Blog

Country Garden says it may not be able to repay debt

Country Garden says it may not be able to repay debt


Signage at a residential project developed by Country Garden Holdings Co. in Baoding, Hebei province, China, on Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2023.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Chinese real estate developer Country Garden Holdings said it expects it will not be able to make all of its offshore repayments, including those issued in U.S. dollar notes.

The company failed to make a debt repayment of 470 million Hong Kong dollars ($60 million), as of Tuesday.

Country Garden warned that this could lead to creditors demanding faster repayments of debt or pursuing enforcement action. Shares of the company fell 1.19%, compared with the broader Hang Seng index which rose about 2%.

In early September, the company narrowly avoided default after it managed to pay $22.5 million in bond coupon payments and its creditors voted to extend repayments on six onshore bonds by three years.

Country Garden also recorded contracted sales of 6.17 billion yuan ($846 million) for September — the sixth straight month of decline and a decrease of 80.7% from a year ago.

Looking ahead, the company expects uncertainty in its liquidity position and asset sales in the short and medium term amid a lack of material, industry-wide improvement in property sales.

Chinese property giants such as Evergrande and Country Garden have been plagued by debt problems, hurting consumer confidence in the sector.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content



Source link

Country Garden says it may not be able to repay debt Read More »

Meet Aampe, The Company On A Mission To Make Every App Personal

Meet Aampe, The Company On A Mission To Make Every App Personal


Personalisation is a buzzword for marketers: by treating customers as individuals, tailoring messaging and marketing to their needs and desires, organisations hope to get a much better response. But there’s a problem: having staked the future on apps, betting that customers will download and engage with their software, they’re discovering that personalisation is very difficult to implement in the app world.

That’s the challenge Paul Meinshausen has set out to confront. The co-founder and CEO of Aampe, which has just announced a $7.5 million pre-Series A funding round, Meinshausen believes the marketing industry needs a new approach. “The assumption has been that once someone is inside your app, you can find ways to persuade them to make certain decisions or to transact with you,” he says. “But while everyone has built an app of their own, the technology around personalisation and the customer relationship is remarkably anachronistic.”

The problem, Meinshausen says, is that app builders currently have no option but to depend on rules-based software. If a user interacts with the app in a certain way, a particular response is generated. The aim is to personalise the interaction, but inevitably the scope for this is limited – in a labour-intensive, manual process, only so many responses can be programmed according to the underlying rules.

Aampe, founded in 2020, therefore takes a different approach. Meinshausen and his colleagues have built an artificial intelligence-driven tool that app builders can plug into their creations. The AI learns from app users’ responses – and the responses that the software has seen from other deployments – in order to create genuinely personalised content and messaging for each customer.

“It’s really about helping apps to get smarter,” Meinshausen explains. “Our software finds out what’s important to each customer in order to enable the app to provide a better service and experience on an individual basis.”

The hope, of course, is that this translates into people making more of the decisions that businesses are looking for – more spending via the app, for example. Aampe insists that is exactly what is happening for the customers it has signed up, including companies such as food delivery apps HAAT and Swiggy, the gig economy specialist IntelyCare, fintech PayU, and the retailer ZALORA.

At the latter company, Southeast Asia’s largest retailer, Aampe says it has already helped to drive a 13.2% increase in app visits and a 6.7% increase in additional purchases.

Certainly, many customers are looking for a new approach. Research suggests one in four users only open an app once before abandoning it forever, and the average app loses 77% of its daily active users within the first three days of them installing it. Meanwhile, research from Salesforce suggests 66% of consumers expect companies to understand their unique needs and expectations, while 52% expect all offers to be personalised.

A business that can square this circle therefore looks set to perform well. Investors in Aampe believe it could be a major beneficiary of this trend – this latest round of fundraising, led by Matrix Partners India and Peak XV Partners, takes the total amount of money raised by the company to more than $9 million.

“Customer engagement and marketing technology has been an early beneficiary of advances in AI and machine learning, and Aampe is a clear front runner in enabling organisations to adopt personalized and result-oriented communication to drive growth,” argues Aakash Kumar, managing director of Matrix Partners India. At Peak XV Partners, partner Anandamoy Roychowdhary adds: “As the world switches from growth at all costs to profitable growth with a solid unit economics profile, the way users are engaged and retained inside an application world has become more important than ever.”

Aampe isn’t the only player in this market, facing competition from a number of specialists in customer relationship management (CRM) software. However, investors are backing Meinshausen’s track record as the successful co-founder of Indian fintech PaySense, sold in 2019 for $185 million. His co-founders at Aampe, Sami Abboud, and Schaun Wheeler, are also well-known entrepreneurs.



Source link

Meet Aampe, The Company On A Mission To Make Every App Personal Read More »

Top Multifamily Investors’ Advice for Buyers in 2023? DON’T Do It!

Top Multifamily Investors’ Advice for Buyers in 2023? DON’T Do It!


The multifamily real estate market went from bad to worse. Interest rates are still at record highs, cap rates have somehow stayed compressed, rent growth looks bleak at best, and sellers refuse to budge on their prices. As a result, inexperienced operators are picking up so-called “deals” to shop around to their investors—and they could be walking into a massive financial trap without even knowing it.

If you want one hundred and one reasons NOT to buy multifamily right now, Brian Burke is here to help. But, if you want a counteracting force of optimism as to why you should pursue multifamily properties, Matt Faircloth can balance out this debate. These investors have owned and managed THOUSANDS of apartment units, but NEITHER of them has bought in over a year. Brian even went as far as selling most of his portfolio right before the commercial crash, a move many thought was far from wise at the time.

These two time-tested multifamily experts come on today to talk about the commercial real estate crash, the “chaos” that could ensue over the next year, why inexperienced syndicators are about to bite the dust, and why multifamily investing may not be the move to make in 2023. Think this is just a bunch of scare tactics to keep you away from good deals? Tune in to be surprised.

Dave:
Hello everyone. Welcome to On The Market. I’m your host, Dave Meyer, joined today by James Dainard. James, how are you feeling about the multifamily market these days?

James:
We’re feeling pretty good. I mean, our portfolio’s pretty balanced out. Our stabilized portfolio is doing well. Now, we just got to find the margin, but the deals are creeping through here and there. They’re sneaking through, so as long as the numbers make sense, we’re all about it.

Dave:
Well, I’m super excited for today’s episode. I don’t personally sponsor multifamily deals, but I invest in multifamily deals and I think this asset class is one of the most interesting ones in all of real estate. If you look at commercial real estate and residential combined, multifamily is in a really interesting space right now, and we have brought on honestly two of the most experienced multifamily operators I personally know. We have Brian Burke coming on, who is the CEO and president of Praxis Capital. He also wrote a book for BiggerPockets on investing in syndications, and we also have Matt Faircloth who is the president of the DeRosa Group. He’s also been a multifamily investor for almost 20 years now. And knowing these guys, I think we’re going to hear some interesting opinions that you might not be expecting about the multifamily market. You don’t know either of these guys, do you?

James:
I know of them, but I’ve never got to meet them, so I’m very excited.

Dave:
Well, I think we’re going to have a lot of fun today because they’re both very entertaining and really know what they’re talking about. And don’t beat around the bush at all. They’re going to give it to you straight. They’re going to tell you what they like about the market. They’re going to tell you what they hate about the market. So if you were interested in investing in multifamily or you’re just curious about what’s going on with this massive, massive asset class, you’re definitely going to want to check out this episode. So with no further ado, let’s just get into it. I’m going to start this interview with an apology to Mr. Matt Faircloth because I am a little bit embarrassed that I have known you and worked with you at BiggerPockets for eight years.

Matt:
Well.

Dave:
And this is the first time you’re on On the Market, and that is completely my fault and I’m sorry, but I’m very glad to finally have you here on this show.

Matt:
I accept your apology, Dave, and it is an honor to be here. Thank you for having me. And I, of course, did not take it personally and thanks again and I’m looking forward to today’s conversation and mixing it up with Brian Burke a little bit. I’m going to try and disagree with everything he says.

Dave:
Okay, good. That’s going to be fun.

Matt:
I’ll make it a saucy conversation to make it up.

Dave:
Okay, good. Yeah, just be a contrarian to everything Brian says.

Matt:
Absolutely.

Dave:
Before we get to Brian, can you just introduce yourself for those in our audience who don’t know you yet?

Matt:
Absolutely. Guys, my is Matt Faircloth. I am the co-founder of the DeRosa Group, and you better have heard of me through BiggerPockets through my book that just had a revised edition release called Raising Private Capital. New version has a foreword written by Pace Morby. I’m also one of the leaders of the BiggerPockets Multifamily Bootcamp that just launched another cohort with hundreds of people. We’ve had thousands of people, Dave, through the program, and I’m really grateful for those that have gotten the multifamily education we’ve been able to deliver with BP through that. So that’s a bit about me and my company is a multifamily operator in multiple states across the United States.

Dave:
Awesome. Well, welcome to On The Market. Brian, you were here I think in the beginning of this year and beginning of 2023, you were a guest on On The Market, but for anyone who missed that show, could you introduce yourself, please?

Brian:
Yes, my name is Brian Burke. I was On The Market podcast before Matt Faircloth. That is my claim to fame. I’m president and CEO of Praxis Capital. I’ve been investing in real estate for 34 years, multifamily for about 20 years. Bought about 4,000 multifamily units around the peak of the market a year and a half ago. I sold most of it, sold about three quarters of my portfolio, and then came on your show and talked about how I thought the multifamily market was going to go down and it since has, I’m also going to be the chief disagreer with Matt Faircloth today since that’s how he wants to play it. That’s how we’re going to play it. But I’ll start out with, you might know me from BiggerPockets through my book, which is the opposite of Matt’s book, which is Raising Private Capital. My book is investing private capital, but it’s not called that. It’s called the Hands-Off Investor. And it’s written to teach passive investors how to invest their money into the offerings from the readers of Matt’s book on Raising Private Capital.

Matt:
Absolutely. They’re good pairings those books. And I’ve had many investors come to join us on our offerings that we’re armed with that book. And so I think it’s a great book to tell passive investors how to approach the investments they want to make.

Dave:
Matt, you were supposed to disagree with Brian and right off the bat you’re just agreeing.

Brian:
He already failing.

Dave:
Yeah, you’re failing here.

Brian:
He had one job. You had one job.

Matt:
Yeah, it’s not as good of a book. How about that?

Brian:
Okay, that’ll work.

Dave:
I like how both of you are basically assuring our audience that they’re going to learn nothing because they’re just going to hear polar opposite opinions from both of you.

Matt:
We’ll just give other perspectives, Dave. We’ll give other perspectives. How about that?

Dave:
Okay.

Brian:
We’re not here to teach you anything, we’re just here to present our thoughts and let you draw your own conclusions. How about that?

Matt:
Right. There you go.

Dave:
All right, fair enough.

James:
Well, I am very excited to have both of you guys on here. I’ve been actually waiting to get to interview both of you. So you guys have a great reputation and I’m excited to chop it up. But to get things started, I think what I’m really curious about, you guys have been a multifamily for a really long time and we’re getting all these nasty headlines right now that it’s just about everything’s coming to doom and gloom. The rates are high, things are resetting, and I think it’s making people pretty unsettled right now. Are these headlines in this fear and this doom and gloom, what are you guys doing right now with the multifamily space? Are you guys getting bullish on it right now? I know we’ve been looking for a lot more new projects or are you starting to take a step back and seeing where the chips lay right now?

Matt:
I mean, Brian and I are actually very good friends and we’re in a mastermind together as well. So I could say that for us, and this may be what Brian will say as well, that my company hasn’t bought a deal in a year and a half, and we’ve bid, we’ve underwritten something like 350 deals. We’ve written dozens and dozens of letters of intent, none of which were accepted, of course. And it’s because just the numbers don’t pencil any more based on what people are asking for. There’s the widest gap that I’ve ever seen between bid and ask, meaning what a seller is asking versus what a buyer is willing to pay for a property that I’ve seen.
It’s starting to come down a little bit, but the sellers, and most importantly the brokers, I think they’re really culprits here, have not come down to the acceptance that rising interest rates are going to pinch a bit on what we’re going to be able to pay for properties. But a lot of properties are being sold in the four to 5% cap rate range or offered up at that range and they’re coming back on, they’re going under contract and they’re coming back on the market. So I’m starting to see a little bit of slippage, which we can talk about, but there’s, up until recently, a lot of stuff we’ve looked at, it’s been drastically overpriced.

Brian:
When I was on this show back in January, the title of this show, and if you didn’t see it, look it up, it was called The Multifamily Bomb is About to Explode or something crazy, some kind of crazy catchy title like that. And I had predicted some chaos in the multifamily market. And so yeah, I think James, to your point, there’s negative articles out there and we’ve earned every one of them. There’s a good reason for these negative articles, that’s because there’s really not a lot of good news to report. It’s just being frank. That’s how it is.
Somebody asked the other day to use a baseball analogy, what inning are we in? Are we in the first inning, second inning, eighth inning, ninth inning? And my answer was, to use your baseball analogy, I’m on the team bus sitting in the parking lot waiting to get to the next venue and we haven’t even gotten on the freeway yet to get to the next park for the next game. I’m not buying anything. I haven’t bought anything in two years and it might be another year or two before I do buy anything. So there’s not a lot of really good news to report, I’m afraid.

James:
And do you guys think that you guys haven’t bought anything in the last year or two just because the opportunity’s not there? Or you just want to see where it’s going because we’re seeing the same thing, we look at hundreds of deals and then we find one out of a hundred that will actually pencil really well, and typically it’s value add, but are you waiting for a better return or is it just because the math’s not working?

Matt:
I think this is where we differ a little bit because we’re still looking at deals. Brian, you’ve told me that most of the time you’re just deleting emails as they come in from the broker. His finger can’t hit the delete button fast enough. He’s like, “Why are you clocking my inbox with this garbage?” So for us, we still do underwrite deals and we still shop and we’ve come very close on deals and I’ve actually seen more and more distress come in, people that have to sell versus folks that want to sell. So I think that’s going to be the next opportunity. We’re trying to catch something like that for somebody that’s looking to sell for a reasonable number versus selling for some astronomical, somebody trying to sell it for double what they paid for it a year ago. And we’ve seen quite a bit of that, by the way. We’ve seen multiple deals that are literally double what the seller paid for it two years ago, and they’re just trying to pass their problem that they bought.
It wasn’t making money when they bought it two years ago. They’re trying to pass that problem up line to me. So there’s a lot, there’s more of that, but we’re seeing more and more distress. So we are actively bidding. We just submitted an LOI yesterday on a deal, but it was a good deal. I mean, it made money, this magical thing called making money the day you buy it instead of being negative for a couple of years, crush your fingers and hope that it makes money later. We’re seeing more of that. Maybe not a torrent or a flood or a bomb just yet. So if there is a bomb, as Brian predicted, I don’t think it’s exploded yet, but the fuse is short if there is one. Brian, am I right? Are you still deleting emails as they come into your inbox and not even [inaudible 00:11:01]?

Brian:
Finally, I get to disagree with Matt because-

Matt:
Oh, please do.

Brian:
… he’s right that in the beginning, I’d say the beginning, when was the beginning? Let’s say late ’21 to early ’22, I was literally doing that. I’d get an email of the new deal coming in, I would just delete, I didn’t even care. You could send me what looked like the greatest deal in the world. I didn’t even care, delete. I couldn’t delete them fast enough. Now, I’m actually underwriting them, but I’m not underwriting them because I want to put in an offer. It’s more like if you’re seeing two cars about to collide, you just can’t take your eyes off of it. You have to watch the accident happen. And so I’ve got to underwrite the deal so that I can see where is the market, what’s really happening, how far apart are the buyers and sellers? What number am I coming to versus what number are other bidders coming to? And I’ll have the conversation with the broker like, hey, where are you coming in on pricing? Oh, our offers are in this range. And it’s like, really? Yeah, just lose my number.

Matt:
Well, at least you’re reading the emails now, Brian.

Brian:
Yes.

Dave:
Yeah, just to make fun of people though.

Brian:
There’s got to be some entertainment. I’ve been doing this for so long, I got to change it up and have some fun. Come on.

Dave:
Right. Yeah. There is some data that supports what you’re saying, Matt. I think the gap between buyer and seller expectations is something like 11% I think I saw last week, which is one of the largest it’s been in several decades. And I just wanted to ask you, Matt, as you’re doing this, you said you’re offering, are these properties selling just for more than what you would pay for them and you disagree with the other investors underwriting or are they just sitting?

Matt:
Yeah, sometimes yes. Sometimes yes, they are trading and we do monitor. We have CoStar, which is a software you can use to monitor transactions and that kind of stuff. So we do see some of these properties, believe it or not, our trading, and I’ve even through our investor base, believe it or not, it’s a bit of a small world. So folks that do invest with me will email, and they say, “Hey, I’m looking at this deal in a market that you do shop in, would you be open to take a look?” And darn it, if I didn’t already bid that deal, and this is a deal that we lost on, and I’m looking at the proud new buyers offering memorandum, and there’s a lot of things that they’re having to do to make the deal make fiscal sense for their investors.
Things that we wouldn’t do necessarily cooking their books, but they’re using a certain crystal ball, looking into the future, hoping that things go well, hoping that rate increases stay great, and hoping that cap rates go even maybe even lower than they are over the next five years. Those deals are closing, but they’re closing with a lot less debt. I mean, Brian and I can remember a day when you could buy a property where 75, 80% loan to value on a mortgage. Those days haven’t been around for a little while. Now, you’re talking 65, 60, even 55% loan to value. And you could present to investors, “Hey, it’s low risk, it’s low debt,” not true investor, what really is at risk is your money.
It’s more risk for the investors because there’s a lot more equity that needs to go in and make these deals work. So those are trading, Dave. But the other thing that I’m seeing as well is we’re also seeing deals come back on, saying, oh, that buyer couldn’t close or that deal fell apart, saying it nicely, but they either couldn’t get financing, couldn’t raise the equity, couldn’t something, and so they ended up backing out. And so the deal comes back on at less than what they were asking before.

Brian:
Part of the problem is too, I mean, I see this as an owner. As owner, our operations are fine. So we look at it and say, “There’s no reason to sell at today’s values. The values are way too low.” And then as a buyer, I’m looking at it going, “There’s no way I would buy at today’s values.” So if I can’t get myself on the same page, there’s certainly no way that unrelated buyers and sellers are going to get onto the same page. It’s just simply not happening. There’s way too much of a spread. To Matt’s point about loan to value ratios, you might be paying a fair price for a deal when the max loan to value you can get is 60% or 55% if that income stream is rapidly growing.
But if that income stream is stagnant, because you’re going to grow your way in to more value on the real estate, but if the income stream is stagnant and you can only get 55 or 60% LTV because that’s all the income the property has to support a debt of that size and you’re not growing the income, you’re paying way too much. And that’s what’s happening. If you could start underwriting properties at 75 or 80 LTV right now at today’s debt rates, you’re probably paying a fair price, but that’s not where sellers are.

Matt:
And these deals are going in at 55% LTV, Brian, that I’ve seen, and the cashflow is 2% on equity to investors.

Brian:
How’d you get it that high? I haven’t seen one that high. Most of the ones I’m finding, it’s negative. I saw one the other day, it was a 3% IRR, let alone cash on cash.

Matt:
Right.

Brian:
Some of them are just really, really bad. Now, some of these trades are happening probably because you’ve got 1031 buyers, they’ve got a gun to their head. The tax tail is wagging the investment dog. You’ve got ones where you have funds that have raised a bunch of money that’s sitting there, maybe they’ve got pref burning a hole in their pocket, they have to spend it. There’s some transactions that are happening out there, but transaction volume is minuscule compared to historical transaction volume. I mean, we’re talking about drops of 70 to 80% in some markets in transaction velocity, and there’s a good reason for that. Nobody wants to pay this price and nobody wants to sell at the price where the value really makes sense.

Matt:
Before we move on, Dave, I want to throw an and in there to Brian, we’ll call it a disagreement. Brian, [inaudible 00:16:56], that’s because I remember we’re supposed to disagree, right? So you forgot to say about cost segregation studies, Brian, and people don’t talk about cost seg enough and how it’s become a driving factor in this market. I cannot tell you how many investors invested with us over the years because of the negative K-1 they could get because of cost seg studies and accelerated depreciation, which in essence guys allows investors to write off a lot of the investment that they made into a property to the tune of 30 to 50% of the check that they write to the deal they’re able to show is a loss. Cost segregation studies and…
Well, accelerated depreciation is slowly burning off. You’re only able to write off 80% of it this year, Brian, as you know, it’s going to 60% next year. So I think that that factor has been artificially driving the market a bit because I still get investors that call us regularly saying, “Hey, can you get me a negative K-1? I mean, I need one by the end Of the year.”

Brian:
Don’t you love it when people want to make bad investment decisions to save paying a few bucks to the government?

James:
It’s so crazy.

Brian:
I think some of the worst investment decisions ever made were made for tax reasons.

Matt:
Oh, goodness.

Brian:
Whether it was a 1031 exchange, a negative K-1, whatever you want to call it, forget about that. This is a game of making money, not saving tax. Now, I know that saving a dollar to the tax man is earning a dollar. Okay, fine. But losing $10 to save $3 doesn’t make any sense.

James:
Well, you guys are two of my new favorite people. I think because I’m loving this and I know when I want to practice my sales skills, I’m going to call Brian and try to sell him a multifamily building in the next six to 12 months.

Matt:
Can I listen in on that?

Brian:
I’ve said I’m the worst marketing person ever, and here I am, I’m in the multifamily business and I’m just totally bagging on it. So this is my marketing prowess at its best, James.

Dave:
People always want to give people money who don’t need it, Brian. So I think you’re going to get a couple of phone calls after this podcast.

James:
But speaking of being a little pessimistic, which I think is a good thing, right? As investors, we’re supposed to punch holes in investments, see what happens, and then whether we want to move forward or not. So I’m one of the most pessimistic salespeople there are in real estate, but going back to work through that pessimism and work through these deal flow, getting back to just the fundamentals of multifamily, like how we buy properties or how you guys have bought in properties over the years and just getting back into those core principles, what you were just talking about of people are using cost segregation just to try to get the tax break when they could be giving away money over here anyways, people get blind by certain strategies sometimes. I agree it makes no sense just to get the tax break if you’re losing money. It’s like when you go buy an expensive car every year.
I’m like, I don’t understand that either. You get the tax ride up, but you’re still spending money on the car. So as we get back to, I mean, the one good thing about these rates going up is it is slowly settling down the multifamily market back to where it was 2016, ’17, ’18. You could look at a deal, you can put your numbers on it and try to move forward. What fundamentals are you guys… Like Matt, you’re looking at a lot of deals, Brian, you’re denying a lot of deals. So you’re still going back to the fundamentals of what are you working through and what are you guys looking for in today’s market? So it hits your buy box of, hey, we’re going to move forward right now because it’s a riskier market. So you want to take your time. What makes you push yes on that deal?

Matt:
Yeah, and this is one of these, again, I get to disagree. Brian and I buy in different vintages. I tend to buy more workforce housing, like the 70s and 80s vintage properties. And so I look at ways that I can add value and take a 70s or an 80s vintage and bring it up to today’s standards. So I look for what can I do? What can I roll my sleeves up with our company? Because we’ve got a fairly robust construction initiative in our company. So what’s possible with regards to renovation, construction, revamping, that kind of thing, and be a little careful in today’s market about that. You have to be very uber sensitive to pricing because anything you invest in a property and CapEx goes to your total cost basis. You can’t have the purchase price be too much of that cost basis.
So we look for construction dollars, James, and then I look for a disparity between the market rent and what the actual rent is. Most of the deals that we’ve done that have gone really well were not owned by seasoned operators before us. These are folks that were onesie-twosie operators or folks that were newer to the space that didn’t really know how to manage properly, mismanaged from one reason or another. So those are deals that we really like. And so I look to bottom line at James, I look for rent bumps if I can get them, construction investments that I can make that’ll create real change at the property. And I look for mismanagement that I can easily cure with a better management strategy.

James:
Yeah, that value add makes a huge difference in your performa, Brian. So are you more pessimistic about the market just because salespeople are trying to pitch you bad deals? Or is it just because you just don’t think it’s the time to be jumping in right now?

Matt:
Brian’s always a pessimist.

Brian:
Yeah, I’m already pessimistic. Both of those are true, actually. I owned this one property that was a complete and utter dog. I mean, there was nothing I could do to get this thing to perform. So this guy, somebody owned it, tried to get it to work, lost it in foreclosure, somebody else bought it, tried to get it to work, couldn’t get it to work. I came in and said, “I can fix this problem.” So I go in, I tried to get it to work, I can’t get it to work. I literally had hired the sheriff’s department to have a full-time deputy on the property to try to control the crime. It was that bad. Finally, I sell it to somebody else because it’s like we got to get out of this thing. We earned a little bit on it, but it certainly wasn’t a smoking deal.
It was probably one of our lower performing deals. And then a year later, somebody’s pitching me the deal to buy this deal and they’re like, “It’s a proven value add strategy with upside potential.” And I’m like, “That thing is a dog. There’s nothing you could ever do other than burn it to the ground that will improve that property.” And so it’s just absolute broker hype and never ever believe it when they say these proven value add strategy, it’s a 100% BS. But at the same time, now, we’re in this market where the market also sucks. So I don’t like where interest rates are. I don’t like where cap rates are. I don’t like where things are going. And then somebody wants to sell me a crap property that proven value add strategy in the middle of a crappy market. So it’s a double negative and that’s not a thing.

Matt:
I’m going to go give Brian Burke a hug right now. I think he needs one.

Dave:
So Brian, you’ve cited a couple of reasons. I just want to make sure we understand. So you’re saying you don’t like where cap rates are, so you still think they’re too low, at least on the buy side. You cited earlier, sluggish rent growth, high capital costs. Is there anything else we’re missing there that you don’t like?

Matt:
Insurance.

Brian:
Oh, yeah.

Matt:
[Inaudible 00:24:05], Brian.

Brian:
I don’t like expenses. Insurance rates are going up, payroll is going up. So all your operating costs are increasing. So now, you’re in this weird position where operating costs are increasing, cost of capital is increasing, income is decreasing because rents are falling, the stats are showing rents are falling, especially in markets that had big increases. Now, you could say like, “Oh, well, they had big increases, now, they have a decrease. No big deal. You’re still up from where you were a couple of years ago, yada, yada.” Great. But that doesn’t help you if you just bought six months ago because that was your starting point. So you’ve got all those factors are problematic. Now, to make matters worse, we’re investing in these assets to do what? It’s to earn a return, right? We’re putting money into a deal with the hope that in the future you’re going to get more money back. That’s the only reason that we’re doing this.
And in order to quantify how much money we’re going to get back, we have to do financial modeling. And when we do financial modeling, we’re using assumptions to determine what the income is going to be in the future and what the property’s value will be in the future so we can see how much we’re going to ultimately sell this property for and how much we’re going to earn along the way. Now, if I can’t quantify the inputs going into this mathematical equation, I can’t quantify the output. And that’s the problem I’m struggling with right now. I don’t know where interest rates are going to be six months, one year, two years from now. I don’t have a lot of confidence that they’re going to go in the direction that I would find favorable and certainly not the direction where I think it’s necessary at today’s values.
So that one’s out the window. I can’t quantify where rent growth is because predictions are all across the map and they’re not what they were. And you can’t look in the rear-view mirror and say, “Well, it was 10%, so it’ll be 10%.” No, it won’t. So that one’s out the window. And then on top of all that, you don’t know where cap rates are. So how do you calculate your exit price if you don’t know the cap rate? And I think cap rates are still too low. I mean, it was one thing to buy four cap properties in a 3% interest rate environment when you had 10% or 15% rent growth, but four cap does not work in 0% rent growth, even if you didn’t change the cost of the capital. Four cap also does not work with increasing rents, but high interest rates. Now, you have decreasing rent and high interest rates and four caps are just a total joke.

Dave:
All right, well, let’s just end now. I think the episode is over. It’s over now.

Matt:
If you were an animal, you would probably be a bear right now, right?

Dave:
An angry bear.

Brian:
It’s realism. It’s demanding some realism in this market. Everybody wants to be rosy, like everything’s going great.

Matt:
Don’t you think there’s going to be opportunity though, bear man? You think there’s going to be opportunity coming down the pipe here, right? And this is like your bull optimist buddy over here talking, right?

Brian:
I was going to say, is this where you say moo or something like that?

Matt:
No, I don’t say moo. I say, right opportunity because I think that I’ll give you a few things that are on the other side of the coin. Equities expectations has not changed. I don’t know if the folks you’re talking to have or whatever. Yes, debt cost of capital has changed, but even though you would think that it would because an investor could just go popping their money into a mutual fund or a CD right now, whatever, and make themselves four and a half, 5%, their expectations on pref or expectations on IRR or returns on a deal have maintained somewhat realistic. It hasn’t changed. They’re not expecting to make… You would think that investors made 20, 25% IRR with syndicators getting lucky and selling deals to the market being really hot the last couple of years.
Investors were not seasoned by that and that’s not what they expect anymore. Investors still, I think I’ve seen investors expect 12, 13, 14% IRR on deals and they’re also willing to be even more patient, right? I think that in addition, everything you just said is right. I’m not disagreeing anything you said, but I’m just giving you another perspective. So I think that there is also opportunity to acquire deals for people that have to sell. There are maybe opportunities and this wave hasn’t come through yet because it just takes a while for distressed properties to work their way through the system to get… I know you were around in 2008 like I was. When the market crashed in 2008, the distressed deals weren’t on the market a month after that.
It took like a year or so for that distressed to work its way through. So that being said, I think we’re going to see maybe some more bank loan foreclosures come onto the market. I think we’re going to see owners that are going to get realistic that they’re going to realize they can’t sell for their number that they need to sell for and they’re going to get more in tune here. So I’m starting to see more of that, more distress in the market, more people that have to sell versus those that want to sell. And I think that in line with equity, in line with really good underwriting and factoring in everything you just said, I think will create opportunity and is beginning to create real opportunities that exist today.

Brian:
Well, I do agree with you that the investor’s return expectations haven’t really changed much. That part, I’m on the same page with you. The difference that I see is that two years ago, we were driving a Corvette en route to that destination and now we’re driving a Tercel and so with a quarter tank of gas. And so we’re still trying to get there, but it’s just difficult to get those mid-teens returns at where prices are today.

Matt:
I’m starting to see broken down Corvettes on the side of the road. And also I’ll give you one more. We don’t invest in top tier markets and that’s something you and I have always differed on that one, Brian, we invest in sub-tier tertiary markets like the Piedmont Triad in North Carolina is one of our markets. I have a joke, if the city has a major league anything, I won’t invest there, major league football, baseball, maybe hockey, but not baseball or football. [inaudible 00:30:33] if major league baseball, major league football’s made a big investment there, not me. I’ll go for where a minor league team is because the cap rates didn’t push down as far as they did in say Greensboro as they did in Raleigh or in Charlotte or something like that.

Brian:
Yes, I call those high barrier to exit markets.

Dave:
No one wants to buy. Yeah.

Brian:
I suppose that makes it easier to buy [inaudible 00:30:55].

Matt:
Something we’ve debated on a lot, Dave, is that it’s easy to get into but hard to get out of those markets.

Dave:
That’s right.

Matt:
Believe it or not, there are people that do want to buy in the tertiary markets.

Brian:
Yes, there is. And there’s arbitrage. There’s arbitrage you could play, I don’t care what the market looks like, you can play arbitrage. I could literally buy a deal today and it would work and I would confidently buy it and I could confidently pitch that to my investors, but it would be at a certain price. And the problem is that no one is willing to sell at that price right now. They will be when their back is against the wall, they will be. I just haven’t seen it yet.

James:
But it does feel like it is coming down, I mean, things are moving downstream right now. We’ve seen some syndicators that maybe are a little bit newer to the market. They’re getting caught with some bad debt right now and it’s causing some issues or their midstream and a value add and their costs are out of control. Maybe their vacancy rate was a little bit higher than they expected during that transition, the turn, their debt has crept up on them on the bridge financing. And so Brian, the one thing is yes, nothing’s making sense, but sometimes that’s the best time to buy a deal because things start falling apart and breaking down.
I feel like these opportunities are starting to come up. We’re starting to see some stuff that we can stabilize out at seven and a half, eight cap in there, which we would not be able to touch two years ago. And so as these things are transitioning though, does it also make you put your deal goggles on? Because when I see those things being able to buy that one rare deal needle in the haystack, I get excited and I’m like, okay, cool. We got some movement coming this way.

Brian:
Yeah, I mean, that’s the beginning of it. That’s the spark lighting the fuse. But for me, our scale is a little bit larger. We need to see that I can’t just buy one needle in one haystack. There needs to be a few needles in there to really make it worthwhile because that one needle in that one haystack is being chased by anybody that’s going to try to find it. Now, you can always find that one that nobody else had their eye on. And I’ve done really well over the years doing that, getting that one deal nobody knew about, but I just don’t think that they were there yet in enough quantity where it makes a ton of sense and I think we’ll get there and time will allow this to wash out. But I just think there’s another six months to a year of chaos that needs to play out before we get to a point where we can confidently say there’s going to be enough deal flow at a fair enough valuation to make the effort worthwhile.

Dave:
So Brian, if you’re not doing multifamily, are you doing anything else instead?

Matt:
Golf.

Brian:
Yes. I’m trying to improve my golf game. Actually, I just got an in-home golf simulator and I have my own driving range in my garage.

Dave:
All right, what’s your handicap done in the last year then? How many strokes have you shaved?

Brian:
It’s absolutely terrible. Absolutely terrible. I cannot break a 100 to save my life and it’s just because I’m not really good at sports and never have been. So yeah, literally nothing. It’s like I sold three quarters of my multifamily portfolio right before the market started to tumble because I saw this coming and I’m like, “We got to get out of all this stuff and sell it all while we still can.” I sold one of my companies and so I don’t have to do anything, so I’m just waiting for the right time. Now, when I was younger and broker, I was out hustling and trying to find deals and I looked for any little pocket I could find that little shred of opportunity. I totally get it. The people that are listening to this podcast, they’re like, “Hey, I’m newer in this business. I don’t have the luxury of being able to sit there and not work for a year. I need to do something.”
Get out there and do it. That needle in that haystack that James talked about is out there if you can find it. I think you’re going to find it probably in small multi. I think that’s where the opportunity is right now. I’m too lazy to do it, but I think if you have the energy for it, go out there and look for your duplex, four-plex, 10-plex because that’s where you’re going to find the quintessential tired landlord or that’s where you’re going to find the undercapitalized, unsophisticated owner that wants to get out of landlording and all that kind of stuff. That’s where you find those deals. You don’t find those in 250 unit apartment complexes. People that own that stuff are generally well capitalized, professional. They do this for a living. They have resources and ways to weather the storm. Now, that doesn’t mean they all do. There are certainly a lot of syndicators that gotten this business over the last few years that probably never should have. This market will clean them out, but the deals are going to happen behind the scenes.
You, casual investors, are never going to see them. There’s billions of dollars. In fact, I think I just saw an article the other day, $205 billion of capital sitting in dry powder on the sidelines by large PE waiting to buy distressed debt packages from these deals. And so what they’ll do is they’ll buy the debt at a discount and then they’ll foreclose. But when they open the foreclosure bid, they’re going to open it at full principal and interest, which will be more than the property is worth. So they’ll get the property back and they’ll buy the property before you ever see it. So I don’t think we’re going to see this big wave of foreclosures, all that’s going to happen in so-called backdoor deals that aren’t going to be out there on the forefront. So it’s just going to take a while for all this cleanup to happen. That’s all.

Matt:
If I may offer a alternative, my way to look at it, first of all, the needle on the haystack is never on the market. The needle on the haystack gets found behind the scenes and the way you’re going to find a needle in a haystack right now, and I’m talking to those listening on how to get going or how to scale up in today’s market. One thing I teach in the BiggerPockets Multifamily Bootcamp is about being market centered, right? You are not going to find a needle in the haystack if you’re just sitting around surfing LoopNet and waiting for a 8% cap rate deal to show up on LoopNet. But you might find a deal that pencils out and is a good deal if you pick a market, not seven, not 10, certainly not any more than one market that you want to become an expert in, and then drill into that market and get to know the brokers.
And then yes, you could start small, as Brian had said, if you’ve got the management equation figure it out on how to manage a 10, 15, 20 unit that you may find. Go for it, right? You are going to see more distress on the small side. Brian is right about that. But if you drill into a specific market, the brokers Will Certainly put the fancy pants, 95% occupied, 50% renovated apartment building with lots of value add, 1992 vintage. They will gladly put that all over the market and blast it to everybody. But what they’re not going to do is they might not put the 75% occupied property where the person’s run out of gas and true story guys, property where the syndicator themself has fired the construction crew and is in the units themselves painting the apartments. We saw that deal.
That’d be like Brian or Matt painting the apartments and doing the renovations on their own because they couldn’t get anybody to work for them anymore, couldn’t afford to pay the labor so that the operator decided to be the labor. Those opportunities are out there, but you’re certainly not going to see a broker mass marketing that opportunity. They’re going to walk around and make that a pocket listing or just find somebody who’s willing to give a good number for that deal because the broker’s not going to put their name on it or do a big blast on it or anything like that.
Deals like that, maybe seller’s a little embarrassed about what they’re dealing with. They don’t want 30, 40 different groups tramping through the property, maybe don’t want to tell their onsite staff that they’re selling. So deals like that are going to get sold more behind the scenes. And if you guys want to get plugged into those needle in a haystack behind the scenes deals, you got to become uber market centered. And they’re starting to happen now. We’ve seen them and there’s going to be way more of them soon. And I also agree with Brian on the foreclosure thing, he’s probably right. Private equity probably is going to buy up a lot of that and then we probably won’t see it, but there’ll be some distressed seller to owner stuff that will happen too.

Dave:
So Matt, you’re just out there looking for deals and not pulling the trigger. Are you actually doing anything, shifting any of your money out of multifamily into other asset classes?

Matt:
Making a lot of offers, but you don’t make money making offers, do you?

Dave:
Doing a lot of podcasts.

Matt:
That’s it. I know. This is a lot of fun but doesn’t pay well. So what we are doing is yet again, like I said, I want to be Brian. I do respect Brian quite a bit and I do follow a lot of what he’s done. And so he’s done very well with hard money and so we have launched a fund that puts money into hard money assets, which hard money gets used during times of distress. If you could borrow money from a bank, you would, you get money, hard money because you have to because you’ve got something that needs to go from A to B, call it bridge capital if you want to call it something nicer than that. But there’s becoming a lot more hard money that’s going to be used to take things to transition assets that maybe need to get around second base, so to speak, and get brought home.
So we’ve launched a fund that’s doing very well, that’s just deploying capital into bridge deals, smaller stuff, not big, big, big multifamily stuff. These are little duplexes, triplexes. We’re doing an office building, hard money loan, that kind of thing. But it’s a great way to create cashflow now because multifamily has gotten away from cashflow over the years. It’s more of an appreciation game or it has been recently. But the fundamental of multifamily used to be cashflow. And what’s great about hard money is that cashflow is day one. And so we really have been pushing that hard while we still bid, I don’t know, we might underwrite, we probably get to between 10 and 15 multifamily deals a week that our team is underwriting as well, hopefully to catch something.

Brian:
And Matt, you’ve brought a good point there about the hard money thing. The other advantage of that is it allows investors a place to invest capital in this market and earn a return. I mean, we’re doing the same thing. We started a debt fund a couple of years ago and it was a follow on. The company that we sold was a loan originator, a hard money loan originator. And so we flipped to the other side and became a debt buyer a couple of years ago. We got about 50 million in our portfolio, but we’re able to get investors an immediate return versus with multifamily ownership, it just takes so long to get there. And right now, we can give more cash on cash return with debt than we can with equity. So it gives investors a place to put money while they wait for the next multifamily cycle to come back.
And I just think right now, I’m more focused on risk than I am on reward because I think in order for us to earn a return in the next market upcycle, we have to survive the market down cycle without losing principal. So if you could put your money into a debt vehicle, I just think somebody else’s money is in first loss position. Our average loan to value ratio is 65%. That means somebody else has 45% or 35% equity in the deal that they can lose before we ever get touched. And so to me, that’s a downside risk protection. So I think people need to think about containing their risk first, finding avenues for cashflow with good risk management and forget about your pie in the sky, double-digit, mid-teens returns for now. Those days will come back, and in fact when they do come back, they’ll probably outperform.
It’s like three years ago, four years ago when we were projecting 15% IRRs on our deals, we were delivering 20s, 30s, 70 in one case. So those returns are really good when the market is really taking off, those days, they will be back. I’m not long-term bearish on real estate, the market or multifamily. I’m short-term bearish. And that’s all going to change. The problem is I don’t know when. Is it going to change next week, next month, next year or two or three years from now? I can’t call it yet. You’ll have to have me back on the show before you have Matt come back on. I don’t want to have him beat me the second time around. Then at some point, I’ll be able to figure out when that’s going to happen, but I can’t figure it out just yet.

James:
No, and I love the debt model. I’ve been lending hard money for a long time and I remember when I was 20, it was 2008 and the market just crashed. I met this private moneylender and he had a gold chain and he would charge us four points in 18%. And I remember I was like, “I want to be that guy when I’m older,” like lending out the money. Because it is, you’re right, it gives you a much safer loan devalue position. We do a lot of private money, hard money loans out in Washington, as debt becomes harder to get, it’s a great engine because you can get a high yield. But going back to the multifamily conversation, the good thing about it is you don’t get taxed at that same rate that you get as ordinary income coming through, right? It’s a high return, high tax.
And I guess since we brought up debt, what do you guys suggest? Hard money, people are starting to use it more for these value add multifamily deals too that are a little bit hairier. They got a lot more construction going on. Their commercial debt’s gotten a lot tougher to get. They don’t want to lend you as much money. It costs more. What are you guys seeing on the commercial debt side right now as far as apartment financing? And for people that are looking at buying that 10, 20, 30 unit buildings, because where a lot of the opportunities are, what kind of commercial debt and who should they be talking to? I know we’re doing a lot of local lenders where we’re moving assets over to them to give us more lending power, because the more assets you bring them, the more flexible they are with you. What are things that you guys are seeing as you’re looking at maybe buying that next deal or one day, if I can get Brian a good enough deal, maybe he’ll buy it. What would you be doing to lock down that debt?

Matt:
Well, okay, the deal’s big enough and it doesn’t need that much renovation. The agency debt, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac are still probably the best out there that you’re going to get because they’re government backed. The yield spread they’re willing to take is a lot less than what you’re going to see elsewhere. So they’re still putting money on the street at like 6.89, I’m sorry, 5.8, 5.9, maybe 6.1, somewhere in there, which is about as low as you’re going to get. But if you need any renovation dollar at all, if you want to renovate the property and do some value add, you got two choices. You can either get that money from your investors and raise it and then hopefully you can recapitalize the property and refinance it or you create enough value add cashflow that the investors are happy with what they’re getting, which that’s what we do.
We just do renovations with investor capital. We just need to just raise what we need for renovations. The other way you can go about it, James, is you could, if you’re buying that 20, 30, 40 unit, a lot of small community banks on the small side would be willing to lend that to you, maybe a fixed rate debt as well. So what scares me is floating rate debt because no telling where it’s going to go and then there’s this awful, terrible invention called a rate cap. Actually, it’s not a bad thing, but they’re just so crazy expensive now that you’ll have to buy to stop your rate from going up. And the cost of those things can really kill the deal.
So if you can get small community bank debt, not a bank that has their name on the side of a stadium, but small banks that maybe has five to 10 branches just in the market that you’re investing in, they might be willing to throw in renovation capital as well and maybe offer to do what’s called rolling up to perm where they can give you acquisition debt and construction debt and then they’ll transition that loan over to a permanent loan and start amortizing it over time once you’re done your work. The only just asterisk put on there is a lot of times almost all the time that debt is recourse, meaning you have to sign off on a personal guarantee. So you have to be okay with that.

Brian:
Yeah, I think Matt’s nailed it as far as most of those financing sources are concerned. I think to that, I’d add that private money is a source to use when you can’t find anybody, any banks or agencies to loan more unique scenarios, heavier lifts, that’s where your private money comes in. It’s a little bit more expensive on an interest rate. It also has a pretty short maturity. There’s unique situations where that works. Now, you really have to be confident that you can execute in the timeframe that you have allotted because I think the biggest killer in real estate in terms of sponsors having a lot of difficulty is in short-term maturities.
And it’s amazing how fast time goes by. And if you take out a three-year loan with two one-year extension options and you think that’s forever from now, well, three years goes by in the snap of a finger in this business. And then if things don’t go according to plan, you might not qualify for those one-year extensions and now you’re completely stuck. So you really have to be careful about loan maturities. Now, in one place, I differ from Matt and I get to disagree with him again, which I love.

Matt:
Please do.

Brian:
Is I like floating rate debt and most people think you’re nuts, why would you want to take on interest rate risk? And the reality of it is if interest rates right now are at a all time high, and when I say all time, I don’t mean all time, all time, I mean, in the last call it decade, interest rates are higher than they’ve been in a decade. Do I want to lock in fixed rate debt at historically high interest rates in relation to this kind of short-term history? I don’t. I want to see it float down. Now, the other problem is when commercial real estate, now, residential real estate, totally different ballgame. I love fixed rate. Any residential property I’ve ever owned has had 30 year fully amortizing fixed rate debt. I wouldn’t do anything other than that.
But in a commercial space, you don’t get 30 year fully amortizing fixed rate debt. You get any kind of debt that you get in commercial real estate that has a fixed rate is going to have some kind of prepayment penalty and it might be a fixed percentage of the loan amount. In which case, that’s not so bad. It might be a concept called yield maintenance, which is astronomically horrible. Yield maintenance means if I take out a 10-year loan, I’m essentially telling that lender they’re going to get all 10 years of interest. And if I have this deal that I’m going to buy fix up and resell in, let’s say three years or five years, I’ve still got to pay the other five or seven years of interest to that lender that I’m not even borrowing their money.
And when you add up the cost of that, it’s enormously expensive. It can cost you millions of dollars. Now, do I want to do that when rates are high? No, because that means I can’t refi if rates go down, and if the property value goes up, I can’t sell either and I painted myself into a corner. Now, I like floating because it doesn’t have that kind of a penalty. Now, floating on the other hand has one risk, and that is if interest rates move high fast, it really sucks to be in floating rate debt. And what just happened, interest rates moved higher than anyone ever imagined, faster than anyone’s ever seen.
And this is the worst time to have been in floating rate debt in probably 20 or 30 years. And I have floating rate debt on the assets that I own, and it sucks. Now, we don’t know yet whether or not fixed would’ve been any better because if I go to sell in a year or two, I might’ve had yield maintenance that would’ve killed it anyway. So nobody really knows. A jury isn’t out until the whole thing is done. But debt isn’t a simple yes or no question. Debt is a very complex question that you have to tailor to your specific circumstance on the deal that you’re doing.

Dave:
That’s fantastic advice, Brian. Thank you. And yeah, I think for all of you who are considering multifamily or are currently investing in multifamily, highly recommend learning more about the debt structures. It’s something I feel still like a novice on, and thank you for teaching us a bit about it, Brian, but it’s a lot riskier and a lot more complex than residential financing. So hopefully you all can take the time to learn it. Maybe that’s what you should spend this time doing instead of buying deals, Brian, is everyone should be learning about commercial debt right now so that they can apply what they learn when the market cycle changes a little bit.

Brian:
Well, I’ve been saying, Dave, for a while, this is a fantastic time to build your business, this is the time where you should be learning everything you can about debt, building your investor base, building your broker network, building your systems. Because you know what? When the market gets really good, you’re going to be busy doing deals and you’re not going to have time to refine your systems and sharpen your tools.

Matt:
No.

Brian:
This is when you sharpen your tools and then you use them when the market is really good. So this is an opportunity, take it.

Matt:
Yeah, and I just would talk, I would work really hard on infiltrating a specific market right now. We’re not going wide, we’re going deep as a company. We’re not tip picking new markets, we’re just trying to make new friends in the markets that we’re already investing in because that’s how we’re going to find those needles in the haystack in today’s times. The worst thing I think you could do is to dilute yourself and go wider than you should as this market’s a little squirrely right now.

Dave:
All right, well, we will end on an amicable friendly note like that with you two, agreeing with each other and offering such great advice.

Matt:
Yes.

Dave:
Brian, if people want to learn more about you and what you’re not doing right now, where should they find you?

Brian:
Well, we are doing a debt fund.

Dave:
Yeah, that’s fair, true.

Brian:
You can learn more about us at our website, praxcap.com. It’s P-R-A-X-C-A-P.com. You can follow me on Instagram at investorbrianburke. You can check out my book biggerpockets.com/syndicationbook.

Matt:
Or you can meet him at the top golf down the block from his house, which is [inaudible 00:53:00].

Brian:
Yes, or you can meet me at BP Con where I will be moderating the panel on multifamily. Actually, it’s just on syndication, not specifically multifamily, but the panel on syndication.

Dave:
All right, great. And Matt, what about you?

Matt:
They can learn more about my company, DeRosa Group at our webpage, DeRosa Group, D-E-R-O-S-A group. They can follow me on Instagram at themattfaircloth and they can also see me at BiggerPockets at our booth that we have there at BiggerPockets. They can come see me at the multifamily networking session that we’re running there as well. So we’re going to be all over BP Con with me and my team from DeRosa. So really excited to connect with all the BP people at that event and seeing Brian as well. And Brian and I are actually really good friends. We actually have a lot of fun pretending to disagree with each other, but I am just a little more of an optimist about things, but I really appreciate people like Brian that can give me more of a real perspective on the world versus best case scenario, which is that’s the world I tend to live in my brain.

Dave:
All right. Well, we appreciate both of your incredible experience and knowledge and sharing it with us here today. And of course, we’ll have to have you both back on soon, hopefully when we have a little bit better line of sight on what’s going to be happening so we can start hearing some of the strategies that you’re both employing to start jumping back into the market. But who knows when that will be? All right, Brian, Matt, thanks so much for joining us again.

Matt:
Thanks for having us, Dave. Thanks, James.

Brian:
Yeah, thanks. Thanks guys.

Dave:
We were just completely useless in that conversation I feel like. We did not need to be here for that entire thing.

James:
No, we just need to do the intro and the outro, Dave, and let them go. That was one of the more entertaining episodes I’ve been on.

Dave:
This is perfect. It’s basically just you and I get to invite people we want to learn from, let them talk and I’m just sitting here taking notes not to ask my next question, just for my own investing of just like it’s basically our own personal bootcamp or webinar mastermind or something. Those two, super entertaining but also just extremely experienced and knowledgeable. I learned a lot.

James:
Yeah, that’s a great perk about our gig. We get to talk to really cool people and it was awesome to have both perspectives because everyone has an opinion on what’s going on right now and getting both sides of the spectrum. Brian being very conservative right now, it was nice to hear that it’s okay, right? He’s like, “Hey, I’m good to wait this out. I’ve done really, really well and it’s not for everybody,” but that’s what he’s going to stick with. So it’s just a great perspective.

Dave:
Yeah, I think that the thing that I walked away with is that for someone like Brian, think about his business model. He has been managing funds for multiple decades. The way he makes money is by collecting tens of millions of dollars from passive investors and investing them into multifamily. So his whole point is right now he could probably raise money. I bet he can, but there’s just not enough good deals for him to deploy that capital. So he’s not going to raise the money. For someone who’s just looking for one deal or for two deals, you might be able to hustle into good deals right now. He said that himself. And so I think that was just a really interesting perspective. If you’re a smaller investor or someone like you, James, who just knows your market extremely well and are willing to take deal flow where it’s just one successful deal out of every a 100 deals you underwrite, that’s totally fine. But I think it sort of makes sense to me that Brian, given his business model and how his business operates is being more conservative.

James:
Yeah, and I think that’s the right approach, especially when you’re dealing with that much of investor capital. And then it was good to hear Matt, “Hey, we haven’t bought anything, but that doesn’t mean we’re not swinging every month.” They’re swinging every month and he just wants to make contact on something. And depending on what you want to do as an investor, both, neither positions are wrong or right. You just want to figure out where your risk tolerance is and how you want to move forward.

Dave:
Yeah, absolutely. And totally agree on debt working really well right now. If you know how to lend money or are an accredited investor and can participate in debt funds, it’s a great way to get cashflow right now. So definitely agree with both of them on that. The other hand, I think it’s just a bit more waiting. It sounds like you’re still looking at multifamily deals, right?

James:
Yeah, we’re always looking and we were actually at a fairly good one in Seattle recently, a couple of days ago. So there’s buys out there, it’s good for us kind of middlemen guys that are in that 30 to 50 range. But yeah, if you’re like Brian, the bigger stuff just doesn’t have the margin in it.

Dave:
So 30, 50 units you mean?

James:
Yeah, it’s like kind of no man’s land right now. A lot of people are looking, so the margin’s a little bit better. The sellers are being realistic, but it takes a lot of swings and that’s okay. Just keeps swinging until you make contact. I think the biggest thing is don’t get itchy finger, just be patient and you’ll get what you’re looking for. Stick to that buy box number you need.

Dave:
Yeah, absolutely. Very good advice. All right, well, James, thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate it. And thank you all for listening to this episode of On The Market. We’ll see you for the next episode, which will come out this Friday. On The Market was created by me, Dave Meyer and Kailyn Bennett. The show is produced by Kailyn Bennett, with editing by Exodus Media. Copywriting is by Calico Content, and we want to extend a big thank you to everyone at BiggerPockets for making this show possible.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link

Top Multifamily Investors’ Advice for Buyers in 2023? DON’T Do It! Read More »

A big AI and robotics idea that has attracted Walmart and Softbank

A big AI and robotics idea that has attracted Walmart and Softbank


Symbotic technology in use at a Walmart facility.

Courtesy: Walmart

Venture-capital giant Softbank notched a $15 billion-plus gain on its 2016 deal to buy Arm Holdings when the artificial intelligence-enabling semiconductor firm went public last month. But not as many investors know about Softbank’s “other” big AI investment, Wilmington, Mass.-based software and robotics maker Symbotic, which Walmart has taken a big stake in itself.

That may soon change.

Symbotic, a company that has already generated market heat selling AI-powered robotic warehouse management systems to clients including Walmart, Target and Albertson’s, is partnering with Softbank to play in a potentially giant and transformative market. The two are teaming up in a joint venture called GreenBox Systems which promises to deliver AI-powered logistics and warehousing to much smaller companies, delivering it as a service in facilities different companies share. They say it’s a $500 billion market, and an example of the kind of change AI can bring to the economy at large.

If it works, GreenBox will reach companies that could never afford the multi-million dollar required investment, in the same way cloud computing puts high-end information tech within reach, said Dwight Klappich, an analyst at technology research firm Gartner.

“I’ve seen a lot of robotics tech and I’ve never seen anything like it in my life,” TD Cowen analyst Joseph Giordano said. “Compared to what it replaces, it’s like day and night.” 

Erasing memories of a big WeWork real estate blunder

It might even mute the memory of Softbank’s most disastrous commercial real estate management investment ever, the notorious office-sharing company WeWork. 

Like WeWork, GreenBox is a promise to fuse technology and real estate. Indeed, its  sales pitch of “warehouse as a service” recalls the “space as a service” slogan in WeWork’s 2019 IPO prospectus almost exactly. The big difference: with WeWork, outside analysts struggled to identify what technological advantage WeWork ever offered clients over working at home or in traditional offices, let alone one that justified its peak valuation of $47 billion. WeWork today is worth under $150 million and is now under bankruptcy watch as it warned in August of its potential inability to remain “a going concern,” and more recently stopped making interest payments on debt, asking lenders to negotiate.

At GreenBox, the technology is the whole point, Giordano said. And unlike WeWork, which wanted people to change the way they used offices, Symbotic and GreenBox are out to let companies that already run warehouses boost efficiency and profits, he said. 

“Contract warehousing exists today – but those operations are mostly manual,” said Robert W. Baird analyst Rob Mason.

Softbank owns more than 8% of Symbotic, according to data from Robert W. Baird, and took it public through a special purpose acquisition company last year. Softbank also owns 65% of the GreenBox venture, which launched with $100 million in investment by the two companies. Walmart owns another 11% of Symbotic, according to a proxy statement from the robotics company, and is by far its biggest customer until the GreenBox venture ramps up, accounting for almost 90% of revenue.

“We share the same vision of going big and going fast,” Symbotic CEO Rick Cohen said. “We believe this market is massive.”

Walmart's betting big on automation to boost productivity and profits

Symbotic has generated stock-market excitement even before the GreenBox deal. Its shares are up 190% this year. Sales in its most recent quarter climbed 77%, and orders for its existing warehouse-management systems jumped to $12 billion – a backlog it would take the company years to fulfill  Add in the $11 billion of Symbotic software and follow-on services GreenBox committed to buy over six years in July, and that backlog soars to $23 billion for a company that expects its first billion-dollar revenue year in fiscal 2023, and to break even on an EBITDA basis for the first time as a public company in the fourth quarter.

The best indication of the future may be from Walmart, which bought its Symbotic stake as part of the companies’ deal to automate the retailer’s 42 U.S. regional distribution centers for packaged consumer goods.

The product is the reason why, analysts say. 

At prices of $25 million to hundreds of millions, according to a conference call Symbotic held with analysts in July, a Symbotic system blends as many as dozens of autonomous robots that scoot around warehouses at speeds up to 25 mph, moving and unloading boxes from pallets and picking orders with AI software that optimizes where in a warehouse to put individual cases of goods, and lets boxes be packed to the warehouse’s ceiling, Giordano said, wasting much less space in the building. 

The system works something like a disk drive that uses intelligence to store data efficiently and retrieve the right data on demand – but with boxes of stuff. And a large warehouse can use several different systems, piling up the required investment to get moving.

Because Symbotic’s system can track inventory down to the case easily, where stuff is put can be matched much more easily to incoming orders, making it possible to more fully automate order picking. It can also match the design of outgoing pallets to the layout of the store the pallet is headed to, speeding up unloading and shelf stocking, Klappich said. 

But the biggest innovation the tech allows is in business models, rather than in technology itself. That hasn’t spread outside of giant companies yet, but Giordano and Mason say they think it will.

The AI’s precision will let multiple companies share the same warehouse, and even commingle their goods for efficient shipping without confusion, much as cloud computing lets multiple clients share the same computer servers, Mason said. 

“Through sharing infrastructure, you can get out of the infrastructure business and focus on what’s important to you,” Klappich said. “Larger-scale automation without the capital expense has been a challenge.”

Born out of stealth work with Walmart, minting a multi-billionaire

The idea grew out of a vision Cohen had when running his family’s grocery distribution company, C&S Wholesale Grocery, which he has grown to $33 billion in annual revenue from $14 million since 1974.  Symbotic was founded in 2006, and worked in stealth mode for years while refining its prototypes with Walmart. 

“I’ve spent my whole life in the outsourcing and [logistics] business with C&S, so, this — the ability to run warehouses for people — has always been on the plate, Cohen said in the July analyst call. “We said we’re going to take care of Walmart first. …We are now starting to say, I think we can do more.”

Symbotic and C&S have made the 71-year old Cohen one of America’s richest men, with a net worth hovering around $15.9 billion, according to Forbes. 

Symbotic teamed up with Softbank to build GreenBox in order to preserve its own capital, Cohen told analysts. The joint venture was initially capitalized 65% by Softbank and 35% by Symbotic, for a total of $100 million. Analysts say the venture will require much more capital, possibly raised by having GreenBox itself borrow money in the bond market. Symbotic said it will use its share of the profits from sales to GreenBox to keep its equity stake in the joint venture around 35%.

“The question has been, who has the capital to set it all up?” Klappich said. “Softbank could be the key because they have deep pockets.”

The joint venture will buy software from Symbotic, then turn around and sell the warehouse space, equipment and related services as a package to tenants. 

Many questions remain, and potential threats from Amazon, private equity

Much else about the new company remains unknown, beginning with the identity of its not-yet-announced chief executive, Mason said. The venture could either develop warehouses or rent them, though Symbotic said it will probably mostly rent them. Pricing for the warehouse-as-a-service is undisclosed. 

But the rise of Greenbox more than doubles Symbotic’s potential market, and nearly doubles its backlog. Symbotic has said that its total market is about $432 billion, a figure chief strategy officer Bill Boyd repeated on the conference call when the GreenBox alliance was announced.  Early adopters will be in businesses like grocery and packaged goods, with Symbotic expanding into pharmaceuticals and electronics over time, according to Symbotic’s annual federal regulatory filing this year.

The GreenBox market for smaller companies shapes up as another $500 billion of possible demand, Gartner’s Klappich said. The estimates are based on the number of warehouses in those industries, the likely percentage of warehouses in each whose owners can afford the technology, either independently or through GreenBox, and the average price of Symbotic-like systems. 

The third quarter of the company’s fiscal year, which ends in October, illustrates how the company’s profits might scale. Revenue jumped 77% to $312 million, and its loss before interest, taxes and non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses shrank to $3 million. Mason says the company will turn profitable on an EBITDA basis in the fiscal year that begins this fall, before orders from GreenBox begin, and EBITDA will be “in the mid-teens” as a percent of sales by the following year.

Clients stand to save money all the way through the warehouse, Klappich said.

Giordano estimated the savings at eight hours of labor per outgoing truck. The technology can also cut space rental costs by allowing goods to be packed closer together and stacked higher. 

Using the facility as a service will let seasonal companies cut back on the space and robot time they use during slow periods, rather than carry them all year. The warehouse should run with many fewer workers, Giordano said. And GreenBox will pay for upgrades to robots and software every few years, rather than making tenants invest more, he said.

Walmart led investors on a tour of its Brooksville, Fla. warehouse in April, and said technology investments like the Symbotic alliance will let profits grow faster than sales. More than half of distribution volume will move through automated centers within three years, improving unit costs by about 20% as two-thirds of stores are served by automated systems. The company has said little about the impact on jobs, but CEO Doug McMillon said overall employment should stay about the same size but shift toward delivery from warehouse roles. 

Competition will be arriving soon enough, analysts say. Building something like Symbotic, and especially moving it down into the realm where companies other than global giants can afford it, takes a combination of technology, money and vision, Klappich said. 

Amazon could expand into the space, using its warehousing expertise in a service that resembles its Web hosting business model, or private-equity firms awash in investable cash might acquire combinations of companies to produce competing products and business models, Klappich said.

For Softbank, the payoff if GreenBox works is potentially huge. Analysts on average project Symbotic shares to rise another 53% in the next year after pulling back amid recent recession fears, according to ratings aggregator TipRanks. With post-IPO estimates arguing that Arm shares will stagnate, and taking into account that Softbank paid a reported $36 billion for Arm in 2016, it’s possible Symbotic will be the bigger win in the end, at least on a percentage basis, as the 65% share of GreenBox rises in value.

CORRECTION: A previous version of this article included a quote from an exchange with a Softbank representative that shouldn’t have been included in the finished report.



Source link

A big AI and robotics idea that has attracted Walmart and Softbank Read More »

How To Do More For Your Customers To Grow Your Business

How To Do More For Your Customers To Grow Your Business


During the pandemic, Zappos once again shot to the top of the customer experience (CX) leaderboard. Instead of pulling back on its historic support amid dropping sales, the company doubled down on its customer commitment. Zappos representatives were encouraged to chat with buyers as if they were buddies — and the scheme worked. Zappos hung on to its top position and received lots of media kudos in the process.

The point isn’t just that Zappos zigged while its competitors zagged. It’s that Zappos realized that cutting off customer lifelines is a bad idea, especially during times of economic turmoil. Customer trust is tough enough to engender. Why take away the support that can foster, fuel, and nurture it?

Yet that’s exactly what too many companies are considering doing today. There’s no doubt that the world is mired in a mix of shrinkflation, stagflation, inflation, and other serious ‘-tion’ words. In response, countless businesses are taking extreme measures including laying off their personnel. And your company may be ready to follow suit. Just think twice before pulling the plug on your customer service because you might be pulling the plug on your ability to scale.

You see, every positive CX adds a bit to your customers ‘trust piggy banks’. The more trust they have in your brand, the less likely they’ll be to shop elsewhere. A full 75% of consumers say that they stick with trusted companies, even when their prices are higher. Consequently, investing in your CX simply makes financial sense, no matter what the economic tailwinds do.

Ready to do more for your buyers and buck the ‘right-sizing’ trend? Try these strategies to keep your costs down while still serving up exceptional CX.

1. Make it a breeze for customers to problem-solve solo.

We live in an era where shoppers frequently try to find answers to their problems before contacting live customer service agents. This is good for your company and its budget. The more customers who can self-serve, the more time your representatives can spend on other customers with complex, higher-level concerns.

An economical way to encourage self-service is by adding AI-powered tools into your CX mix. Many respectable startups have grown by prioritizing things like this. One of my favorite advanced solutions is AI chatbot technology. Chatbots can solve baseline buyer questions quite efficiently. A chatbot can rapidly direct customers to videos, how-to articles, instructional manuals, and do more. At the end of the day, empowered customers who can take care of their business will take care of your business as well.

2. Offer free resources and educational opportunities to customers.

Your brand goal shouldn’t just be to sell merchandise or provide services. Ideally, your company should become synonymous with your industry. One way to make this happen is by telling your customers what you know. By sharing your expertise freely, you’re making them more informed consumers. At the same time, you’re cementing your business as ‘the’ place to go in your field.

This doesn’t mean creating gated whitepapers and calling it a day. To truly give away your knowledge, you have to think broader and with less of an immediate lead generation focus. For example, you may want to offer webinars to talk about innovative ways to use your products. Or you might start a YouTube channel, or even launch a podcast. Some of the biggest corporations are trying to capture the millions-strong podcast listener market. A podcast doesn’t have to break the bank but can assist you in breaking out as a go-to brand.

3. Encourage customers to become members of your brand.

Do your customers feel like they’re part of an exclusive group? You can make them feel that way by setting up a membership or branded community system. For instance, you might want to offer customers the chance to join a special club. The club would give them access to exclusive ‘sneak peaks’, discounts, coupons, and other valuable add-ons in exchange for their personal data.

When laying out your membership group, think about what makes sense given your customer base. Oh, and be sure to begin small and free. You can always expand your program later to include premium or paid membership options. Right now, though, you just want to design a community experience that rewards your customers for choosing you over your competition.

4. Set up customer feedback mechanisms — and make changes accordingly.

You can’t wow your customers if you’re not listening to what they need. A fast way to find out what they want is by eliciting feedback. Plenty of companies set up automatic surveys to deploy after a customer makes a purchase. The survey captures the customer’s mood, satisfaction, and experience in real-time. The result is a better handle on how customers are feeling and what they would like to see during future engagements with your brand.

Of course, asking for customer feedback implies that you’re going to do something with the answers. You can’t always encourage people to fill out surveys without making improvements or changes. The upside to making changes is that your customers will have fewer negative interactions.

You can’t stay in business if you don’t have customers. Before agreeing to shave your customer service and support funding, rethink your plans. Improving and enhancing your CX isn’t just another cost. It’s an investment in the future growth of your company courtesy of a loyal, trusting cadre of buyers.



Source link

How To Do More For Your Customers To Grow Your Business Read More »

How Long to Hold On to a BAD Rental Property

How Long to Hold On to a BAD Rental Property


DON’T sell your low-cash flow rental property just yet—you could make it a cash cow with one quick strategy switch. At least that’s Rob Abasolo’s advice as he joins David this Sunday for a Seeing Greene episode, where they take questions directly from BiggerPockets listeners, commenters, and reviewers! And even if you don’t have your first rental in the bag, this episode will be worth tuning into.

David and Rob discuss whether buying your first property with a fixed vs. adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) makes more sense with today’s high interest rates. Then, we hear from an investor looking to sell their rentals and move that money into a bigger city with more appreciation potential. The problem? Their rentals are making some serious cash flow. Speaking of cash flow, we hear from an investor who’s got a townhouse that COULD become a rental but would have some meager returns. Is it worth keeping? Tune in to hear answers to all those questions and more!

Want to ask David a question? If so, submit your question here so David can answer it on the next episode of Seeing Greene. Hop on the BiggerPockets forums and ask other investors their take, or follow David on Instagram to see when he’s going live so you can hop on a live Q&A and get your question answered on the spot!

David:
This is the BiggerPockets Podcast show 828. BiggerPockets has a Rental Property Calculator that you can use to look into this and decide would that town home support that rent? You can also call local property managers, meet local real estate investors. You’re living in LA, one of the benefits other than the rattlesnake sausage, is all the other people that are out there that are investing in real estate themselves. So, take advantage of that. Talk to people that own town homes and ask what they’re getting for rent. If it doesn’t bring in what you need for it to make money and you can’t afford to bleed money every month, the answer becomes pretty clear that you need to sell it.
What’s going on, everyone? It’s David Greene, your host of the BiggerPockets Real Estate Podcast. The biggest, the best, the baddest real estate podcast in the world here today with a Seeing Greene episode. In today’s shows, we take questions from you, the listener base, the future millionaires, the future financially free. And I do my best to answer them with the knowledge that I’ve gained with over a decade of investing in real estate, serving people as real estate agents and a loan officer and more.
In today’s show, we cover how to structure a short-term rental with a partner, when to go with an adjustable rate versus a fixed rate mortgage. If you should keep what you got or invest where it’s hot. And more. And as a surprise, I’m joined by my partner today, like Captain America with the Falcon, Rob Abasolo. Rob, welcome to Seeing Greene.

Rob:
Hello. Hello. Listen, I was really offended there because you talked about the future of real estate investors, the future millionaires, but you didn’t hit on the most important group of people, the future farmers of America.

David:
You heard the word future and your mind went there right away, didn’t it?

Rob:
Hey man, the FFA, it was a very popping group in my high school. I wasn’t part of it, but I knew lots of good people that raised cows and stuff.

David:
That tells you a lot about where Rob grew up, we’re the cool kids, we’re the future farmers of America. If that is you, if you’re in FFA, keep an eye out on future shows. We may have something about a USDA loan. I know we’ve interviewed people before that do hog hacking, pig flipping.
But in today’s show we are going to talk primarily about real estate, partnerships, structure, moving money around to make more sense, and more. Rob, it’s nice to have you on today’s show, especially with those growing muscles that you’ve been working on.

Rob:
Well, David, I had a really great time today and I appreciate the offer to come on to the show. Listen, if you ever need a day off, I’ve been thinking maybe we rebrand the show. We call it coiftions and answers with Rob Abasolo and David Greene, or maybe Q&A-basolo, just a couple of working titles. I’ll let you sleep on it, but just wanted to tell you where my head’s at. Feel free to take a breather here and there.

David:
Thank you for that, Rob. I appreciate your coifidence in the matter. You’ll be the first call if I ever need a day off. All right, let’s get into our first question with Rob and I.

Ben:
Hey David, love the show. I would like to know your advice on how to structure a deal with family members that want to invest in a short-term rental with me. I’d like to purchase the property as a second home to put 10% down and use their investment for that deal. I’m looking for something in the Hudson Valley in New York for the property.
I currently have a two unit and a three unit property in New York with a W-2 job that I don’t plan on leaving anytime soon. So, I want to purchase the short-term rental for my next property to help offset tax liability from my W-2, which my CPA has recommended as the best way to accomplish that. Mainly, I want it to offset taxes for my W-2 and they want a place to park their money that will appreciate over time and have a nice rate of return that a short-term rental could offer. So, outside of investing money in the deal, they don’t want to necessarily be involved in any of the day-to-day management and would like to really just invest their money. So, how would you structure a deal to be able to accomplish that and still use that process? Look forward to hearing from you. Thanks.

David:
Thank you, Ben. This is a very good question. You are thinking the right things and you’re asking the right questions. This falls right into your wheelhouse, Rob, probably not the tax planning part, but definitely the short-term rental part. So, what advice do you have for Ben? Let’s start off with your perspective here.

Rob:
Well, it sounds like he’s looking for the tax benefits and the family members aren’t looking for the tax benefits, so there are a lot of different ways you could structure this. You could almost structure it to where they get all the appreciation, so all the upside, you get all the tax benefits and then you split the cashflow down the middle. That would be the first way to do it. You could also just split everything across the board.
And I think you get really interesting territory here when you’re working with family because so many things can go wrong. So, I think you should almost work harder to make sure that the family member is getting paid back. So, I would probably suggest a waterfall here. They get paid back 75% of the profits and you get paid 25% of it, and then once they get paid back their initial contribution, then you waterfall the cashflow to be 50/50, all while giving you as much of the tax benefits as you can negotiate.
So again, not enough context to know if that’s important to the family member. I’m going to say it’s probably not because they’re not going to be actively managing that short-term rental themselves, so they won’t get to take advantage of the cost segregation or the bonus depreciation. So, I almost feel like if he’s going to be sacrificing 75% of the profits out the gate to pay back that family member, maybe he could negotiate or maybe you, Ben, can negotiate keeping 100% of the bonus depreciation. Did you keep up with all that, Dave, or was that a bunch of mumbo jumbo?

David:
No, that was really good and I always love sitting in the position where I get to talk after you do. Like Alex said when we interviewed Alex Hormozi and Leila, he likes to let Leila talk first because then he can sum up what she said and add something that maybe she missed. You always sounds smarter. But the real work is done by the person who speaks first.
There’s basically several benefits to real estate. We typically only talk about cashflow, but there is some tax benefits in this case, there is appreciation and there’s cashflow. These are the main three that we see in this deal.
So, if the person that you’re partnering with doesn’t care about the tax benefits, then take all of them. They probably care about the cash on cash return. I think that you could probably structure this where you split the equity 50/50, you split the cashflow 50/50, you keep 100% of the tax benefits for yourself because they don’t want it anyways. They’re happy to be getting a good return on their money.
The only question you didn’t ask is how are you going to split up the management of this asset? Are you going to be doing that work? Are you hiring a third-party company to do it? If you’re thinking about hiring a third-party company so that neither of you is doing the work because your partner has already said they don’t want to, I would caution you to look very closely at the service that you’re getting. Sometimes you find a great property manager. Most of the time the deals don’t make sense when you have a third-party person managing it unless you’re doing it in-house.

Rob:
I think he has to self-manage because he’s doing the bonus depreciation, so he has to materially participate in the management. So, I think Ben will be self-managing. And it has to be that way just for the sake of his … Why would they need him?

David:
Good point there. Thank you, Rob, for catching that. I’m a real estate professional because of all the work that I do in the real estate brokerage and the mortgages, so I sometimes forget other people are not in that position, but thank you for bringing that up. He’s going to have to manage it if he wants to get the hours in that he needs to, to qualify for the short-term rental loophole.
So, there you go, Ben. You got a really good plan there. I don’t think you have to give anything up. I think you can go back to your partner and just say, “Hey, there’s some tax benefits that I’m going to get out of this, but that’s because I’m running the show. Doesn’t hurt you, because you can’t use them anyways.” You’re going to get half the equity, you’re going to get half the cashflow and then they’re going to contribute the down payment. So, fingers crossed for you.

Rob:
I think that’s a good resolution. I think he should have 25% of the cashflow, so he gets a little bit. Investor gets the cashflow since Ben is getting the majority or all of the tax benefits. That’s a very tangible benefit to him. I think that’d be a better way to strike that deal personally.

David:
Yeah, Rob, that’s a good point. That’s an option too. I’d probably go there myself if the partner didn’t like the 50/50 split, I’d maybe say, “Okay, then fine, I’ll take 25. You take 75.” Definitely a good backup plan. That tends to be how you negotiate though. You start with what you want and then if they agree to it, great, and if they don’t, then you, “Okay, here’s plan B. Here’s plan C.” And you keep working down until you find something that works for both of you.
The last piece to consider is how you’re going to structure this agreement. You could buy a property and put both of you on title. You could form an entity that you each own 50% of and then buy the property in that entity, and then that entity has an operating agreement that dictates who’s going to be doing what and what the splits are going to be. That might be the cleanest way. So, I’d recommend reaching out to a lawyer and having them draw up the documents for you. I have someone that I use for that. If you’d like to DM me, I’d be happy to put you in touch with them. But in general, this doesn’t have to be super complicated. I think you’re asking all the right questions and best wishes to you. Thanks for reaching out to Seeing Greene.
Before we move on to our next question, Rob, in your answer, you mentioned waterfalls. As a child, I was cautioned not to go chasing them. Can you share for everyone listening what a waterfall is in this context?

Rob:
Sure. Simple terms here. If you have a waterfall agreement, I talked about the 75/25 thing, it basically means that the terms change. So, it goes from 75/25 to 50/50. It waterfalls into a different tier once you’ve returned the capital of that investor.

David:
There you go. And that’s a principle that works in most syndications or partnerships. So, you’ll often see the silent investors or the limited partners, also known as LPs, will tend to get a preferred return or a higher return that they get out of the cashflow before the sponsors or the general partners get any money. And then once their investment is paid back, the splits switch to something that’s more equitable for both parties. It’s just a way of making sure the investors get their capital back out of the deal they put in and then the returns are adjusted. So, thanks, Rob, for helping provide a free education to our BiggerPockets listeners.
Our next question comes from Melissa N in SoCal. Rob, this is your hood. You spent quite a bit of time in Southern California. You know it well. You took us to a sausage restaurant when we were all there recently and I believe you ordered the rattlesnake sausage. Longest I’ve seen you go without talking. You are definitely into that thing. So, I’m going to let you read this question since you might know Melissa, since you guys grew up in the same area.

Rob:
It’s true. Los Angeles is a very small city, so I’ve probably run into her. “So, a little bit of background here. Husband is interested in getting me on board with real estate for the last five years, but he’s not very convincing. Fun fact,” she’s saying nice things about us, “you made it very easy for me to understand, follow along and stay motivated in this industry. I hope he isn’t listening to this episode. Anyways, thank you so much for all the motivation. I’m a big fan of your analogies. We listen to you on our LA commute to work every day. You make the drive something to look forward to.” That’s very nice.

David:
Yeah, before you continue here, every husband loves for his wife to compliment other men and tell them how they did a much better job than he did. So, Melissa N, thank you for that and to Melissa N’s husband who probably is listening to this, I feel you man.

Rob:
“Okay. So, the issue. We purchased a town home house hack in Lakewood, California. We’re in a dilemma because we realized after using BiggerPockets’ Rental Property Calculator, our purchase wasn’t as great as we thought it was when we initially bought it for a future rental. So, the pros for keeping the property are we want to keep this property as an investment because the area is great for families, it’s safe, has great schools and is within walking distance to so many shops and restaurants, grocery stores, and even a mall.
The cons. The problem is we looked at rent in our area and it doesn’t make up for even a small amount of cashflow unless we hike the rent price up. We think part of the problem is that it’s a town home, which means we can’t expand and there’s an HOA.” Ew.
“So, the needs. We want to purchase another property, but we’re just not sure if we want to keep this house or house as a long-term investment. If we hike our rent prices up $500 or more, we could make about $100 in cashflow. We’re just not so sure if anyone would pay 3,500 bucks to live in a town home. We’re considering Section 8, but we would have to do more research. My question to you David and Rob, what would you do in our situation? Would you keep this property and try to rent it out to a family who can afford it for 3,500 bucks? Or, would you sell it and purchase a single-family where we can build an ADU?”

David:
So, first off, Ms. Melissa, you’ve already noticed that the time to use tools to analyze properties, like the BiggerPockets Calculator, which is great, is before you buy the property, not after. No need to beat that dead horse. You learned that one the hard way. That’s okay. It’s all about learning.
I think what happened is you looked at a town home and you assume that the comps would be the same as the single-family homes. They’re not comps. Learn that lesson the hard way too. That’s okay. That’s a part of real estate investing. That’s one of the reasons that we say everybody should house hack first because you get some of these little errors or misunderstandings of how the whole thing works out of the way at a relatively low-risk experience. Rob got into house hacking when he lived in Los Angeles. I started house hacking. It’s how a lot of us learned how to ride a bike. We put the training wheels on before we took them off. So, no shame in your game there.
I don’t think you should look at it like, “Should we raise the rent to 3,500?” I think you should look at it as the question being, “Can we raise the rent to 3,500?” BiggerPockets has a Rental Property Calculator that you can use to look into this and decide would that town home support that rent? You can also call local property managers, meet local real estate investors. You’re living in LA, one of the benefits other than the rattlesnake sausage is all the other people that are out there that are investing in real estate themselves. So, take advantage of that. Talk to people that own town homes and ask what they’re getting for rent.
If it doesn’t bring in what you need for it to make money and you can’t afford to bleed money every month, the answer becomes pretty clear that you need to sell it. You sell the property, you reinvest into something else. That’s something that we at the David Greene Team help people with all the time, how to make good financial decisions with their real estate, reinvest the money into somewhere better. So, we’d be happy to help you with that.
And then moving forward, I would, my last piece of advice, say, you need to get other people involved in these decisions before you make them. That’s one of the things that when we’re helping clients with, we’re looking into this stuff for you. Your real estate agent really should have known what you were attempting to do with this, and they should have told you, “A town home isn’t going to cashflow as much.” You don’t have the right team. This shouldn’t be a mistake that you’re having to learn the hard way. There should have been other people involved, and if it’s not your agent, if it’s not your loan officer, although it should be them, you should have other investors involved in the process.
This is something that if you had bounced off of Rob or I, we would’ve known in two seconds, “Hey, hey, hey, hang on here. Town homes have HOAs and they also get less rent. Let’s slow your roll. Let’s look into something that’s better.” But when you’re flying solo, you could easily make these mistakes. Rob, what are your thoughts?

Rob:
A couple things here. I don’t know what the bed/bath count of the property is, so take what I’m about to say as a grain of salt. Los Angeles County, you cannot really Airbnb there and even if you could, she’s in an HOA. The HOA may not allow it. Typically, town home HOAs aren’t going to be quite as strict as neighborhood ones, but you never really know.
I actually think it’s a perfect play for a midterm rental. I mean, 3,500 bucks, if that’s what she’s trying to lock down, assuming it’s at least a 2/2, I think she’d be able to get the 3,500 bucks. But if it’s a 3/2 or a 4/3 or anything like that, I think all day she’s going to get at a minimum 3,500 bucks in Lakewood, California, which is, I think it’s north of Long Beach, east of Los Angeles, I want to say. Never eat slimy worms. Yeah, east of Los Angeles. And so, I really do think as a midterm rental, I mean, she could possibly be making four to $5,000 a month in rent.
It’s not like you just list it as a midterm rental and you rock it, right? She has to go and she has to list it on Airbnb for 30 days at a time. She has to build relationships with health agencies and relocation agencies. I mean, she has to hustle a little bit, but if she wants to not be in this predicament where she’s losing money, she’s going to have to work for it. So, 3,500 bucks doesn’t really scare me. Think it’s totally primed for a midterm rental. Or, she was already house hacking before, just rent out all the rooms. If it’s a three-bedroom, I think she could probably get 1,200 bucks or something like that for each room. I don’t know enough about the bed/bath count for that to be an informed decision though.

David:
Yeah. But if they bought it recently in Los Angeles, even 3,600 is probably not going to be enough to cover the mortgage with where today’s rates are. It’d probably need to be five to six bedrooms before they could expect to make a decent amount there. Again, we don’t know the details of the purchase price, but from what I’ve seen, most of those properties are going to have a higher mortgage.

Rob:
I agree, but isn’t $3,500 the number that she cited? I assume that that’s her mortgage.

David:
Great point there, Rob. And that’s some creative thinking. If you got to get to the 3,500 a month, if you can get 1,200 a room, you’re there. It’s a little more work. Just like if it’s a medium-term rental, it’s a little more work, but like you mentioned, Rob, you’re going to have to work for it. So, go to Craigslist, look up what rooms rent for in that neighborhood, and if it’s $800 a room, this isn’t going to work, but if it’s close to 1,200 you can get there.
Last piece, I’ll say, you mentioned, “Should we do Section 8?” I forgot to address this earlier. You don’t control the rents on Section 8. There’s actually government regulations and guidelines that tell you for the size of the property, the bedroom and the bathroom count, what you will be paid by Section 8. And then how much the tenant is responsible for is something that the HUD program themselves will determine, not you. So, I wouldn’t look at Section 8 like that’s going to be your saving grace necessarily, because you can’t determine the rent there. I would look up what the guidelines are and see how much a property like that could bring in on Section 8 or even call the HUD program, that stands for Housing and Urban Development, and ask them what your property would rent for. And if it’s not 3,500, throw that out as an option.
If you decide you’re going to sell it, remember that there is a capital gain exception for those that have lived in a property for two years out of a five-year period. For most people, that means they lived in it for two years in a row, but that doesn’t have to be the case. If you’ve rented it out and you’ve lived there as long as over a five-year period, you’ve been in it for two years as your primary residence, you can sell it and have up to $250,000 of your capital gains wiped out or $500,000 if you are married.
So, selling that property and reinvesting into something that you analyze a little better and you get some more supporters on your side going into it is probably where this one’s going to end up. Send me a DM if you’d like to talk about that more, and thank you for sending this question to Seeing Greene.

Rob:
I will say, that sounds a lot harder than just trying to make it work though, like selling and then buying. I think you should try to make it work if you can. I don’t know if it’s worth the rigmarole of getting into a new property, because she’s so close. 3,500 bucks, I think that’s super achievable in the midterm rental pad split space, co-living area. So, I would really leave no stone unturned on this before selling it, I think.

David:
Thank you for that, Rob. All right, let’s get into our next question. This comes from Joel Yunek in Des Moines, Iowa.

Joel:
Hey, David, I’m Joel Yunek. I’ve been listening to the show for about five years now. Huge fan. So, thank you for all the years of knowledge that you’ve been able to give to this audience.
So, I just graduated college and had my first house hack under contract. So, my question is when it comes to financing, with the increasing rates, I’m sure it’s on everybody’s minds right now. I’m looking at a 30-year fixed versus a adjustable rate mortgage, probably a 7 or 10 year fixed rate before it’s able to adjust. So, I know there’s some risk there with the adjustable rate, it seems like a 10-year period is a long period of time to figure out what is the next stage, whether it’s selling, refinancing or just assessing where the interest rate environment is in a decade.
So, with the fixed rate, you get the security of locking that in for 30 years, but while I’m investing with a long-term horizon, what are the odds I hold onto the same property for 30 years? So, my question is when it comes to balancing the options of an adjustable rate and the fixed rate. So, what would you recommend to get the security with a locked in 30 year versus the money saved and the compounding effect of that over the course of a decade with the adjustable rate? Yeah, thanks, David. Appreciate all of the knowledge over the years.

Rob:
Okay. I think I get this one. So, he is basically wanting to know should he get a 30 year or should he risk it for the biscuit and get a 7 or 10 year arm? Which personally, I mean that’s a big difference between 7 and 10 years. I don’t really think either one is particularly risky. I would say 7 years is so far from now. I think he’d certainly be able to refi out pretty close to the 5 to 7 year mark. Chances of him keeping that mortgage for 10 years, that exact mortgage at the current interest rate, I feel is low. But what do you think?

David:
It’s hard to know where interest rates are going to be in 10 years. My gut says whoever the next president is, is probably going to lower rates. Much like when someone’s elected class president, they immediately want throw a party to reward everyone for electing them and establish goodwill. We’re probably going to see rates come down with a new president put in place, but we don’t know that. And you can’t bet on that happening. Although, every decision that you make is some form of a bet. And what we’re talking about here is hedging your bets to put yourself in the best position.
So, Joel, if you’re really good at managing money, if you live beneath your means, if you save a lot of money, if you don’t mind working overtime, working side hustles, working two jobs, it’s okay to err on the side of taking a little bit more of a risk with that 7 to 10 year arm, much better than a three-year arm or something like that.
If you know you’re not that person, you’re not a Rob Abasolo who’s going to work 18-hour days, or a David Greene who’s going to just sleep in his office chair and get right back to it. You’re probably better off taking the safe bet, going with the fixed rate mortgage. And neither decision is going to create a huge difference in the portfolio you have. We’re splitting hairs here. What you really want to do is accumulate more assets in great locations where rents are going to be increasing and values are going to be increasing, and over time you’re going to build some big wealth.
So, don’t get too caught up in these decisions, but as a general rule, I am a fan of being more aggressive with your strategy if you’re more conservative with your finances, and more conservative with your strategy if you’re more aggressive with your personal spending. Rob, what do you think?

Rob:
Yeah, I think that makes sense. And for everybody at home, do you think you could just clarify what a arm mortgage is, for those of us at home that don’t know what it is? I mean, for those that … I know what it is, but…

David:
Yeah. So, a fixed rate mortgage is one where for the life of the loan, the rate stays the same. And an adjustable rate mortgage is for a period of time you get a certain interest rate and then it could adjust. Now, I will also say most of us look at adjustable rate mortgages like they are evil and bad and risky, it’s like gambling, but that’s how most loans are made across the world. Most people do not lock in on a 30-year rate, especially when it’s really low like 3 or 4%.
Rob, you and I would never lend our money at 3% for 30 years. The only reason those exist is because the government sponsors these loans through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It’s a cool little option that we get in America, but it doesn’t exist everywhere.

Rob:
Well, you’d be surprised, man, I just got a seller financed deal locked down about five minute walk from my house here at 3%. They wanted 5, knocked them down to 3%. So, you’d be surprised. I mean, they’re still out there. They’re few and far in between, but…

David:
That’s not you loaning out your money. That’s you buying an asset from somebody who they’re giving you a loan, but they’re not doing it because it’s a pure loan. It’s attached to a real estate transaction where they probably got something in return. They got a better price for the house, right?

Rob:
No, not really. I really knocked them down. No, it was a very equitable transaction. But I agree. And to go to your point about the president changing the rates and all that stuff, I mean, 10 years from now … That’s why I say the difference between a 7 and a 10, pretty drastic because 10 years from now is technically like two and a half presidents from now, possibly three different presidents. No, probably not three, but definitely two different ones. Right?

David:
So, you’re tripling your odds of seeing rates come down, right?

Rob:
I think so. 7, take it or leave it, but 10 I’m like, yeah … I mean, I did a five-year arm, didn’t really know. I took the risk when I was first getting into real estate. It was a really good deal at that time and I refied out of it before it mattered, but I was pretty aggressive with how I did things. So, I think you’re right. It all comes down to investing preference.

David:
There it is. And just keep that in mind. If you’re a more aggressive investor, you got to be more conservative with your finances, with your reserves and with your work ethic. And if you’re someone who doesn’t love work and you’re not out there trying to set the world on fire, just invest a little bit more conservatively to balance it out. Thank you, Joel, for giving us the opportunity to highlight this. Good luck with your investing endeavors. And my final piece of advice will be, don’t get too caught up in the financing of real estate. It’s really not the foundational wealth building piece. It’s just fun to talk about.

Rob:
And definitely don’t get too caught up in the spelling of rigamarole.

David:
And our production team has had Rob’s back. He spelled it incorrectly, however it would apply in the situation that he used it. The definition is a mid-18th century word, apparently an alteration of ragmanrole, originally denoting a legal document recording a list of offenses. You are welcome for this completely useless but still entertaining piece of knowledge on today’s Seeing Greene episode. It’s also considered a long and complicated process that is annoying and seems unnecessary, which is exactly how Rob meant for its to sound.

Rob:
Yeah. And then I looked it up on Urban Dictionary and it’s just a picture of my coif.

David:
Moving on to the next section. At this part, we like to get into the comments that y’all have left for us on YouTube as well as wherever you listen to your podcast. So, today’s comments come from episode 816. The first comes from henneyhomes1852. Rob, I’d also like you to note that I’m not the only person that puts a number at the end of my name. As much as you make fun of me for that, apparently it’s a trendy thing. Maybe I made it trendy.
Henneyhomes1852 says, “‘Luxury’ house hacking,” in quotes, “we’ve been there, done that a couple of times, made tons of equity, over $600,000 on each, allowing us to stay in upscale neighborhoods, paying less than half the mortgage every month, saving lots of cash and being easy to rent out. And yes, rent went up every year.” This comes from a question that I answered on the Seeing Greene episode 816 where someone was asking, “Is it okay, is it allowed financially to splurge a little bit? Instead of house hacking and having 100% of my mortgage paid, what if I want to house hack in a really nice neighborhood where my family would love to live, but I’m going to be covering part of my mortgage?”
And my answer was, if you’re financially in a good position, hell yeah, that’s absolutely okay. And as we’re seeing from henneyhomes, you actually can make more money when you’re paying part of your own mortgage because the rents go up every year. It’s very easy to find tenants. The equity grows faster in the best areas. Look, the three rules of real estate are and always have been, location, location, location. I recommend starting off with the best locations and then figuring out the strategy, whether it’s short-term rental, house hacking, BRRRR, whatever, in that area to make it work. So, I thought this was a great testimony, Rob, you had a similar experience, right? Didn’t you do a house hacking where you rented out an ADU at your luxury property, and maybe it wasn’t luxury, but it was expensive real estate in Los Angeles, right?

Rob:
Yeah. House was 624,000 bucks and the mortgage was $4,400, which was, I mean, a lot of money, a lot of money. But we had a little studio apartment underneath and that was going to make about 2 to $3,000 on Airbnb. So, really, it did end up being that. We were paying $1,400 out pocket on our best months, which was most of them on that particular property, and that was still less than the rent that we would’ve paid at the apartment that we lived in right before that house. And then we built a tiny house ADU in the backyard, and that completely covered all the mortgage.
So, I think it’s better to do what he’s saying where you can splurge a little bit and pay a little bit out of pocket because ultimately that’s still probably going to be cheaper than just living on your own without house hacking. And B, if you could have a plan for expansion or a plan to eventually get that all subsidized, I think that’d be great too. That’s what I did in LA. I knew one day maybe I could build a tiny house. I didn’t do it initially. It took about a year, year and a half, but once I did, mortgage was completely subsidized and that house is now worth twice as much.

David:
Great point. If you wait long enough, especially in the best areas, the rents will go up and it will eventually subsidize your mortgage and then you get even more upside.
Moving on. The ongoing Cali, California, Californi-A and hella usage debate continues. This was a big part of episode 816, and if you haven’t heard of this before, go check it out. We have lots of great comments from fellow Californians that we’re about to read here. Geography and age may be the reasons for the hella differences. We can call on the great USA and First Amendment and put this one to rest, freedom of speech. Remember that we have a First Amendment and we can all use the language that we want.
But in reference to that show, cowvet2018 says, “I love the show. Listen to it on Spotify, and it got me into real estate. I live in the Central Valley of California. I’ve been here my whole life. I’ve never heard anyone in this state call it Cali, unironically, I say hella. Boom.” This was in reference to my perspective that no one in California actually calls it Cali. It’s only people outside of California that say that, there was a few people that disagreed, and cowvet is taking my side.
They also use the phrase hella, which funny story, I grew up in Northern California, I didn’t know other people didn’t say that word until I had a conversation with my aunt in Washington who did not know why I was saying hecka. And as a kid I was like, “Well, I’m not allowed to say hella.” And she still did not understand what that meant. And it was not until the No Doubt song Hella Good came out that I realized, oh, other people don’t say that word. Funny story there. Rob, did you have an experience like that? It’s not really a Southern California thing, right?

Rob:
No, no. I’ve always heard it was a Northern California thing. So, we in the southern part of California, the cool peeps, we didn’t say that stuff.

David:
Rob, why don’t you go ahead and take the next comment here from JevonMusicGroup?

Rob:
All right. JevonMusicGroup says, “Biggie had to say, Cali. You try rapping with California in its place.” That’s funny. Yeah, it is a very long word, I suppose. “Great episode, by the way, answered some questions I had with my current situation.” They even got four likes and a reply. What that reply was, I’ll never know, but I’m sure it was a great one.

David:
Go give JevonMusicGroup’s comment on episode 816 on YouTube a couple more likes. Let’s reward him for that great insight.
And jeanpaulg1037 says, “Hi, David. Thank you for all your knowledge sharing. Question, my lender said that I would not be able to buy a cheaper house than my current one and make it a primary residence. Is there any merit to what he’s saying? That means I would need to buy a more expensive home every year if I was going to continue buying new ones. Thanks in advance for your great support. You’re great.”
Great question there, Jean Paul. First off, you should have came to us because we’re better than that and we would’ve got it to get accepted. Here’s what’s going on. When you try to buy a primary residence in the same area where you have one, you’re trying to put a smaller down payment down, lenders look at that and go, “Uh, uh, uh, you’re trying to get an investment property using a primary residence loan, because nobody would downgrade their house unless they were trying to be sneaky and they deny it.”
You can overcome this. Our company, The One Brokerage does this all the time. We go back and fight and say, “No, this person’s actually financially smart. They’re making good decisions. They’re a BiggerPockets listener and they are going to be moving into it as a primary residence.” And we get these exceptions covered. Your lender’s not fighting hard enough for you. I don’t like this. I don’t like it when anyone in my world comes back and goes, “Sorry, we can’t do it.” What they should be coming back and saying is, “We can’t do it. Here’s what we need to change so that we can do it.”
Rob has had some experiences like that with properties that we’ve bought where insurance goes up and they say, “We can’t insure it.” And we just say, “Great, tell me what you have to do so that you could.” Or different issues like that. That’s what you’re looking for when you’re building your core four and you’re picking your lender, not a person who comes back and says no. But now all of you know how the lending world works and when you get this, “Nope, you can’t buy that house.” It’s because it’s in the same area as the one you have and they believe you’re trying to buy an investment property with 3.5 or 5% down. You want to read the Apple Review, Rob?

Rob:
Yeah. So, let’s get into this five-star Apple review from HGDTNVK. See now that right there, that’s a complicated username. “The best place to learn. Been listening for over a year now and every episode has something to teach. There are so many strategies discussed and so many stories that prove every person can become an investor. Listen, absorb, apply the knowledge. I have unlocked deals I never thought I would. I have unlocked deals I never would’ve known to look for if I hadn’t listened to the show religiously. Five stars, baby.” Wow, thank you very much, HGDTNVK. I’m going to tattoo that on my arm.

David:
That’s awesome. We would love it if you’d leave us a five-star review wherever you listen to your podcasts, whether that’s Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, whatever your fancy, please consider doing that. It helps the show quite a bit.
And they’re making a good point. With The One Brokerage, we were having a meeting and I realized people tend to learn from watching other people do it. So, when I had agents that were joining the David Greene Team, they would sit in the office and listen to me talk to clients, listen to me talk to agents, then we would debrief and I’d say, “Here’s what they said that let me think. This is the strategy I use. I’ve put it into a book. This is the approach you should take.” And they got good.
Well, as we grew and I stopped selling houses myself, the new agents that joined didn’t get that same ability to watch me do it, and it was much harder for them to build confidence having these conversations. Podcasts like this are a really cool substitute where you don’t have to be in Rob’s attic where he’s recording right now, or in my studio. You can listen to us from the comfort of your own home, car, or gym and learn from what we’re doing. This is a great perspective that if you just listen to the show, you absorb the perspective that people that have experience investing have, and will slowly start to develop your own confidence and like they said, “Seeing opportunities and deals they never would’ve known to look for.”
So, thank you for listening to us. Thank you for your attention and we are going to be getting right back into the show. We love and we appreciate the engagement. Please continue to like, comment, and subscribe on YouTube, and like we said, if you’re listening to this on your podcast app, take some time to give us a rating and an honest review. Helps the show a lot.

Rob:
And I’ll possibly get your username tattooed on my arm, that’s bigger than Dave’s.

David:
Our next question comes from Christopher Dye who says, “I am in the Air Force active duty and moving from Little Rock to San Antonio. I have three long-term rentals in Little Rock that cashflow $1,500 combined every month, with two properties having sub-3% interest rates and one property with the 5.375 rate. There’s roughly $200,000 worth of equity trapped in these properties and they are all in neighborhoods that will continue to appreciate.
I’m considering a 1031 exchange for a small multifamily property in Texas. I’m seeking advice on the best way to move forward. Should I hold on and sell in 5 to 7 years or capitalize on this opportunity to take the 70K that I have invested that’s been turned into 200K in two years and use it to propel into the San Antonio multifamily market?” Rob, what say you?

Rob:
Okay, so this is a very tough one because, I mean, it sounds like he hit the jackpot. Right? He invested 70,000 and it’s turned into $200,000 in two years. It feels like maybe he feels like he’s on top of the world a little bit, right? He’s like, “Wow, if I can just do that again, then I can turn 200,000 into 600,000.” But he purchased at a time where that was possible.
So, I don’t want to necessarily steer him away from using that money and reinvesting it, but we are in a tougher time right now and I think he’s got something that a lot of people want, 1,500 bucks of cashflow and sub-3% interest rates. Going into a multifamily, as long as he can at a minimum get that $1,500 cashflow, I think I’d be okay with it. But I think he’s just got such a good situation. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with holding onto it. He’s got 3, he’s really at the beginning of this. I think patience would really serve him well in this particular situation, but I don’t know, what do you think?

David:
I would try to make this as logical of a decision as possible. So, first thing, people talk about interest rates a lot. It’s not that they don’t matter, it’s that they themselves don’t matter. They matter in the sense of they influence cashflow. So, your cashflow is what it is. Getting rid of a good rate isn’t a bad thing if you’re getting more cashflow. I’d rather have higher cashflow at a higher rate than lower cashflow at a lower rate. The rate just has an impact on how the cashflow works.
So, I wouldn’t worry too much about giving up those rates. I’d worry more about, well, how much money are the other ones going to make? So, to simplify this, there’s two ways that we typically look at making money in real estate, equity and cashflow. Can you sell these properties and buy another one that will earn you more than the 1,500 a month you’re getting now? If the answer is yes, we’re heading in a good direction.
And the other equation would be if you sell them, over the next 5 to 7 years will San Antonio appreciate more or will Arkansas appreciate more? Odds are San Antonio is probably going to be the better bet. The next thing I’d look at would be, well, how much more? Because there’s an inefficiency every time you sell and buy. There’s closing costs when you buy and there’s closing costs when you sell, so you’re going to lose some water out of that bucket. What you want to be asking is, in 5 to 7 years will I replace more water than I lost during that transaction?
And the last piece I would say is you also can walk into a transaction with water in your equity bucket if you buy it below market value. Do you have an opportunity to go get a really good deal on San Antonio real estate where the rents are going to appreciate faster than Arkansas and the values are going to appreciate faster than Arkansas? My gut would say, probably so. San Antonio is likely to grow faster than Arkansas would. So, I’m leaning towards you should sell and reinvest that money somewhere else. Rob, what do you think about that?

Rob:
I think it’s fine. I don’t think there’s a wrong or right on that. I think makes sense, looking at the appreciating market, which I totally agree, San Antonio is a very, very fast-growing city right now. I think you can confidently buy in San Antonio and know historically that it’ll probably outperform Little Rock.
I just think he’s got a good situation. Sometimes, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. I think $1,500 off of three long-term rentals is a lot of money. I don’t know. I personally wouldn’t mess with it, but sometimes I understand there’s a little bit of impatience of like, “I got to make more.” Right? If his dream is to become a full-on real estate investor and he wants to make a ton of money and he’s like, “This is going to be my thing.” Then he has to make some big moves to make that happen. But if he’s just trying to play the slow and steady route, I think he should hang onto it. But that’s a bit more conservative than I would typically advise probably.

David:
Great point. Christopher, how aggressive do you want to build a portfolio? If you want to go big, selling and buying in San Antonio makes more sense. But what if you don’t, what if just want slow and steady wins the race because your job at the Air Force keeps you super busy and you’re not going to have time to manage this somewhat complicated process full of as Rob loves to say, rigmarole? When Rob deals with it, we call it Robamarole. Is that something that you could take on right now or is that going to be too much?
If you’ve got tons of time on your hand and you want to jump into this, I’d move to towards selling and reinvesting. If your plate’s already a little full, there’s nothing wrong with keeping what you got, saving up money and just buying a new property in San Antonio with a 3.5 or 5% down, low down payment option and house hack. Either way, you’ve got some good options. Both of them look good, so don’t overthink this one.
All right, we covered a lot today. And Rob, thank you so much for joining me. We got into structuring a partnership when the partner wants no part of the day-to-day operations, hanging onto a potential bad rental deal that may not reach market rents, and what options do you have when you’re not cash flowing, using a 7/10 arm or a fixed rate mortgage, as well as other things. Thanks for joining me again on this, Rob, anything you want to say before we let you get out of here?

Rob:
No, thanks for letting me infiltrate Seeing Greene. I hope to be invited back if you think I did okay, I’ll happily do it because I’ll do anything for you, bud.

David:
What do you guys think? Let me know in the comments if you want to see more Rob on Seeing Greene. Do you feel you’ve been robbed of his presence when he’s not here? Let us know. We read those and we incorporate them into our shows.
All right, that was our show for today. Thank you everyone for joining us for Seeing Greene. And Rob, thank you for joining us. It was so nice to have a little bit of backup here, bringing a different perspective and even pushing back a little bit on some of the perspectives I had. If you enjoyed hearing these dual opinions and different perspectives, please go to YouTube where this is hosted and leave us something in the comments. Rob just might get your username tattooed onto his ever-growing arms, and remember to leave us a review wherever you listen to these shows.
If you would like to submit your own question to Seeing Greene, just head to biggerpockets.com/david where you can upload your question and have it answered on the show. If you’ve got a little bit of time, check out another one of our videos. If you don’t, we’ll see you next week on another episode of Seeing Greene. This is David Greene for Robamarole Abasolo, signing off.

 

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.





Source link

How Long to Hold On to a BAD Rental Property Read More »

After solar, this is big money decision about controlling home power

After solar, this is big money decision about controlling home power


A customer inspects a Tesla Motors Inc. Powerwall unit inside a home.

Ian Thomas Jansen-Lonnquist | Bloomberg | Getty Images

After a summer of extreme weather and wildfires and now during the peak of hurricane season, the power going out again is becoming familiar to more Americans. That means it may be a good time to consider a home backup power storage system.

The pervasiveness of extreme weather and climate change, local utility reliability and cost may all factor into this financial decision.

“Backup power may be warranted depending on regional factors and geography as well as the state of the infrastructure there,” said Benjamin R. Dierker, executive director of the Alliance for Innovation and Infrastructure, a research and educational organization, in an email. 

In coastal areas, for instance, considerations include the resilience of storm or sea walls, the quality and capacity of drainage infrastructure and the electrical grid’s hardiness, he said. In other areas, extreme weather conditions like high winds, tornados and ice may cause falling trees or downed lines — a risk that’s significantly mitigated if there are buried utility lines rather than overhead lines, Dierker said. Pre-emptive shutdowns, due to extreme weather or other factors, can also be a consideration.

As of Sept. 11, there have been 23 confirmed weather/climate disaster events with losses exceeding $1 billion each to affect United States, according to the National Centers for Environmental Information, which has a graphic that shows the locations of these disasters. These events included two flooding events, 18 severe storm events, one tropical cyclone event, one wildfire event, and one winter storm event. 

Here’s what consumers need to consider about home back-up power options:

Appliance needs during power outages

A good first step is to think about the most important appliances you are running on electricity and how long you might realistically need them to run in the event of an outage, said Vikram Aggarwal, chief executive and founder of EnergySage, which helps consumers compare clean home energy solutions.

If you have minimal backup needs, a small portable fossil-fuel generator or battery could suffice, which can cost a few hundred dollars. But if you want your home to operate as normal, you’ll want to consider whole home options.

Location can be a factor since in some areas, the power goes out infrequently or for only short periods of time. In some states like California, Texas and Louisiana, however, it can be a whole different ball game. California consumers, for example, can get an up-to-date sense of outages in their area to get a sense of what their risk may be.

Fossil fuel vs. battery power

If you’re not opposed to fossil fuel-powered options, there are several categories to consider based on your power needs. For lower power needs, a portable generator, which often runs on gasoline or diesel can cost a few hundred dollars to several thousand dollars. There are also higher-priced portable versions that are usually quieter and more fuel-efficient and may be able to power multiple large appliances—and for longer. How long depends in part on the appliances you’re powering.

A whole home standby generator, meanwhile, is permanently installed and automatically kicks on when the power goes out. This generator type is often fueled by propane or natural gas and costs vary based on size, brand and fuel type. There are options in the $3,000 to $5,000 range, but with installation the total can be considerably higher. This could be a good option if you’re expecting outages for multiple days; theoretically, the generator can run for as long as fuel is supplied, but it can be advisable to shut it down for engine-cooling purposes.

For the environmentally-inclined, battery-powered backups can be a good option for their more environmentally friendly and quieter nature. For a few hundred dollars, give or take, there are lower-priced smaller to mid-size battery options that people can purchase and that will last for several hours.

There are also battery-powered options to back up the whole home that offer many of the same functions as conventional generators, but without the need for refueling, according to EnergySage. Consumers might expect to pay $10,000 to $20,000 to install a home battery backup system, EnergySage said. This can often last for eight to 12 hours, or even longer if you aren’t using it to power items such as air conditioning or electric heat.

Incentives that lower the cost of purchase and installation

When thinking about what type of backup to choose, incentives can factor into the equation. Thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act, households can receive a 30% tax credit for a battery storage installation, even if it’s not paired with a solar system, Aggarwal said.

Other state and local incentives may also be available. For instance, in some markets like California, Vermont, Massachusetts and New York, utilities pay consumers to tap into their batteries during peak periods like the summer, Aggarwal said. Consumers with larger batteries—10kWh or more—may be able to earn hundreds of dollars a year, he said.

EVs as a backup power option for the home

Some electrical vehicles can be used to back up essential items, or, in some cases, a whole home.

Ford’s F-150 Lightning, for example, can power a home for three days, or up to 10 days under certain circumstances, according to the company. With the required system installed, and the truck plugged in, stored power is transferred seamlessly to the home in the case of a power outage. For its part, GM recently said it would expand its vehicle-to-home bidirectional charging technology to its entire lineup of Ultium-based electric vehicles by model year 2026.

In the past, Jim Farley, Ford CEO has spoken about how the F-150 Lightning’s abilities as a source of backup power for homes and job sites have been a real “eye-opener” for the automaker. 

“If you’re contemplating spending $10,000 on a whole home gas generator system, why not think about an EV with this capability instead?” said Stephen Pantano, head of market transformation at Rewiring America, a nonprofit focused on electrifying homes, businesses and communities.

Consumers in the market for a new stove might also consider an induction model with an integrated battery to power it or other items such a fridge on an as-needed basis, Pantano said. “This opens up new possibilities for power backups that weren’t there before.”  

Solar-plus-storage can lead to long-term savings

Home solar panels are becoming more popular, but most are connected to the grid, and you need some kind of battery storage in order to have backup power, said Sarah Delisle, vice president of government affairs and communications for Swell Energy, a home energy solutions provider.

That’s where a solar-plus-storage system can come in handy. It allows people to use electricity generated from their solar panels during the day at a later point, which can be particularly useful for people who live in areas where there are frequent power outages, said Ted Tiffany, senior technical lead at the Building Decarbonization Coalition, a group that promotes moving buildings off fossil fuels.

A solar-plus-storage system costs about $25,000 to $35,000, depending on the size of the battery and other factors, according to the U.S. Dept of Energy. It’s easier and more cost-effective to install panels and the battery at the same time, but it’s not required. Homeowners who have already installed solar panels and want to add storage, might expect to pay between $12,000 to $22,000 for a battery, according to the Energy Department. Consumers who purchase a battery on its own or with backup are eligible for federal tax credits. Some states provide additional solar battery incentives

Also consider the long-term savings potential, Tiffany said. He has a family member who, with electrical upgrades, spent around $8,000 on a fossil fuel-powered whole home generator. Putting that money into solar instead might have been more economical because of the energy savings over time and tax incentives, he said. 

Consumers can visit EnergySage to find contractors and get information about solar and incentives. They can also visit, Switch is On, which helps consumers find information on electrification and efficiency measures for home appliances that supports the renewable energy integration.

Solar power undergoing 'boom' at residential level, says Sunnova CEO John Berger



Source link

After solar, this is big money decision about controlling home power Read More »

5 ChatGPT Prompts To Make Focus Your Superpower (and Actually Get More Done)

5 ChatGPT Prompts To Make Focus Your Superpower (and Actually Get More Done)


Focus is a superpower. And you can make it yours. Losers flit around being distracted by shiny objects and what the latest business influencer says you should do. Winners take their success by the metaphorical horns and develop a bulletproof focus that can fend off any infiltration. Which will you be? The one who made their plan and became unstoppable, or the one who couldn’t quite hold it in place when it really mattered?

Get your act together by knowing exactly what to focus on. Use these five prompts in ChatGPT, copying, pasting and editing the square brackets, and using the same chat window so the context pulls through.

Make focus your superpower with ChatGPT

Define your path to success

A struggle with focus is masking a bigger problem, and a lack of clarity could be it. No matter how defined your vision, how big your goals, if you can’t see a way to make them happen you’ll follow any path in the hope it takes you there. That leads to flitting around, dead ends and wasting time. Tunnel vision and consistent action is needed for most achievements, and your business success is one of them. Outline your goals and get the steps with this simple prompt.

“My ultimate business goal is [describe your goal] and within the next year I want to [describe a key milestone]. Act as a business consultant tasked with ensuring my business grows as planned. My current activity towards this milestone is [describe the work you’re doing right now]. Outline the steps that are essential for me to take to hit this milestone and my ultimate goal.”

Gain clarity on your most valuable resources

Your network, your huge brain, your dazzling smile. Your motivated team, your early-mover advantage, your mailing list. You have resources at your disposal that might not be deployed in the best way. Confusion on what your highest leverage resource might be leads to reduced focus, less progress and fewer positive feedback loops. It results in scattered and ineffective work. Ask ChatGPT to assess your resources and find the way forward that’s uniquely yours.

“Sometimes I struggle with focus. I have a lot of different things I could do, and I don’t always know what I should do. Act as a business analyst to assess my resources, and explain which are the most scarce or valuable, and therefore how I focus on maximizing the resources that are unique to me. These resources include: [describe yours here].”

Align your energy

Energy channeled in one direction moves the needle on that project. Energy dispersed creates mediocre results. And no one wants those. Align the energy of your goals and plans with what’s actually in your calendar. Remove what doesn’t fit. Clear the space to find the focused and dedicated time for meaningful actions. Remove the overwhelm that could be holding you back and see what you can do when you’re not so rushed.

“Within a normal week I spend time doing the following things: [outline your schedule and how many hours and minutes you spend doing each item in as much detail as possible.] I want to focus on my growth plan and achieving success in my business. Act as a productivity expert and tell me what I should cut out, in order that I align my energy with my goals and clear space to focus better. Include a plan of action for how I opt out of hand over responsibilities or commitments that don’t align.”

Optimize for fun

Your logical brain and emotional brain are often conflicted. Logically, you know you should focus. The task is clear, the brief is laid out, but your emotions are getting in the way. You’re taking yourself too seriously or questioning yourself. You’re not doing what’s required and you’re definitely not having a good time. The missing link might be enjoyment. It’s far easier to focus on the work that matters if you’re truly motivated to actually do it. That way, the effort brings the reward, not just the outcome. Get the fun back with this prompt and up the probability of you staying on track.

“I want to have more fun going after my goals. I want to have fun with focusing. You are tasked with making my work engaging and motivating, so that focusing on it feels effortless. Suggest 3 ways I could gamify my day, regarding my business, that will find the fun factor and keep me on track.”

Consider deadlines

Deadlines focus attention on a specific date and time. Ideally this date is a stretch target; not so close you panic, not so far away you lose interest. Having a deadline forces you to rally the troops and put the wheels in motion to get stuff done. Just its existence can make all else seem irrelevant. Just its existence can find the focus that went awry.

“Today is [today’s date]. At the moment I am working on [describe the tasks you’re working on], of which [one of them] is the most important in reaching my first milestone. In order to attract higher levels of focus, can you suggest a deadline that will stretch me to achieve and force me to focus? I think this particular task could take [how long it might take without a deadline] but I want to set a motivating deadline for completion. Suggest the deadline then outline my steps to complete the work faster.”

Find deeper focus with these ChatGPT prompts

Make focus your superpower and become someone who always delivers. Plan for the growth with full clarity on the next steps, assess your resources to play your ace cards, and align your calendar with your energy to make success inevitable. Find the game in the work so it doesn’t feel like labour, and set challenging deadlines you’ll feel motivated to fit.

Find focus to unlock a new level of your business. Remove the barriers with these five prompts.



Source link

5 ChatGPT Prompts To Make Focus Your Superpower (and Actually Get More Done) Read More »

David Greene on The 3 “Pillars” of Wealth That Lead to Financial Freedom

David Greene on The 3 “Pillars” of Wealth That Lead to Financial Freedom


If you dream of becoming a successful real estate investor, there are three “pillars” of wealth you must build in your own life. What are these keys to financial freedom? Well, fortunately, today’s guest has written an entire book about them!

Welcome back to the Real Estate Rookie podcast! Today, we’re speaking with none other than David Greene—host of the BiggerPockets Real Estate podcast and author of SIX top real estate investing books—the latest of which is titled Pillars of Wealth. Far too often, rookie investors dive into the world of real estate without having mastered the three areas they need to succeedmaking, saving, and investing their money. Then, they are gutted when real estate doesn’t work out for them. The truth is that the money habits you build today will follow you throughout life. Work hard, foster a healthy money mindset, and master one challenge before advancing to the next. This is the real path to financial freedom.

In this episode, David shares his own experiences with money—including how he was able to steadily increase his income over time, save over $100K while in college, and find success as a real estate investor. You’ll learn about the true cost of financial freedom, how to play offense AND defense with your money, and why you MUST work the long game with real estate—prioritizing delayed gratification over immediate cash flow!

Ashley:
This is Real Estate Rookie episode 328.

David:
Really, the book is an antidote against deception. The people who are getting into our game, they don’t know who to listen to. They’ve got these people saying this and those people saying this, and this TikTok person, this podcast. While most of us go with what sounds the easiest, one of the ways that you avoid being deceived is you ask yourself if the information that you are being told works in other areas of life. Can I go to the gym with that philosophy that I don’t have to work hard when I’m there, but as long as my outfit looks good, I’m going to leave burning a lot of calories, right? And if everyone looks at the world that way, we are much less likely to be deceived by the predators that are out there that want to sort of steal our eyeballs and steal our money and take whatever we’re doing.

Ashley:
My name is Ashley Kehr and I am here with my co-host, Tony J Robinson.

Tony:
And welcome to the Real Estate Rookie Podcast where every week, twice a week, we bring you the inspiration, motivation, and stories you need to hear to kick start your investing journey. And boy, do we have an episode for you guys. Today, we’ve got the one and only David Greene, who most of you may know from maybe the BRRRR book, maybe the Long Distance Real Estate Investing book, maybe his book Skill, maybe his book Sold, maybe his book Scale. This guy’s just like a book writing machine. But today, David’s coming back to talk about his new book called Pillars of Wealth, and it’s really about he describes the antidote of the get rich quick scheme or ideas that permeate through the world of real estate investing. And as always, David brings just a ton of amazing info into today’s conversation.

Ashley:
Along with some great analogies as always. So we’ve had David on the show before. We are so happy to have him back. You can find out information about his new book, biggerpockets.com/pillars, and his book is available for pre-order now. David Greene, welcome to the show. Is this your favorite podcast to be on?

David:
I love this podcast because you guys let me talk. On my show, I never get to talk, I just ask the questions, but here, I get to be the one that runs.

Ashley:
You know what? We’ll even let you ask the questions too.

David:
Just go ahead and take the day off. I got it here. What’s going on, Rookies? This is David Greene, host of the BiggerPockets, but just kidding. You guys do a great job and your chemistry is really good. We all met together in Los Angeles and recorded in person and I just was like, we got a little bit of a John Stockton, Karl Malone thing going on here between these two. I like how you guys have developed over time.

Tony:
Who’s John Stockton? Who’s the mailman?

David:
I was so afraid you were going to ask me that because I am like, “Well, there’s the obvious gender and race thing going on that I didn’t want to walk right into,” but I don’t know how that appeals to basketball. Every analogy falls apart at some point.

Tony:
There you go. Fair enough.

Ashley:
You know what? We’ll just both lay awake at night pondering that.

David:
Wondering what it is, [inaudible 00:02:48], and which one you want to be too, right? Which one’s better to be here?

Ashley:
Well, David, you are here today because you wrote another book. How many books have you published?

David:
That’s a good question. This is number six, I believe.

Ashley:
Wow, congratulations.

Tony:
That’s amazing, man. It’s amazing.

Ashley:
Yeah, Tony and I both got our copies in the mail, so thank you to you and BiggerPockets for sending one over. We always love to read them, but please introduce your new book Pillars of Wealth.

David:
There it is. Thank you. Tony, it’s got to have…

Tony:
There it is, right here.

David:
There it is. So the book is basically an antidote to what your average real estate investor who’s coming into the game and wants to learn about it is being told. But frankly, I don’t know if it’s outright lies, but there’s definitely a manipulation of how the information is presented. Think about the infomercial of the person on the yacht surrounded by the women in bikinis. Like if you take my course, you can have this life too. They’re selling you on a dream. They’re not selling you on the reality of what it looks like. And after years and years of doing this and interviewing people and hiring people to work in my companies and giving my whole life to this process of how do you help people build wealth through real estate, patterns have emerged.
And I’ve noticed that there’s certain people that do well with this, and there’s other people that just continually find new ways to fail in ways that’s frankly impressive, how they can fail this many times. And what I’ve noticed is they’re walking into it with the wrong idea of what it takes to be successful. This book is not a complete autobiography, but it has a lot of the stories from my own life of how I went from being a guy that was just making sandwiches at a sandwich shop to eventually buying a bunch of real estate, becoming a real estate broker, hosting the podcast, writing the books, and I really believe this is a blueprint that everyone can follow.

Tony:
David, I love that you opened up with that man because I think so many people do get sold the idea of passive investing through real estate where it’s like they just get to plop their money down, close their eyes, and get these magical returns month after month, when really there is a lot of hard work that goes into it. I think you can get your business to a point where your time involvement is reduced pretty dramatically, but that takes time to build up to that level, and you have to have the systems and processes and people in place to do that. But I think a lot of new people are still looking at real estate as this get rich quick type scheme, and it really isn’t. There’s a lot of foundational things that need to be set up before you can just take your foot off the gas. So I’m excited to get into this with you, man. But when you talk about wealth, because that’s what this book is, what does wealth mean? How do you define that? Break that down for us.

David:
So part of the way that you deceive people, and really the book is an antidote against deception. The people who are getting into our game, they don’t know who to listen to. They’ve got these people saying this and those people saying this and this Instagram person and this TikTok person, this podcast and this YouTube, and I’m saying something and Tony’s saying something and then this other person over here says something different. Well, most of us go with what sounds the easiest, and I’ve learned in life one of the ways that you avoid being deceived is you ask yourself if the information that you are being told works in other areas of life. So if I come to you and say, hey, you’re doing it all wrong, podcasting is supposed to be really easy. You’re not supposed to try, you’re not supposed to prepare, you’re not supposed to think about how to be better, you just show up and talk on a microphone. But the thumbnail has to be good, and if the thumbnail is good, your podcast will blow up.
You should ask yourself, does that work at anything else in life? Can I go to the gym with that philosophy that I don’t have to work hard when I’m there, but as long as my outfit looks good, I’m going to leave burning a lot of calories. It sounds ridiculous when you talk about it at the gym. So it should sound ridiculous when you talk about it within podcast growth or something. And if everyone looks at the world that way, we are much less likely to be deceived by the predators that are out there that want to sort of steal our eyeballs and steal our money and take whatever we’re doing. So one of the ways people get deceived is they get sold on the goal being different than what the goal should be. They’ll say, “Hey, I’m going to help you get out of your W2 job.” Well, that’s not a hard goal. You can just quit it if you want to get out of it. The hard thing is replacing the income from it, but they don’t tell you how hard it’s going to be.
So if you had the wrong goal, it is very easy. You are susceptible to being deceived. So I start the book by talking about the three ways that I measure wealth. The first is net worth. This is your assets minus your liabilities, the properties you own minus what you owe on them and the money that you have in the bank minus the credit card debt that you have. That’s a way to measure how well you’re doing with wealth. Very simple, but it opens up a lot of doors when your brain understands ways that you create equity, ways that you create value, and ways that you limit expenses. It’s a framework that you have to grasp just like calories in versus calories out. If you understand that, you have some idea of how to get started in the fitness world, and I say that because you both are remarkably fit, so your audience probably can appreciate this, not because I think that I’m a fitness expert.
The next would be cashflow, how much money is coming in versus how much money is going out. Not necessarily equity, but when I look at a profit and loss statement for a business, how much money came in and then what were my expenses and what went out? Our personal lives, we should have a profit and loss statement for as well, how much money did I earn? How much money did I spend? That principle typically gets sold to the investor through property like, hey man, here’s the only thing you got to understand, just a cashflow. Here’s a calculator, here’s a thing. You find cashflowing properties and it’s never explained anybody that cashflow can come in more ways than one. You can earn it through work, you can earn it through a job, you can earn it through just the sweat of your brow.
You can earn it for rental properties, but having a more holistic view of ways that this principle works in life will give you a much safer portfolio of properties in your life. So we measure cashflow. And then the third is your quality of life. You do not have wealth if you are tied to a moneymaking opportunity that you can’t get away from. If every day you got to wake up before you want to and do things you don’t want to do and you’re not happy when doing it, it does not matter if you make $10 million a year, you are not wealthy, you’re miserable. And oftentimes we’ll be talked about like, well, you have to have your health. That’s a part of your wealth. You have to have relationships. I put all those things in this same bucket of quality of life. There’s many things you want.
You don’t want to make a ton of money and your kids grow up to be terrible people because you weren’t there to guide them through what was happening. It is possible that you get sold on one of these three, but they leave out the other two. They tell you how to build cashflow, but they don’t talk about equity or net worth and they don’t talk about quality of life. So you commit to this journey and you get really, really good. Maybe think of a strong man who’s super strong, he’s good at that one thing, but they have terrible cardiovascular health and they have diabetes and they’ve got all these other health related issues because they only focused on one. It’s really looking at all three of these and how they work together is how I’m recommending that people take the approach of building wealth.

Ashley:
David, the first thing is how can someone figure out their net worth and what their cashflow is, even if it’s not on a property, just their personal finances from their W2 job, what are some resources they can do to figure that out?

David:
So in Spartan League, that’s my mastermind. We give them literally a spreadsheet, but anyone can make one of these. You track what properties you have and what they’re worth and then how much debt you have on them. You track how much personal debt you have in your life, your credit card bills, your student debt, if you have medical bills that are unpaid, anything that you owe to any person and then how much money you have in the bank. And then if you own assets like a car or jewelry or something that could be sold for a substantial amount of money, and I don’t track all of your old CDs or your PS3 video games or something, that’s probably not worth looking into, but things that are worth money, you put it on there too, and you just create a formula in an Excel or a Google Sheets that says, “Here’s what I own and this is what I owe, and the difference is what my net worth is.”
Now, here is the principle that I find happens when you start tracking something, you start to care about it more. When you look every week at what your net worth is, you get this desire to want to see it get bigger. You start thinking in your head, how do I solve this problem? How do I make this thing get more? And it starts to open doors into the type of real estate that you want to buy as opposed to just the, well, I was told to look for cashflow, so I’m looking at these $40,000 duplexes in a degrade area. That’s always going to cause me headaches because on a spreadsheet they show the most cashflow. You get deceived into looking into these wrong properties when you don’t take this approach.

Ashley:
That’s great. I think that’s something that not all people are aware of. They think you have to be a CPA to figure out those things, and BiggerPockets actually just partnered with Stessa, S-T-E-S-S-A and as Tony always likes to say, assets spelled backwards, but just partnered with them and that is one way you can use their tools to calculate your net worth and also your cashflow of your properties too. It’s almost like a asset management tool, and it’s free for everyone. But if you want to unlock the advanced features, you got to be a BiggerPockets Pro member to access those for free.

David:
Now, no one likes doing that because it’s a pain in the butt. It takes some time. However, we can all agree, Tony has had some really big success in changing his… I shouldn’t say changing his fitness, but he’s excelled in the realm of fitness, right? Tony, did you go into that world not tracking what you eat and not tracking your workouts? Did you just wing it and hope it worked out, or did you have a plan?

Tony:
No, it was an incredibly dialed in plan that I tried to follow ruthlessly, so I had a meal plan that got updated every two weeks. I weigh my food at every single meal when I’m on prep. I was eating every three hours in 15 minutes. I was measuring my water. I was making sure that my supplements were being taken at the correct times throughout the day. It was an incredibly detailed process to go through.

David:
And then you saw some success, right?

Tony:
Right.

David:
I mean, we all saw your success, whether you saw it or not, right? You look way better.

Ashley:
I mean, come one, Tony, flex.

David:
Yeah, go on Tony’s Instagram and you can see a success for yourself. And I think a lot of people think, why do I want to spend my life putting that much effort into tracking my finances? That sounds miserable, but here’s the cool thing. If Tony stayed on that program for a couple of years, maybe not even that long, maybe just nine, 10 months, it becomes habit. You start to learn how much food you’re eating and you remember from last time, it doesn’t have to be weighed every single time. The meal prepping gets quicker because you get systems in place for where you buy your food, when you buy your food, how you store it. It’s only laborious in the very beginning when you’re trying to build the system.
Over time, your workouts might even become shorter because you get more efficient at what to do and how to do it. The meal prepping becomes easier. The whole system becomes habits, and now it doesn’t have to be tracked as religiously because you’re doing it subconsciously. Wealth will work the same way when you get good at managing your money, only spending money on things that make sense, living beneath your means, earning more and more money all the time. You don’t have to spend six hours a day looking at spreadsheets trying to figure out how to make these cuts. It becomes a habit in your life and it happens on its own.

Tony:
David, one thing I want to get clarity on is you’ve got these three different categories, the net worth, the cashflow, the quality of life. Is your recommendation that people rank those or is the recommendation they try and balance those so it’s like, hey, my first priority is always going to be net worth and I’m going to prioritize that over quality of life and cashflow, or is it, hey, your goal should be to try and maintain equilibrium between all three?

David:
No, I think it depends on your personality. So just like a fitness goal, how do I know if someone says, well, am I supposed to get really big and strong and build huge muscles, or am I supposed to have really strong cardiovascular health so I can work out for four hours at a time? It depends on what that person’s goals are for their life or their sport or whatever they’re training for. Some humans would rather walk around yoked out and really big, and that’s what fitness looks like to them. Other ones would rather know that they can do 400 sit-ups in a row and they can just have a lot of endurance. You’re only going to be motivated by what you like.
So there’s some humans that are like, I want a really big net worth. I want to be able to pull big chunks out of my properties to go do really fun things, to have a Ferrari, whatever motivates them, that’s the one they’re going to lean more towards. Others will say, I love the security that comes from cashflow. I love knowing that I have way more coming in every month than I have going out. I don’t need a Ferrari, but I definitely want to know that if I lose my job or if I have a medical bill that hits, I’ve got plenty of money to replace it and others are going to be, I don’t really care about either of those. I just want to have a life and do what I want and I need some combination of net worth and cashflow to get me that.
I think it’s a mistake when the guru comes out and says, here’s what you’re supposed to be doing because that’s what they do, and here’s why you should do this one, because now they have something to sell you to show you how to do it, but it doesn’t line up with what you want. You recognize, I don’t like lifting these heavy weights. I am a long distance runner or I’m a CrossFit person. I don’t like stacking 500 pounds on my squat. I’m just not going to go. Then you feel shame. There’s something wrong with me. I wasn’t cut out for this. I guess I’m just not into fitness, but it’s because that wasn’t the kind of fitness you wanted.

Ashley:
David, it’s easy to think right now, which one of those, what kind of life you want. That’s most of the time the easy part, as you just described those three things, I’m sure each person listening was thinking about, that’s what’s important to me, but what are the actual items? What are the next steps? Those hard conversations you have to have with yourself to actually implement the things that get you there?

David:
Well, you don’t know what those conversations will be until you start the tracking. That’s what I found. Okay, so imagine that you’re in a river and the river’s your life and you’re in a current, and the current is the habits that you have, your spending habits, your eating habits, whatever they are. You are not aware of the current when you’re in the river unless you’re looking at things moving around you. If you just close your eyes and float it in this river, it’s how most of us are living life. You don’t recognize you’re in a current, you don’t feel it. You don’t feel it until you put your foot down in the riverbed and try to stay in one place that you’re like, oh, that’s pressure. It’s a strong current, a light current, but you become aware of the pressure of your habits when you put some form of rigidity in place.
Okay, some people listening to this, my hope is this is them opening their eyes and they look around and say, “Five years have gone by, this isn’t where I want to be in life.” That would be opening your eyes in this river and seeing, “oh my God, I’m in a really strong current, taking me in the wrong direction.” When you start to track where your money’s going on your personal budget, or a lot of people run businesses and literally don’t have a profit and loss statement, they just have a general idea that they have more money than they did before. There are people that work that way or you’re not tracking the equity growth in your properties. You’re just like, “Well, it’s doing okay.” You can live that way, but you’re not going to make progress. When you create the system of tracking it, you become aware of things that you would not have seen before.
When you start to track where your money’s going and where your assets are growing or what’s actually happening in your finances, the right steps naturally reveal themselves. You realize, “Oh my gosh, I spend $300 every time I go to Target. What am I getting for that?” That’s one of the things that our members frequent, Target is always what comes up, or I didn’t realize that my portfolio that I was so proud of, 14 doors in some really low income area that you’re so proud of, you get all this dopamine every time you go to a meetup and you tell people that you own 14 doors actually isn’t producing hardly any cashflow and your net worth hasn’t grown in three years. They’re not great investments. You were tricked into thinking that they were just like a lot of people go to the gym and they tricked themselves into thinking that they exercised, but I’ve seen those people, I’m always amazed at the people that go in there with full makeup or the dudes that are wearing hats and nice clothes.
I’m like, “Why are you dressing up to go get sweaty and get messy?” They’re not tracking anything. That’s what we’re getting at. So once you start this, it becomes very clear where I need to make cuts, where I need to make adjustments, and then the right questions start to come up. Well, why am I not making more money at my job? Why haven’t I gotten a raise? Why is all my money flying out the door? Oh, it turns out that I’m actually addicted to retail therapy. Every time I feel bad, I go buy something. And when you look at how much of your money you’re keeping at the end of the month, I think one of the things the book talks about is spending from gross. So we think I make $90,000 a year. I can afford to buy this $500 thing, but if you start looking at how much of that money you keep after taxes and then how much of that money you keep after all your expenses, it might be like $9,000 is what you have at the end of the year.
And so 500 bucks is a really big chunk out of 9,000 versus 90,000. But if you’re not tracking, your brain will just go to these general basic, I went to the gym today, I make 90 grand, and you can justify spending money on things that don’t matter. Those answers you’re asking, Ashley, where should people start? Don’t pop up until you start measuring where your money’s going. Just like with fitness, when Tony started looking at what he was eating, he’s like, “Oh my gosh, that quesadilla is 2,800 calories. That is not worth it. I got to do so much work to burn that off.” You cut quesadillas out of your diet.

Ashley:
David, one thing that I’ve found that can increase your cashflow by just bidding out or quoting this expenses insurance even just every year, that’s an expense you have on your properties, and that’s one that you are able to go and get quotes on that can add another $100 a month to your cashflow on your duplex or single family home. So that’s just one easy thing to do. Every single year, you set yourself a little reminder and you message your insurance agent and say, “Hey, can I quote these, quote my policies out?” And they’ll send you what’s back and either it’s better or it’s not.

David:
But you probably wouldn’t have thought of it until you were actively measuring the cashflow of your properties and asking the question, how do I improve it? And one of the uncomfortable things that I really highlight in this book that I think people need to hear but they don’t want to hear, we can all agree, the three of us, it’s very hard to add $300 of cashflow to your portfolio, especially in today’s market where rates are and prices are, it’s not easy to just go out and grab something or to earn the money it takes to put down to get $300 a month, but cutting certain expenses out of your life. You don’t need DirectTV if you just never use it and you watch Netflix, that could save you 150 bucks right there. Why are we not tackling the easy stuff and we’re chasing after this idea of cashflow through real estate as the only way to build wealth?
That’s incredibly difficult when there’s some obvious stuff right in front of us. You eat out every single night or you eat out five times a week, and you might even be happier if you were cooking at home. You might make some good memories with your partner as the two of you are cooking together or listening to a podcast while you… You could have a higher quality of life spending less money a lot of the time, but we don’t even look at it. We don’t even consider that maybe we need to work on our budget. We’re just chasing this real estate dream that’s incredibly difficult when there’s low hanging fruit in other areas. Our insurance is a great example, especially with how expensive it’s getting. Have you guys seen insurance quotes lately?

Ashley:
Yeah.

David:
It’s rough, man. I have an insurance company and I just had a really tough talk with my partner on the phone today that we literally cannot get policies for many of the states where our clients are buying homes. They’re not insuring, and the premiums are three times higher than they were. So there’s some people that may be paying 12 grand a year in insurance that if they found a cheaper provider could come in at eight grand, that’s a lot of money you could save, but it’s not going to happen until you start tracking.

Tony:
I think the tracking is such an important thing and I’m glad that we’re spending a lot of time on here. I feel like a lot of Rookies don’t have the discipline to do that yet, but I know that there are metrics I look at inside of my businesses. Ash, but let me ask you first, when you think about your real estate business, what are some of the things that you’re tracking that you feel help you make better decisions in your business?

Ashley:
Yeah, it’s definitely on the property management side as to how long are units vacant, how long our turnover is taking, how long for maintenance request to get assigned to a technician, how long until that maintenance request is completed and how long until it is billed out? So I would say the property management company by far is the thing that I track the most as to what’s happening. And that’s not only for me internally as to how my properties are performing, the sooner we get tenants in, the better, but also for that quality control that we are actually providing a great customer service to the tenants too. And I’m sure that must be similar to you, Tony, with tracking your short-term rentals.

Tony:
Yeah, absolutely. There’s a lot that we look at, even just in our cleaning business, we have pretty thorough metrics that we track there. We’ll track how many five star reviews did we earn as a cleaning company, how many were below five stars? How many inspections do we complete on our cleaners after they finish the cleans? How many of those failed inspections? What’s our average time to clean a property across the portfolio? So many little things, and it’s like when you start to see these trends, you can start to understand if you’re moving in the right direction or moving in the wrong direction.
On the Airbnb side, we track page rank for our properties. We track occupancy, we track revenue, we track just everything, any slice of data that we can track. We’re going to try and put it on a piece of paper and look at it over time because I feel like you can make better decisions and be more confident in your decisions when there’s both qualitative and quantitative data behind that decision. What a lot of people do is that they just make decisions based on how they feel, which sometimes could be a part of it, but you want cold hard facts to help you make better decisions.

David:
Yeah, and my theory that I put forward in the book is a different way to look at things, and I talk a lot about this in the second pillar, which is offense. This is the ability to make more money, but the theory is that you haven’t earned the right to make more money until you’ve done a really good job with what you have right now. You haven’t earned the right to get more clients in your business, which will result in more money until you’ve given really good service to the ones you have. You haven’t earned the right to get a bigger podcast audience until you’ve done a really good job with the ones you have. You haven’t earned the right to get more money coming in until you’ve managed well the money you’ve got. And if you try to skip that step, which most people will, and that’s what they’re sold on.
Cryptocurrency is a great example of this, man, just buy this crypto. Everything’s going up. Everything’s being pumped. You have all these instant millionaires, they didn’t know how to manage that wealth. It’s not healthy. It’s taking a bunch of steroids and you’re getting super strong really fast, but your joints can’t handle it. They’re not growing along with the muscles. Injuries are going to come. And when the market turned around on them, they lost everything. And a lot of them unfortunately deleted themselves. It was a rough, rough thing.
If you’re not managing the money you’ve got, when you get more of it, it’s just like pouring water in a bucket with holes. It’s all going to come back out. And so I think there’s a lot of people listening to this that have the ambition, that have the drive, that have the talent, that are willing to do what it takes, but they don’t have the discipline. They’re not currently managing the money they’re making right now very well, and they’re not tracking the right things, and that’s why the next opportunity hasn’t come.

Tony:
So David, you do a really good job of breaking down the importance of this, but as you started to track, how did you personally get a good outcome from doing that in your own business, in your own life?

David:
So I started off most young high school kids just get a job, just trying to get a job. And I applied everywhere in town and I got rejected for all of it until I had a friend that was like, “Oh, my place is hiring. Let me just talk to my boss.” The next thing you know, I had a job and it was that who you know matters more than what you know was my first experience with that. That was a good lesson to learn. That was at Baskin Robbins scooping ice cream, and they paid us 75% of minimum wage because there was some loophole where they didn’t have to pay the full minimum wage if you were a student, and at my high school, you had to get permission from your high school to even get a job. So the minute you give them the forum that says, I have permission to work, they’re like, “Okay, now, we can pay you less.”
And I did a good job and the boss of the Togo’s restaurants, like a subway sandwich shop out here, saw me and offered me a job to work at Togo’s because they saw that I was working hard when everybody else was in the back screwing around. I was scooping the ice cream as fast as I could and trying to keep up with the demand, trying to keep the line moving. And my coworkers were just lazy because most 16, 17 year olds are. And so I got a job for full minimum wage, which was a 25% increase. And so now, I’m working over there and I just approached it the same way I approached basketball because that was kind of my whole life. How do I become excellent at this? How do I make sandwiches faster than everyone else? How do I become more efficient? I would practice pulling the turkey pieces off of the stack of turkey faster.
What’s the right finger movement to get to where you can get it off quicker? And I would close my eyes and visualize where the lettuce, tomato and whatever was so that as I was working, I wasn’t thinking, looking down where is it? It became a habit and I quickly stood out as a person that was the fastest. And when I had all that stuff sort of subconsciously worked out that I could make a sandwich quick, more of the horsepower in my brain could go towards talking to the client. So now, you’re making the person laugh as they’re waiting in line, you’re asking them about their day and you’re ripping through. Your boss is seeing that your line moves faster and the people are happier and you’re even getting tips sometimes. It quickly became, “Hey, do you want to be a shift manager?” Now, I’m learning how to help everyone else get faster like I was.
I would look at their sandwich making stations and be like, “Oh, that person’s running out of mayonnaise. That person’s running out of ham.” I would go get it for them rather than making them stop what they were doing, walk across the restaurant, get the ham, come back, no, the whole line’s waiting. And they don’t care because they’re just a regular employee. And it became clear how easy it was to get to the top if you just give a crap. That was one of the things I realized is nobody shows up to work like I showed up to basketball practice or a basketball game. They just don’t care. So caring a little bit got you to the top, and I still wasn’t really making any kind of money. It wasn’t until I got a job at a restaurant and started bussing tables that this light bulb went off.
So I would get paid minimum wage to work at the restaurant, but I’d come home with 30 to 50 bucks in tips. And this was around 2001, 2002 right around there. And that was the equivalent of five to six hours of work just in tips. And I’m like, I was here for six hours, but with these tips, I got paid for 12. It would be really hard to get my boss to double my wage. But it was very easy to get these tips. Something clicked. It was like this wasn’t a full sales job, but it was like this hybrid situation I got a taste of what sales look like. And then I just started out working every busser and I would help all the other waitresses with their what’s called side work, like the work you have to do with the end of the night when you’re done with your shift.
And when there was no tables to bus, I would just go help them make the salads for their tables or run their food, whatever it was. If I had a spare moment, I wanted to be productive. And I stood out to my boss and I was young, but I got promoted over all the bus boys that worked there more than me. And I got made a waiter, it was the nicest restaurant in town basically. And there was grown folks, like 30, 40 year olds that would support their families on that wage. And I’m 18 years old making that same money. And so now, instead of making 30 to 50 a night, I’m making a 100 to 200 a night plus your checks. And I started to think like, “All right, how am I going to track all this money?” Because when tips are coming in, man, it’s so easy in that business, easy in, easy out.
You get paid cash, you go spend cash. I would watch people that had been there for decades and they were never going to do anything else because they were just stuck in this treading water system of easy money that you don’t really have anywhere to progress. So I would come home at night and I would write down on a little piece of paper in the drawer where I kept all my money, how much money I made that night, $140, $80, whatever it was. And anytime that I would go buy something, I would buy it with cash and I would just subtract 20 bucks. I took that out to go do whatever. I made it a game. At the end of the week, I had at minimum deposit $500 in the bank. So my defense now that I’m tracking this was pretty simple. It was like, don’t spend money on stuff.
And I realized when I’m working all the time, and I don’t consider this to be hustle porn or this anti-hard work sentiment we have because you’re 18, what the heck do you need a vacation for at 19 years old? There’s no reason a 19-year-old man or boy shouldn’t be working two full-time jobs if he’s… All right, so I was going to college and then I had that job and I would just pick up other shifts. Sometimes you’d realize my offense isn’t enough. It was a slow week. I need to go pick up extra shifts for other people. Sometimes I’d pay another waiter 20 bucks to work their shift for them. But I’d make 80 bucks or I’d make a 100 bucks. So everyone else thought that that was ridiculous.
Of course, I’d do it for free if I could, but if they didn’t want to give it up, what about 20 bucks? Okay, I’ll do that. I’ll go party. And David gave me 20 bucks. He bought my alcohol for the night, but I’d make a 100 bucks. And so I was $80 up and this was where this framework of defense and offense working together made sense. Now, I was not crushing it. Okay, I’m probably making 30 grand a year, 35 grand a year, but that wasn’t terrible money in 2001, and I could save more than $500 a week. Well, I did this all through college. At the end of four years of college, I had my car paid off, my school paid off, and a $100,000 in the bank saved up because that’s 24 grand a year if you’re saving saving $500 a week. And I was able to save a little bit more than that. Everyone else came out of college in massive debt.
But I look at what they spent that four years doing, they were spending it on weed. They were spending it on alcohol. They were going to Cancun to vacation from their really hard 20 year old life of going to college and waiting tables. They had nothing. And then when the market crashed, I invested that money. I bought a bunch of real estate. Now, I could acknowledge I had good timing. However, everyone else had access to that same timing, but they didn’t have a $100,000. They didn’t have the resources to do it. And that was my framework of understanding that those people didn’t play defense. They didn’t save their money and the other waiters didn’t play offense. That was another thing I would do is I would stay and pick up all the late tables at night, and I would usually increase my income by 30 to 40% a night, just staying an extra hour and a half to close when everyone else was in a rush to leave and go to the bars and go have fun.
I was like, I’m going to take every last table for another hour. I can almost increase my income by 50%, well, over four years of time, that is a lot of money. And that’s the same money that all the people who listen to us keep saying, “I don’t know how to make it. I can’t earn it.” But the majority of people wouldn’t even do a good job at a restaurant job and they want to go be a CEO and they want to be a big house flipper and they want to be an internet influencer. So once that clicked in my head and I had these fundamentals down, when I started getting better jobs, I became a police officer. I applied the same thing to working overtime, and I learned a system for how to maximize that.
When I became a real estate agent, I learned how to apply these principles in a more complicated arena, but how did I save money and how did I make money? And it sort of leveled up at every point. And the people that I saw that didn’t do well financially, almost all of them, I could look at them and say, “You’re not even doing good at what you’re doing now. You constantly find excuses to not work hard. You’ve constantly find excuses to not hit KPIs.” In general, I realize they don’t actually want to be wealthy. They would just like it if someone gave them wealth. And so the principles of this book were formed in that arena that a 17, 18 year old kid kind of put together.

Tony:
David, appreciate all that insight, man. And there’s a few things that come to mind for me. So first, I’d love that you’re focusing on both sides of the coin because Dave Ramsey, he’s all about defense, right? Rice and beans all day, every day. Pay down your debt. Don’t do this. Don’t do that.

David:
Make your own soap.

Tony:
Yeah, make your own soap. On the opposite end of that spectrum is someone like Grant Cardone where he’s just like, 10X everything. 10X your income. Don’t worry about Starbucks, don’t worry about this. Just make more money. Make more money. And you’re saying like, “Hey, there’s some truth to both of those approaches. You want to be smart with what you’re spending, but you also want to focus on expanding your income.” And I think most people who are listening to this podcast, they probably have some idea of what it means to play defense, but I think a lot of people struggle with the offensive side, and what I’ve found in my personal life is that yes, crushing at your job is a great way to try and increase your income, but also don’t be afraid to change careers or change jobs or change industries. For me, in my life, that was always the biggest income jump that I made.
When I graduated from college, I got a degree in business management and I was working in marketing and I think my very first job after college, I think I was making $48,000 a year or something like that, and then I get a random call from a recruiter to say, “Hey, Tony, we know you work in marketing, but we like your background. Do you want to come be an operations manager in a warehouse?” I’m like, I’ve never done that before, but it was a $60,000 job, so $12,000 more than I was making this marketing gig. I said, “Okay, sure.” So I do that. I stay there for a couple years, get a couple raises, get an offer to go somewhere else, and they want to offer me $100,000. So it’s like you take these leaps and those jumps, and I think that’s a really big way to increase your income, but a lot of people, I think are afraid to take that leap. They get comfortable where they’re at, they know the ins and outs of what they’re doing, and they don’t want to take that next step because it’s too scary.

David:
I would take your point, which is exactly what the offensive section, the second pillar, it’s literally five chapters that focus on this is what people who make more money do. This is how you can go make more money. I would expand on what you said by saying not only are they afraid to take the jump, they would fail if they took it, and that’s why they’re afraid. Most people are doing the bare minimum when they go to work to not get fired. And I’m not trying to be a negative person. I’m just saying in my experience of my coworkers, the companies I’ve run, the people I’ve come across, there’s a handful of top performers, 20% of the company that goes above and beyond and they crush it. 80% are showing up and they act like clocking in that day is already they’ve done their job.
If you took one of those people who’s trying to get by in the bare minimum and you gave them a promotion to have more responsibility, more stress, harder problems to solve, all the things that come with making more money, they would fail. Just like if I can bench press a certain 200 pounds and then Tony comes along and says, “Let’s put another a 100 pounds on it,” that’s equivalent of making more money. It would crush my ribs. I can’t, I have to earn the right to do more by doing good at what I’m doing. And our subconscious knows I don’t deserve that. And it’s not always imposter syndrome. It’s not always like I’m afraid of success. I really think a lot of it is like you wouldn’t do well in that position. If you quit your job and you became a real estate agent or some type of sales position, you’d fail because you don’t know how marketing works because you’ve only worked on backend operations because you’re not comfortable.
You’re not good at talking to people. You see a lot of realtors that say, “I don’t know, I’m just shy to go on camera.” And everyone will tell them like, “Well, you got to make the videos anyways.” Then the video gets four views and two likes. They really didn’t need to go on camera. If you’re shy to be on camera, your audience sees that and they don’t want to go have you be their agent if you’re scared to talk. And I am not shaming people that are not good at it. I’m saying you need to build the skills to get confidence so that when you talk, you sound confident. There’s actually a progression of how this works. If you’re going to the gym and you’re saying you’re at the gym, but you’re not trying, you’re not going to failure, your muscles aren’t burning when you’re working out, it would be ludicrous to think you’re going to get stronger.
In the book, I give this example of the people who show up at work and they don’t try hard and they think that they won because they got paid for not having to work, are like people who have a gym membership and they show up at the gym and they brag that they made it through their whole workout without having to pick up a weight. That sounds so stupid within that context, but the world of wealth works the same way. If I gave someone a job at 7-Eleven sweeping the floors, are they doing the best job they can sweeping the floors as well as they can? And then seeing, you know what? If we move this soda display from here to here, more people would see it. And soda is one of our top sellers. Oh, you know what? That worked with soda. I wonder if it also worked with the hot wings.
That type of approach would get you promoted and then get you promoted again, and eventually your boss would leave you running the 7-Eleven and they could go start another one. And if they didn’t do that, because they were lazy, you would have the confidence to go start a 7-Eleven because you already know how all the operations work. There’s a chapter on extreme ownership where I talk about leaders are people who embrace responsibility. This needs to get done. I’m going to go do it. The people who say, “Oh my God, someone else needs to do that, that’s not my job.” You’re probably never going to have much money.
You’re going to struggle financially your whole life because wealth follows the people that bring value, that take on responsibility, that lift the weights, that learn. And there’s not a lot of people or anybody who’s really out there sharing this information, which is why I wrote this book. It was super hard to write. But to me, as a business owner, and I think you two can both agree, finding people who care about their job and take pride in their work is incredibly hard. You mentioned a cleaning company, Tony. Is that for short-term rentals?

Tony:
Yeah.

David:
Okay. So I imagine it’s not easy to find people that are going to go in there and do an amazing job. I mean, the fact that you have to have them share a picture of what they did is an indication that they’re not taking a lot of pride in their work. You shouldn’t even have to get proof if they went in there trying to crush it. But if you found one that just crushed it every single time, it was like, “What more can I do? How can I help you? Hey, I left some mints on the counter for your next guest. Hey, I put this thing in the toilet to make it smell better for the next people, or I noticed that you don’t have a sign for wifi, so I made one. Here it is.” That person would become your next manager. Easy.
You wouldn’t be like, “Oh man, I have to pay them another 25 bucks per clean.” You’d be happy to give them more money. You give them more responsibility, and you’d see how they did. These opportunities are everywhere in the world. All of the business owners are trying to figure out, how do I get employees that will work harder? And all the employees are out there trying to figure out, how do I get paid without having to work? And none of us are talking about it, but that’s sort of the dynamic that’s going on. So for the people that are listening to this, the book is just a blueprint of how you change your approach that way. And what I say is you should approach every workday like it’s the last day of tryouts and you don’t want to get cut.

Ashley:
David, I want to hear your point on, I’ve seen a lot of news articles come out about Gen Zers and how 70% of them plan to leave their job within the next 12 months, and it’s projected between the age of 18 and 34 that Gen Zers will have 10 jobs during that timeframe. Do you think this is actually a good strategy to do and you should be bouncing around to every opportunity you have? Where do you draw the line where taking advantage of these opportunities and going to several different jobs doesn’t weigh out?

David:
Well, they date the same way. All the studies show that Gen Z is bouncing from partner to partner all the time, and what’s behind it is there’s something better for me. There’s someone else out there who would appreciate me, who would like me more, who would spend more money on me, give me more attention, whatever it is, and that belief is what causes them to bounce from partner to partner. I think the same thing is happening within work. There’s a better job, but better usually means easier, or makes more money but fits within my personalities. I do think there’s a component of you want to find the right fit for yourself, but the question that I think people should be asking is, how is this job making me stronger? Is it making me smarter? Am I learning things that are making me a more valuable employee?
Am I getting stronger by lifting these weights, not just are they paying me more? For the last decade, we’ve had one of the best, easiest economies ever because we printed so much money. I don’t even blame Gen Z. They grew up with easy money everywhere. Why wouldn’t you be thinking, I want a job that fits me when there’s jobs everywhere? Why wouldn’t you be thinking, I want a romantic partner that worships me when there’s options and opportunity everywhere? Dating apps, social media, it’s all made this thing to where that it feels like there’s unlimited opportunity. We see the same thing happening within the workplace. My fear is as we head into a recession, people are getting laid off. We saw what happened when Elon Musk took over Twitter. A lot of people lost their jobs that thought that they were safe, and he’s like, “We don’t need them at all. They don’t do anything productive.”
A lot of other companies, like in the mortgage industry, a lot of loan officers are getting laid off. You’re going to see a lot of insurance brokers losing income. From where I sit, I’m seeing a lot of people getting… I literally had a conversation with someone yesterday who reached out to me looking for a job because he’s losing his six figure a year job that he was able to do in two hours a day. The companies are figuring out, I don’t need to pay you to do this. There’s cheaper ways to get it done. Now, no company looks at that when the money’s rolling in, when they’re just making a handover fist because the economy’s great. They’ll let people work for them that aren’t doing a great job. If Tony’s short-term rental business is crushing it, he’ll pay a cleaner a lot of money to go in there and clean the house.
But what happens when his vacancy goes up and there’s not as much profit margin there? Now, he’s tracking. He’s looking at every little expense. He’s like, “I don’t need to pay a cleaner $600. I can find a person that will do it for 300 because there’s no jobs out there.” As we enter into that type of an environment, it becomes very clear who’s been working out and who’s been slacking off. I just don’t think this has been a relevant conversation because the money’s come in so easy and we’ve gotten used to thinking that’s normal. I’m seeing that starting to change. So the Gen Z people that are bouncing job to job to job, I mean, do you guys get these DMs constantly of someone that wants to put an email campaign together for you or edit your reels and they’re going to be using AI to do it and they think they’re smart.
They’re like, “Well, I can make all this money editing reels, but AI does all the work.” That only lasts for so long. It’s the crypto thing. It goes away. You don’t have any real skills. You are pursuing an easy life, not how do I go to work every day and try to get stronger and they’re all going to get exposed. I think that our workforce in general isn’t building these skills and the good news for the people listening to this is if you’re the one who is going to go work out, you’re the one who is going to track. You’re the one that approaches every day at work like it’s the last day of tryout and you don’t want to get cut, you will get promoted, you will get more opportunity. Every job I had, I worked until I was the best person there and then I went to my boss and said, “What’s next?”
And when they said, there is no next, you’re already the apex. I knew it was time to find another job and I didn’t have all those thoughts in my mind like, I don’t know. What if I don’t make it? I’m scared. I was like, no, of course I’m going to go be good over there because I’m already at the top over here. I’ve earned that right. That’s the next step. I just had humility that I knew when I took the job, I’m starting at the bottom, and I’m going to have to fight my way back to the top, but there aren’t that many jobs that you couldn’t be the best person there if you wanted to be, especially when you consider that hardly anyone else is trying.

Tony:
David, so much good insights there, brother, and I love everything that you’ve said so far and I feel some people are hearing this and hopefully it’s like a bit of a wake-up call for them. We’re like, “Man, a lot of what David is saying here is how I’ve been living my life.” I want to talk just about the next pillar here. We talked offense, we’ve talked defense. Where do we go from there?

David:
The last is investing, which you don’t get wealthy by just saving money and making money. You accumulate seeds, you get wealthy by investing those seeds and letting them grow, and I think everyone listening to the three of us, they get that, that’s why they’re here. The problem from my perspective is they’re never told. How do you accumulate the capital to invest? They’re always given a backdoor sidetrack thing like a shortcut. Well, invest with nowhere low money down. Go find a partner who worked really hard and saved $200,000 and buy your first deal with their money because it’s OPM. Well, it’s still someone’s money. A lot of those people, no one talks about the big Ls they take, but a lot of people that listen to real estate content have lost other people’s money because they weren’t responsible enough to manage their own because they didn’t have any.
The message I think gets really muddied as we’re telling people, well, you don’t need money to invest in real estate. You don’t need skills. You could just go out there and use this system and then they pay a bunch of money to learn some system that involves none of their own money and they can’t hack it and I might not be able to hack it, right? A lot of these methods we teach people like find an off market deal. You make a 100 calls a day, you do it for eight months and you finally get a wholesale deal where you make 20 grand. All that the person hears about is the 20 grand that they made, but if you put that many hours into a job, you might’ve made 80 grand at a job.
It was a stupid endeavor to take that we keep getting marketed to and sold on like this is what you can do as opposed to let’s start with building the foundation that you’re going to need to get to the point where you’re lifting the really heavy weight or you have the six-pack or whatever the case is going to be. So the third pillar is investing, which is what BiggerPockets is providing, what all of us are providing. The beautiful thing is our audience doesn’t need to be sold on this where a lot of people do. Dave Ramsey’s audience, they’re not going to want to hear about that pillar. They’re like, “Nope, I make my soap. I’ve worn the same clothes since high school. I drive a Toyota Corolla that’s from 1987 and I’m always going to,” they’re good at that. They’re not going to be good at investing. Or the people that are like the boiler room fast talking, I make a lot of money.
I do crypto trading. They’re good at the offense side. They’re always looking for the next opportunity, but they don’t put their money anywhere stable, so then they lose it. You have to get this investing part down. The reason I don’t talk about it as much is because most of our audience already understands this. For the person who finds this book that isn’t in the BiggerPockets world, the real estate investing world, this is mind-blowing to them and I just detail strategies at a very high level, very basic things that people can do to build wealth. I’ll give you an example of one that no one thinks about, but you don’t have to be a super high level Grant Cardone investor. Let’s say that you find a property that you buy and you put it on a 15-year note and it loses $400 a month when you first buy it because this 15-year note is more expensive, but that’s okay because you’re saving three grand a month because you live beneath your means.
You’ve earned the right to buy this house that’s going to lose 400 a month, but your principal reduction is pretty big. Maybe you’re paying off $1,400 a month. The principal, even though the cashflow is 400 negative, conventional wisdom would say, “Don’t buy it because negative cashflow is evil,” but when you expand and you look at the whole budget, you’re like, “Well, I’m gaining $1,400 in equity, which is adding to my net worth. I bought an asset below market value in an area where rents are going to grow, so in 20 years, it’s going to be in really good shape. The only downside is this 400 a month I’m losing. Well, how can I get around that? Well, I live beneath my means. I work overtime, I have plenty of money coming in. I’m good.”
Next year, you buy another house on a 15-year note, same thing. It loses 400 a month, but the first one you bought now only loses 300 a month because rents went up. Every year, you progressively buy another house and put it on a 15-year note, or you put it on 30-year note to make extra principal payments. That’s the equivalent of a 15-year note. Same idea. At the end of 15 years, that first house is completely paid off. You refinance it on another 15-year note and you pull $200,000 out of the house or the property. That’s tax-free. You have $200,000 of tax-free money to live on for the year because of work you did 15 years ago. The next year, the second house that you bought, same thing. It’s paid off. You pull $200,000 out. You live on that tax-free. You probably didn’t spend the whole $200,000 from the first one. Maybe you only spent a 100,000, so you got a 100 in the bank. Now, you pull out another 200, you have 300 in the bank.
You spend another a 100 grand that year. You’re left with 200 at the third year when the next house is paid off. When your 15th house is paid off, the refinance of the first one is done. If you can for 15 years, just take a very simple process of buying one house, putting it on a note, living beneath your means, paying it down, you will live in perpetuity on tax-free money that you pulled out forever, not having to work if you don’t want to. That’s not a super complicated strategy. That’s not a thing that you have to listen to podcasts all day to figure out. This is a very good example of delayed gratification mixed with tracking, mixed with defense, mixed with investing, and voila, you’ve got an easy life where you’ll never pay taxes again. It doesn’t even occur to someone that life can be that simple because that isn’t sexy to sell.

Tony:
Yeah. David, I think that last piece you said is the linchpin here is that that’s not going to capture people’s attention, and that’s the unfortunate truth of the world that we live in today is that you have to say things that are outrageous. You have to say things that are almost borderline unbelievable. You have to make these super crazy claims about what’s working and what’s not, because if you don’t, if you tell someone, “Hey, here’s a very simple strategy that if you follow for the next 15 years will allow you to live in financial freedom,” you’ve lost people’s attention. And so I think the reason I point that out is because I want all of our Rookies who are listening to try and fight the natural pull towards all of these hypey flashy headlines and try and find the stuff that’s sound, the stuff that’s just rooted in common sense. And if you can do more of that stuff and just do it long enough, you’re almost guaranteed to be successful, and I think that’s a really important point that people are missing today.

Ashley:
So David, to recap here, I think you did a great explanation of a lot of things that Rookies can take into action today. Talking about how to figure out your baseline, building that foundation, getting an understanding of your finances, whether business or personal, also tracking them, keeping your eye on your expenses, where your income is coming from, and also your investments. So is there any last piece of advice that you want to give out to our listeners today before we wrap up?

David:
And it has to do with something you guys mentioned earlier, which is making money is important. A lot of people come in the real estate world because they’re like, “Well, I suck at making money at my job, so maybe I’ll try my hand at real estate.” It’s just terrible. The 49ers that moved to California looking for gold, hardly any of them ever made money. The people that did were the merchants that sold them things. They took the sound approach that made more sense. It wasn’t as sexy, but all of them raked it in while all the people that were trying to strike it rich, trying their hand and hoping luck would favor them, they lost everything. Defense, I talk when the book is all about discipline, having a budget is not sexy and it’s not easy, but it’s pretty simple. You only spend money on the things you’ve allotted money towards, and so if you want to be good at that, you really need to be in a community of other people that are encouraging you so that you can keep encouraging and keep your eyes on the ultimate goal.
But defense is about discipline. Offense, that’s about personal growth. You will not make more money at the job you have now, at the job you want to have, at whatever endeavor you have if you aren’t becoming a better version of yourself. I get that the realtor’s nervous to make their video on Instagram, but none of their clients care. They’re going to choose the realtor with the most confidence and the most skills that’s going to help them the most. No one cares about your dreams. We often get told, “Yeah, your goal should be to be able to get passive income, so you could go to the beach and drink your Mai Tais and get fat and just that’s what the goal of life is,” but no one else in the world caress about your goal. They care about their goals. So the secret is how do you provide value to the other people?
That’s what the vendors that sold the shovels and the pickaxes and the materials to the 49ers figured out. They were giving the value to other people. Offense is about growth, and the chapters are about taking on more responsibility as a leader, which is what no one wants to do. Skill development, there’s an art of building skills. There’s an actual process to it. If I dropped either of you in a new situation, you would immediately start figuring out, how do I build the skills to be successful here? That’s why you’re both good. It’s why you’re on the podcast. It wasn’t luck. It wasn’t privilege. It wasn’t just like, oh, everything happened to be handed to them. You guys do well because you’re doing that. There’s a chapter on a winning mindset. Just taking that approach, like I said, of every day I go to work, like I got to be the hardest worker here.
I control that. I can’t control the opportunity my boss gives me. I can control the effort that I put forward. So personal growth is really important. If you’re just looking for a way to live life on cruise control, you’re also choosing to not be financially fit. And then the third piece of advice, I don’t think anyone needs to hear that is you got to invest your money. You got to put in smart investments, and my advice is to delay gratification. Don’t chase after that year one right now cashflow that you think is going to make you attractive to a girlfriend or help you quit that job that keeps making you be at work at nine o’clock because you don’t want to. That’s a bad motivation and it will lead you to buying the wrong properties. Take the longer term approach. In 20 years, in 30 years, what’s this property going to be worth?
Where are rents going to be 15 years from now? Not where are rents right now. Frequently when you just use the BP calculator and you run your ROI, you’re like, “Oh, this property has a 12% ROI. This one has a two. I’m going to go with the 12.” We’ve all seen that five years later, that property that had a 2% ROI has a 30% ROI because rents has increased a lot and revenue has increased while expenses have stayed the same. And now, the person that looks stupid for buying the 2% property looks really smart. In life, take that longer term approach. Don’t chase after escaping your pain from an easy route because that’s what’s going to draw you to the 12% returns.

Ashley:
If you want to learn more about everything David talked about, you can go to biggerpockets.com/pillars, and his book is available for pre-order now. And David, where can more people find out more information about you?

David:
Thank you guys for that. They can follow me at davidgreene24 on social media. They can go to davidgreene24.com or they can go to spartanleague.com.

Ashley:
Well, David, thank you so much for coming onto our show again. We always love to have you as a guest. There’s always a ton of knowledge and information you bring, and also motivation to our listeners and to Tony and I. I’m Ashley at Wealth from Rentals, and he’s Tony at Tony J Robinson, and we will be back on Wednesday with another guest.

 

Help us reach new listeners on iTunes by leaving us a rating and review! It takes just 30 seconds and instructions can be found here. Thanks! We really appreciate it!

Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email [email protected].

Note By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of BiggerPockets.



Source link

David Greene on The 3 “Pillars” of Wealth That Lead to Financial Freedom Read More »

Home affordability initiatives need to come at the fiscal level, says MBS Lives’ Matthew Graham

Home affordability initiatives need to come at the fiscal level, says MBS Lives’ Matthew Graham


Share

Matthew Graham, chief operating officer at Mortgage News Daily, and CNBC’s Diana Olick join ‘The Exchange’ to discuss mortgage rates correlating with the ten-year and pricing off mortgage-backed securities, mortgage rates hitting a 23-year high, and initiatives that could help home affordability without manipulating the broader financial market.



Source link

Home affordability initiatives need to come at the fiscal level, says MBS Lives’ Matthew Graham Read More »