Entrepreneurs Just Getting Started

Needless to say, their entrepreneurial careers have taught them a lot, and even if you take just one lesson from their experiences, you could be one step closer to achieving your own business goals.

Read on to see some of their best advice.

Be curious and open-minded

Martha Stewart – Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia

Stewart stresses the value of curiosity — and explains how she uses it to expand her horizons every day.

“Curiosity is certainly a character trait that I think is very important if you’re trying to understand, ‘Where is the world going? What the hell are we doing here? What are we going to do?'” Stewart says. “So I’ve always been happy to be curious. I read a lot. I travel a lot. And one of the things I try very hard to do is never drive down the same street twice if there’s an alternative so that I might see something that I’ve never seen before. And when I travel, I try to do the same thing. I try to see as much as I can in a day.”

Melissa Ben-Ishay – Baked By Melissa

Ben-Ishay isn’t afraid to admit when she doesn’t have all the answers.

“I love to be wrong,” Ben-Ishay says. “I don’t think I know everything. In fact, the older I get and the more experience I have under my belt, the less I know. And that is something I know with certainty. And I think that is an incredibly important mindset for a leader and an entrepreneur.”

Related: 3 Ways to Foster a Culture of Curiosity (and Why You Should)

Arsha Jones – Capital City Mambo Sauce

Jones didn’t grow up in a family of entrepreneurs and says she was on her own when it came to figuring out how to grow her small, home-based business. Without outside money to fund her venture or an extensive network to tap into, she took a grassroots approach instead.

Jones scanned grocery shelves for small bottled brands, “like a local barbecue sauce,” and then sent their owners an email: “I would say, ‘How did you do X? And how did you get on the store shelf?'” Jones explains. “And they would just sit down and answer any kind of questions that I had. And that was really how I jumped over a few of those hurdles, at least in the beginning.”

Image Credit: Courtesy of Capital City Mambo Sauce. Arsha Jones.

Get clear on what you want and stay true to it

John Mackey – Whole Foods Market, Love.Life

Mackey suggests entrepreneurs first figure out if they want to be startup serial entrepreneurs or builder entrepreneurs. “If you’re the serial entrepreneur, then my advice is figure out when is a good time to sell so you can go on to your next thing,” he says.

Mackey’s advice for builder entrepreneurs concerns the critical issue of venture capital. He says most venture capitalists and those in private equity will automatically assume you’re a serial entrepreneur, and “they’ll be looking to replace you.”

“If you are going to be a builder, you should be very clear with the investors that you bring in that you’re not looking to sell the business: You’re looking to build it — you hope to grow it for many years, and the exit for them will not be a sale. It’ll be an IPO,” Mackey says.

Tom Baker – Mr Black Cold Brew Coffee Liqueur

Baker says it’s important to consider your business’s unique offering, even if it slows you down temporarily.

“[I wish we’d] spent a little more time upfront thinking about how we were actually going to recruit drinkers into our brand,” Baker explains. “What will we be better at than every other liquor company? How am I going to get into [customers’] repertoire? I think we probably could have saved millions of dollars and a few years had I just spent another three months thinking about that before we started Mr Black.”

Related: How to Turn Vision Into Reality — A Step-by-Step Approach to Achieving Your Goals

Jackie Summers – Sorel Liqueur

Summers recommends taking breaks to get an accurate accounting of your goals.

“Our culture says you must keep going at 100 miles an hour at all times,” Summers says. “If you don’t have a chance to reflect, you don’t get the opportunity to see what your strengths and weaknesses are and how you’re going to compensate for both. It’s important to cocoon on a regular basis — whether [that’s] 20 minutes of meditation a day or being able to get away once every few weeks and spend some time in nature and quiet your mind. Once you have clarity, all sorts of things can move forward.”

Irene Chen and Matthew Grenby – Parker Thatch

Parker Thatch makes handbags, but its “true mission” is about giving customers a confidence boost, Chen says — a guiding principle that helps other aspects of the business fall into place.

Finding that “why” helped supercharge the company and serves as a solid defense against inevitable industry challenges, like competitors that produce knock-offs, Grenby says.

“That ‘why’ is not something that’s not easily copyable,” he explains. “If it’s not authentic, people sense that, and they value authenticity.”

Image Credit: Courtesy of Parker Thatch. Matthew Grenby and Irene Chen.

Don’t wait forever to start — do take calculated risks

Jenny Just – PEAK6 Investments, Poker Power

Just emphasizes that strategic early risk-taking can pay off in spades.

“When we talk about women taking risks, it’s not about taking bigger risks,” Just explains. “It’s just taking more risks sooner, and what poker allows you to do is take those risks in a bite-sized way.”

Johanna Hartzheim – Wildgrain

Hartzheim recommends jumping in and learning as you go.

“Just go for it because it’s something you learn while doing,” Hartzheim says. “It sounds kind of cliche, but as long as you’re motivated and passionate, you can do anything. I knew nothing about tracking, importing, all these things, but it’s not rocket science. You can learn anything or find the right people who do know these things.”

Related: You Have to Take Risks to Succeed. Here Are 4 Risk-Taking Benefits in Entrepreneurship

Kathrin Hamm – Bearaby

Hamm suggests setting a definitive timeline to put your best foot forward.

“Once you believe in a product, just take a chance and give yourself a year,” Hamm says. “It’s much more manageable if you [have] a considerable time frame where it’s like, Okay, in that year, I’m giving everything I have, 100%. Because sometimes we second guess ourselves. After [a few] months or six weeks, we don’t see the success, [and] we start doubting ourselves. You say [I have] one year, and I’m not asking if this is working. Just have tunnel vision for one year, and then reevaluate after those 365 days.”

Image Credit: Courtesy of Bearaby. Kathrin Hamm.

Embrace failure and the learning-filled journey

Payam Zamani – Autoweb, One Planet Group

Zamani notes that entrepreneurial fulfillment doesn’t have to depend on a business’s success.

“The fact is the overwhelming majority of businesses don’t survive,” Zamani says. “So you want to make that journey worth experiencing, and not just seeking an exit, seeking an IPO that may never happen. Then you feel like, ‘Ah, that was a failure.’ But if you’re making that journey something that’s worth living, you will always feel fulfilled whether or not that climax comes about in your business.”

Bobbi Brown – Bobbi Brown Cosmetics, Jones Road Beauty

Brown suggests giving entrepreneurship a shot so you don’t have to wonder “what if.”

“If you don’t try, you’ll never know,” Brown says. “I don’t believe in failure because it’s just a message that if something didn’t work out, do it differently.”

Related: 7 Ways Companies Can Harness Failure to Drive Success

Ellen Bennett – Hedley & Bennett

Bennett cautions against aiming for overnight success because a slow and steady approach brings some of the biggest gains.

“I’m a huge believer in the long game,” Bennett says. “You can start something out of your house with no money and have a viable, profitable business that you are a majority owner of many years later. And that is awesome. There’s nothing wrong with taking longer to build something great. I know our whole lives are oriented towards speed and how quickly things grow and [becoming] a unicorn, but you can be a long-game unicorn, too.”

Missy Tannen – Boll & Branch

Missy Tannen emphasizes that aspiring entrepreneurs don’t have to have it all figured out from the start.

“You don’t have to know everything day one,” she says. “You’re going to learn so much along the way, and I think if we’d realized all the things we didn’t know, we would have never started.”

Image Credit: Courtesy of Boll & Branch. Missy and Scott Tannen.

Keep your priorities in check

Alexis Ohanian – Reddit

Ohanian wants to reframe the question of what it takes to achieve work-life balance.

“I don’t think it’s about work-life balance,” Ohanian explains. “I don’t think anyone can really accomplish that. It’s not about balancing. If you’re chasing balance, you’re implying, like Thanos, [that] you’d be able to create something perfectly balanced. And the reality is work-life [is] never 50/50. You’ll never achieve anywhere close to that — nor should you. There are times in your life where you will need to focus on the career, the work. There are times in your life when you need to focus on life. It’s on a spectrum that’s ever-flowing back and forth.”

Related: 5 Priorities for Young Entrepreneurs

Do good and do well

Wemimo Abbey – Esusu

Abbey stresses that responsible entrepreneurship doesn’t have to be a zero-sum game.

“We need to find ways where we can create a win-win-win construct across the board,” Abbey says. “We really believe in this idea of justice capitalism: We can do good and do well — and it’s by no means mutually exclusive.”

Cason Crane – Explorer Cold Brew

Crane acknowledges that not every customer will support Explorer Cold Brew because of its LGBTQ+ partnerships, but he’s committed to running a business that reflects his values.

“It certainly helps keep me going every day,” Crane says. “There are things that you do as a business owner to position your business for financial success, and then there are the things you do to keep yourself excited to get out of bed every morning. And I think it’s important as a business owner to do both.”

Related: How to Make Giving Back Part of Your Brand’s DNA

Randy Goldberg and David Heath – Bombas

Goldberg and Heath say founders must ensure the mission is “fully integrated into the business.”

“Every team at Bombas is responsible for the mission in either a direct or an indirect way,” Heath says. “And I think having that so intertwined makes our employees feel good about our mission. But it also makes it so that the mission shows up in everything that we do, from customer experience interactions, to the website, to the creative, to the product. It’s so much a part of our DNA that you could never separate the mission. It’s not an afterthought.”

Image Credit: Courtesy of Bombas. David Heath and Randy Goldberg.

Lead with intention and encourage creativity

Chris Kirby – Ithaca Hummus

Kirby explains what it takes to build a company culture that promotes ideation, risk-taking and learning.

“I’ve learned that true leadership is about empathy, clear communication and creating an environment where people feel valued and empowered,” Kirby says. “So I’ve worked hard to build a culture that’s the complete opposite of what I experienced in a lot of those kitchens. I want my team to feel safe to share ideas, take risks and learn from mistakes without fear of being punished.”

Scott Tannen – Boll & Branch

Tannen says that a business leader is only as good as the people with whom they surround themselves.

“I am not the most talented person in this company by miles,” Tannen explains, “and I think that’s a mark of a great company when I can say that.”

Related: What Makes a Good Leader? Here’s What I’ve Learned After 20-Plus Years as a CEO.

Jocelyn Gailliot – Tuckernuck

Gailliot says Tuckernuck leaders strive to learn from their team members, which means listening to them.

“We constantly ask [them] questions,” Gailliot says. “I’ve been in industries before where it’s very much: ‘This is the role you play at these different hierarchical levels.’ And for us, it’s always been: ‘You’re on the team — you have amazing ideas to contribute, and we want to hear them.’ And we really do.”

Richard Branson – Virgin Group

Branson cites Virgin Unite’s The Elders, a group of independent global leaders working for peace and human rights that has included leaders like Nelson Mandela and Jimmy Carter, as an example of strong leadership.

“They’re all great listeners,” Branson explains. “They know what they’re thinking. They don’t need to hear themselves saying it out loud, and the only way they can learn is by listening to other people talk.”

Work hard to achieve the results you want

Amir Loloi – Loloi Rugs

Loloi says that the only person standing in the way of your business success is yourself.

“If you dream big and work hard, no one is there to stop you,” Loloi explains. “It’s not about the color of your skin. It’s not about your background. It’s not about your religion. It’s not about anything except about you personally: What are you willing to do? When you are given a task, how much more are you willing to add to it to deliver so much more? If you want to be someone in life, step out of the boundaries.”

Image Credit: Courtesy of Loloi. Amir Loloi and his sons.

Adriana Carrig – Little Words Project

Carrig suggests a three-pronged strategy to realize your biggest dreams.

“If you want it bad enough that you’re willing to work for it and believe in yourself, and all those things come together in this perfect trifecta, then there’s nothing you can’t achieve,” Carrig says. “So go for it.”

Related: 7 Elements of a Strong Work Ethic

Fawn Weaver – Uncle Nearest Premium Whiskey

According to Weaver, entrepreneurs need to give the business their all — or rethink it altogether.

“If you’re not going to do it with excellence and with consistency, bow out and get a job,” Weaver says. “Period. If you are going to do it with excellence and with consistency over time, don’t let anybody slow you down — no one. Just keep going after it, because the only people that fail doing it with excellence and with consistency are those who give up before they succeed.”



Source link

Business Advice: I Asked 100+ Founders of $1M-$1B Businesses Read More »

Where  Million in Retirement Savings Lasts the Longest: Study

Where $1 Million in Retirement Savings Lasts the Longest: Study


A Northwestern Mutual study showed that the magic number for retirement, or the number that U.S. adults think they will need to save to retire comfortably, leaped to $1.46 million in 2024, up from $951,000 in 2019.

Americans, on average, reported having saved $88,400 for retirement in 2024, per the same study, leaving a $1.37 million gap between goals and reality.

Now, a new analysis from GoBankingRates released earlier this month examined just how far a hypothetical $1 million in retirement savings will stretch in each state when combined with Social Security benefits.

GoBankingRates used data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, and Missouri’s Economic and Research Information Center to find how long a $1 million retirement nest egg will last given each state’s cost of living.

Related: Where Do You Have the Most Buying Power? In These 4 Cities, Your Paycheck Is Worth More Than It Seems.

The study calculated the cost of living by looking at the prices of necessities like housing, food, transportation, and utilities in each state. The researchers did not include federal and state income taxes in their estimates. The average monthly Social Security retirement check in January was $1,976, per the Social Security Administration.

The states where retirement funds run out the fastest usually have the highest cost of living and the greatest average monthly expenditures.

Hawaii tops the list; $1 million in retirement savings, plus Social Security benefits, would last less than 13 years in the state. One cause could be high housing costs due to restrictive land use regulations that only allow for 4% of the state’s land to be used for residential purposes. The resulting land scarcity means high home prices — the median price of a home in Hawaii is 2.7 times the national average with a median price of $850,000.

California and Massachusetts are also states where $1 million in retirement savings runs out in less than 20 years. GoBankingRates estimates that monthly expenses in those states are higher than $2,200, with Californians spending more on groceries per month than any other state’s residents. Housing in Massachusetts is priced 108% higher than the national average.

Related: $1 Million Retirement Savings Won’t Last 25 Years Anywhere in the U.S. — But It Will Go the Furthest in These 6 States

On the flip side, a $1 million retirement nest egg could last for over 70 years in five states where the cost of living is low: Oklahoma (71 years), Louisiana (76 years), Arkansas (76 years), Mississippi (87 years) and West Virginia (88 years). Factoring in Social Security, monthly expenses come out to less than $1,200 in these states, per GoBankingRates.

West Virginia has a cost of living 9% lower than the national average, with housing 21% lower than average, according to RentCafe. The World Population Review estimated in a 2024 ranking that Mississippi had the lowest cost of living in the U.S. with the lowest housing prices overall.

Here are the states where $1 million in retirement savings will last the longest, and where it will run out fast.

States Where $1 Million in Retirement Savings Will Run Out More Quickly

1. Hawaii

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,761
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $80,125
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 12.48

2. California

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,269
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $61,406
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 16.29

3. Massachusetts

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,340
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $51,686
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 19.35

4. Washington

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,096
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $45,629
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 21.92

5. New Jersey

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,001
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $41,315
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 24.20

6. Colorado

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,899
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $39,759
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 25.15

7. New Hampshire

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,081
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $38,052
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 26.28

8. Utah

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,893
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $37,797
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 26.46

9. Oregon

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,017
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $37,346
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 26.78

10. Rhode Island

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $2,113
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $36,920
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 27.09

States Where $1 Million in Retirement Savings Lasts the Longest

1. West Virginia

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,833
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $11,263
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 88.79

2. Mississippi

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,784
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $11,473
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 87.16

3. Arkansas

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,725
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $13,000
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 76.93

4. Louisiana

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,785
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $13,065
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 76.54

5. Oklahoma

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,832
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $14,048
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 71.18

6. Kentucky

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,864
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $14,456
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 69.17

7. Alabama

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,794
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $14,874
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 67.23

8. Iowa

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,836
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $15,158
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 65.97

9. Kansas

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,801
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $15,315
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 65.29

10. Ohio

  • Average monthly expenditure cost: $1,853
  • Annual total cost of living for one person after Social Security benefits: $16,099
  • How many years $1M and Social Security benefits will last: 62.12

Click here for the full report.



Source link

Where $1 Million in Retirement Savings Lasts the Longest: Study Read More »

Scaling Your Business? You May Not Want to Hire More People Right Away — Here’s Why.

Scaling Your Business? You May Not Want to Hire More People Right Away — Here’s Why.


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

Within startups, especially tech startups, there’s long been this idea that if you’re not growing fast, you’re falling behind. Growth has always meant hiring more people as quickly as possible. But today, I see things a bit differently. Scaling a company doesn’t have to mean adding more people to the payroll. A small, tight-knit team can accomplish just as much, if not more, than a big one — especially if you’re smart about how you run things.

When I started my most recent company, Bread, we wanted to build something impactful without getting bogged down by the typical growing pains that come with rapid hiring. The big question we kept asking ourselves was: How do we make the most out of a small team?

What we found is that staying lean can actually be a huge advantage.

Related: Small Team, Big Success — 3 Ways to Make the Most Out of a Small Team

Why bigger isn’t always better

A lot of startups get caught up in the idea that more people equals more success. But I’ve seen firsthand how quickly that can backfire. The more people you have, the harder it becomes to communicate effectively, and making decisions starts to slow down. Before you know it, you have layers of management and it’s much harder to keep everyone on the same page.

In my experience, keeping the team small has allowed us to stay focused. We can make decisions faster, change direction when we need to and stay close to the work that really matters. We’re not trying to build a massive organization — we’re trying to build something that works well and does what it’s supposed to do.

The perks of keeping it small

There are a lot of upsides to sticking with a small team:

  • Quick on your feet: With fewer people involved, you can pivot quickly if something isn’t working or if a new opportunity pops up. If you run your company in short cycles — about six weeks — you’re always in a position to make adjustments without getting stuck in the weeds.
  • Communication flows easily: Without a ton of management layers, it’s easier to make sure everyone knows what’s going on. When your team is all on the same page, it makes everything you do more effective.
  • Creativity thrives: When you’re part of a small team, you often end up wearing multiple hats, which can lead to some pretty creative solutions. Focus on hiring people who are comfortable switching between tasks — whether it’s coding, designing or strategic thinking.
  • Less overhead: Automate your routine tasks so you can focus on the stuff that really matters, and so you don’t need a big admin team to keep the wheels turning.

It might seem counterintuitive but ultimately, having fewer people can allow you to accomplish more.

Related: How Small Teams Can Achieve Big Results

How to make a big impact with a small team

So, how do you scale a company without blowing up your headcount? One of the key strategies my team has employed is automation. By building our own tools to handle tasks like reporting and forecasting, we’ve significantly reduced the time spent on administrative work, allowing us to focus on the bigger picture.

The adoption of low-code and no-code platforms is also becoming increasingly popular. Coding automation tools like these allow small teams to build and deploy applications incredibly fast without needing to hire more engineers.

Making a big impact with a small team requires versatility in hiring. When I’m in hiring mode, I don’t just look for people who are good at one thing; I seek out individuals who can think strategically but aren’t afraid to roll up their sleeves and dive into the work. It’s important to have team members who are comfortable with both the big-picture thinking and the nitty-gritty details.

My co-founders and I have also learned to be selective about the projects we take on. With a small team, it’s impossible to do everything, so we focus on initiatives that align with our strengths and goals.

Small teams, big results

There are plenty of examples out there of small teams doing big things. WhatsApp, for instance, had only 55 employees when Facebook bought it for $19 billion. Or take Basecamp, which has kept its team at around 60 people while serving millions of users. You don’t need a massive workforce to make a huge impact.

For me, the small-team approach isn’t about staying small for the sake of it. It’s about staying lean and focused, so we can do our best work without getting bogged down in unnecessary complexity. I’ve found that when you have a small, dedicated team that works well together, you can accomplish a lot more than you might think.

Related: 5 Ways Lean Teams Can Work Smarter and Get More Done

The small team trend

After the rapid hiring and subsequent workforce reductions that many tech companies experienced in the last four years, I think more leaders are realizing that you don’t need a big team to succeed. It’s not about how many people you have; it’s about how effective those people are. And in a lot of cases, keeping it small might be the smartest way to grow.

As an early entrepreneur, don’t get too caught up in the idea that growth means hiring more people. Focus on building a team that works well together, stays flexible, and gets things done. In the end, it’s not about the size of your team — it’s about what that team can achieve.



Source link

Scaling Your Business? You May Not Want to Hire More People Right Away — Here’s Why. Read More »

Starbucks Is Cutting 13 Drinks From Its Menu Next Week: List

Starbucks Is Cutting 13 Drinks From Its Menu Next Week: List


Starbucks has been making a slew of changes in recent months as new CEO Brian Niccol tries to turn around the coffeehouse’s lagging sales. It has revamped the code of conduct, added ceramic mugs, and capped mobile orders. On Monday, the company announced it was laying off 1,100 corporate jobs.

Now, the coffee giant is also cutting its menu.

In an announcement posted to the company’s website, Starbucks said it would eliminate 30% of its menu by the end of fiscal year 2025 in the U.S. The cuts begin next week on Tuesday, March 4.

“We’re simplifying our menu to focus on fewer, more popular items, executed with excellence,” the statement says. “This will make way for innovation, help reduce wait times, improve quality and consistency, and align with our core identity as a coffee company.”

Despite the cuts (see full list below), Starbucks is still adding new items. The announcement touts its recently launched “premium” Cortado espresso beverage, which “has already performed beyond our expectations.”

Starbucks will also bring back its Lavender beverages lineup this spring and introduce an “Iced Cherry Chai” and “Jalapeño Chicken Pocket” sandwich.   

Related: ‘Necessary Change’: Starbucks Is Laying Off 1,100 Corporate Workers and Eliminating Open Roles

“We’re helping to create a more intentional, thoughtful experience for our customers — one where every drink is handcrafted with precision and care,” the company said.

Starbucks shared the full list of the drinks that will be eliminated with The Associated Press. Here’s what is being cut next week.

  1. Iced Matcha Lemonade
  2. Espresso Frappuccino
  3. Caffè Vanilla Frappuccino
  4. Java Chip Frappuccino
  5. White Chocolate Mocha Frappuccino
  6. Chai Crème Frappuccino
  7. Caramel Ribbon Crunch Crème Frappuccino
  8. Double Chocolaty Chip Crème Frappuccino
  9. Chocolate Cookie Crumble Crème Frappuccino
  10. White Chocolate Crème Frappuccino
  11. White Hot Chocolate
  12. Royal English Breakfast Latte
  13. Honey Almondmilk Flat White



Source link

Starbucks Is Cutting 13 Drinks From Its Menu Next Week: List Read More »

Joann Will Shutter All of Its 800 U.S. Stores, Conduct Sales

Joann Will Shutter All of Its 800 U.S. Stores, Conduct Sales


Craft and fabrics retailer Joann, which has been in business for the past 80 years, announced it is closing all 800 of its stores in 49 states and going out of business following a period of financial turmoil and low sales.

The company has 19,000 employees, 15,600 of whom are part-time.

Joann filed for bankruptcy in March 2024, going from a publicly traded company to a private one while reporting between $1 billion and $10 billion in debt. The company filed for bankruptcy again earlier this year, then stated that it would close 500 of its locations and keep about 300 open as it tried, and failed, to find a buyer to keep it in business.

Assets were auctioned off on Friday. According to a news release, the financial services firm GA Group was selected as the winning bidder. As part of the agreement, GA Group will shutter the company’s operations, choosing to shut the doors of all 800 Joann stores.

Related: Macy’s Just Released the List of 66 Stores Closing This Year — Here’s Where

“Joann leadership, our Board, advisors and legal partners made every possible effort to pursue a more favorable outcome that would keep the company in business,” the statement read. “We are committed to working constructively with the winning bidder to ensure an orderly wind-down of operations that minimizes the impact on all our stakeholders.”

Joann stated that going-out-of-business sales would start immediately at all locations and online, with the timeline for store closings still unclear. According to the company’s customer FAQ, store closure dates will be disclosed “as soon as possible” and the company expects to take “a number of weeks” to complete its final sales.

A Joann store in Miami, Florida. Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Crafters and designers took to X to express their sadness that Joann was closing.

“Joann is the reason I was able to have a small part of my life be that of a designer/maker,” one X user wrote. “It was the only accessible fabric store for millions of people. I’m gutted.”

Another X user wrote that it was “a dark day for crafters” while yet another stated that “the world is feeling increasingly devoid of inspiration and community.”

Sewist Julie Muniz presented a different take, writing on LinkedIn that shopping at Joann was “more of a necessary evil than an inspiring experience” and that “relying too heavily on a niche market and not heavily enough on customer loyalty and experience does not bode well for a lasting legacy.”

Joann was established in 1943 as the Cleveland Fabric Shop. It began calling itself Jo-Ann Fabrics in the 1960s, then eventually Joann in March 2018.

Joann isn’t the only store to recently shut its doors. Kmart closed its last full-sized U.S. store in October while Sears shut down its last New York location in January, bringing its total number of stores in the U.S. down to just a dozen.

Related: A Historic Cheese Shop in New York’s Little Italy Is Closing After 130 Years in Business





Source link

Joann Will Shutter All of Its 800 U.S. Stores, Conduct Sales Read More »

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Regrets Cursing But Stands By RTO

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Regrets Cursing But Stands By RTO


JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon says that despite employee pushback, and a petition signed by over 1,800 staff at the time of writing, most of JPMorgan’s 300,000 employees are still returning to the office full-time in March.

However, he admitted that he shouldn’t have cursed while speaking about it at a town hall in Ohio earlier this month.

“I should never curse, ever,” Dimon said in an interview with CNBC on Monday. “And I shouldn’t get angry and stuff like that.”

When addressing questions about the RTO mandate in mid-February, Dimon said, “Don’t give me the s— that ‘work from home Friday’ works.” He also said that JPMorgan was sticking with its return-to-office policy and he didn’t care “how many people sign that f—ing petition.”

Related: Jamie Dimon Says the U.S. Government Is ‘Not Very Competent’ and Hopes Elon Musk’s DOGE Is ‘Quite Successful’

Though Dimon’s delivery may have changed since the town hall, his core message has not. He told CNBC that he stands by in-person work and explained the move from three days in the office to five was in the best interests of JPMorgan and its clients.

“I completely respect people that don’t want to go to the office all five days a week,” Dimon stated, adding, “They can get a job elsewhere.”

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Photographer: Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg via Getty Images

According to Dimon, JPMorgan is not entirely against remote work, with 10% of the bank’s jobs operating on a fully remote basis — and staying that way even after the return-to-office mandate. For example, the bank has built virtual call centers in Baltimore and Detroit that collectively employ more than 100 remote workers.

But while working from home may make sense for virtual call centers, Dimon doesn’t think it should apply to all JPMorgan employees. According to Bloomberg, 60% of JPMorgan staff, including managing directors and salespeople, are already at the office five days per week. The switch to fully in-person work in March affects back-office staff who currently work on a hybrid schedule.

“I’m not against work-from-home,” Dimon told CNBC. “I’m against where it doesn’t work… We’re not going to change. We’re going back to the office.”

Related: ‘Feels Like a Slap in the Face’: Some JPMorgan Employees Reportedly Aren’t Happy With Their Bonuses

JPMorgan first announced a strict return-to-office policy last month, with plans to implement it in March. Staff immediately flooded an internal website with over 300 comments calling out the policy’s negative impact on their commute and work-life balance. Employees circulated a petition addressed to Dimon calling for hybrid work to be the default mode of work at the bank. The petition has received 1,803 signatures as of press time.

JPMorgan is the largest bank in the U.S., with $3.9 trillion in assets. In mandating five days back in the office, the bank follows the examples of companies like Amazon, Walmart, and AT&T.



Source link

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Regrets Cursing But Stands By RTO Read More »

Investors Pay Attention to This Before Even Looking at Your Business

Investors Pay Attention to This Before Even Looking at Your Business


Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.

In modern businesses, creating and building a great personal brand is not just an asset; it has become a survival tool. Impressive metrics might catch attention, but it’s the founder’s personality and reputation that ultimately win over investors, partners and customers.

Why is a personal brand essential for founders?

According to Nielsen’s Global Trust in Advertising Survey, 92% of people trust individual recommendations rather than from companies. This demonstrates a very obvious truth that human beings need human ties and relatable stories more than they do polished corporate rhetoric. Moreover, 82% of respondents said they trust a company more if its CEO is active on social media, and 77% are more likely to buy from a company whose CEO publicly demonstrates expertise. These numbers align with my own experience. Of all the general assets at a company, nothing rivals what a founder’s strong personal brand can do.

At its core, a personal brand fosters trust. In an age overwhelmed with information, people need dependable touchpoints for reference. A well-crafted personal brand helps you stand out, creating emotional connections with your audience. This audience is not just limited to customers; it extends to partners, investors and employees.

Related: Why Rejection is a Startup’s Best Growth Strategy

What do investors look for in a founder?

Research from Zayed University reveals that 90% of investors look for traits like determination, passion and a willingness to learn in startup founders. Interestingly, personal branding becomes the means to showcase these attributes. When you share your success, talk about challenges you faced and highlight how you overcame them, you’re becoming more than just an entrepreneur but also an inspiring leader.

When founders invest in their brand, they attract potential investors’ interest while building confidence in their teams. In fact, 54% of surveyed investors noted that internal team dynamics play a crucial role in their decision-making. Such high-involvement teamwork comprises strong leadership and effective communication that inspires other team players.

Additionally, a personal brand gives you a platform to amplify your voice. Speaking at conferences or sharing your insights on industry challenges positions you as an authority. In that instant, you’re not even speaking about your company; you’re shaping a story that touches people’s lives. This is particularly vital for startups, where the energy and enthusiasm of people are the music that would make winning an everyday affair.

Personal branding as a networking tool

It is well known that networking serves as a keystone in success, and personal branding is an easy way to unlock innumerable opportunities. A famous founder accesses partners, mentors and investors easily. Your reputation precedes you, making you stand out at industry events and enabling you to connect with like-minded individuals.

Moreover, personal branding can directly impact funding opportunities. When a founder’s name is synonymous with success, their startup is more likely to get investments. Take names like Elon Musk, Steve Jobs or Richard Branson: their personal brands did not just speak about their companies, but they became a legacy in themselves for innovation and inspiration.

The impact of visibility

Early in my career, I worked on crafting my public image. By sharing insights on social media, attending events and remaining visible in professional circles, I was able to discover great investment opportunities and build lasting relationships with talented entrepreneurs.

One memorable experience was with the startup that had a working founder, who was quite established in their niche. This person regularly shared articles, celebrated achievements and openly discussed failures, demonstrating their ability to learn and grow. I trusted them based on their authenticity, and I was quite quick to see their project’s potential. That investment became one of the most successful ones in my investment career.

On the other hand, I have seen very talented entrepreneurs miss out on massive opportunities due to a lack of personal branding. One founder I met at a conference had an incredible product but no public presence. They shared no story or demonstrated their expertise, which made it difficult for them to attract investors and partners. This taught me an important lesson: even groundbreaking ideas need a face behind them to gain traction.

Related: How to Boost Your Business’s Visibility in Local Search Results

How to start building your personal brand

The first step in building your personal brand is understanding its value. It exists to give visibility, to furnish credence and to build trust. Start by little: create valuable content, share your thoughts and participate in events in your industry. The minute you get the story to show to the world, the world starts paying attention.

Authenticity is crucial. Trust is the foundation of a personal brand, and honesty is the source of trust. Do not hesitate to show your mistakes alongside your successes. People who don’t need to go into a closet to hide behind their fantasies are the most real; open folk are those people who get a lot more of people’s support.

Remember, building a personal brand is a long-term process. Start by defining your values, goals and target audience. Then, gradually develop a strategy, incorporating various formats and communication channels as you go.

Personal branding is no longer the privilege of the elite; rather, it has become almost compulsory for every startup founder. Personal branding lures investors into entering firms, facilitates team building, widens networks and earns confidence for the project. Think of it as an asset that works for you even when you’re not actively networking. Most importantly, it’s your chance to tell the world who you are and what you believe in.



Source link

Investors Pay Attention to This Before Even Looking at Your Business Read More »

JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon Hopes Elon Musk’s DOGE Is Successful

JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon Hopes Elon Musk’s DOGE Is Successful


Now that JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Tesla CEO and DOGE leader Elon Musk have repaired their relationship after years of litigation, Dimon is wishing Musk well on his new government endeavor.

When asked for his thoughts on DOGE and the agency’s effort to cut government waste on Monday by CNBC’s Leslie Picker, Dimon was upbeat.

Related: Want to Work for DOGE? Elon Musk Is Looking for ‘Super High-IQ’ Hires — But There’s a Catch

“I’m hoping it’s quite successful,” Dimon said.

Musk is considered a “special government employee” who’s officially serving under President Donald Trump, according to the White House. “A special government employee is anyone who works, or is expected to work, for the government for 130 days or less in a 365-day period,” per the U.S. Department of Justice.

DOGE’s function is to eliminate government waste, fraud, and abuse, according to the agency.

“The government is inefficient, not very competent, and needs a lot of work,” Dimon said.

“It’s not just about the deficit, it’s about building the right policies and procedures and the government we deserve,” he added.

When asked if he supports the “chain-saw approach” DOGE is taking to the federal government, Dimon said this is something that has been tried before.

“Remember, it was tried by Al Gore and Bill Clinton. It was tried by a bunch of other folks in the past,” he said. “Yes, they should try.”

Watch the full video on CNBC, here.

Related: JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Fires Back at Employees Who Signed a Petition Calling for Hybrid Work



Source link

JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon Hopes Elon Musk’s DOGE Is Successful Read More »

How Much MrBeast Paid to Create Amazon’s ‘Beast Games’

How Much MrBeast Paid to Create Amazon’s ‘Beast Games’


On the Amazon reality show “Beast Games,” contestants participated in a potato sack race, tower climbing task, and coin collection challenge, among others, as they competed for a $10 million cash prize, the single biggest prize in the history of television and streaming. The show, which aired the final episode of its first season on February 13, was Amazon’s biggest unscripted show ever, earning 50 million viewers in its first 25 days.

Now Jimmy Donaldson, the 26-year-old creator who is also known on YouTube as MrBeast, is revealing that he lost “tens of millions” of dollars on the show, but that he has no regrets about using his own money to help fill in the gaps in the show.

“I lost a ton of money filming the show,” Donaldson told Steven Bartlett on a “Diary of a CEO” podcast episode released earlier this month. “It was not a good financial decision to make ‘Beast Games’.”

Jimmy Donaldson. Photo by Chris Unger/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images

Donaldson revealed that the first episode alone required over $15 million to construct the set, which consisted of 1,000 towers that were each 10 feet tall. The set of the second episode, meanwhile, took $14 million to build.

Related: MrBeast Has Grown Up. He Thinks His YouTube Videos Should Too.

Donaldson declined to specify how much the entire 10-episode season cost but said that the show cost more than its $100 million budget overall.

However, when Bartlett asked if he had any regrets, Donaldson said no.

“For me, it was about making season one as good as possible,” Donaldson stated. “I can’t let the YouTube community down.”

According to Donaldson, YouTube creators don’t have a good reputation when it comes to moving over to streaming platforms. He said that even he, as the YouTuber with the most subscribers in the world, struggled to garner interest among streaming executives for his show.

So the stakes weren’t just high for “Beast Games,” they were high for the YouTube community at large, Donaldson said. Now that the show is a success, doors are opening for him and other creators.

“I already know of two creators who have signed deals just based on the success of ‘Beast Games,’ and probably hundreds of millions of dollars [are] going to flow into creators’ pockets just because of ‘Beast Games’ in the next year,” Donaldson claimed.

Related: MrBeast Has Grown Up. He Thinks His YouTube Videos Should Too.

Donaldson also revealed in the interview that while he may be a billionaire on paper, he actually has less than $1 million in his bank account. Though he gives himself a salary, he ensures it is just enough to cover his personal expenses. He reinvests the rest into his brand.

Beast Games is available exclusively on Prime Video. According to Donaldson, the show attracts about 700,000 new unique viewers every day.



Source link

How Much MrBeast Paid to Create Amazon’s ‘Beast Games’ Read More »

How MacKenzie Scott’s Billions Have Impacted Nonprofits

How MacKenzie Scott’s Billions Have Impacted Nonprofits


MacKenzie Scott has given large, unrestricted gifts to more than 2,450 nonprofits over the past six years. The 54-year-old donated over $2 billion in 2024 alone, bringing her total gifts to $19.2 billion since 2019.

Now, a new three-year analysis from the Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP) finds that Scott’s no-strings-attached gifts, with a median size of $5 million, have had a “transformative effect” on nonprofits by helping them expand their impact and become more financially stable.

CEP released the research earlier this month after surveying over 800 organizations that received donations from Scott from June to July 2024.

Related: MacKenzie Scott Donates $640 Million to Non-Profits After Elon Musk’s ‘Ex-Wife’ Comment on X

The overwhelming majority of nonprofit leaders, 93%, reported that Scott’s grant moderately or significantly strengthened their ability to carry out their mission. Most, 90%, said the gift bolstered their financial positions, while more than 60% said they used the grant to establish credibility with other funders.

The grants have also expanded nonprofits’ operating budgets and have helped them provide more of an impact on their communities while also improving their own employee’s well-being, the study notes.

The nonprofit Kaboom!, for example, builds playgrounds in areas that lack them. Scott donated $14 million to the organization in 2021, and more than doubled its annual operating budget.

After receiving a $9 million donation from Scott in 2020, the South Texas Food Bank nearly doubled the food it distributed — 14 million pounds in 2019 to 26 million in 2020. South Texas Food Bank CEO Alma Boubel told USA Today that the donation allowed the food bank to sustain distributing around 20 million pounds of food each year from 2021 to 2024 and provide its 42-person staff with free healthcare.

Related: Melinda French Gates Announces Open Call for $250 Million Fund. Here’s Who Can Apply.

Overall, Scott’s gifts have enabled 85% of nonprofit recipients to improve or expand their programming and given 52% a greater capacity to respond to the needs of the communities they serve, the study found.

“Few funders have the resources to give at the level that MacKenzie Scott is giving, but every funder can learn from her fascinating approach,” Phil Buchanan, president of CEP, stated in a press release.

MacKenzie Bezos. Photo by Michael Kovac/Getty Images for J/P HRO Gala

Nonprofit tax filings also reflected the impact of Scott’s contributions. The organizations that received awards from Scott had double the amount of cash reserves than comparable nonprofits.

Scott selected these nonprofits based on “quiet research,” or a discreet vetting process that carefully analyzed the organizations according to their size, mission, and track records. Some key focus areas of the grant recipients were human services (44%), education (41%), and health (35%). Recipients of the gifts can allocate the funds as they desire without input from Scott.

Still, some nonprofit leaders have identified drawbacks to Scott’s approach.

More than half (53%) were concerned that other funders might withdraw their support because they’d feel recipients didn’t need additional funding. More than 60% reported being afraid the grant would create a funding cliff, or decreased long-term funding.

Related: ‘I’m Inspired By All the Ways People Invest’: MacKenzie Scott Has Donated Over $2 Billion This Year. Here’s Where the Money Went—and Why.

The nonprofits Scott contributed to were, on average, larger than the norm with a median budget of $7 million. According to the National Council of Nonprofits, 88% of nonprofits have a budget of less than $500,000 per year. Scott also gave gift recipients more than expected, the CEP found. Compared to the median grant size tracked by the center of $123,000 among nonprofits as a whole, Scott’s contributions ranged from $300,000 to $80 million.

Scott’s wealth originates from the shares in Amazon she received after divorcing Amazon founder Jeff Bezos in 2019. Scott signed the Giving Pledge that year, writing that she had “a disproportionate amount of money to share” and would keep donating “until the safe is empty.”

According to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Scott is worth around $40.2 billion and is the 41st richest person in the world.

Related: ‘Wanted to Cry for Joy’: MacKenzie Scott Donates $65M Gift to Housing Nonprofit.



Source link

How MacKenzie Scott’s Billions Have Impacted Nonprofits Read More »